Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Book of Mormon - the musical, not the book Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 2
 
 
2012-09-21 4:24 PM

User image

Subject: Book of Mormon - the musical, not the book

Saw it Wednesday nite.  Boy howdy that's a nasty play.  But what do you expect from South Park?  I thought it was hilarious, no disrespect to the religious.  I put it on a level with Python's Life of Brian.

I did notice that the LDS bought several pages of advertising in the playbill, so hopefully they aren't getting too offended      I know we have some Mormons here, curious as to how they feel about it. 



2012-09-21 4:40 PM
in reply to: #4422756

User image

Sensei
Sin City
Subject: RE: Book of Mormon - the musical, not the book
ChrisM - 2012-09-21 2:24 PM

Saw it Wednesday nite.  Boy howdy that's a nasty play.  But what do you expect from South Park?  I thought it was hilarious, no disrespect to the religious.  I put it on a level with Python's Life of Brian.

I did notice that the LDS bought several pages of advertising in the playbill, so hopefully they aren't getting too offended      I know we have some Mormons here, curious as to how they feel about it. 

Where did you see it?  It was showing in Denver when I was there last month but sold out. 

I STILL think it's perfect for a long term engagement for Vegas.  They would make an absolute killing here.  (as if they need MORE money)

2012-09-23 7:24 PM
in reply to: #4422756

User image

Subject: RE: Book of Mormon - the musical, not the book
Honestly - I think that LDS members are most likely to 1) not see it, and 2) shake their head and smile. I grew up Mormon. I'm used to seeing the name of the prophet insulted, the church called a cult, and among others, defended the missionaries. I've had people who weren't very educated call me unchristian, and that was the very least of my problems. So a play that probably repeats the kind of insults most LDS members have grown accustomed to? It isn't anything new. The response from any church member should be twofold - turn the other cheek, and be ready with answers as to what the truth about the church is. I really don't expect an group of people who are trying to walk in Christ's footsteps to be incited to anything up to and including violence over this. If anything, I would hope it is seen as an opportunity. If you know the history of the church, you know this is mild compared to what members have dealt with in the past.
2012-09-23 9:03 PM
in reply to: #4422756

User image

Pro
4909
20002000500100100100100
Hailey, ID
Subject: RE: Book of Mormon - the musical, not the book
Interesting article on just this subject (political warning)

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444450004578002010241...

"After the debut of "The Book of Mormon" musical, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints responded with this statement: "The production may attempt to entertain audiences for an evening but the Book of Mormon as a volume of scripture will change people's lives forever by bringing them closer to Christ.""

I am LDS. I think it's tasteless comedy and pretty disrespectful. With that said, they have the freedom to do what they'd like and people can see what they'd like. It doesn't make me lose sleep at night.
2012-09-23 10:00 PM
in reply to: #4424382

User image

Subject: RE: Book of Mormon - the musical, not the book
bradword - 2012-09-23 9:03 PMInteresting article on just this subject (political warning)http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444450004578002010241044712.html"After the debut of "The Book of Mormon" musical, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints responded with this statement: "The production may attempt to entertain audiences for an evening but the Book of Mormon as a volume of scripture will change people's lives forever by bringing them closer to Christ.""I am LDS. I think it's tasteless comedy and pretty disrespectful. With that said, they have the freedom to do what they'd like and people can see what they'd like. It doesn't make me lose sleep at night.
Brad it's interesting that you post that. I was just having that discussion with someone else how it was okay to mock (not really) Mormons, Catholics, Jews, Baptists, but to mock another religion could raise an entire people to violence. What I'd like to know is how is what happened different from the cruelty toward the church I and others endured as children. I know that may come across as flippant, but tone can't be communicated on the internet. I'm really genuinely curious what the difference is. As for how the church handled the musical, it is very classy. Gives me warm fuzzies.

Edited by ironultrared 2012-09-23 10:18 PM
2012-09-25 12:05 PM
in reply to: #4422756

Regular
173
1002525
Subject: RE: Book of Mormon - the musical, not the book
ChrisM - 2012-09-21 2:24 PM

Saw it Wednesday nite.  Boy howdy that's a nasty play.  But what do you expect from South Park?  I thought it was hilarious, no disrespect to the religious.  I put it on a level with Python's Life of Brian.

I did notice that the LDS bought several pages of advertising in the playbill, so hopefully they aren't getting too offended      I know we have some Mormons here, curious as to how they feel about it. 

It is offensive.  It was written to be offensive.  It mocks what we hold sacred.  It is NOT a warm hearted send up of our faith as is often suggested. 

What I find very ironic is how the liberal community LOVE LOVE LOVE it to pieces.  Its the best!!!!  Tony awards and accolades galore.  Horay... lets go watch a play that belittles and slanders an entire religion, its founding prophet and its adhearants.  But its ok... it was meant as a joke.  Fine. 

But then when a home spun film that degrades the Muslim faith shows up on Youtube our fearless leader Obama and his minions go all out to make sure that the world knows that we as Americans do not tollerate the abuse of our freedom of speach when it is used to degrade other cultures (Really?).  Quoting Obama referring to the anti muslim film "it was crude and disgusting"  "The future can not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam."  But in the USofA it is fine and dandy that the future can belong to those who would slander the Prophet Joseph Smith.  How can he and his democratic party denounce a two bit youtube video that slanders a prophet when the biggest Broadway smash of the decade (a play beloved by so many thousands of liberals, and a play they likely have viewed) is a play that slanders a prophet.  Big fat Hypocrites.  I am waiting and waiting for a leading democrat to stand up denounce the musical and call it a shameful abuse of free speech.  Won't happen.

