General Discussion Triathlon Talk » masters swimming complaining about triathletes filling events Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 3
 
 
2013-02-10 9:15 PM
in reply to: #4616801

User image

Extreme Veteran
1190
1000100252525
Silicon Valley
Subject: RE: masters swimming complaining about triathletes filling events

simpsonbo - 2013-02-10 7:04 PM The issue is that some meets are being sold first come first serve instead of limiting the field size in a 1500/1650. I have seen meets that state they will only take a certain number of heats for 400/800/1500 and if your seed time isn't fast enough you don't get to swim.

Is this a bad thing?  If I can't swim fast enough to earn a spot then I don't get in. I will have to find another meet that I can qualify for.  Why shouldn't any swimmer with the best qualifying time get in just because they are a triathlete?  If this or any other race takes all comers based solely on first-come first-served with limited spots the issue is not with the tri team, its with the race organizers.

Besides, if demand is so high I find it difficult to think that void will not be picked up by someone. 



2013-02-10 9:17 PM
in reply to: #4616801

User image

Extreme Veteran
1190
1000100252525
Silicon Valley
Subject: RE: masters swimming complaining about triathletes filling events

Sorry...double post. 



Edited by Stuartap 2013-02-10 9:17 PM
2013-02-10 9:32 PM
in reply to: #4616812

User image

Veteran
2297
2000100100252525
Great White North
Subject: RE: masters swimming complaining about triathletes filling events
I'm stating its a good thing . I'm always in the fastest heat in the 1500. I'd hate to lose a spot in a meet to someone who is a faster mouse clicker, it's bad enough in triathlon when events sell out in minutes.
2013-02-10 10:35 PM
in reply to: #4616753

User image

Alpharetta, Georgia
Bronze member
Subject: RE: masters swimming complaining about triathletes filling events
Left Brain - 2013-02-10 8:29 PM

I have no swimming background.....but I'm involved in my kid's club team and I watch alot of practices/meets.  The kids are so good to each other that it's absolutely comical to read some of the threads about.....whatever goes wrong at the pool.  I've watched kids run into each other, swim under each other, over each other, many times 6-8 to a lane, smacking arms, and heads....and never a problem.  And from age 10 on they can swim faster than at  least 75% of any "triathlete" I've ever seen. Yeah, if you have never been to a decent kids meet, go watch the 11-12 year olds swim sub 30 50's and sub 1 minute 100's.....then maybe you won't be so quick to get on your high horse while you trudge up and down the pool at your "fast" 1:20 - 1:30 per hundred.  Those kids do their intervals at less than that.

I happen to think, from what I have seen, that triathletes, as a group, are some of the most rude, self-absorbed people to grace a swimming pool.

Some of us grew up in those kids swim meets (myself included)... and I agree with your post. But that doesn't give people a license to be a jerk, in or out of the pool. Which is what I think some of the crazy threads are about. Some.

2013-02-10 11:14 PM
in reply to: #4616838

User image

Master
1858
10005001001001002525
Salt Lake City
Subject: RE: masters swimming complaining about triathletes filling events
simpsonbo - 2013-02-10 7:32 PMI'm stating its a good thing . I'm always in the fastest heat in the 1500. I'd hate to lose a spot in a meet to someone who is a faster mouse clicker, it's bad enough in triathlon when events sell out in minutes.


I can only assume after reading the outrage and confusion in that thread that USMS swimers are not accustomed to events selling out quickly or at all.

It sounds like this event is a fairly important meet/regional championships of some kind. I can understand the frustration if competitive swimmers are being shut out when they aren't accustomed to events selling out like that.

The obvious solution to this problem is limiting some or all of the slots to athletes with a certain qualifying time. The fact that this seems to be a difficult conclusion to reach actually says something about the "come one come all" culture of their events.
2013-02-10 11:43 PM
in reply to: #4616931

User image

Veteran
2297
2000100100252525
Great White North
Subject: RE: masters swimming complaining about triathletes filling events
Masters does try to be inclusive, this may have to change if national/regional titles are supposed to mean something. Tradition is that clubs do the entries on behalf of their swimmers, so being quick on the draw might even be out of your own hands. Swimmers are accustomed to getting entries in by the deadline and the idea of selling out is foreign.


2013-02-10 11:58 PM
in reply to: #4616736

User image

Master
2372
20001001001002525
Subject: RE: masters swimming complaining about triathletes filling events

simpsonbo - 2013-02-10 8:19 PM I do both sports and I usually have wait for a gazillion heats of 800/1500. The issue is showing up and making a clusterfuck of 2 to 3 events. If yo are going to race meets EMBRACE swimming and do other events too. I can play both sides since I'm top 10 in my AG (world rankings) for the 1500, 400 IM & 200 Fly and do well at regional and national level events in triathlon ( usually qualify for ITU worlds, just can't afford to go most of the time).

