"Breasts - Not just for selling cars anymore." (Page 7)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2006-11-22 8:58 AM in reply to: #605963 |
Elite 2733 Venture Industries, | Subject: RE: "Breasts - Not just for selling cars anymore." akustix - 2006-11-22 12:05 AM jmwebs - 2006-11-21 10:59 PM Bcozican - 2006-11-21 2:27 PM "the child is 22 months old.... Has anyone noticed this aspect of the story? Isn't that a bit old to still be breastfeeding?There is no set time to stop breast feeding. I know women who breast fed their kids past four years old... Peace, Brian 4? Why? My wife didn't breast feed so I have no idea about the logistices. But 4 seems old to me. Especially in the U.S. or some other developed country. Shouldn't a child be eating solid foods by age 4? Anyway, obviously the "regulars" are itching for an issue on cup of joe today, is everyone bored and ready to leave work....? 5 pages on "The Great Breast Feeding Controversy" I think some people are looking for an arguement. |
|
2006-11-22 9:02 AM in reply to: #606148 |
Pro 4545 Orange Park Florida | Subject: RE: "Breasts - Not just for selling cars anymore." ASA22 - 2006-11-22 9:58 AM akustix - 2006-11-22 12:05 AM 4? Why? My wife didn't breast feed so I have no idea about the logistices. But 4 seems old to me. Especially in the U.S. or some other developed country. Shouldn't a child be eating solid foods by age 4? Anyway, obviously the "regulars" are itching for an issue on cup of joe today, is everyone bored and ready to leave work....? 5 pages on "The Great Breast Feeding Controversy" I think some people are looking for an arguement. jmwebs - 2006-11-21 10:59 PM There is no set time to stop breast feeding. I know women who breast fed their kids past four years old... Bcozican - 2006-11-21 2:27 PM "the child is 22 months old.... Has anyone noticed this aspect of the story? Isn't that a bit old to still be breastfeeding?Peace, Brian Ya think! |
2006-11-22 9:07 AM in reply to: #605940 |
molto veloce mama 9311 | Subject: RE: "Breasts - Not just for selling cars anymore." in minnesota, the indecent exposure law has an exemption for breastfeeding. our law is similar, that women can breastfeed where ever they and their children are legally allowed to be anyway. thought i would add a tri related breastfeeding picture into the discussion. |
2006-11-22 9:50 AM in reply to: #605301 |
COURT JESTER 12230 ROCKFORD, IL | Subject: RE: "Breasts - Not just for selling cars anymore." Okay, just did a google picture search for Milkshakes (for future distraction posts) and this picture showed up. Thought it was funny that it got lumped in with a milkshake post…… (Milkshake-1_426.jpg) Attachments ---------------- Milkshake-1_426.jpg (19KB - 6 downloads) |
2006-11-22 9:53 AM in reply to: #606238 |
molto veloce mama 9311 | Subject: RE: "Breasts - Not just for selling cars anymore." i wonder if bt has an exposed nipple rule, ty. i think that's a very cute picture, really. |
2006-11-22 9:54 AM in reply to: #606238 |
Crystal Lake, IL | Subject: RE: "Breasts - Not just for selling cars anymore." tupuppy - 2006-11-22 9:50 AM Okay, just did a google picture search for Milkshakes (for future distraction posts) and this picture showed up. Thought it was funny that it got lumped in with a milkshake post……
I always joke that when Jen goes running in the cold weather Josh is going to get a milkshake when she gets home.
|
|
2006-11-22 10:21 AM in reply to: #606103 |
Elite 2768 Raleigh | Subject: RE: "Breasts - Not just for selling cars anymore." vortmax - 2006-11-22 8:24 AM without reading ALL the posts.... What is the big deal? People are acting like the big, bad, evil corperation (Delta) is imposing it's will on innocent, hapless mothers. Is this what happens when the generation that grew up fighting the man finally grows up and gets lawyers? I'm sorry, but I Just don't get it. For one, it was ONE case. I SINGLE flight attendant had an issue and talked a ticket agent into taking the people off the plane. ONE PERSON. Delta even said it's not in their policy to do this. Delta as a corperation is clean. They appologized and I'm sure the family will get something out of it. Done deal. It's over. You won, you can sit down now. Why do people have to jump up and start screaming that (as a whole) they have been wronged when a single stupid person makes a mistake? It was one woman. It's not like hundreds of women were wronged, or it was an entire plane of breast feeding nuns. Was it just because it happened to a woman? I mean if I'm cut off on the highway by a woman and then start commenting about women drivers, everybody gets in a huff about me stereotyping. That is unless it was a woman in an SUV. Since SUV's have a bad rap now anyway, then that would make it okay, but if it was a woman in a Prius, fists would fly. Why are we at the point where individual people can't make mistakes without litigation being thrown around at them, the company they work for and the manufacture of their SUV? Yes, the attendant was wrong in her actions. Why does this demand a mass investigation by the "Civil Rights League"? Shouldn't they be off spreading their good will in places that actually need it? anyway, my 2 cents
I totally agree, back in the old days people just said "I am sorry" and everyone went on about their lives... Now, it is I am going to take you to court.... 1 person, 1 stupid mistake... Delta dealt with it. |
2006-11-22 2:02 PM in reply to: #605301 |
Champion 10157 Alabama | Subject: RE: "Breasts - Not just for selling cars anymore." I haven't read all 5 pages of this thread so maybe this has already been noted but here are a few thoughts: 1. What if a woman is an exhibitionist? Does having a baby give her the right to exhibit her breasts to the public? 2. It has been my experience that woman who are nursing are much less inhibited about their breasts when they are nursing than at any other time. Why is that? 3. Women's breasts are the largest they are ever gonna be while they are lactating - see item #1. See also #2 4. Was the baby actually nursing or was she just making herself available in the event the child (2 yo) got thirsty? 5. Were other passengers staring or coming by to stuff dollar bills in her pants? ~Mike |