 



2012-09-25 12:25 PM
in reply to: #4426708

User image

San Diego, CA
Subject: RE: Book of Mormon - the musical, not the book
bluebike - 2012-09-25 10:05 AM
ChrisM - 2012-09-21 2:24 PM

Saw it Wednesday nite.  Boy howdy that's a nasty play.  But what do you expect from South Park?  I thought it was hilarious, no disrespect to the religious.  I put it on a level with Python's Life of Brian.

I did notice that the LDS bought several pages of advertising in the playbill, so hopefully they aren't getting too offended      I know we have some Mormons here, curious as to how they feel about it. 

It is offensive.  It was written to be offensive.  It mocks what we hold sacred.  It is NOT a warm hearted send up of our faith as is often suggested. 

What I find very ironic is how the liberal community LOVE LOVE LOVE it to pieces.  Its the best!!!!  Tony awards and accolades galore.  Horay... lets go watch a play that belittles and slanders an entire religion, its founding prophet and its adhearants.  But its ok... it was meant as a joke.  Fine. 

But then when a home spun film that degrades the Muslim faith shows up on Youtube our fearless leader Obama and his minions go all out to make sure that the world knows that we as Americans do not tollerate the abuse of our freedom of speach when it is used to degrade other cultures (Really?).  Quoting Obama referring to the anti muslim film "it was crude and disgusting"  "The future can not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam."  But in the USofA it is fine and dandy that the future can belong to those who would slander the Prophet Joseph Smith.  How can he and his democratic party denounce a two bit youtube video that slanders a prophet when the biggest Broadway smash of the decade (a play beloved by so many thousands of liberals, and a play they likely have viewed) is a play that slanders a prophet.  Big fat Hypocrites.  I am waiting and waiting for a leading democrat to stand up denounce the musical and call it a shameful abuse of free speech.  Won't happen.

 

Well said! Just another example of politics in action!

My guess is they won't stand up and denounce it since is is unlikely that Mormon people will break out their rocket launchers, storm the US Embassy, and murder innocent people.  I'm not well educated on the Mormon religion, but I get the feeling they are more peaceful than that!

2012-09-25 12:47 PM
in reply to: #4426755

User image

Subject: RE: Book of Mormon - the musical, not the book
jasonatkins - 2012-09-25 10:25 AM
bluebike - 2012-09-25 10:05 AM
ChrisM - 2012-09-21 2:24 PM

Saw it Wednesday nite.  Boy howdy that's a nasty play.  But what do you expect from South Park?  I thought it was hilarious, no disrespect to the religious.  I put it on a level with Python's Life of Brian.

I did notice that the LDS bought several pages of advertising in the playbill, so hopefully they aren't getting too offended      I know we have some Mormons here, curious as to how they feel about it. 

It is offensive.  It was written to be offensive.  It mocks what we hold sacred.  It is NOT a warm hearted send up of our faith as is often suggested. 

What I find very ironic is how the liberal community LOVE LOVE LOVE it to pieces.  Its the best!!!!  Tony awards and accolades galore.  Horay... lets go watch a play that belittles and slanders an entire religion, its founding prophet and its adhearants.  But its ok... it was meant as a joke.  Fine. 

But then when a home spun film that degrades the Muslim faith shows up on Youtube our fearless leader Obama and his minions go all out to make sure that the world knows that we as Americans do not tollerate the abuse of our freedom of speach when it is used to degrade other cultures (Really?).  Quoting Obama referring to the anti muslim film "it was crude and disgusting"  "The future can not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam."  But in the USofA it is fine and dandy that the future can belong to those who would slander the Prophet Joseph Smith.  How can he and his democratic party denounce a two bit youtube video that slanders a prophet when the biggest Broadway smash of the decade (a play beloved by so many thousands of liberals, and a play they likely have viewed) is a play that slanders a prophet.  Big fat Hypocrites.  I am waiting and waiting for a leading democrat to stand up denounce the musical and call it a shameful abuse of free speech.  Won't happen.

 

Well said! Just another example of politics in action!

My guess is they won't stand up and denounce it since is is unlikely that Mormon people will break out their rocket launchers, storm the US Embassy, and murder innocent people.  I'm not well educated on the Mormon religion, but I get the feeling they are more peaceful than that!

Exactly.  Has nothing to do with free speech.  We should be able to make that youtube video.  But if you want to pander to people that want to kill you, you compromise.

I think Book of Mormon is a great exercise of free speech.  Just because it's offensive to a Mormon is utterly irrelevant in my opinion.  People are free to offend me all they want.  And I ain't even a lib

Kido, saw it in Los Angeles, agree that it would make a great Vegas run

2012-09-25 12:59 PM
in reply to: #4422756

User image

Expert
1158
10001002525
Chicagoland
Subject: RE: Book of Mormon - the musical, not the book

I imagine the president (that darn liberal) was just trying to do some post-damage PR to halt more deadly protests, when he made his statement.  I can't say that making fun of another person's religion is something that I condone but it happens.  And luckily those darn liberals who wrote the Constitiution granted us liberals freedom of speech.  Sticks and Stones, I believe the saying goes.  There are hundreds of movies or plays out there which make fun of a religion or an ethnic group or at least portray some inaccurate stereotypes but thankfully no one is storming the embassies here!