Good to know the expert has chimed in and we can shut this discussion down.

2013-02-11 12:22 AM
in reply to: #4616956

User image

Veteran
2297
2000100100252525
Great White North
Subject: RE: masters swimming complaining about triathletes filling events
I bet no meet records get broken in the distance events. I read the whole usms thread and guess what people are now skipping the meet to race elsewhere, and an overwhelming number of entrants do not have PROOF of entry times (which is something that matters at quite a few swim meets). You want to enter the 1500/1650 at a championship, you should have a proven entry time from another meet.
2013-02-11 12:56 AM
in reply to: #4616812

User image

Subject: RE: masters swimming complaining about triathletes filling events
Stuartap - 2013-02-10 5:15 PM

simpsonbo - 2013-02-10 7:04 PM The issue is that some meets are being sold first come first serve instead of limiting the field size in a 1500/1650. I have seen meets that state they will only take a certain number of heats for 400/800/1500 and if your seed time isn't fast enough you don't get to swim.

Is this a bad thing?  If I can't swim fast enough to earn a spot then I don't get in. I will have to find another meet that I can qualify for.  Why shouldn't any swimmer with the best qualifying time get in just because they are a triathlete?  If this or any other race takes all comers based solely on first-come first-served with limited spots the issue is not with the tri team, its with the race organizers.

Besides, if demand is so high I find it difficult to think that void will not be picked up by someone. 

With regards to your first couple of questions...what if the WTC adopted this strategy do their IM signups for races that sell out quickly?  Have registration to races like IMFL, IMAZ, IMLP, IMWI, etc open for 3 months.  Then just send an email out to the top 2500 athletes with the best qualifying times.

Sure, it's okay to have some events require qualifying times, but if you do this for every event, you're going to shut out a large portion of your customer base that is obviously enthusiastic to participate if they are willing to sign up so early. 

With regards to the bolded...I agree.  If race organizers are going to set up registration as first come first serve...then don't blame the people signing up early. 

To your last statement, I also agree...if the demand for events that require qualifying times was in such great demand, then you'd likely see more of them. 

 

2013-02-11 5:52 AM
in reply to: #4616965

User image

Pro
6011
50001000
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania
Subject: RE: masters swimming complaining about triathletes filling events
tri808 - 2013-02-11 1:56 AM
Stuartap - 2013-02-10 5:15 PM

simpsonbo - 2013-02-10 7:04 PM The issue is that some meets are being sold first come first serve instead of limiting the field size in a 1500/1650. I have seen meets that state they will only take a certain number of heats for 400/800/1500 and if your seed time isn't fast enough you don't get to swim.

Is this a bad thing?  If I can't swim fast enough to earn a spot then I don't get in. I will have to find another meet that I can qualify for.  Why shouldn't any swimmer with the best qualifying time get in just because they are a triathlete?  If this or any other race takes all comers based solely on first-come first-served with limited spots the issue is not with the tri team, its with the race organizers.

Besides, if demand is so high I find it difficult to think that void will not be picked up by someone. 

With regards to your first couple of questions...what if the WTC adopted this strategy do their IM signups for races that sell out quickly?  Have registration to races like IMFL, IMAZ, IMLP, IMWI, etc open for 3 months.  Then just send an email out to the top 2500 athletes with the best qualifying times.

Sure, it's okay to have some events require qualifying times, but if you do this for every event, you're going to shut out a large portion of your customer base that is obviously enthusiastic to participate if they are willing to sign up so early. 

With regards to the bolded...I agree.  If race organizers are going to set up registration as first come first serve...then don't blame the people signing up early. 

To your last statement, I also agree...if the demand for events that require qualifying times was in such great demand, then you'd likely see more of them. 

 

This is actually how it works (at least here in PA) for HS swimming in County and District Championship meets.  There are anticipated qualifying times published at the beginning of the season, but they are only estimated.  In the end, only the fastest x number of times in each event gets to swim.  This coming weekend is the York-Adams County Championships for the team I coach, and the psych sheets were only posted online this past Friday.

I agree this is fine for any kind of championship that wants to be taken seriously but that it's not a good thing for qualifying events.

 

2013-02-11 9:06 AM
in reply to: #4616838

User image

Veteran
441
10010010010025
Clearwater, FL
Subject: RE: masters swimming complaining about triathletes filling events

simpsonbo - 2013-02-10 10:32 PM

I'd hate to lose a spot in a meet to someone who is a faster mouse clicker, it's bad enough in triathlon when events sell out in minutes.

