IM Kansas 70.3 (Page 12)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2008-05-14 1:36 PM in reply to: #1052423 |
Expert 844 Denver, Colorado | Subject: RE: IM Kansas 70.3 We're stying in Lawrence the night before so we don't have to drive from wichita. If you haven't seen the course I recommend getting down to at least drive it so you know what to expect. |
|
2008-05-14 1:49 PM in reply to: #1402388 |
Champion 34263 Chicago | Subject: RE: IM Kansas 70.3 climbin5414 - 2008-05-14 1:36 PM We're stying in Lawrence the night before so we don't have to drive from wichita. If you haven't seen the course I recommend getting down to at least drive it so you know what to expect. Yeah I thought `This is going to SUCK!' before I saw it. And when I finally drove it I thought to myself `This is REALLY going to SUCK!' |
2008-05-14 2:58 PM in reply to: #1402443 |
Expert 823 Stafford, Ks | Subject: RE: IM Kansas 70.3 mr2tony - 2008-05-14 1:49 PM climbin5414 - 2008-05-14 1:36 PM We're stying in Lawrence the night before so we don't have to drive from wichita. If you haven't seen the course I recommend getting down to at least drive it so you know what to expect. Yeah I thought `This is going to SUCK!' before I saw it. And when I finally drove it I thought to myself `This is REALLY going to SUCK!'It's all relative. Everybody has to ride the same hills. The only thing you can change is weather or not you are prepared. Having seen the hills from my saddle. I'm not as excited about qualifying for Clearwater but you can damn sure bet come race day I will put it ALL out there!!! |
2008-05-14 3:17 PM in reply to: #1402670 |
Extreme Veteran 388 Overland Park, Kansas | Subject: RE: IM Kansas 70.3 You want hills? Ride around Jefferson City, MO; the Ozarks, Bella Vista, AR; those area's qualify as hilly and make IMKS look pretty smooth! Geesh we are only talking about maybe 3,000' of vertical climb spread out over 56 miles and don't for get, you can rest going down the hills! |
2008-05-14 4:03 PM in reply to: #1052423 |
Champion 34263 Chicago | Subject: RE: IM Kansas 70.3 Hey haters, I live in Chicago where the biggest hill is going from the street to the sidewalk. Of course the weekends in Omaha help. Lots of hills in Omaha. ``Hills'' are relative, and to me, the ones on the bike look like frickin' mountains! But don't you guys worry your pretty little heads about it -- I'm going to finish. Whether I finish in six hours or seven hours, I'll cross that frickin' finish line. Uh oh. Did I just jinx myself into a bent rim at mile 10 or something? |
2008-05-14 4:05 PM in reply to: #1402747 |
Expert 844 Denver, Colorado | Subject: RE: IM Kansas 70.3 montyzooma - 2008-05-14 3:17 PM You want hills? Ride around Jefferson City, MO; the Ozarks, Bella Vista, AR; those area's qualify as hilly and make IMKS look pretty smooth! Geesh we are only talking about maybe 3,000' of vertical climb spread out over 56 miles and don't for get, you can rest going down the hills! I've done a century ride in the Rolla area, tour of the ozarks, and I honestly don't think those hills were any harder. Some may have been bigger but there were flat places too. I wouldn't call this course any easier then that century ride. |
|
2008-05-14 6:28 PM in reply to: #1402880 |
Expert 823 Stafford, Ks | Subject: RE: IM Kansas 70.3 climbin5414 - 2008-05-14 4:05 PM montyzooma - 2008-05-14 3:17 PM I've done a century ride in the Rolla area, tour of the ozarks, and I honestly don't think those hills were any harder. Some may have been bigger but there were flat places too. I wouldn't call this course any easier then that century ride. You want hills? Ride around Jefferson City, MO; the Ozarks, Bella Vista, AR; those area's qualify as hilly and make IMKS look pretty smooth! Geesh we are only talking about maybe 3,000' of vertical climb spread out over 56 miles and don't for get, you can rest going down the hills! I think what people are trying to say is that compared to where they regularly train, KS70.3 has a lot more climbing. I have posted before that the hills are not killer but they will make an average cyclist beg for mercy. UNLESS you train on similar terrain. I grew up in the Ozarks so I know what hills are. I haven't trained there other than the occasional ride while visiting family. You live in OP and have the ability to regularly train on hills whereas most of the mid-westerners don't. On race day it is all going to come down to who has the higher pain tolerance. I have faith in my ability and I know I will put it out there mentally. We are just saying if you don't train on hills you should try to get a couple of good quality hilly rides in pre June 15! |
2008-05-14 9:13 PM in reply to: #1052423 |