I will probably go see the Book of Mormon and I will probably laugh.  But when I go home I won't think that it was an accurate portrayal of the Mormon religion or view my Mormon friends any differently.  Just like when I see a movie or play about Judaism (my mom's religion) or Catholicism or any religion (except Scientology - those people are crazy!).  But I am just a liberal so I probably have no morals!

2012-09-25 1:05 PM
in reply to: #4426842

User image

San Diego, CA
Subject: RE: Book of Mormon - the musical, not the book
TeddieMao - 2012-09-25 10:59 AM

I imagine the president (that darn liberal) was just trying to do some post-damage PR to halt more deadly protests, when he made his statement.  I can't say that making fun of another person's religion is something that I condone but it happens.  And luckily those darn liberals who wrote the Constitiution granted us liberals freedom of speech.  Sticks and Stones, I believe the saying goes.  There are hundreds of movies or plays out there which make fun of a religion or an ethnic group or at least portray some inaccurate stereotypes but thankfully no one is storming the embassies here!

I will probably go see the Book of Mormon and I will probably laugh.  But when I go home I won't think that it was an accurate portrayal of the Mormon religion or view my Mormon friends any differently.  Just like when I see a movie or play about Judaism (my mom's religion) or Catholicism or any religion (except Scientology - those people are crazy!).  But I am just a liberal so I probably have no morals!

Wrong again, liberals may or may not have morals, that has not yet been proven.

Liberals don't have the capacity for thinking on their own or accepting facts!

Now that we have cleared that up, proceed with the commenting.

2012-09-25 1:06 PM
in reply to: #4426842

User image

Sensei
Sin City
Subject: RE: Book of Mormon - the musical, not the book

I seem to recall the Jews, catholics, Scientologists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and so on and so on have ALL been in the barrel for being poked fun at. 

Politicol and religious satire has been around for 100's of years.  If someone wanted to make fun of the Lutherans, I would probably laugh as well, and just move on.  I'm not going to take a broadway play too much to heart.  Especially one created my the South Park crew that make fun of EVERYTHING.



2012-09-25 1:18 PM
in reply to: #4426869

User image

Expert
1158
10001002525
Chicagoland
Subject: RE: Book of Mormon - the musical, not the book
jasonatkins - 2012-09-25 1:05 PM
TeddieMao - 2012-09-25 10:59 AM

I imagine the president (that darn liberal) was just trying to do some post-damage PR to halt more deadly protests, when he made his statement.  I can't say that making fun of another person's religion is something that I condone but it happens.  And luckily those darn liberals who wrote the Constitiution granted us liberals freedom of speech.  Sticks and Stones, I believe the saying goes.  There are hundreds of movies or plays out there which make fun of a religion or an ethnic group or at least portray some inaccurate stereotypes but thankfully no one is storming the embassies here!

I will probably go see the Book of Mormon and I will probably laugh.  But when I go home I won't think that it was an accurate portrayal of the Mormon religion or view my Mormon friends any differently.  Just like when I see a movie or play about Judaism (my mom's religion) or Catholicism or any religion (except Scientology - those people are crazy!).  But I am just a liberal so I probably have no morals!

Wrong again, liberals may or may not have morals, that has not yet been proven.

Liberals don't have the capacity for thinking on their own or accepting facts!

Now that we have cleared that up, proceed with the commenting.

I will have to watch the Daily Show and CNN before I can make any comment!Laughing
2012-09-25 1:25 PM
in reply to: #4426871

Regular
173
1002525
Subject: RE: Book of Mormon - the musical, not the book
To be clear.  I am not suggesting that my religion should not be attacked and am fully supportive of free speech - even when it is offensive.  As noted above the official statement from our church regarding BOMtheMusical was quite representative of the 'turn the other cheek' philosophy.  What I disagree with is when politicians, and liberals in particular in this case, find it acceptable to laud as wonderful a play that is slanderous, while denouncing a film as deplorable because it is slanderous.  Using Obamas words "To be credible, those who condem that slander must also condem the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated"  But.... I don't hear that from him.  He is not credible nor are those who chuckle at BOM the musical and then denounce that preacher for burning the Quaran or condem this new anti muslim film for slandering the Muslim faith.  Either take the high road and denounce all hateful speech, or be a hypocrite and say I can mock when convient and be offended when it suits me. 
2012-09-25 1:30 PM
in reply to: #4426935

User image

Sensei
Sin City
Subject: RE: Book of Mormon - the musical, not the book

bluebike - 2012-09-25 11:25 AM To be clear.  I am not suggesting that my religion should not be attacked and am fully supportive of free speech - even when it is offensive.  As noted above the official statement from our church regarding BOMtheMusical was quite representative of the 'turn the other cheek' philosophy.  What I disagree with is when politicians, and liberals in particular in this case, find it acceptable to laud as wonderful a play that is slanderous, while denouncing a film as deplorable because it is slanderous.  Using Obamas words "To be credible, those who condem that slander must also condem the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated"  But.... I don't hear that from him.  He is not credible nor are those who chuckle at BOM the musical and then denounce that preacher for burning the Quaran or condem this new anti muslim film for slandering the Muslim faith.  Either take the high road and denounce all hateful speech, or be a hypocrite and say I can mock when convient and be offended when it suits me. 

