General Discussion Triathlon Talk » IM Louisville Participant Hit by Car - No Refund or Rollover Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
2008-08-27 9:24 PM

User image

Veteran
214
100100
Barrington, NJ
Subject: IM Louisville Participant Hit by Car - No Refund or Rollover

So a member of my tri club was on his last training ride last weekend and gets hit by a car.  It was a low-speed collision and he's OK.  He's got some injuries to his hip and arm, deep bruising and road rash.  Docs say he won't be doing any more damage, but doing an IM will make the healing process longer.  He contacts the RD about it.  They forward their refund (not what he wants)/roll over policy.  Essentially he's SOL. 

Its amazing that with so many variables involved in training that the RDs don't take this into consideration when devising their policies.  Its beyond me that they can't make exceptions for people who are unable to participate through no fault of their own.

Really leaves a sour taste in my mouth for Ironman. 

Just beware that Ironman has no tolerance for irresponsible athletes who get hit by cars after the deadline.



2008-08-27 9:47 PM
in reply to: #1633629

User image

Subject: RE: IM Louisville Participant Hit by Car - No Refund or Rollover

Someone here (Suzanne?) had an accident or other problem before CdA andI believe she got an entry to another race.  Of course, that's NAS and not WTC.

That's really a bummer about the accident, sorry to hear it

2008-08-27 9:54 PM
in reply to: #1633629

User image

Master
1219
1000100100
Sachse
Subject: RE: IM Louisville Participant Hit by Car - No Refund or Rollover
Man.. sorry to hear about your friend. I am glad he will be ok.... Since there is no refund at this point, is he still going to race?

That really sucks.. and it was a point that made me nervous about signing up so far in advance. A lot can happen during that time and I way underestimated the amount of money I would spend getting here and throughout training. I guess I can see it from both sides though. While it sucks for your buddy and anyone put in that position, they also have to draw the line in the sand, somewhere. Right or wrong, I do see both sides and it is something I really had to think about going into this situation.

I hope he recovers quickly.

Kenny
2008-08-28 5:05 AM
in reply to: #1633629

User image

Champion
10157
500050001002525
Alabama
Subject: RE: IM Louisville Participant Hit by Car - No Refund or Rollover

Sorry to hear about your friend.  I too got hit by a car this year and it sucks.

There are a lot of businesses that have no-refund policies after a deadline - airlines, cruise ships and Disney World come to mind. 

Personally, I think there ought to be a 100% refund policy up till about 3 months.  AND, they ought to reallocate that slot so someone else could take it.  From a business persepective, this would be a zero sum gain. 

Last minutes cancelations/refunds are tough.  If you have a policy that allows exceptions, I'm sure some people will claim they had an accident or had a death in the family or sickness or can't get off work etc.  Then you put the RD in a position of trying to evaluate all the refund cases to decide who gets a refund (and/or slot in another race) and who does not.

Maybe what they ought to do is offer 'race insurance' similar to trip insurance.  Then, if something goes wrong, you'd get a refund and/or a new race slot.

Just some random thought.

 

~Mike

2008-08-28 5:59 AM
in reply to: #1633629

User image

Champion
19812
50005000500020002000500100100100
MA
Subject: RE: IM Louisville Participant Hit by Car - No Refund or Rollover

I agree that the refund policy should be more generous in some time period prior to the race..90 days seems good to me. IMs are expensive and the injury rate is high plus stuff happens in life. Agreed that they could easily fill slots for zero sum gain. My tri team had 18 folks registered for IMLP, 10 started, 8 finished.

They play the % game knowing that everyone that signs up will not race, and even when it gets down to bib assignment they no not all those registering will show up. They have the statistics they run it like a business so they can get the max number people paying the registration fee and not exceed the number of athletes they want to race.

The thing that bothers me is that I hear they do make exceptions to the no rollover policy at times but it is inconsistent and more like an exception. The reasons I have heard about that they do allow it are similar to the reasons that they won't allow it...bike crashes, significant injuries and the like.


Suzanne was a community slot athlete who had a bike crash within 2 weeks of IMCDA and they can roll over to following year or transfer if there is a spot. 

I hope your buddy heals up quickly...all that training, effort, it is really tough. 

 

2008-08-28 6:20 AM
in reply to: #1633629

User image

Extreme Veteran
392
100100100252525
Pennsylvania
Subject: RE: IM Louisville Participant Hit by Car - No Refund or Rollover
What is the refund policy for an IM?


2008-08-28 7:24 AM
in reply to: #1633629

User image

Master
2571
20005002525
Tiger's Den
Subject: RE: IM Louisville Participant Hit by Car - No Refund or Rollover

I got to move my registration to WI, but that was primarily because I am a community fund athlete. There is more flexibility there, and they do allow you to change races based on availability.

