Other Resources My Cup of Joe » NYC proposes ban on sale of oversized sodas, sugary drinks Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 3
 
 
2012-05-31 10:18 AM
in reply to: #4236583

User image

Subject: RE: NYC proposes ban on sale of oversized sodas, sugary drinks
It completely astounds me that anyone

thinks this is a good idea at all

believes it's the government's job to do this

or

believes there should be a law of any sort even resembling this.

Just totally floors me. That may be the definition of incomprehensible for me.



2012-05-31 10:19 AM
in reply to: #4237056

User image

Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC
Subject: RE: NYC proposes ban on sale of oversized sodas, sugary drinks
TriRSquared - 2012-05-31 11:05 AM
bzgl40 - 2012-05-31 10:52 AM
dontracy - 2012-05-31 7:31 AM

scoobysdad - Our purpose is merely to pay taxes and serve government.

I have a young friend who is a socialist.  
He attends NYU.
He also smokes.

Taxes in NY are something like $4.50 a pack, which puts a pack of cigarettes at around $9.00 or $9.50.

My young friend now brings cigarettes from Philadelphia and sells them to his socialist leaning friends in NYC at a profit. A pack in Philly is around $4.00 or something like that.

Why?

Because he doesn't want to pay the taxes in NY
even though he thinks that we the people aren't taxed enough.

Go figure.

 

So you are saying that because someone is a socialist it means they everyone to be taxed more?  

If you don't like the law (which is likely not to pass) then don't move to NY.  Dang, wonder what happens if everyone in NY moved out cause they don't like the law.  Cause I keep getting told if you don't like something about a state just move...

No the point is that if he is a true "socialist" he should be paying the local taxes to support the local services that he, and others enjoy.

Furthermore by subverting the taxes, and then by making a profit off of it, he's the socialist pot calling the capitalist kettle black...

Exactly.

I don't blame him for what he's doing, although it is illegal and that's a problem.
The real issue is that he is inconsistent.

But he's young still. He'll learn.

New York is my home state. I also use to live in NYC.
I love both places, but the politics of the state and the city are ruining both.

Just returned from a long weekend fishing trip to the St. Lawrence River in upstate NY, 1000 Islands area.
My brother and I have been going there since we were kids, and now we take our own kids.

My brother and I both live in Pennsylvania now.
He's interested in buying a vacation home up there, but the taxes are outrageous for the property value.
So he's reluctant to do so.

So that's like not liking something in a state and moving. Except in this case it keeps him from moving back into the state.

New York's motto is The Empire State.
Not so much anymore.

Upstate New York is rich in natural beauty. It's a wonderful place as long as you like winter. For myself, nothing can beat the Adirondacks. There is a longstanding built up infrastructure including top notch educational institutions. I miss living there.

Yet the entire upstate area is economically depressed.

Why? 

 

 



Edited by dontracy 2012-05-31 10:22 AM
2012-05-31 10:21 AM
in reply to: #4236583

User image

Champion
12759
5000500020005001001002525
Chicago
Subject: RE: NYC proposes ban on sale of oversized sodas, sugary drinks
I think a better idea would be to band the sales of plus size clothing. That would definitely warm people when they get to XL they might want to slow down. And for those who have a medical excuse, doctor can write a RX.
2012-05-31 10:46 AM
in reply to: #4237092

User image

Champion
6056
500010002525
Menomonee Falls, WI
Subject: RE: NYC proposes ban on sale of oversized sodas, sugary drinks
BigDH - 2012-05-31 10:16 AM

Fact is that marketing controls people. People don't know it. So get up in arms about the government trying to control you, just because it is blatant.


Yes, marketing controls people.

This was proven by the folks who brought us New Coke. And Hostess. And Buick. And the Segway. And...

2012-05-31 10:47 AM
in reply to: #4237100

User image

Master
1890
1000500100100100252525
Gig Harbor
Subject: RE: NYC proposes ban on sale of oversized sodas, sugary drinks

DanielG - 2012-05-31 8:18 AM It completely astounds me that anyone thinks this is a good idea at all believes it's the government's job to do this or believes there should be a law of any sort even resembling this. Just totally floors me. That may be the definition of incomprehensible for me.