It's a brave, new world. Adapt or drown.

 

Stuartap - 2013-02-10 10:15 PM

Besides, if demand is so high I find it difficult to think that void will not be picked up by someone.

Reading through the USMS mission statement, goals and objectives and vision, it looks like they're not able to keep up. Does USMS have any competition that can pick up the slack or do they have it too easy?



2013-02-11 9:07 AM
in reply to: #4616961

User image

Master
2010
2000
Falls Church, VA
Subject: RE: masters swimming complaining about triathletes filling events

simpsonbo - 2013-02-11 1:22 AM I bet no meet records get broken in the distance events. I read the whole usms thread and guess what people are now skipping the meet to race elsewhere, and an overwhelming number of entrants do not have PROOF of entry times (which is something that matters at quite a few swim meets). You want to enter the 1500/1650 at a championship, you should have a proven entry time from another meet.

There were no qualifying times for this meet. it was first sign up. Times were only requested for seeding.

2013-02-11 9:26 AM
in reply to: #4616753

User image

Veteran
667
5001002525
asheville, nc
Subject: RE: masters swimming complaining about triathletes filling events
Left Brain - 2013-02-10 9:29 PM

I have no swimming background.....but I'm involved in my kid's club team and I watch alot of practices/meets.  The kids are so good to each other that it's absolutely comical to read some of the threads about.....whatever goes wrong at the pool.  I've watched kids run into each other, swim under each other, over each other, many times 6-8 to a lane, smacking arms, and heads....and never a problem.  And from age 10 on they can swim faster than at  least 75% of any "triathlete" I've ever seen. Yeah, if you have never been to a decent kids meet, go watch the 11-12 year olds swim sub 30 50's and sub 1 minute 100's.....then maybe you won't be so quick to get on your high horse while you trudge up and down the pool at your "fast" 1:20 - 1:30 per hundred.  Those kids do their intervals at less than that.

I happen to think, from what I have seen, that triathletes, as a group, are some of the most rude, self-absorbed people to grace a swimming pool.

Your last statement is probably quite true.  But many swimmers tend to behave that way as well. It's awfully ironic too, considering that in competition triathletes swim in the most chaotic type of swimming possible. In fact, it's probably one of the most chaotic forms of any competition. There are no guides, short of buoys that are difficult to see. Virtually no rules and aside from equipment, most of them would be impossible to enforce since you can't see whats going on for 90% of most athletes.  Yet we get into a pool and we require a 10 foot bubble around us at all times.  I used to be a in the pool, but have calmed down once I realized that I was being a in the pool.  The only time i get annoyed is if the person who wants to share with me needs to have a conversation about their intent.  I usually wave if i see them, make eye contact or do something so they know I've seen them.  

Funniest thing I saw was a woman, who seemed to have a similar temperament as me, acknowledged the guys presence, but he needed vocal cofirmation, and after a couple laps of standing there, in the pool, he actually grabbed her ankle to stop her and ask.  I've never seen someone yell at someone else in the pool so loudly. It was hilarious!

2013-02-11 11:19 AM
in reply to: #4616104

User image

Extreme Veteran
1001
1000
Highlands Ranch, Colorado
Subject: RE: masters swimming complaining about triathletes filling events
I don't understand how a "Championship" in any sport can be an all comers meet based upon the click of a mouse.  Any championship should have a documented qualifying time, if anyone meets that time they should be able to get in.  In the case of this event it is supposed to be exclusive based upon Q time and it should not matter if the participant is a swimmer or triathlete.
2013-02-11 11:36 AM
in reply to: #4617224

User image

Veteran
2297
2000100100252525
Great White North
Subject: RE: masters swimming complaining about triathletes filling events
You're right that it can't be changed now. But the whole "zone championship" is now a total joke. Because the distance events are closed people are now choosing other meets. I hope the folks at Team Z dont brag about all the Zone Titles they "win".
2013-02-11 11:42 AM
in reply to: #4617458

User image

Expert
1951
10005001001001001002525
Subject: RE: masters swimming complaining about triathletes filling events

rick4657 - 2013-02-11 12:19 PM I don't understand how a "Championship" in any sport can be an all comers meet based upon the click of a mouse.  Any championship should have a documented qualifying time, if anyone meets that time they should be able to get in.  In the case of this event it is supposed to be exclusive based upon Q time and it should not matter if the participant is a swimmer or triathlete.

From what I read on the thread it sounds like they're not willing to spend the time and money in order to verify "documented qualifying times" for each of the participants. 