I guess I haven't followed this that closely.

Are you saying there are politicians that are going on record lauding this as a wonderful play?  Can you please give me some sources of which politicians are doing this?  I think I would have something to say if they are getting paid my tax dollars and taking time making politcal statements lauding/reviewing broadway plays.

2012-09-25 1:35 PM
in reply to: #4422756

User image

Subject: RE: Book of Mormon - the musical, not the book

You can't hear what he is saying here, but it was something along the lines of, "I strongly urge all of you to go see The Book of Mormon.  It's freaking Hylarious!!!!!"

2012-09-25 1:44 PM
in reply to: #4426956

Regular
173
1002525
Subject: RE: Book of Mormon - the musical, not the book
Kido - 2012-09-25 11:30 AM

bluebike - 2012-09-25 11:25 AM To be clear.  I am not suggesting that my religion should not be attacked and am fully supportive of free speech - even when it is offensive.  As noted above the official statement from our church regarding BOMtheMusical was quite representative of the 'turn the other cheek' philosophy.  What I disagree with is when politicians, and liberals in particular in this case, find it acceptable to laud as wonderful a play that is slanderous, while denouncing a film as deplorable because it is slanderous.  Using Obamas words "To be credible, those who condem that slander must also condem the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated"  But.... I don't hear that from him.  He is not credible nor are those who chuckle at BOM the musical and then denounce that preacher for burning the Quaran or condem this new anti muslim film for slandering the Muslim faith.  Either take the high road and denounce all hateful speech, or be a hypocrite and say I can mock when convient and be offended when it suits me. 

I guess I haven't followed this that closely.

Are you saying there are politicians that are going on record lauding this as a wonderful play?  Can you please give me some sources of which politicians are doing this?  I think I would have something to say if they are getting paid my tax dollars and taking time making politcal statements lauding/reviewing broadway plays.

Hillary Clinton attended last year.  Paid money.. went in.. laughed... was photographed laughing and having a wonderful time.  Can you IMAGINE the outrage if she had attended a screening of this muslim film... paid money to see it no less... and was photographed laughing???  But she chuckles at the mocking of one prophet then goes out to the world and condems the mocking of another.  I can not without hypocracy go out and burn a quoran then turn around and stand up and denouce BOMmusical. But the Obama administration's elite representatives have done just that only in reverse. 



2012-09-25 1:46 PM
in reply to: #4426935

User image

Subject: RE: Book of Mormon - the musical, not the book

bluebike - 2012-09-25 11:25 AM To be clear.  I am not suggesting that my religion should not be attacked and am fully supportive of free speech - even when it is offensive.  As noted above the official statement from our church regarding BOMtheMusical was quite representative of the 'turn the other cheek' philosophy.  What I disagree with is when politicians, and liberals in particular in this case, find it acceptable to laud as wonderful a play that is slanderous, while denouncing a film as deplorable because it is slanderous.  Using Obamas words "To be credible, those who condem that slander must also condem the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated"  But.... I don't hear that from him.  He is not credible nor are those who chuckle at BOM the musical and then denounce that preacher for burning the Quaran or condem this new anti muslim film for slandering the Muslim faith.  Either take the high road and denounce all hateful speech, or be a hypocrite and say I can mock when convient and be offended when it suits me. 

Interesting Question - If it is not "speech" that has been constrained to some extent or another by the SCOTUS (i.e., fighting words), for which there may be a reasonable argument that it should be curtailed or at the very least, one may not have full rights, what is "hateful speech"?  Speech that the listener is offended by?  All speech that denounces another's religion?  sex? Is the Book of Mormon "hate speech"?   Every line?  if not, which lines? 

ETA - to be clear, I am a little confused.  If it's hate speech, but you still support one's right to say it....  that seems inconsistent to me

I've got absolutely no problem with a Mormon, or anyone else, denouncing the play as insulting.  I would assume that those that don't like it have seen it in order to comment on whether they are offended or not.  But, you know what they say about assuming.... 

But just because someone is insulted is not sufficient, in my mind, anyway, to foreclose an entire avenue of speech.  Cartoonists have been threatened merely for depicting Mohammed, whether in compromising positions or not, simply because it is believed that merely portraying their prophet is wrong.  Is that where we want to go?

Granted, I am no Mormon scholar, but from my viewing of the play, the authors merely stated the historical bases for the Mormon religion (yes, there was some mocking, but it really was more about individuals than the religion itself).  Listen, all religions have.... odd...  origination stories.  Tablets on the mount???   parting of the seas???   come one....   So, that I can't get on board with the golden plate stuff and find it rather amusing, is that hate speech?  I feel the same way about most of the stories in the bible, and the new testament.  If I make a joke about Catholics,,,,,  hate speech?

We need a clear line, not just where someone thinks it should be based on their personal beliefs. 