X2

2012-05-31 10:49 AM
in reply to: #4237109

User image

Subject: RE: NYC proposes ban on sale of oversized sodas, sugary drinks
NRG42 - 2012-05-31 11:21 AM

I think a better idea would be to band the sales of plus size clothing.


Hmmmmmmmm...


2012-05-31 10:57 AM
in reply to: #4236583

Member
121
100
Brawley (Middle of the Desert), CA
Subject: RE: NYC proposes ban on sale of oversized sodas, sugary drinks
I just find it interesting that NYC is so "Pro Choice" on everything (Abortion, Gay Marriage, etc) but all the sudden, you cant CHOOSE what size/type of drink you get?? 
2012-05-31 11:13 AM
in reply to: #4236583

User image

Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC
Subject: RE: NYC proposes ban on sale of oversized sodas, sugary drinks

What's mind numbing to me about this, as well as things like the plastic bag issue in LA (I'm also a former SF California resident), is that it seems these are the things at the top of the list in states like NY and CA, states which are facing fiscal disasters.

Meanwhile, from what I've read Scott Walker's initiatives in WI have brought about real fiscal change that will be for the long term benefit of WI residents. And for that he's vilified.

Someone please explain all of this to me.
I don't understand. 



Edited by dontracy 2012-05-31 11:14 AM
2012-05-31 11:30 AM
in reply to: #4237248

User image

Champion
6056
500010002525
Menomonee Falls, WI
Subject: RE: NYC proposes ban on sale of oversized sodas, sugary drinks
dontracy - 2012-05-31 11:13 AM

What's mind numbing to me about this, as well as things like the plastic bag issue in LA (I'm also a former SF California resident), is that it seems these are the things at the top of the list in states like NY and CA, states which are facing fiscal disasters.

Meanwhile, from what I've read Scott Walker's initiatives in WI have brought about real fiscal change that will be for the long term benefit of WI residents. And for that he's vilified.

Someone please explain all of this to me.
I don't understand. 




Villified by a loud minority, backed by the media.

If you look at recent polls which consistently have Walker ahead 5 - 7 points, Wisconsin voters will hand Walker a mandate-worthy margin of victory on Tuesday. We've seen the results of prudent, common sense fiscal policy. I mean, it's not like we're California or New York or Illinois or someplace.



2012-05-31 11:33 AM
in reply to: #4237109

User image

Expert
3126
2000100010025
Boise, ID
Subject: RE: NYC proposes ban on sale of oversized sodas, sugary drinks

NRG42 - 2012-05-31 9:21 AM I think a better idea would be to band the sales of plus size clothing. That would definitely warm people when they get to XL they might want to slow down. And for those who have a medical excuse, doctor can write a RX.

^^Great idea!

 

The smaller drinks size is for restaurants, sporting venues, theaters, etc. This is awesome for them! Now instead of paying $8 for a super size, you can pay $5 for 16 oz and buy 3, hello double profit! 

2012-05-31 11:47 AM
in reply to: #4237284

User image

Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC
Subject: RE: NYC proposes ban on sale of oversized sodas, sugary drinks
Aarondb4 - 

^^Great idea!

 

The smaller drinks size is for restaurants, sporting venues, theaters, etc. This is awesome for them! Now instead of paying $8 for a super size, you can pay $5 for 16 oz and buy 3, hello double profit! 

I wonder if my young socialist friend will start smugling in 20oz cokes and sell them from under his coat while standing near the street carts.

If so, Washington Square will become the place to score contraband cigarettes and sodas in NYC!



2012-05-31 12:16 PM
in reply to: #4237109

User image

Master
2946
200050010010010010025
Centennial, CO
Subject: RE: NYC proposes ban on sale of oversized sodas, sugary drinks

NRG42 - 2012-05-31 9:21 AM I think a better idea would be to band the sales of plus size clothing. That would definitely warm people when they get to XL they might want to slow down. And for those who have a medical excuse, doctor can write a RX.