Veteran 117 Frontenac , Kansas | Subject: RE: IM Kansas 70.3 There are no hills to speak of in Southeast Kansas, but I'm prepared. Prepared to suceed in a good finish. Prepared to suffer any consequences that may follow the lack of hills in my part of the country. Prepared to have a wonderful race regardless of the terrain. Prepared to give my best and be glad no matter the amount of time I finish inbut that I finish! Man this may be a race but if your not going to have a good time doing it why are you doing it at all? |
2008-05-14 9:22 PM in reply to: #1403416 |
Extreme Veteran 388 Overland Park, Kansas | Subject: RE: IM Kansas 70.3 Well I am glad its hilly to most because most will kick my arse on the swim, and I need all the help I can get after that! |
2008-05-15 8:29 AM in reply to: #1052423 |
Expert 939 Tulsa | Subject: RE: IM Kansas 70.3 I mapped the course on my route tracker here on BT and it said 2021ft of climbing. Does this sound right? |
2008-05-15 8:45 AM in reply to: #1403926 |
Extreme Veteran 732 Omaha, USA | Subject: RE: IM Kansas 70.3 ballyard7 - 2008-05-15 8:29 AM I mapped the course on my route tracker here on BT and it said 2021ft of climbing. Does this sound right? My 305 showed 2,575' |
|
2008-05-15 10:13 AM in reply to: #1403973 |
Veteran 200 Golden, CO | Subject: RE: IM Kansas 70.3 VeganMan - 2008-05-15 8:45 AM ballyard7 - 2008-05-15 8:29 AM I mapped the course on my route tracker here on BT and it said 2021ft of climbing. Does this sound right? My 305 showed 2,575' I'm goign to ride ballyard7's course for the race |
2008-05-15 10:16 AM in reply to: #1404287 |
Extreme Veteran 732 Omaha, USA | Subject: RE: IM Kansas 70.3 bvfrompc - 2008-05-15 10:13 AM VeganMan - 2008-05-15 8:45 AM ballyard7 - 2008-05-15 8:29 AM I mapped the course on my route tracker here on BT and it said 2021ft of climbing. Does this sound right? My 305 showed 2,575' I'm goign to ride ballyard7's course for the race Must have taken the Lone Star lake detour... Give and take will be do you want to be behind him to follow him or ahead of him to beat him? |
2008-05-15 10:26 PM in reply to: #1052423 |
Expert 1226 Chicago | Subject: RE: IM Kansas 70.3 There were a few references on Motion Based around 2800 feet. I'd love it if it's around 2000-2500. |
2008-05-16 6:52 AM in reply to: #1406078 |
Extreme Veteran 388 Overland Park, Kansas | Subject: RE: IM Kansas 70.3 RunningJayhawk - 2008-05-15 10:26 PM There were a few references on Motion Based around 2800 feet. I'd love it if it's around 2000-2500. @ a total climb of 2800', it averages out to 1' of vertical for every 105.6' of horizontal! |
2008-05-16 9:13 AM in reply to: #1403973 |
Veteran 582 Golden, CO | Subject: RE: IM Kansas 70.3 VeganMan - 2008-05-15 7:45 AM ballyard7 - 2008-05-15 8:29 AM I mapped the course on my route tracker here on BT and it said 2021ft of climbing. Does this sound right? My 305 showed 2,575'My 305 gives me consistently ridiculous numbers for elevation gain. It seems to me to overestimate the amount of climbing by 50-100%. Does that mean that the course is actually flat? |
|
2008-05-16 9:20 AM in reply to: #1406490 |
Extreme Veteran 732 Omaha, USA | Subject: RE: IM Kansas 70.3 moneyman - 2008-05-16 9:13 AM VeganMan - 2008-05-15 7:45 AM ballyard7 - 2008-05-15 8:29 AM I mapped the course on my route tracker here on BT and it said 2021ft of climbing. Does this sound right? My 305 showed 2,575'My 305 gives me consistently ridiculous numbers for elevation gain. It seems to me to overestimate the amount of climbing by 50-100%. Does that mean that the course is actually flat? Yes, if this is flat: |
2008-05-16 9:23 AM in reply to: #1406507 |
Expert 939 Tulsa | Subject: RE: IM Kansas 70.3 VeganMan - 2008-05-16 9:20 AM moneyman - 2008-05-16 9:13 AM VeganMan - 2008-05-15 7:45 AM ballyard7 - 2008-05-15 8:29 AM I mapped the course on my route tracker here on BT and it said 2021ft of climbing. Does this sound right? My 305 showed 2,575'My 305 gives me consistently ridiculous numbers for elevation gain. It seems to me to overestimate the amount of climbing by 50-100%. Does that mean that the course is actually flat? Yes, if this is flat: Yeah but the jaggid peaks are all relative to the scale of the plot. "MOST" of those climbs are under 100ft. I could make it look really hilly if the plot was every 50 ft on the left. |
2008-05-16 9:42 AM in reply to: #1406507 |
Veteran 582 Golden, CO | Subject: RE: IM Kansas 70.3 VeganMan - 2008-05-16 8:20 AM moneyman - 2008-05-16 9:13 AM Yes, if this is flat: VeganMan - 2008-05-15 7:45 AM ballyard7 - 2008-05-15 8:29 AM I mapped the course on my route tracker here on BT and it said 2021ft of climbing. Does this sound right? My 305 showed 2,575'My 305 gives me consistently ridiculous numbers for elevation gain. It seems to me to overestimate the amount of climbing by 50-100%. Does that mean that the course is actually flat?