Edited by ChrisM 2012-09-25 1:48 PM
2012-09-25 1:48 PM
in reply to: #4426956

User image

Champion
11989
500050001000500100100100100252525
Philly 'burbs
Subject: RE: Book of Mormon - the musical, not the book
Kido - 2012-09-25 2:30 PM

bluebike - 2012-09-25 11:25 AM To be clear.  I am not suggesting that my religion should not be attacked and am fully supportive of free speech - even when it is offensive.  As noted above the official statement from our church regarding BOMtheMusical was quite representative of the 'turn the other cheek' philosophy.  What I disagree with is when politicians, and liberals in particular in this case, find it acceptable to laud as wonderful a play that is slanderous, while denouncing a film as deplorable because it is slanderous.  Using Obamas words "To be credible, those who condem that slander must also condem the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated"  But.... I don't hear that from him.  He is not credible nor are those who chuckle at BOM the musical and then denounce that preacher for burning the Quaran or condem this new anti muslim film for slandering the Muslim faith.  Either take the high road and denounce all hateful speech, or be a hypocrite and say I can mock when convient and be offended when it suits me. 

I guess I haven't followed this that closely.

Are you saying there are politicians that are going on record lauding this as a wonderful play?  Can you please give me some sources of which politicians are doing this?  I think I would have something to say if they are getting paid my tax dollars and taking time making politcal statements lauding/reviewing broadway plays.

Is it ok if they laud or review it once it goes on tour, or the London cast perhaps??

2012-09-25 1:53 PM
in reply to: #4426871

User image

Subject: RE: Book of Mormon - the musical, not the book
Kido - 2012-09-25 1:06 PM

I seem to recall the Jews, catholics, Scientologists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and so on and so on have ALL been in the barrel for being poked fun at. 

That was kind of my point before.  Why is another religion so different?

I'm in the camp that people should get over themselves.  Seriously.  For example - our military and homeland emergency services.  You'll never find a more diverse group (no, we're not all whitebread American calendar meatheads).  And yet, we get the job done, we have appalling humor that is offensive to EVERY imaginable person on the face of the planet.  And when we go home, we get over it.  Well, usually.

The crap that falls out of one person's mouth reflects nothing about the person they are talking to or about.  It only reflects the person talking.

What is so different?

2012-09-25 1:54 PM
in reply to: #4426992

User image

Master
2802
2000500100100100
Minnetonka, Minnesota
Subject: RE: Book of Mormon - the musical, not the book
mrbbrad - 2012-09-25 1:48 PM
Kido - 2012-09-25 2:30 PM

bluebike - 2012-09-25 11:25 AM To be clear.  I am not suggesting that my religion should not be attacked and am fully supportive of free speech - even when it is offensive.  As noted above the official statement from our church regarding BOMtheMusical was quite representative of the 'turn the other cheek' philosophy.  What I disagree with is when politicians, and liberals in particular in this case, find it acceptable to laud as wonderful a play that is slanderous, while denouncing a film as deplorable because it is slanderous.  Using Obamas words "To be credible, those who condem that slander must also condem the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated"  But.... I don't hear that from him.  He is not credible nor are those who chuckle at BOM the musical and then denounce that preacher for burning the Quaran or condem this new anti muslim film for slandering the Muslim faith.  Either take the high road and denounce all hateful speech, or be a hypocrite and say I can mock when convient and be offended when it suits me. 

I guess I haven't followed this that closely.

Are you saying there are politicians that are going on record lauding this as a wonderful play?  Can you please give me some sources of which politicians are doing this?  I think I would have something to say if they are getting paid my tax dollars and taking time making politcal statements lauding/reviewing broadway plays.

Is it ok if they laud or review it once it goes on tour, or the London cast perhaps??

No!  Only the original Broadway cast!

We are seeing it when it comes to town next year as we get season tickets.  Opinion witheld until then.

2012-09-25 2:01 PM
in reply to: #4426984

User image

Sensei
Sin City
Subject: RE: Book of Mormon - the musical, not the book
bluebike - 2012-09-25 11:44 AM
Kido - 2012-09-25 11:30 AM

bluebike - 2012-09-25 11:25 AM To be clear.  I am not suggesting that my religion should not be attacked and am fully supportive of free speech - even when it is offensive.  As noted above the official statement from our church regarding BOMtheMusical was quite representative of the 'turn the other cheek' philosophy.  What I disagree with is when politicians, and liberals in particular in this case, find it acceptable to laud as wonderful a play that is slanderous, while denouncing a film as deplorable because it is slanderous.  Using Obamas words "To be credible, those who condem that slander must also condem the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated"  But.... I don't hear that from him.  He is not credible nor are those who chuckle at BOM the musical and then denounce that preacher for burning the Quaran or condem this new anti muslim film for slandering the Muslim faith.  Either take the high road and denounce all hateful speech, or be a hypocrite and say I can mock when convient and be offended when it suits me. 

I guess I haven't followed this that closely.

Are you saying there are politicians that are going on record lauding this as a wonderful play?  Can you please give me some sources of which politicians are doing this?  I think I would have something to say if they are getting paid my tax dollars and taking time making politcal statements lauding/reviewing broadway plays.

Hillary Clinton attended last year.  Paid money.. went in.. laughed... was photographed laughing and having a wonderful time.  Can you IMAGINE the outrage if she had attended a screening of this muslim film... paid money to see it no less... and was photographed laughing???  But she chuckles at the mocking of one prophet then goes out to the world and condems the mocking of another.  I can not without hypocracy go out and burn a quoran then turn around and stand up and denouce BOMmusical. But the Obama administration's elite representatives have done just that only in reverse. 