I was very lucky I signed up as a community fund participant. I would have been SOL otherwise.

2008-08-28 8:02 AM
in reply to: #1633629

Veteran
197
100252525
Florida
Subject: RE: IM Louisville Participant Hit by Car - No Refund or Rollover
I hope he heals and gets better, that is one of my fears is getting hit by a car.

I'm sorry he will not make the race, that has got to be tough to put out so much time and energy into training and not get to use it. I would be beside myself.

I see IM's side of it also, can you imagine the amount of request to transfer or refund they would get for the hundreds of reasons people would give them. I dont see how they could offer the same product if they could not count on a certain dollar amount to use for the race.

What really bugs me is that I have heard of exceptions to their rules, even for Kona, for this happening, people getting transfers to another race or year.

Sorry for his bad luck, I hope he gets back in the game soon

Edited by Millco 2008-08-28 8:03 AM
2008-08-28 8:22 AM
in reply to: #1633629

User image

Veteran
214
100100
Barrington, NJ
Subject: RE: IM Louisville Participant Hit by Car - No Refund or Rollover

I can understand the business reasons for having a limited refund/rollover policy (i.e. abuse by participants, anxiety of racing, etc), but I'm sure that if they thought about it carefully they could create a fair policy that would give people who are truly injured (with documentation) and unable to participate an opportunity to race the following year. 

I'm getting hypothetical, but its not hard to imagine this policy creating more problems for RDs than giving someone the opportunity to do the race the next year.  For instance, say someone is hurt, but can't rollover.  They decide to do the race rather than lose out of the money.  They could potentially put themselves in danger as well as other competitors, which could certainly lead to big headaches for the RDs.

I just think its an unfair policy given the level of committment people put into the sport and punishes participants.  I'd imagine the profit margin on the races is enough to support a few rollovers.  Do elites/pros pay entry fees?  If so, if they pull out because of injury, do they get those fees back?  If they are paid by their sponsors, do their sponsors get those fees back or some other compensation for not having their sponsored athlete in the race?  I'd bet they do. 

2008-08-28 8:28 AM
in reply to: #1633629

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2008-08-28 8:30 AM
in reply to: #1634236

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.


2008-08-28 8:40 AM
in reply to: #1634257

over a barrier
Subject: RE: IM Louisville Participant Hit by Car - No Refund or Rollover
JeepFleeb - 2008-08-28 8:28 AM

I like the no transfer/deferment policy.

If you let people move their race because of injury it would be abused and turn into a nightmare.  How injured is injured enough?  Who decides?  How do you prove it?  I think you'd see a lot of athletes register then defer because they're scared that they haven't trained enough.  Or they hit their taper and have the normal aches and pains and over-react.

10-15% of the registered atheletes won't make it to the start line.  If you let people transfer without loosing their money that will just go up.  Suddenly 25% of the field is moved to the next year and those are slots that can't go on sale the day after the race.  The transfers didn't have to pay the registration fee again so less slots are available and the entry fee will have to increase.

It sucks if you get caught on the other side of the rule, but I think it's there for good reason.

Glad to hear your friend wasn't injured too seriously.



+1
2008-08-28 8:42 AM
in reply to: #1633629

Veteran
203
100100
Subject: RE: IM Louisville Participant Hit by Car - No Refund or Rollover

In IM South Africa there is also a no refund, roll over or transfer policy. 

There is an insurance that you can opt to take out though.  It covers for accidents, training injuries, sickness, death or emergency in the family as well as pregancy (as long as you found out after you entered).  Not many people opt to take it though.

2008-08-28 8:47 AM
in reply to: #1634257

Veteran
321
100100100
Georgia
Subject: RE: IM Louisville Participant Hit by Car - No Refund or Rollover
JeepFleeb - 2008-08-28 9:28 AM

10-15% of the registered atheletes won't make it to the start line. 

I may be mistaken, but I believe they oversell slots based on this fairly consistent statistic, just like the airlines.  I imagine a race would be overwhelmed if everyone made it to the start.  Any accomodation on a refund policy for NAS or WTC means more work, less profit and as long as IMs sellout, I doubt there will ever be any changes.

On that note, does anyone know what they do in European and non-North American M-dot races for refunds, particularly the ones that do not sell out immediately or at all?

As to the original OP, that really sucks for your friend.   If he decides to give it a go, he should be sure to nukes his system with a Z pack or some other antibiotic after the race (swim in the river).  This setback will make finishing the race even more of an achievement.

