BT Development 2012 Summer Olympics » Men's 200m (spoiler) Rss Feed  
Moderators: alicefoeller Reply
2008-08-20 10:31 AM

User image

Giver
18427
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Subject: Men's 200m (spoiler)
19.30? Are you freaking kidding me? Bolt is clearly the man...


2008-08-20 12:09 PM
in reply to: #1616069

User image

COURT JESTER
12230
50005000200010010025
ROCKFORD, IL
Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler)

Saw the prelim run with Bolt and Dix (i think...USA) finishing first and second.  It appeared that Dix was putting out quite the effort and Bolt was barely working to keep pace and that he had another gear or three to hit. 

With a 19.30 he must have redlined his high gear. 

I do believe FORMER record holder Michael Johnson said he didn't think Bolt would approach the record.  Hmmmmmmm.....Michael...how is that foot tasting?

2008-08-20 12:15 PM
in reply to: #1616069

User image

Giver
18427
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler)
Here's the other thing...he ran into a 0.9m/sec headwind. Holy crap...
2008-08-20 12:20 PM
in reply to: #1616069

User image

Extreme Veteran
586
500252525
Edgewater, CO
Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler)
I really hate to bring this up, but it all just seems too good to be true. I hope we don't have another Ben Johnson/Marion Jones on our hands.....
2008-08-20 12:57 PM
in reply to: #1616414

User image

Elite
3489
20001000100100100100252525
Lakewood, CO
Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler)

jneugeba - 2008-08-20 11:20 AM I really hate to bring this up, but it all just seems too good to be true. I hope we don't have another Ben Johnson/Marion Jones on our hands.....

 

I normally like to believe the best, but I was thinking the same thing.  

2008-08-20 1:28 PM
in reply to: #1616547

User image

Master
2287
2000100100252525
Calgary, Alberta
Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler)
peto_primo - 2008-08-20 11:57 AM

jneugeba - 2008-08-20 11:20 AM I really hate to bring this up, but it all just seems too good to be true. I hope we don't have another Ben Johnson/Marion Jones on our hands.....

 

I normally like to believe the best, but I was thinking the same thing.  

For now - let's assume he is innocent until proved otherwise.  He's a different body type than those others so I could see this being legit.



2008-08-20 1:36 PM
in reply to: #1616639

User image

Expert
1207
1000100100
Parker, Co
Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler)

I thought he was a new comer or a phenom...however ,they said the american had beaten him 5 out of 9 races or something to that effect.....since he has been beaten, and frequently - it would cast a shadow over how he got SO fast without previous form

Shame if he gets caught because its a thrill to watch him run!

2008-08-20 1:52 PM
in reply to: #1616655

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.

Edited by surfwallace 2008-08-20 1:57 PM
2008-08-20 2:07 PM
in reply to: #1616703

Extreme Veteran
586
500252525
Edgewater, CO
Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler)
surfwallace - 2008-08-20 12:52 PM

ETA: Is anybody else frustrated that they have seen the results before they are broadcast? I understand the event has taken place. I understand that the news is going to broadcast it for those that want to know. But why shive it right in my face and every other American's face that they know haven't seen it? This is the 3rd event I have really been looking forward to seeing that I have found out the result just by opening a new browser and WHAM! it is right there on my homepage. What happened to "turn TV volume down if you don't want to know?"


This is so frustrating - I found out on a website that has nothing to do with athletics at all, but for some reason decided they needed to post the results. I don't know why we can't watch them live like everyone else in the world!
2008-08-20 3:10 PM
in reply to: #1616069

Champion
9430
50002000200010010010010025
No excuses!
Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler)

Dude is a freak of nature, makes it look so easy

2008-08-20 9:02 PM
in reply to: #1616069

Sneaky Slow
8694
500020001000500100252525
Herndon, VA,
Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler)
Good lord.  He made those other guys look like they were just standing still.


2008-08-21 6:48 AM
in reply to: #1616069

Expert
1014
1000
Virginia
Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler)

Dude is a freak of nature for real!  He's so tall, each of his steps just eats up way more track than everyone else. 

And yeah - I don't understand why we saw every single race of the swimming and gymnastics and beach volleyball live, but with the track, it's all over the place!   Every news source - online or on paper publishes the results. Even worse - you go to NBCOlympics.com and it's all over the front page.  You'd think that since NBC knows they haven't shown it, they wouldn't splash the track results all over the front page every morning. I went to check on other events and accidentally got more results today, grrrrrr!

2008-08-21 7:18 AM
in reply to: #1618052

Giver
18427
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler)
kimmitri408 - 2008-08-21 7:48 AM

 

And yeah - I don't understand why we saw every single race of the swimming and gymnastics and beach volleyball live, but with the track, it's all over the place!  