2013-02-11 3:04 PM
in reply to: #4616104


631
50010025
Subject: RE: masters swimming complaining about triathletes filling events

I don't know much about master's swimming but they are saying it is an "East Coast Championship". How does the championship not require qualifying times? To me it sounds like a open meet that was handled as first come first serve.

2013-02-11 3:09 PM
in reply to: #4617888

User image

Veteran
2297
2000100100252525
Great White North
Subject: RE: masters swimming complaining about triathletes filling events
Because this is a new phenom in masters swimming. Usually they have more people wanting to race short events and distance is an afterthought. The club who has the lions share of the swimmers are using this meet as a ckub distancr time trial and I bet the winning times in each AG will be notably slower than it would have been otherwise.
2013-02-11 3:12 PM
in reply to: #4616104


631
50010025
Subject: RE: masters swimming complaining about triathletes filling events

I don't know much about master's swimming but they are saying it is an "East Coast Championship". How does the championship not require qualifying times? To me it sounds like a open meet that was handled as first come first serve.

2013-02-11 4:45 PM
in reply to: #4617458

User image

Subject: RE: masters swimming complaining about triathletes filling events

rick4657 - 2013-02-11 7:19 AM I don't understand how a "Championship" in any sport can be an all comers meet based upon the click of a mouse.  Any championship should have a documented qualifying time, if anyone meets that time they should be able to get in.  In the case of this event it is supposed to be exclusive based upon Q time and it should not matter if the participant is a swimmer or triathlete.

What type of qualifying times would you suggest for IM Melbourne, IM Germany, IM Mont Tremblant, New Zealand 70.3, Panama City 70.3, and St George 70.3?  As it stands now, all of these events are labled as "Championship" but have no qualifying standards.

2013-02-11 4:57 PM
in reply to: #4616104

User image

Master
1858
10005001001001002525
Salt Lake City
Subject: RE: masters swimming complaining about triathletes filling events
They may not have AG quslifying standards, but they definitely have a number of elite spots with an entirely different registration that are only available to athletes who qualify as an elete.


2013-02-11 5:04 PM
in reply to: #4618046

User image

Member
5452
50001001001001002525
NC
Subject: RE: masters swimming complaining about triathletes filling events
tri808 - 2013-02-11 5:45 PM

What type of qualifying times would you suggest for IM Melbourne, IM Germany, IM Mont Tremblant, New Zealand 70.3, Panama City 70.3, and St George 70.3? 

Sub-10 full; sub-5 half.

2013-02-11 5:11 PM
in reply to: #4618056

User image

Subject: RE: masters swimming complaining about triathletes filling events

JZig - 2013-02-11 12:57 PM They may not have AG quslifying standards, but they definitely have a number of elite spots with an entirely different registration that are only available to athletes who qualify as an elete.

Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but pro spots for the events I mentioned do not have a qualifying standard.  You simply need your pro card.  Some events may only attract a pro field of 10 men and 8 women...while these "championship" events may attract 35 men and 24 women due to a bigger prize purse.  Our famous friend Lance Armstrong raced in Panama City as his first pro triathlon race.

2013-02-12 9:17 AM
in reply to: #4616104

User image

Regular
233
10010025
NW
Subject: RE: masters swimming complaining about triathletes filling events
Breaking news!  Newly proposed rules will require all USMS distance events be completed with.......wait for it............flip turns!!Smile
2013-02-12 9:28 AM
in reply to: #4618069


631
50010025
Subject: RE: masters swimming complaining about triathletes filling events
tri808 - 2013-02-11 6:11 PM

JZig - 2013-02-11 12:57 PM They may not have AG quslifying standards, but they definitely have a number of elite spots with an entirely different registration that are only available to athletes who qualify as an elete.

Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but pro spots for the events I mentioned do not have a qualifying standard.  You simply need your pro card.  Some events may only attract a pro field of 10 men and 8 women...while these "championship" events may attract 35 men and 24 women due to a bigger prize purse.  Our famous friend Lance Armstrong raced in Panama City as his first pro triathlon race.

FWIW That was not his first pro triathlon. He turned pro at 16 and was the national sprint coursechampion at 18 and 19. He switched to pro cycling around 21 or 22.  Didn't he also race in an xterra triathlon race in 2011 while Panama was in 2012?

You do need to qualify to hold an elite card. I have not researched it but he might of been able to keep it active for 20 years? Prior to 2005 elite status was lifelong in 2005 the rules changed that you need to qualify every 3 years. I don't know if they grandfathered in the elites prior to 2005. If not he would have needed to qualify as an elite at an earlier race. If he raced some as an age grouper he could have qualified.

http://www.usatriathlon.org/membership-services/elite-membership/qualification.aspx

New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » masters swimming complaining about triathletes filling events Rss Feed  
 
 
of 3