About to hit the Fan: Part II

Hard to read through the tears.

Men's rights activists? National Center for Men? That's just funny. What else do they ***** about, I wonder? How mean their mommies were? (Oh I just know I'm going to catch hell....)

In my avatar is the M-18 Claymore. These and other tools of lethality are needed more than ever.
And I was worried about radical muslims. This country is so infected with whiny *** twinkle toed, irresponsile, "mommy deprived me of adequate nipple time", weenie headed, $#@^&%$#$%@'s.

Excuse me, I have to go beat the $#$%@ out of  some unfortunate pencil necked geek.

OK I'm alright now, at ease.

btw what sorry *** beeoch gave up the goods to one of these %$#@*&^ in the first place.

Gullah is being far, far too charitable with this guy. A man who turns his back on his own infant child, whatever the circumstances, is beneath contempt. The bottom of my shoe is too good for him.

If anything, child support laws need to be strengthened, not weakened like this guy wants. The idea that we should leave a young mother without financial support from the father in order to increase "men's rights" is absurd.

This jumps out at me, though:

Feit counters that the suit's reference to abortion rights is apt.

"Roe says a woman can choose to have intimacy and still have control over subsequent consequences," he said. "No one has ever asked a federal court if that means men should have some similar say."

"The problem is this is so politically incorrect," Feit added. "The public is still dealing with the pre-Roe ethic when it comes to men, that if a man fathers a child, he should accept responsibility."

That's such a sad statement, but I worry that it is getting to the heart of the problem; that we are creating a society that does not want to take responsibility for it's actions.

"I'm trying to find a way for a man also to have some say over decisions that affect his life profoundly."

He had his chance to vote.  He should have abstained.  Pun intended. 

You beat me to it.  I was going to bring that idea up to spark debate.  Technically speaking, the fetus is half the man's genes yet he gets no say in the abortion (either for or against) yet he is held responsible for the child. 

I don't like him being a punk and dodging his responsibility, but I also don't like the argument that the man has various alternatives for contraception.  Such an argument could very easily be used against the woman.  She has countless contraception methods that don't involve abortions as well.

bts