Oh, she made an official statement it was funny - on record?  Or was this just a picture of her laughing in a play?  Was she laughing at the play, laughing at what was said in the play?  Or something someone sitting next to her said?  Maybe her seat mate said the Cowboys were going to win the superbowl.  Now THAT'S funny.

OR, are you saying since there is a picture of her, laughing, at a location where this play was being performed, she's being hypcritical because she spoke out against the anti muslem film?



2012-09-25 2:25 PM
in reply to: #4426987

Regular
173
1002525
Subject: RE: Book of Mormon - the musical, not the book
ChrisM - 2012-09-25 11:46 AM

bluebike - 2012-09-25 11:25 AM To be clear.  I am not suggesting that my religion should not be attacked and am fully supportive of free speech - even when it is offensive.  As noted above the official statement from our church regarding BOMtheMusical was quite representative of the 'turn the other cheek' philosophy.  What I disagree with is when politicians, and liberals in particular in this case, find it acceptable to laud as wonderful a play that is slanderous, while denouncing a film as deplorable because it is slanderous.  Using Obamas words "To be credible, those who condem that slander must also condem the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated"  But.... I don't hear that from him.  He is not credible nor are those who chuckle at BOM the musical and then denounce that preacher for burning the Quaran or condem this new anti muslim film for slandering the Muslim faith.  Either take the high road and denounce all hateful speech, or be a hypocrite and say I can mock when convient and be offended when it suits me. 

Interesting Question - If it is not "speech" that has been constrained to some extent or another by the SCOTUS (i.e., fighting words), for which there may be a reasonable argument that it should be curtailed or at the very least, one may not have full rights, what is "hateful speech"?  Speech that the listener is offended by?  All speech that denounces another's religion?  sex? Is the Book of Mormon "hate speech"?   Every line?  if not, which lines? 

ETA - to be clear, I am a little confused.  If it's hate speech, but you still support one's right to say it....  that seems inconsistent to me

I've got absolutely no problem with a Mormon, or anyone else, denouncing the play as insulting.  I would assume that those that don't like it have seen it in order to comment on whether they are offended or not.  But, you know what they say about assuming.... 

But just because someone is insulted is not sufficient, in my mind, anyway, to foreclose an entire avenue of speech.  Cartoonists have been threatened merely for depicting Mohammed, whether in compromising positions or not, simply because it is believed that merely portraying their prophet is wrong.  Is that where we want to go?

Granted, I am no Mormon scholar, but from my viewing of the play, the authors merely stated the historical bases for the Mormon religion (yes, there was some mocking, but it really was more about individuals than the religion itself).  Listen, all religions have.... odd...  origination stories.  Tablets on the mount???   parting of the seas???   come one....   So, that I can't get on board with the golden plate stuff and find it rather amusing, is that hate speech?  I feel the same way about most of the stories in the bible, and the new testament.  If I make a joke about Catholics,,,,,  hate speech?

We need a clear line, not just where someone thinks it should be based on their personal beliefs. 

Chris I am not debating free speech.  We all support free speech.  It is not inconsistent to support all forms of free speech and the rights of individuals to say whatever they want, or burn what ever book, or write whatever play.  What I am discussing is the inconsistancy of individual behavior... like when Hillary Clinton CHEERED a slanderous play one day, and condems a slanderous movie the next.  The film makers had the right to make their anti-muslim film and Hillary was a hypocrite to condem it having herself participated in mocking a prophet.  

So there is a new play out by Trey Parker and the southpark crew... its called "Lets throw all the Jews down a well"  Its a funny heartwarming send up of Judiasim and focuses on how the hollocost was a lie.  Would you buy a ticket or be seen cheering for that in public?? 

We can allow all forms of free speech in our country, AND at the same time we can choose to reject forms of speech that we as individuals find vulgar or coarse or hateful.  I reject as hateful the Book of Moron play... so I will not pay to see it...(I won't argue that it should be abolished or that they didn't have the constitutional right to create it) and by extension I will not pay to see movies or plays or buy books whose purpose is to tear down other religions. 

2012-09-25 2:30 PM
in reply to: #4427036

Regular
173
1002525
Subject: RE: Book of Mormon - the musical, not the book
Kido - 2012-09-25 12:01 PM
bluebike - 2012-09-25 11:44 AM
Kido - 2012-09-25 11:30 AM

bluebike - 2012-09-25 11:25 AM To be clear.  I am not suggesting that my religion should not be attacked and am fully supportive of free speech - even when it is offensive.  As noted above the official statement from our church regarding BOMtheMusical was quite representative of the 'turn the other cheek' philosophy.  What I disagree with is when politicians, and liberals in particular in this case, find it acceptable to laud as wonderful a play that is slanderous, while denouncing a film as deplorable because it is slanderous.  Using Obamas words "To be credible, those who condem that slander must also condem the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated"  But.... I don't hear that from him.  He is not credible nor are those who chuckle at BOM the musical and then denounce that preacher for burning the Quaran or condem this new anti muslim film for slandering the Muslim faith.  Either take the high road and denounce all hateful speech, or be a hypocrite and say I can mock when convient and be offended when it suits me. 

I guess I haven't followed this that closely.

Are you saying there are politicians that are going on record lauding this as a wonderful play?  Can you please give me some sources of which politicians are doing this?  I think I would have something to say if they are getting paid my tax dollars and taking time making politcal statements lauding/reviewing broadway plays.

