Men's 200m (spoiler)
-
No new posts
Moderators: alicefoeller | Reply |
2008-08-20 10:31 AM |
Giver 18427 | Subject: Men's 200m (spoiler) 19.30? Are you freaking kidding me? Bolt is clearly the man... |
|
2008-08-20 12:09 PM in reply to: #1616069 |
COURT JESTER 12230 ROCKFORD, IL | Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler) Saw the prelim run with Bolt and Dix (i think...USA) finishing first and second. It appeared that Dix was putting out quite the effort and Bolt was barely working to keep pace and that he had another gear or three to hit. With a 19.30 he must have redlined his high gear. I do believe FORMER record holder Michael Johnson said he didn't think Bolt would approach the record. Hmmmmmmm.....Michael...how is that foot tasting? |
2008-08-20 12:15 PM in reply to: #1616069 |
Giver 18427 | Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler) Here's the other thing...he ran into a 0.9m/sec headwind. Holy crap... |
2008-08-20 12:20 PM in reply to: #1616069 |
Extreme Veteran 586 Edgewater, CO | Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler) I really hate to bring this up, but it all just seems too good to be true. I hope we don't have another Ben Johnson/Marion Jones on our hands..... |
2008-08-20 12:57 PM in reply to: #1616414 |
Elite 3489 Lakewood, CO | Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler) jneugeba - 2008-08-20 11:20 AM I really hate to bring this up, but it all just seems too good to be true. I hope we don't have another Ben Johnson/Marion Jones on our hands.....
I normally like to believe the best, but I was thinking the same thing. |
2008-08-20 1:28 PM in reply to: #1616547 |
Master 2287 Calgary, Alberta | Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler) peto_primo - 2008-08-20 11:57 AM jneugeba - 2008-08-20 11:20 AM I really hate to bring this up, but it all just seems too good to be true. I hope we don't have another Ben Johnson/Marion Jones on our hands.....
I normally like to believe the best, but I was thinking the same thing. For now - let's assume he is innocent until proved otherwise. He's a different body type than those others so I could see this being legit. |
|
2008-08-20 1:36 PM in reply to: #1616639 |
Expert 1207 Parker, Co | Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler) I thought he was a new comer or a phenom...however ,they said the american had beaten him 5 out of 9 races or something to that effect.....since he has been beaten, and frequently - it would cast a shadow over how he got SO fast without previous form Shame if he gets caught because its a thrill to watch him run! |
2008-08-20 1:52 PM in reply to: #1616655 |
Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. Edited by surfwallace 2008-08-20 1:57 PM |
2008-08-20 2:07 PM in reply to: #1616703 |
Extreme Veteran 586 Edgewater, CO | Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler) surfwallace - 2008-08-20 12:52 PM ETA: Is anybody else frustrated that they have seen the results before they are broadcast? I understand the event has taken place. I understand that the news is going to broadcast it for those that want to know. But why shive it right in my face and every other American's face that they know haven't seen it? This is the 3rd event I have really been looking forward to seeing that I have found out the result just by opening a new browser and WHAM! it is right there on my homepage. What happened to "turn TV volume down if you don't want to know?" This is so frustrating - I found out on a website that has nothing to do with athletics at all, but for some reason decided they needed to post the results. I don't know why we can't watch them live like everyone else in the world! |
2008-08-20 3:10 PM in reply to: #1616069 |
Champion 9430 No excuses! | Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler) Dude is a freak of nature, makes it look so easy |
2008-08-20 9:02 PM in reply to: #1616069 |
Sneaky Slow 8694 Herndon, VA, | Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler) Good lord. He made those other guys look like they were just standing still. |
|
2008-08-21 6:48 AM in reply to: #1616069 |
Expert 1014 Virginia | Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler) Dude is a freak of nature for real! He's so tall, each of his steps just eats up way more track than everyone else. And yeah - I don't understand why we saw every single race of the swimming and gymnastics and beach volleyball live, but with the track, it's all over the place! Every news source - online or on paper publishes the results. Even worse - you go to NBCOlympics.com and it's all over the front page. You'd think that since NBC knows they haven't shown it, they wouldn't splash the track results all over the front page every morning. I went to check on other events and accidentally got more results today, grrrrrr! |
2008-08-21 7:18 AM in reply to: #1618052 |
Giver 18427 | Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler) kimmitri408 - 2008-08-21 7:48 AM
And yeah - I don't understand why we saw every single race of the swimming and gymnastics and beach volleyball live, but with the track, it's all over the place! Because with swimming and gymnastics, the event finals were in the morning in Beijing...swimming finals started at 10am locally, so 10pm EST. It was set up like that by NBS so that the finals could be shown live (at least on the east coast). With track, the event finals are at night locally (some events are after 11pm), which means they are run in the morning here in the US. NBC doesn't want to show them live in the states because no one (relatively) will be watching. Therefore, they delay it by 12 hours which gives the news outlets an opportunity to report the results. Which, of course, is their job. |
2008-08-21 8:04 AM in reply to: #1616414 |
Master 1699 Malvern, PA | Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler) jneugeba - 2008-08-20 1:20 PM I really hate to bring this up, but it all just seems too good to be true. I hope we don't have another Ben Johnson/Marion Jones on our hands..... ditto... those records are broken in hundreths of seconds and to cost the way he did and demolish a record is just too good to be true... I would bet the house that he's on somethin'...
