Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Theory Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
2007-04-19 11:08 PM

User image

Extreme Veteran
309
100100100
Subject: Theory
There seems to be an increased number of threads that contain sexual innuendo, or outright sexual discussion in COJ. Curious phenomenon. Three theories:

1. It's spring- everyone is influenced by that primal urge to procreate.
2. There is a need to test Marmadaddy & Rick. Where exactly is the line when it comes to this subject?
3. We are heathens and can't help ourselves.

Feel free to discuss or add any other theory you may come up with.


2007-04-19 11:14 PM
in reply to: #769469

User image

Master
1809
1000500100100100
hiding in your closet
Subject: RE: Theory
i think we just like to push the limits. just as in, lets see what our bodies will put up with, we want to know what Marma will put up with.
2007-04-20 7:08 AM
in reply to: #769469

User image

Giver
18427
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Subject: RE: Theory
I think it's backlash from all the guns and killing threads.
2007-04-20 7:13 AM
in reply to: #769469

User image

Crystal Lake, IL
Subject: RE: Theory

Yer all horny. 

Wow, that was easy.

2007-04-20 10:34 AM
in reply to: #769469

User image

Elite
3519
20001000500
San Jose, CA
Subject: RE: Theory

1 and 3 are good and probably true for some.

4. is that we need to get away from all the hate and killing this week and move toward more loving

5. I find it an interesting subject.  I find other peoples ideas of what is sexy and hot to be interesting. 

2007-04-20 10:36 AM
in reply to: #769469

User image

Pro
4089
20002000252525
Without house
Subject: RE: Theory
We're all twitterpatted!


2007-04-20 10:42 AM
in reply to: #769469

Expert
1113
1000100
Las Vegas
Subject: RE: Theory
I hate politics, and all that's left is threads surrounding the bikini line.  Just trying to find my place in the world.
2007-04-20 10:44 AM
in reply to: #769988

User image

Elite
3519
20001000500
San Jose, CA
Subject: RE: Theory

ryanlc - 2007-04-20 8:42 AM I hate politics, and all that's left is threads surrounding the bikini line.  Just trying to find my place in the world.

And if your place in the world has to do with bikini lines...then you would be a happy man!...right!.

2007-04-20 2:46 PM
in reply to: #769469

User image

Buttercup
14334
500050002000200010010010025
Subject: RE: Theory

JoyfullySo - 2007-04-20 12:08 AM

There seems to be an increased number of threads that contain sexual innuendo, or outright sexual discussion in COJ. Curious phenomenon.

What do you find curious about it? What makes sexual innuendo or discussion phenomenal?

I've been on the board for just over 2 years and it doesn't seem any more prevalent than in the past - seems like more of the same - but then I don't open many of the threads.

2007-04-20 2:50 PM
in reply to: #769469

User image

Pro
4481
20002000100100100100252525
Reston
Subject: RE: Theory

I think it's because of reasons #6 and 9. 

 

haha.  69.

2007-04-20 6:07 PM
in reply to: #769469

User image

Extreme Veteran
309
100100100
Subject: RE: Theory
Renee,

I could be totally wrong. Don't you think Marma has some super moderator feature that could tell us the number of times that a thread specifically mentions sex or sexual proclivities during a specific time period? That would be helpful.

Just seems to be on everyone's mind...


2007-04-20 6:08 PM
in reply to: #770590

User image

Extreme Veteran
309
100100100
Subject: RE: Theory
3558 - 2007-04-20 3:50 PM

I think it's because of reasons #6 and 9.

haha. 69.



See what I mean????
2007-04-20 7:55 PM
in reply to: #770813

User image

Buttercup
14334
500050002000200010010010025
Subject: RE: Theory
JoyfullySo - 2007-04-20 7:08 PM
3558 - 2007-04-20 3:50 PM

I think it's because of reasons #6 and 9.

haha. 69.

See what I mean????

But this has always been a feature of CoJ.  That's what I'm not getting, I guess. It's nothing new.

Within the context of training issues, we talk about aaaaalllllllllll kinds of body functions, extremely unpleasant chafing in very tender areas (both men and women), we've had many WOMEN ONLY and MEN ONLY threads (which is a clear signal for the opposite sex to have a peek), do you pee in the pool, do you look at other people in the locker room, etc.... and I think both genders just enjoy learning more about the opposite sex and their intimate issues. I think it's only natural that adults on an adult website are going to get cheeky. We're a very cheeky bunch in CoJ.

As for the lines... I'm not sure anymore. There seems to be a more narrow tolerance of cheekiness than I've seen in the past and that seems to be a much more recent development.  Anyway, I leave it to the folks who keep the lights on around here to make whatever decisions they want to make about the place.

New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Theory Rss Feed