login
You think YOUR thread distribution is bad?
-
No new posts
|
 2007-10-11 3:20 PM |
Champion  8936      |  Subject: You think YOUR thread distribution is bad?
No, this isn't me. (This is the part where people feverishly click on their stats to see if it's them) Who are you, mystery master of COJ? |
| 2007-10-11 3:27 PM in reply to: #1003336 |
Champion 6285 Beautiful Sonoma County | Subject: RE: You think YOUR thread distribution is bad? |
| 2007-10-11 3:27 PM in reply to: #1003336 |
Science Nerd 28760 Redwood City, California | Subject: RE: You think YOUR thread distribution is bad? Rynamite. |
| 2007-10-11 3:28 PM in reply to: #1003336 |
Champion 8936 | Subject: RE: You think YOUR thread distribution is bad? You guys are killing the fun of this. |
| 2007-10-11 3:30 PM in reply to: #1003360 |
Pro 5153 Helena, MT | Subject: RE: You think YOUR thread distribution is bad? Rynamite! I done figgered it out! |
| 2007-10-11 3:30 PM in reply to: #1003358 |
| over a barrier | Subject: RE: You think YOUR thread distribution is bad? madkat - 2007-10-11 3:27 PM Duh... I vote for Spokes. My second choice would be bear or scout.
No way its bear...he has at least 64 posts alone that say 'ride lots' in tri talk |
| 2007-10-11 3:31 PM in reply to: #1003358 |
Resident Curmudgeon 25290 The Road Back Gold member | Subject: RE: You think YOUR thread distribution is bad? madkat - 2007-10-11 3:27 PM Duh... I vote for Spokes. My second choice would be bear or scout. Puh-leeze. I'm hardly that one-dimensional. Maybe if he left off the Tri Talk line:
|
| 2007-10-11 3:32 PM in reply to: #1003367 |
| Elite 3130 | Subject: RE: You think YOUR thread distribution is bad? kimj81 - 2007-10-11 2:30 PM Rynamite! I done figgered it out! Pennsylvania is the giveaway.
|
| 2007-10-11 3:32 PM in reply to: #1003358 |
Runner | Subject: RE: You think YOUR thread distribution is bad? madkat - 2007-10-11 4:27 PM Duh... I vote for Spokes. My second choice would be bear or scout. pffffttt... I don't post in the gear section. And I have WAAAAAAAAY more CoJ posts than THAT. |
| 2007-10-11 3:33 PM in reply to: #1003377 |
Champion 8936 | Subject: RE: You think YOUR thread distribution is bad? I couldn't figure out a way to delete that part of it. The real question is will he make it out of TAN to even see this thread? ScottoNM - 2007-10-11 3:32 PM kimj81 - 2007-10-11 2:30 PM Rynamite! I done figgered it out! Pennsylvania is the giveaway.
|
| 2007-10-11 3:33 PM in reply to: #1003336 |
Resident Curmudgeon 25290 The Road Back Gold member | Subject: RE: You think YOUR thread distribution is bad? If it's Ryanamite, 3800 of those Coj posts must be in the TANs, 'casue I sure don't see them... |
| 2007-10-11 3:38 PM in reply to: #1003336 |
Queen BTich 12411 , | Subject: RE: You think YOUR thread distribution is bad? Who's rynamite? I don't read the tan threads. |
| 2007-10-11 3:38 PM in reply to: #1003336 |
Pro 5153 Helena, MT | Subject: RE: You think YOUR thread distribution is bad? Oh, I don't go into the TANs so I barely knew who the guy was. I used the user listing. |
| 2007-10-11 3:39 PM in reply to: #1003385 |
| Crystal Lake, IL | Subject: RE: You think YOUR thread distribution is bad? the bear - 2007-10-11 3:33 PM If it's Ryanamite, 3800 of those Coj posts must be in the TANs, 'casue I sure don't see them... I agree, and I'm thinking we're better off for it. And Scout, I agree. You and Spokes came up I thought that was almost insulting. To think that you guys only have that many COJ posts. We haven't put all this effort into nonsense to be disrespected like that!!! |
| 2007-10-11 3:39 PM in reply to: #1003336 |
Pro 4292 Evanston, | Subject: RE: You think YOUR thread distribution is bad? Sigh. The last time we played this, mine was MUCH better than this:
See what I've let you people do to me? Maybe I need to go back to the personal rule of only posting in CoJ if I can make a limerick out of it. |
| 2007-10-11 3:40 PM in reply to: #1003336 |
Champion 6786 Two seat rocket plane | Subject: RE: You think YOUR thread distribution is bad? |
| 2007-10-11 3:42 PM in reply to: #1003407 |
Runner | Subject: RE: You think YOUR thread distribution is bad? hangloose - 2007-10-11 4:39 PM the bear - 2007-10-11 3:33 PM If it's Ryanamite, 3800 of those Coj posts must be in the TANs, 'casue I sure don't see them... I agree, and I'm thinking we're better off for it. And Scout, I agree. You and Spokes came up I thought that was almost insulting. To think that you guys only have that many COJ posts. We haven't put all this effort into nonsense to be disrespected like that!!! Thank you. |
| 2007-10-11 3:43 PM in reply to: #1003336 |
| Crystal Lake, IL | Subject: RE: You think YOUR thread distribution is bad? |
| 2007-10-11 3:43 PM in reply to: #1003336 |
Expert 878 Tallahassee, FL | Subject: RE: You think YOUR thread distribution is bad? Can't be Spokes, not enough posts. |
| 2007-10-11 3:44 PM in reply to: #1003412 |
Champion 8936 | Subject: RE: You think YOUR thread distribution is bad? No. It's a thread poking fun at Rynamite, but he's not here to see it apparently. ride_like_u_stole_it - 2007-10-11 3:40 PM
So this is the thread about meta-nothing? |
| 2007-10-11 3:46 PM in reply to: #1003424 |
Runner | Subject: RE: You think YOUR thread distribution is bad? hangloose - 2007-10-11 4:43 PM You're welcome. Scout, what happened to your avatar? I had it liquidated, it was insolent. Haven't found a good replacement yet. I'm kinda liking being "faceless", though. Adds a whole new perspective on things. |
 2007-10-11 3:49 PM in reply to: #1003404 |
| Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
| 2007-10-11 3:51 PM in reply to: #1003431 |
| Elite 3130 | Subject: RE: You think YOUR thread distribution is bad? Scout7 - 2007-10-11 2:46 PM hangloose - 2007-10-11 4:43 PM You're welcome. Scout, what happened to your avatar? I had it liquidated, it was insolent. Haven't found a good replacement yet. I'm kinda liking being "faceless", though. Adds a whole new perspective on things. Here you go scout, no charge.
(hatfm.JPG) Attachments ---------------- hatfm.JPG (18KB - 19 downloads) |
| 2007-10-11 3:53 PM in reply to: #1003448 |
| Subject: RE: You think YOUR thread distribution is bad? By Apollo's unwashed Speedos, what is THAT? |
| 2007-10-11 3:55 PM in reply to: #1003383 |
| Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
|
|
|
|
View profile
Add to friends
Go to training log
Go to race log
Send a message
View album
CONNECT WITH FACEBOOK