2008-08-28 9:13 AM
in reply to: #1633629

The Original
7834
5000200050010010010025
Raleigh/Durham
Subject: RE: IM Louisville Participant Hit by Car - No Refund or Rollover
I think they should offer some type of athlete insurance when you register.  You don't have to buy it, but if you do and something happens then you could get more of your regsitration fee back, if not all of it.  That's my .02.

Edited by runnergirl 2008-08-28 9:14 AM
2008-08-28 10:20 AM
in reply to: #1634304

Champion
5575
5000500252525
Butler
Subject: RE: IM Louisville Participant Hit by Car - No Refund or Rollover
running2far - 2008-08-28 8:40 AM
JeepFleeb - 2008-08-28 8:28 AM

I like the no transfer/deferment policy.

If you let people move their race because of injury it would be abused and turn into a nightmare.  How injured is injured enough?  Who decides?  How do you prove it?  I think you'd see a lot of athletes register then defer because they're scared that they haven't trained enough.  Or they hit their taper and have the normal aches and pains and over-react.

10-15% of the registered atheletes won't make it to the start line.  If you let people transfer without loosing their money that will just go up.  Suddenly 25% of the field is moved to the next year and those are slots that can't go on sale the day after the race.  The transfers didn't have to pay the registration fee again so less slots are available and the entry fee will have to increase.

It sucks if you get caught on the other side of the rule, but I think it's there for good reason.

Glad to hear your friend wasn't injured too seriously.

+1
+2. I can only image that this would be a nightmare at the IM level.  Some sprint I am sure do it and a local one let me do it and I was not injured.  Wife is expecting at the time my original race was scheduled and they just let me move to a different race earlier in the year.  Now they did say no transfers but they probably do this to avoid a plethera of them.

I say keep it like it is.  You know going it you can't transfer or get a refund so if you don't want to risk it don't race.  I would love to do IMKY next year but not sure where I will be living or working and until I have a new job after I lose my in December I am not signing up for anything a year out.



2008-08-28 11:21 AM
in reply to: #1633629

Champion
8766
5000200010005001001002525
Evergreen, Colorado
Subject: RE: IM Louisville Participant Hit by Car - No Refund or Rollover

This is definitely one of the reasons I feel like you shouldn't have to register for these races a  year in advance.  As another poster said, a LOT can happen in a year!

It wouldn't help someone who gets hurt right before the race, but it would still help a lot of people.

I wish there was a legit way to get refunded or transfer if you get hurt close to the race.  It sucks to lose that much money over something that wasn't your fault.

Last year I was registered for Boulder Peak when the military told me about 30 days out that I had to go to some training in Alabama and I wasn't going to be able to race.  I e-mailed the RD and they had a policy (unadvertised...nowhere on their site, nowhere when you registered) that said you could only get a refund 60 days out.  I replied that if I had GOTTEN 60 days notice I would have given THEM 60 days notice.  Still no dice.

I complained heavily that their policy wasn't advertised and wouldn't you know?  This year it's on their site.  Still didn't help me.

But I digress.  Perfect example of a situation completely beyond my control but RD's wouldn't budge.  It really sucks and it happens way too often.  Life happens.  RD's need to bend a little.

2008-08-28 12:02 PM
in reply to: #1633629

Subject: RE: IM Louisville Participant Hit by Car - No Refund or Rollover
To be fair to the race, we all register for IMs fully aware (or we should be) of the refund policy, unlike jen's case.  As Aaron said, it sucks to be on the wrong end of that stick, but sometimes sh*t happens
2008-08-28 6:41 PM
in reply to: #1633629

Expert
936
50010010010010025
Salisbury
Subject: RE: IM Louisville Participant Hit by Car - No Refund or Rollover

If everyone was honest and never took advantage of situations they could change their policies. We all know that's not the case. It's a shame.

When I did IMAZ I was worried all year that I'd get injured but I also knew the risk when I signed up.  As a matter of fact I think they even sent me an email with a video explaining the no refun policy.

2008-08-28 6:48 PM
in reply to: #1633629

Champion
10157
500050001002525
Alabama
Subject: RE: IM Louisville Participant Hit by Car - No Refund or Rollover

I'm guessing the no-refund policy provides a modicum of motivation for some folk.  If you knew you could get your $500 back if you were not 'ready' come race time.... 

~Mike

2008-09-02 10:51 AM
in reply to: #1633629

Veteran
214
100100
Barrington, NJ
Subject: RE: IM Louisville Participant Hit by Car - No Refund or Rollover
Well, he did the race anyway and finished around 15:25ish. 


New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » IM Louisville Participant Hit by Car - No Refund or Rollover Rss Feed