|
2008-08-21 8:18 AM in reply to: #1616069 |
Science Nerd 28760 Redwood City, California | Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler) He's pretty amazing. I want to think it's a matter of training, his height, etc., but I'm kind of skeptical with all the doping going around. Which is a shame since he hasn't been accused or had positive results. Are we going to view all athletic achievements this way now? |
2008-08-21 8:25 AM in reply to: #1618083 |
Expert 1014 Virginia | Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler) run4yrlif - 2008-08-21 8:18 AM kimmitri408 - 2008-08-21 7:48 AM
And yeah - I don't understand why we saw every single race of the swimming and gymnastics and beach volleyball live, but with the track, it's all over the place! Because with swimming and gymnastics, the event finals were in the morning in Beijing...swimming finals started at 10am locally, so 10pm EST. It was set up like that by NBS so that the finals could be shown live (at least on the east coast). With track, the event finals are at night locally (some events are after 11pm), which means they are run in the morning here in the US. NBC doesn't want to show them live in the states because no one (relatively) will be watching. Therefore, they delay it by 12 hours which gives the news outlets an opportunity to report the results. Which, of course, is their job.
True, but why don't they put more of that stuff online then? I would gladly watch stuff online or on TV if given the opportunity. For example - the men's 400m is in progress right now, actually should be over by the time I'm done writing this post. But I've checked all morning and right before and it's not being shown online. Then show it on primetime if you want. I guess i'm just frustrated b/c I'm a track-fan and I've been trying avoid the news to wait to see the few things they decide to show in the evening. |
|
2008-08-21 8:28 AM in reply to: #1618206 |
Giver 18427 | Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler) kimmitri408 - 2008-08-21 9:25 AM run4yrlif - 2008-08-21 8:18 AM kimmitri408 - 2008-08-21 7:48 AM
And yeah - I don't understand why we saw every single race of the swimming and gymnastics and beach volleyball live, but with the track, it's all over the place! Because with swimming and gymnastics, the event finals were in the morning in Beijing...swimming finals started at 10am locally, so 10pm EST. It was set up like that by NBS so that the finals could be shown live (at least on the east coast). With track, the event finals are at night locally (some events are after 11pm), which means they are run in the morning here in the US. NBC doesn't want to show them live in the states because no one (relatively) will be watching. Therefore, they delay it by 12 hours which gives the news outlets an opportunity to report the results. Which, of course, is their job.
True, but why don't they put more of that stuff online then? To force you to tune in to the broadcast, so you can watch the commercials. |
2008-08-21 8:46 AM in reply to: #1618214 |
Expert 1014 Virginia | Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler) run4yrlif - 2008-08-21 9:28 AM kimmitri408 - 2008-08-21 9:25 AM run4yrlif - 2008-08-21 8:18 AM kimmitri408 - 2008-08-21 7:48 AM
And yeah - I don't understand why we saw every single race of the swimming and gymnastics and beach volleyball live, but with the track, it's all over the place! Because with swimming and gymnastics, the event finals were in the morning in Beijing...swimming finals started at 10am locally, so 10pm EST. It was set up like that by NBS so that the finals could be shown live (at least on the east coast). With track, the event finals are at night locally (some events are after 11pm), which means they are run in the morning here in the US. NBC doesn't want to show them live in the states because no one (relatively) will be watching. Therefore, they delay it by 12 hours which gives the news outlets an opportunity to report the results. Which, of course, is their job.
True, but why don't they put more of that stuff online then? To force you to tune in to the broadcast, so you can watch the commercials. boooooooooooooooooo! sigh but you are right. i hate television sometimes. |
2008-08-21 8:54 AM in reply to: #1616069 |
Champion 8766 Evergreen, Colorado | Subject: RE: Men's 200m (spoiler) I thought all athletes were tested immediately after events? I mean, if he was on something...he'd be caught by now, right? Still, it is freakish watching him run...ridiculous fast...makes it look WAY too easy. |