Subject: RE: Must be the M statesI thought that the no vote = vote no issue was fairly well communicated beforehand...all the news outlets went over what it meant, and there were signs at the polling places. I DO think the vote-yes folks could have hammered that point a little harder...but then again, to what effect? The people who are already listening to them will have voted yes. The people who aren't listening are voting no or not voting, so why spend the money on people who aren't listening. And, of course, there's the whole notion that they took a "deliberately low-key approach" to their marketing (the Strib's phrasing, not mine). I guess they figured when you are advocating a position that is perceived by many to be extremely self-centered and narrow-minded at best, and bigoted and hate-filled at worst, low-key is the way to go... |