Hillary Clinton attended last year.  Paid money.. went in.. laughed... was photographed laughing and having a wonderful time.  Can you IMAGINE the outrage if she had attended a screening of this muslim film... paid money to see it no less... and was photographed laughing???  But she chuckles at the mocking of one prophet then goes out to the world and condems the mocking of another.  I can not without hypocracy go out and burn a quoran then turn around and stand up and denouce BOMmusical. But the Obama administration's elite representatives have done just that only in reverse. 

Oh, she made an official statement it was funny - on record?  Or was this just a picture of her laughing in a play?  Was she laughing at the play, laughing at what was said in the play?  Or something someone sitting next to her said?  Maybe her seat mate said the Cowboys were going to win the superbowl.  Now THAT'S funny.

OR, are you saying since there is a picture of her, laughing, at a location where this play was being performed, she's being hypcritical because she spoke out against the anti muslem film?

THE Secretary of State provided a standing ovation at the end of the BOM musical.  She stood and cheered for it.  Can you really argue that is somehow unofficial.  YES. I AM saying that she was a hypocite for participating in the mocking of a prophet and then turning around and condeming the mocking of another. 

2012-09-25 3:18 PM
in reply to: #4427098

User image

Champion
7821
50002000500100100100
Brooklyn, NY
Subject: RE: Book of Mormon - the musical, not the book
bluebike - 2012-09-25 2:25 PM

ChrisM - 2012-09-25 11:46 AM

bluebike - 2012-09-25 11:25 AM To be clear.  I am not suggesting that my religion should not be attacked and am fully supportive of free speech - even when it is offensive.  As noted above the official statement from our church regarding BOMtheMusical was quite representative of the 'turn the other cheek' philosophy.  What I disagree with is when politicians, and liberals in particular in this case, find it acceptable to laud as wonderful a play that is slanderous, while denouncing a film as deplorable because it is slanderous.  Using Obamas words "To be credible, those who condem that slander must also condem the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated"  But.... I don't hear that from him.  He is not credible nor are those who chuckle at BOM the musical and then denounce that preacher for burning the Quaran or condem this new anti muslim film for slandering the Muslim faith.  Either take the high road and denounce all hateful speech, or be a hypocrite and say I can mock when convient and be offended when it suits me. 

Interesting Question - If it is not "speech" that has been constrained to some extent or another by the SCOTUS (i.e., fighting words), for which there may be a reasonable argument that it should be curtailed or at the very least, one may not have full rights, what is "hateful speech"?  Speech that the listener is offended by?  All speech that denounces another's religion?  sex? Is the Book of Mormon "hate speech"?   Every line?  if not, which lines? 

ETA - to be clear, I am a little confused.  If it's hate speech, but you still support one's right to say it....  that seems inconsistent to me

I've got absolutely no problem with a Mormon, or anyone else, denouncing the play as insulting.  I would assume that those that don't like it have seen it in order to comment on whether they are offended or not.  But, you know what they say about assuming.... 

But just because someone is insulted is not sufficient, in my mind, anyway, to foreclose an entire avenue of speech.  Cartoonists have been threatened merely for depicting Mohammed, whether in compromising positions or not, simply because it is believed that merely portraying their prophet is wrong.  Is that where we want to go?

Granted, I am no Mormon scholar, but from my viewing of the play, the authors merely stated the historical bases for the Mormon religion (yes, there was some mocking, but it really was more about individuals than the religion itself).  Listen, all religions have.... odd...  origination stories.  Tablets on the mount???   parting of the seas???   come one....   So, that I can't get on board with the golden plate stuff and find it rather amusing, is that hate speech?  I feel the same way about most of the stories in the bible, and the new testament.  If I make a joke about Catholics,,,,,  hate speech?

We need a clear line, not just where someone thinks it should be based on their personal beliefs. 

Chris I am not debating free speech.  We all support free speech.  It is not inconsistent to support all forms of free speech and the rights of individuals to say whatever they want, or burn what ever book, or write whatever play.  What I am discussing is the inconsistancy of individual behavior... like when Hillary Clinton CHEERED a slanderous play one day, and condems a slanderous movie the next.  The film makers had the right to make their anti-muslim film and Hillary was a hypocrite to condem it having herself participated in mocking a prophet.  

So there is a new play out by Trey Parker and the southpark crew... its called "Lets throw all the Jews down a well"  Its a funny heartwarming send up of Judiasim and focuses on how the hollocost was a lie.  Would you buy a ticket or be seen cheering for that in public?? 

We can allow all forms of free speech in our country, AND at the same time we can choose to reject forms of speech that we as individuals find vulgar or coarse or hateful.  I reject as hateful the Book of Moron play... so I will not pay to see it...(I won't argue that it should be abolished or that they didn't have the constitutional right to create it) and by extension I will not pay to see movies or plays or buy books whose purpose is to tear down other religions. 