Enough of this depressing talk of hills. How is the wind?
|
2008-05-16 9:46 AM in reply to: #1406584 |
Extreme Veteran 732 Omaha, USA | Subject: RE: IM Kansas 70.3 moneyman - 2008-05-16 9:42 AM VeganMan - 2008-05-16 8:20 AM moneyman - 2008-05-16 9:13 AM Yes, if this is flat: VeganMan - 2008-05-15 7:45 AM ballyard7 - 2008-05-15 8:29 AM I mapped the course on my route tracker here on BT and it said 2021ft of climbing. Does this sound right? My 305 showed 2,575'My 305 gives me consistently ridiculous numbers for elevation gain. It seems to me to overestimate the amount of climbing by 50-100%. Does that mean that the course is actually flat?
Enough of this depressing talk of hills. How is the wind?
The wind is great. The day of the training camp (May 4th) there was almost zero wind. It has not been windy (>10mph) 4 days the last 3 months in Omaha, so I imagine the same is true for Clinton Lake. I would just expect it to be about 20mph. If it's not, you have been blessed. |
2008-05-16 10:03 AM in reply to: #1052423 |
Expert 939 Tulsa | Subject: RE: IM Kansas 70.3 It has been the windest season since i have lived in Oklahoma. The last 2 weeks have been better, but the past 1 1/2 months have been brutal! I'm talking 25-35 almost everyday! But i'm in Oklahoma so lets hope it doesn't work like that in Kansas. |
|
2008-05-16 12:41 PM in reply to: #1052423 |
Alpharetta, Georgia | Subject: RE: IM Kansas 70.3 Oh it has been windy in Kansas, but that's normal for this time of year. Most of the central region had a 'wind advisory' on Monday (4 days ago) because of 40mph gusts. Usually by June the winds subside. Also, just from personal observation (not a meterologist), winds usually pick up in the afternoon as opposed to the morning. Did an OWS here in Wichita the other day... winds picked up (6 p.m. timeframe) and it was a VERY different experience swimming the leg back in. Swallowed a buncha water because of the waves, and ended up 'sighting' more than I planned. Ya'll, I'm getting SO excited! Edited by lisac957 2008-05-16 12:42 PM |
2008-05-16 3:54 PM in reply to: #1407156 |
Veteran 582 Golden, CO | Subject: RE: IM Kansas 70.3 lisac957 - 2008-05-16 11:41 AM Oh it has been windy in Kansas, but that's normal for this time of year. Most of the central region had a 'wind advisory' on Monday (4 days ago) because of 40mph gusts. Usually by June the winds subside. Also, just from personal observation (not a meterologist), winds usually pick up in the afternoon as opposed to the morning. Did an OWS here in Wichita the other day... winds picked up (6 p.m. timeframe) and it was a VERY different experience swimming the leg back in. Swallowed a buncha water because of the waves, and ended up 'sighting' more than I planned. Ya'll, I'm getting SO excited! Thanks for the info. Actually, I was just kidding about the hills and the wind. I keep trying to convince myself that it is going to be what it's going to be. I have put in my time on the hills and I have ridden in some hellacious wind (where do you think the Kansas wind comes from). With the race 4 weeks and 2 days away, there is not much more we can do in any event. I can't believe I we are down to the last 2 hard weeks, then its taper time.
|
2008-05-19 9:33 AM in reply to: #1052423 |
Champion 34263 Chicago | Subject: RE: IM Kansas 70.3 I was worried about the hills because of the roughly 2200 feet of climbing (I think), until my neighbor told me the ride he's doing ahead of the TDF requires 14,000 feet of climbing. |
2008-05-21 6:20 PM in reply to: #1410552 |
Expert 844 Denver, Colorado | Subject: RE: IM Kansas 70.3 mr2tony - 2008-05-19 9:33 AM I was worried about the hills because of the roughly 2200 feet of climbing (I think), until my neighbor told me the ride he's doing ahead of the TDF requires 14,000 feet of climbing. The second 14,000 foot moutain I ever climbed (on foot) I ran into a guy coming down on his mountain bike. I was gasping while I walked... crazy people... |
|