Sure this is a good idea because I can't wait to see 2 and 3xl people stuffing themselves into xl clothes.  

2012-05-31 12:23 PM
in reply to: #4236583

User image

Champion
5529
500050025
Nashville, TN
Subject: RE: NYC proposes ban on sale of oversized sodas, sugary drinks

Tri Take Me Away and I had this conversation earlier. 

1.  It's not the governments role so I prefer them to stay out of it. 

2.  I wouldn't oppose them taxing the heck out of big gulps or things like this.

She made an awesome point.  We are a FAT nation.  And growing FATTER each year.  Maybe if we use taxes as a disincentive for such behavior then we can attack the obesity and debt problem at the same time.  Win-win!!! We know many wouldn't change their behavior.  At least we would be a fat and wealthy country.  That's better than fat and broke. 

It was only a half way serious discussion. 

2012-05-31 12:23 PM
in reply to: #4237109

User image

Champion
16151
50005000500010001002525
Checkin' out the podium girls
Subject: RE: NYC proposes ban on sale of oversized sodas, sugary drinks
NRG42 - 2012-05-31 11:21 AM

I think a better idea would be to band the sales of plus size clothing. That would definitely warm people when they get to XL they might want to slow down. And for those who have a medical excuse, doctor can write a RX.


Do you really want fat naked people maurauding the streets? Not me! Ban clothing for size 6 and under women!
2012-05-31 12:27 PM
in reply to: #4236583

User image

Expert
2192
2000100252525
Greenville, SC
Subject: RE: NYC proposes ban on sale of oversized sodas, sugary drinks

im mixed on this.  i don't think its any of the city's business if someone wants to commit nutritional suicide, but on the other hand, my healthcare costs go up continually because some people don't understand that you can't drink a 32oz soda at every meal.

i would want to see some evidence that this would have a real positive impact on the city's populace.

2012-05-31 12:37 PM
in reply to: #4237377

User image

Master
2946
200050010010010010025
Centennial, CO
Subject: RE: NYC proposes ban on sale of oversized sodas, sugary drinks
ADollar79 - 2012-05-31 11:23 AM

Tri Take Me Away and I had this conversation earlier. 

1.  It's not the governments role so I prefer them to stay out of it. 

2.  I wouldn't oppose them taxing the heck out of big gulps or things like this.

She made an awesome point.  We are a FAT nation.  And growing FATTER each year.  Maybe if we use taxes as a disincentive for such behavior then we can attack the obesity and debt problem at the same time.  Win-win!!! We know many wouldn't change their behavior.  At least we would be a fat and wealthy country.  That's better than fat and broke. 

It was only a half way serious discussion. 

I think your halfway there.  We should incentivize people to be healthy.  You can do this by giving discounts on things to people who are healthy.  

Using health insurance as an example, let me have 25-30% off for being healthy.  Kind of like a safe driver discount.  Those with more risk pay more.  (Of course this would just lead to more people not getting insurance, so eventually my rates would rise to cover all those people. But I digress).



2012-05-31 12:40 PM
in reply to: #4237417

User image

Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC
Subject: RE: NYC proposes ban on sale of oversized sodas, sugary drinks
velocomp - 2012-05-31 1:37 PM
ADollar79 - 2012-05-31 11:23 AM

Tri Take Me Away and I had this conversation earlier. 

1.  It's not the governments role so I prefer them to stay out of it. 

2.  I wouldn't oppose them taxing the heck out of big gulps or things like this.

She made an awesome point.  We are a FAT nation.  And growing FATTER each year.  Maybe if we use taxes as a disincentive for such behavior then we can attack the obesity and debt problem at the same time.  Win-win!!! We know many wouldn't change their behavior.  At least we would be a fat and wealthy country.  That's better than fat and broke. 

It was only a half way serious discussion. 

I think your halfway there.  We should incentivize people to be healthy.  You can do this by giving discounts on things to people who are healthy.  