There’s a difference between satire and debasement. That line might be different for different people. Some Hindus might find the character of Apu in the Simpsons very offensive, but I suspect that most recognize it as good-natured humor. Same with South Park, Monty Python, etc.
Part of the problem with this country is that everybody gets outraged about everything. If you can’t see the difference between a play intended to be satiric (whether or not you personally find it funny) and a movie trailer intendded to offend Muslims, I don’t really know what to tell you. And if you find it offensive, then you're entitled to your opinion and certainly don't need to go and see it. But ask yourself: do you really want to get to a place in our society where no art is allowed to portray subjects that might offend someone? Art is supposed to provoke. That is its purpose, whether it's a painting of waterlillies or a Nan Goldin photograph.
2012-09-25 3:33 PM
in reply to: #4427227

Regular
173
1002525
Subject: RE: Book of Mormon - the musical, not the book
jmk-brooklyn - 2012-09-25 1:18 PM
bluebike - 2012-09-25 2:25 PM
ChrisM - 2012-09-25 11:46 AM

bluebike - 2012-09-25 11:25 AM To be clear.  I am not suggesting that my religion should not be attacked and am fully supportive of free speech - even when it is offensive.  As noted above the official statement from our church regarding BOMtheMusical was quite representative of the 'turn the other cheek' philosophy.  What I disagree with is when politicians, and liberals in particular in this case, find it acceptable to laud as wonderful a play that is slanderous, while denouncing a film as deplorable because it is slanderous.  Using Obamas words "To be credible, those who condem that slander must also condem the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated"  But.... I don't hear that from him.  He is not credible nor are those who chuckle at BOM the musical and then denounce that preacher for burning the Quaran or condem this new anti muslim film for slandering the Muslim faith.  Either take the high road and denounce all hateful speech, or be a hypocrite and say I can mock when convient and be offended when it suits me. 

Interesting Question - If it is not "speech" that has been constrained to some extent or another by the SCOTUS (i.e., fighting words), for which there may be a reasonable argument that it should be curtailed or at the very least, one may not have full rights, what is "hateful speech"?  Speech that the listener is offended by?  All speech that denounces another's religion?  sex? Is the Book of Mormon "hate speech"?   Every line?  if not, which lines? 

ETA - to be clear, I am a little confused.  If it's hate speech, but you still support one's right to say it....  that seems inconsistent to me

I've got absolutely no problem with a Mormon, or anyone else, denouncing the play as insulting.  I would assume that those that don't like it have seen it in order to comment on whether they are offended or not.  But, you know what they say about assuming.... 

But just because someone is insulted is not sufficient, in my mind, anyway, to foreclose an entire avenue of speech.  Cartoonists have been threatened merely for depicting Mohammed, whether in compromising positions or not, simply because it is believed that merely portraying their prophet is wrong.  Is that where we want to go?

Granted, I am no Mormon scholar, but from my viewing of the play, the authors merely stated the historical bases for the Mormon religion (yes, there was some mocking, but it really was more about individuals than the religion itself).  Listen, all religions have.... odd...  origination stories.  Tablets on the mount???   parting of the seas???   come one....   So, that I can't get on board with the golden plate stuff and find it rather amusing, is that hate speech?  I feel the same way about most of the stories in the bible, and the new testament.  If I make a joke about Catholics,,,,,  hate speech?

We need a clear line, not just where someone thinks it should be based on their personal beliefs. 

Chris I am not debating free speech.  We all support free speech.  It is not inconsistent to support all forms of free speech and the rights of individuals to say whatever they want, or burn what ever book, or write whatever play.  What I am discussing is the inconsistancy of individual behavior... like when Hillary Clinton CHEERED a slanderous play one day, and condems a slanderous movie the next.  The film makers had the right to make their anti-muslim film and Hillary was a hypocrite to condem it having herself participated in mocking a prophet.  

So there is a new play out by Trey Parker and the southpark crew... its called "Lets throw all the Jews down a well"  Its a funny heartwarming send up of Judiasim and focuses on how the hollocost was a lie.  Would you buy a ticket or be seen cheering for that in public?? 

We can allow all forms of free speech in our country, AND at the same time we can choose to reject forms of speech that we as individuals find vulgar or coarse or hateful.  I reject as hateful the Book of Moron play... so I will not pay to see it...(I won't argue that it should be abolished or that they didn't have the constitutional right to create it) and by extension I will not pay to see movies or plays or buy books whose purpose is to tear down other religions. 

There’s a difference between satire and debasement. That line might be different for different people. Some Hindus might find the character of Apu in the Simpsons very offensive, but I suspect that most recognize it as good-natured humor. Same with South Park, Monty Python, etc. Part of the problem with this country is that everybody gets outraged about everything. If you can’t see the difference between a play intended to be satiric (whether or not you personally find it funny) and a movie trailer intendded to offend Muslims, I don’t really know what to tell you. And if you find it offensive, then you're entitled to your opinion and certainly don't need to go and see it. But ask yourself: do you really want to get to a place in our society where no art is allowed to portray subjects that might offend someone? Art is supposed to provoke. That is its purpose, whether it's a painting of waterlillies or a Nan Goldin photograph.

Soooo missing the point.  I never said or inferred that speech should be curtailed... even when I find it offensive. 

The OP asked for a Mormon opinion on the BOM musical.  We live in a country where you can create through mediums of speech (film, books, movies, paint etc) ANYTHING you want.  And that is correct, but as an individual I feel we should turn our backs on works of filth vulgarity and degradation instead of putting them on center stage and giving them tony awards.  If you wouldn't think of supporting art that intentionally slanders women, or jews, or muslims, or gays, then you should also not go see BOM the musical. 



Edited by bluebike 2012-09-25 3:57 PM
New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Book of Mormon - the musical, not the book Rss Feed  
 
 
of 2