2006-11-22 2:39 PM in reply to: #606644 |
Elite 3201 South Florida | Subject: RE: "Breasts - Not just for selling cars anymore." Rogillio - 2006-11-22 3:02 PM I haven't read all 5 pages of this thread so maybe this has already been noted but here are a few thoughts: 1. What if a woman is an exhibitionist? Does having a baby give her the right to exhibit her breasts to the public? I'm sure exhibitionists aren't going to use their hungry children to get their thrills. 2. It has been my experience that woman who are nursing are much less inhibited about their breasts when they are nursing than at any other time. Why is that? Um, maybye because that's the one time they are actually needed and not seen as sexual objects?? 3. Women's breasts are the largest they are ever gonna be while they are lactating - see item #1. See also #2 Is there a question here? 4. Was the baby actually nursing or was she just making herself available in the event the child (2 yo) got thirsty? I am sure she just felt like letting her left boob hang out to get some air in case the baby decided it needed a sip. 5. Were other passengers staring or coming by to stuff dollar bills in her pants? That depends if Robit was on the plane. (hah - now he can slap me in Disney!) ~Mike |
2006-11-22 3:00 PM in reply to: #606644 |
COURT JESTER 12230 ROCKFORD, IL | Subject: RE: "Breasts - Not just for selling cars anymore." Rogillio - 2006-11-22 1:02 PM I haven't read all 5 pages of this thread so maybe this has already been noted but here are a few thoughts: 1. What if a woman is an exhibitionist? Does having a baby give her the right to exhibit her breasts to the public? NOPE. Being in public give her the right to be arrested. Pity about that. 2. It has been my experience that woman who are nursing are much less inhibited about their breasts when they are nursing than at any other time. Why is that? PERHAPS this applies more to women who are normally smaller of chest. They are larger and want to flaunt it a bit while they can. 3. Women's breasts are the largest they are ever gonna be while they are lactating - see item #1. See also #2 YUP...and I know someone who will be lactating next July AND will be standing up in a wedding and she plans on showing them off...tastefully as she can for a wedding. 4. Was the baby actually nursing or was she just making herself available in the event the child (2 yo) got thirsty? Women who nurse just don't walk around with their breast hanging out so the child can pull from the tap when they want to? 5. Were other passengers staring or coming by to stuff dollar bills in her pants? Or down her nursing bra.... ~Mike |
2006-11-22 3:36 PM in reply to: #606148 |
Arch-Bishop of BT 10278 Pittsburgh | Subject: RE: "Breasts - Not just for selling cars anymore." 4? Why? My wife didn't breast feed so I have no idea about the logistices. But 4 seems old to me. Especially in the U.S. or some other developed country. Shouldn't a child be eating solid foods by age 4? Anyway, obviously the "regulars" are itching for an issue on cup of joe today, is everyone bored and ready to leave work....? 5 pages on "The Great Breast Feeding Controversy" I think some people are looking for an arguement. Well of course they are eating solid food as well... My 6 month old just started eating cereals and veggies, but he still breast feeds. There are still advantages to breastfeeding, like immuniological benefits, bonding between mother and child, neurological development, etc. No reason to stop. Our oldest son weaned himself at about 2. He didn't need it anymore, but my wife would have kept going if he had wanted. Peace, Brian |
|
2006-11-22 3:59 PM in reply to: #605301 |
Wife, Mother, Friend. 2457 South | Subject: RE: "Breasts - Not just for selling cars anymore." |
2006-11-22 4:00 PM in reply to: #606761 |
COURT JESTER 12230 ROCKFORD, IL | Subject: RE: "Breasts - Not just for selling cars anymore."
Okay, what web site are those from?? I'm getting that shirt for my wife!!!! |
2006-11-22 4:21 PM in reply to: #606741 |
Elite 2733 Venture Industries, | Subject: RE: "Breasts - Not just for selling cars anymore." akustix - 2006-11-22 4:36 PM 4? Why? My wife didn't breast feed so I have no idea about the logistices. But 4 seems old to me. Especially in the U.S. or some other developed country. Shouldn't a child be eating solid foods by age 4? Anyway, obviously the "regulars" are itching for an issue on cup of joe today, is everyone bored and ready to leave work....? 5 pages on "The Great Breast Feeding Controversy" I think some people are looking for an arguement. Well of course they are eating solid food as well... My 6 month old just started eating cereals and veggies, but he still breast feeds. There are still advantages to breastfeeding, like immuniological benefits, bonding between mother and child, neurological development, etc. No reason to stop. Our oldest son weaned himself at about 2. He didn't need it anymore, but my wife would have kept going if he had wanted. Peace, Brian I understand what you're saying, and I'm not trying to say it's wrong/right, but shouldn't the immuniological benefits of breastfeeding be well established prior to the age of four, additionally, should the bonding process be set prior to that age too. Similar to the imunilogical benefits of breast feeding, shouldn't the neurological benefits be well established prior to the age of 4? Any doctors out there? |
2006-11-22 4:36 PM in reply to: #606686 |
Champion 10157 Alabama | Subject: RE: "Breasts - Not just for selling cars anymore." MomX3 - 2006-11-22 2:39 PM Rogillio - 2006-11-22 3:02 PM
Um, maybye because that's the one time they are actually needed and not seen as sexual objects??
They aren't?!
|
|