Using health insurance as an example, let me have 25-30% off for being healthy.  Kind of like a safe driver discount.  Those with more risk pay more.  (Of course this would just lead to more people not getting insurance, so eventually my rates would rise to cover all those people. But I digress).

What about for behavior that results in STDs?

2012-05-31 12:44 PM
in reply to: #4237391

User image

Sensei
Sin City
Subject: RE: NYC proposes ban on sale of oversized sodas, sugary drinks

I watched "Weight of the Nation" on HBO.  Pretty eye opening.  I'm typically the "less government" the better kind of guy.  I don't think you legislate what people want to do with their lives, if they are not  hurting anyone...  We don't need a bunch of laws to protect us from ourselves.

HOWEVER...  the documentary started discussing the cost impacts to our nation, due to obesity and the health results (diabets, heart issues, etc) that result from it...  I don't want the government to protect those from themselves, but I DO think the government should protect ME from THEM.  I used to think that they are just hurting themselves.  But when insurance rates go up for everyone, business losses (in the BILLIONS per year) due to lost efficiency from obesity, etc.  Who pays for that?  ME, even if I'm not doing it.

I would think a high tax on high calorie drinks is a better idea than just a flat out ban - just like cigarettes.  It doesn't stop anyone from buying it, but it costs them.  And then at least there is money coming in.  GRANTED, I'm usually opposed to taxes, because the money gets wasted..  So it's also a catch 22.

I just know something has to be done or this nation is going to have some SERIOUS issues.

2012-05-31 1:01 PM
in reply to: #4236583

User image

Elite
3091
20001000252525
Spokane, WA
Subject: RE: NYC proposes ban on sale of oversized sodas, sugary drinks

As someone else mentioned, I doubt this will go through. Hopefully the discussion will get people thinking about the wisdom of drinking over 500 calories of soda at once. I honestly have never once ordered one of those things.

Probably the only thing I like about the proposal is from a waste management/environmental angle. In a city that huge, it might have a slight impact.



Edited by zed707 2012-05-31 1:05 PM
2012-05-31 1:06 PM
in reply to: #4237483

User image

Subject: RE: NYC proposes ban on sale of oversized sodas, sugary drinks
zed707 - 2012-05-31 2:01 PM

As someone else mentioned, I doubt this will go through.



You sure about that?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16051436/ns/health-diet_and_nutrition/t...
New York City passes trans fat ban
Restaurants must eliminate artery-clogging ingredient by July 2008
2012-05-31 2:19 PM
in reply to: #4237425

User image

Expert
1083
1000252525
The Woodlands, TX
Subject: RE: NYC proposes ban on sale of oversized sodas, sugary drinks
dontracy - 2012-05-31 12:40 PM

I think your halfway there.  We should incentivize people to be healthy.  You can do this by giving discounts on things to people who are healthy.  

Using health insurance as an example, let me have 25-30% off for being healthy.  Kind of like a safe driver discount.  Those with more risk pay more.  (Of course this would just lead to more people not getting insurance, so eventually my rates would rise to cover all those people. But I digress).

What about for behavior that results in STDs?



The last 2 companies I worked for gave discounts on health insurance if you prove you're healthy (by lab results - BMI, cholesterol & blood pressure). I think it's awesome, this year I'm saving $1200 by my husband and I being healthy! My last company we had a smaller lab-based discount but also earned rewards for completing healthy habits via a points based system for all sorts of healthy behaviors. For example every race was worth 100-500 points depending on the distance. Woo-hoo!

As for risky behaviors, that would be harder to prove (races were deemed provable by sending them a link to your race results online). I know lab results don't prove that you're healthy, but they're a good indicator. How would you prove someone is putting themselves at risk? My last company started by charging smokers more. Then everyone said "but I don't smoke" and left the company to prove they are smokers. The next year they switched to charging everyone more but then giving discounts for healthy lab results.