Because with swimming and gymnastics, the event finals were in the morning in Beijing...swimming finals started at 10am locally, so 10pm EST. It was set up like that by NBS so that the finals could be shown live (at least on the east coast). With track, the event finals are at night locally (some events are after 11pm), which means they are run in the morning here in the US. NBC doesn't want to show them live in the states because no one (relatively) will be watching.

Therefore, they delay it by 12 hours which gives the news outlets an opportunity to report the results. Which, of course, is their job.

2008-08-21 8:04 AM
in reply to: #1616414

Master
1699
1000500100252525
Malvern, PA
Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler)

jneugeba - 2008-08-20 1:20 PM I really hate to bring this up, but it all just seems too good to be true. I hope we don't have another Ben Johnson/Marion Jones on our hands.....

ditto...

those records are broken in hundreths of seconds and to cost the way he did and demolish a record is just too good to be true...

I would bet the house that he's on somethin'...

 

 

2008-08-21 8:18 AM
in reply to: #1616069

Science Nerd
28760
50005000500050005000200010005001001002525
Redwood City, California
Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler)
He's pretty amazing.  I want to think it's a matter of training, his height, etc., but I'm kind of skeptical with all the doping going around.  Which is a shame since he hasn't been accused or had positive results.  Are we going to view all athletic achievements this way now?
2008-08-21 8:25 AM
in reply to: #1618083

Expert
1014
1000
Virginia
Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler)
run4yrlif - 2008-08-21 8:18 AM
kimmitri408 - 2008-08-21 7:48 AM

 

And yeah - I don't understand why we saw every single race of the swimming and gymnastics and beach volleyball live, but with the track, it's all over the place!

Because with swimming and gymnastics, the event finals were in the morning in Beijing...swimming finals started at 10am locally, so 10pm EST. It was set up like that by NBS so that the finals could be shown live (at least on the east coast). With track, the event finals are at night locally (some events are after 11pm), which means they are run in the morning here in the US. NBC doesn't want to show them live in the states because no one (relatively) will be watching.

Therefore, they delay it by 12 hours which gives the news outlets an opportunity to report the results. Which, of course, is their job.

 

True, but why don't they put more of that stuff online then?  I would gladly watch stuff online or on TV if given the opportunity.  For example - the men's 400m is in progress right now, actually should be over by the time I'm done writing this post.  But I've checked all morning and right before and it's not being shown online.  Then show it on primetime if you want.  I guess i'm just frustrated b/c I'm a track-fan and I've been trying avoid the news to wait to see the few things they decide to show in the evening. 



2008-08-21 8:28 AM
in reply to: #1618206

Giver
18427
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler)
kimmitri408 - 2008-08-21 9:25 AM
run4yrlif - 2008-08-21 8:18 AM
kimmitri408 - 2008-08-21 7:48 AM

 

And yeah - I don't understand why we saw every single race of the swimming and gymnastics and beach volleyball live, but with the track, it's all over the place!

Because with swimming and gymnastics, the event finals were in the morning in Beijing...swimming finals started at 10am locally, so 10pm EST. It was set up like that by NBS so that the finals could be shown live (at least on the east coast). With track, the event finals are at night locally (some events are after 11pm), which means they are run in the morning here in the US. NBC doesn't want to show them live in the states because no one (relatively) will be watching.

Therefore, they delay it by 12 hours which gives the news outlets an opportunity to report the results. Which, of course, is their job.

 

True, but why don't they put more of that stuff online then? 

To force you to tune in to the broadcast, so you can watch the commercials.

2008-08-21 8:46 AM
in reply to: #1618214

Expert
1014
1000
Virginia
Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler)
run4yrlif - 2008-08-21 9:28 AM
kimmitri408 - 2008-08-21 9:25 AM
run4yrlif - 2008-08-21 8:18 AM
kimmitri408 - 2008-08-21 7:48 AM

 

And yeah - I don't understand why we saw every single race of the swimming and gymnastics and beach volleyball live, but with the track, it's all over the place!

Because with swimming and gymnastics, the event finals were in the morning in Beijing...swimming finals started at 10am locally, so 10pm EST. It was set up like that by NBS so that the finals could be shown live (at least on the east coast). With track, the event finals are at night locally (some events are after 11pm), which means they are run in the morning here in the US. NBC doesn't want to show them live in the states because no one (relatively) will be watching.

Therefore, they delay it by 12 hours which gives the news outlets an opportunity to report the results. Which, of course, is their job.

 

True, but why don't they put more of that stuff online then?

To force you to tune in to the broadcast, so you can watch the commercials.

boooooooooooooooooo!  sigh but you are right.  i hate television sometimes. 

2008-08-21 8:54 AM
in reply to: #1616069

Champion
8766
5000200010005001001002525
Evergreen, Colorado
Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler)

I thought all athletes were tested immediately after events?  I mean, if he was on something...he'd be caught by now, right?

Still, it is freakish watching him run...ridiculous fast...makes it look WAY too easy. 

New Thread
BT Development 2012 Summer Olympics » Men's 200m (spoiler) Rss Feed