2012-05-31 2:22 PM
in reply to: #4237425

User image

Alpharetta, Georgia
Subject: RE: NYC proposes ban on sale of oversized sodas, sugary drinks
dontracy - 2012-05-31 12:40 PM
velocomp - 2012-05-31 1:37 PM
ADollar79 - 2012-05-31 11:23 AM

Tri Take Me Away and I had this conversation earlier. 

1.  It's not the governments role so I prefer them to stay out of it. 

2.  I wouldn't oppose them taxing the heck out of big gulps or things like this.

She made an awesome point.  We are a FAT nation.  And growing FATTER each year.  Maybe if we use taxes as a disincentive for such behavior then we can attack the obesity and debt problem at the same time.  Win-win!!! We know many wouldn't change their behavior.  At least we would be a fat and wealthy country.  That's better than fat and broke. 

It was only a half way serious discussion. 

I think your halfway there.  We should incentivize people to be healthy.  You can do this by giving discounts on things to people who are healthy.  

Using health insurance as an example, let me have 25-30% off for being healthy.  Kind of like a safe driver discount.  Those with more risk pay more.  (Of course this would just lead to more people not getting insurance, so eventually my rates would rise to cover all those people. But I digress).

What about for behavior that results in STDs?

What about for behavior that results in any sort of doctor/hospital visit/treatment? Like, say, a bike wreck? 



Edited by lisac957 2012-05-31 2:22 PM
2012-05-31 2:27 PM
in reply to: #4237437

User image

Master
2946
200050010010010010025
Centennial, CO
Subject: RE: NYC proposes ban on sale of oversized sodas, sugary drinks
The problem is costs get passed along regardless.  Tax it more, and they can't afford health care.  And we pay for it.  One of the biggest problems, I see, in our society is the fact that those that follow the rules and do things right have to carry those who don't.  And the pool of those that don't is only getting bigger, NOT better.
2012-05-31 2:48 PM
in reply to: #4237417

User image

Champion
5529
500050025
Nashville, TN
Subject: RE: NYC proposes ban on sale of oversized sodas, sugary drinks
velocomp - 2012-05-31 1:37 PM
ADollar79 - 2012-05-31 11:23 AM

Tri Take Me Away and I had this conversation earlier. 

1.  It's not the governments role so I prefer them to stay out of it. 

2.  I wouldn't oppose them taxing the heck out of big gulps or things like this.

She made an awesome point.  We are a FAT nation.  And growing FATTER each year.  Maybe if we use taxes as a disincentive for such behavior then we can attack the obesity and debt problem at the same time.  Win-win!!! We know many wouldn't change their behavior.  At least we would be a fat and wealthy country.  That's better than fat and broke. 

It was only a half way serious discussion. 

I think your halfway there.  We should incentivize people to be healthy.  You can do this by giving discounts on things to people who are healthy.  

Using health insurance as an example, let me have 25-30% off for being healthy.  Kind of like a safe driver discount.  Those with more risk pay more.  (Of course this would just lead to more people not getting insurance, so eventually my rates would rise to cover all those people. But I digress).

 

I agree with you 100%.  In my fantasy world, that is what the government and corporations would do...incentivize behavior.  But in my cynical real world, I know that would require evil corporations to forgo extra profits.  And that isn't happening.  Sigh. 

2012-05-31 5:44 PM
in reply to: #4237363

User image

Sensei
Sin City
Subject: RE: NYC proposes ban on sale of oversized sodas, sugary drinks
velocomp - 2012-05-31 10:16 AM

NRG42 - 2012-05-31 9:21 AM I think a better idea would be to band the sales of plus size clothing. That would definitely warm people when they get to XL they might want to slow down. And for those who have a medical excuse, doctor can write a RX.

Sure this is a good idea because I can't wait to see 2 and 3xl people stuffing themselves into xl clothes.  

Like this doesn't happen all the time already.  Well, at least here in the Vegas clubs.  I think it's funny to see girls pulling down their dresses all night as they ride up just moving around.

New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » NYC proposes ban on sale of oversized sodas, sugary drinks Rss Feed  
 
 
of 3