General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Hit by car: Trapped by bureaucrats, HELP! Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 4
 
 
2008-08-07 11:40 AM
in reply to: #1587663

User image

Champion
16151
50005000500010001002525
Checkin' out the podium girls
Subject: RE: Hit by car: Trapped by bureaucrats, HELP!
ohiost90 - 2008-08-07 11:41 AM

so what exactly is damaged on the bike and what did they offer?

Frame, front and rear wheels(what type were they btw), pedal, STIs.  Anything else?

If the RD, FD, cassette, chain, cranks, handle bars, brakes, seat posts, fork, etc have not been damaged, why replace it?

I guess I'm having a hard time trying to come up with 5.6K as well. 

Good luck to ya, I think it sucks and I'm glad I'm not in your position.



Let's go with what's good. All except brakes (Ultegra) are Dura Ace:
Chain (SRAM)
cassette
seatpost (LOOK ergo)
computer (Cateye)
bottle cages (Tacx)
chainrings (FSA)
derailleurs
Nokon cables (but I'd need new liner and SS inner cable and these are sold as sets, so the housing isn't worth anything)
Hubs
Tires / tubes (Vredestein)
Brakes
Bottom bracket (FSA platinum / Ti)

Much of these are 9-speed which is obsolete now and harder to find. It might be useable on a new build,although it's still functional. You're down to 2 derailleurs, chainrings and some accessories at this point.

Suspect:
Carbon crankset (pedal is snapped, what's the CF in that crankarm like? Bet your life on it? Not me)
ITM White CF super-over handlebar (impact to front of bike makes the above CF hidden damage argument in play here)
ITM White CF Super-over Stem (same as above)

Known trash:
LOOK 555 frame (cracks visible in paint; underlying CF must also be)
HSC5 fork (again)
Shifters (Dented, scratched, one is stuck)
Headset (fork took a hard slam knocking the headset out of round)
Velocity Rims (2)
Spokes (can't re-use these in a new wheel build)
San Marco Asp / Ti saddle (torn)
Keo Carbon pedals (snaped in 1/2 (impressive!))
Bar tape
Giro Atmos Helmet
Pearl Izumi Ultrasensor bibs
Adidas Pro CF soled shoes.

I'm not seeing much salvage value in this.



2008-08-07 11:40 AM
in reply to: #1587592

User image

Resident Curmudgeon
25290
50005000500050005000100100252525
The Road Back
Gold member
Subject: RE: Hit by car: Trapped by bureaucrats, HELP!

pitt83 - 2008-08-07 10:15 AM
the bear - 2008-08-07 11:05 AM It's not reasonable to expect a new bike as compensation for damage to a used bike.
How do you set the value, eBay? There's none like mine if you search current or recently closed sales.

You have yet to tell us what they offered, or on what they say they base that offer. As someone said earlier, this may shape up as a negotiation, they offer X, you counter with Y, and settle for Z somewhere in the middle. On which end of the spectrum it settles may depend on how well either side substantiates the value.

2008-08-07 11:43 AM
in reply to: #1587774

User image

Resident Curmudgeon
25290
50005000500050005000100100252525
The Road Back
Gold member
Subject: RE: Hit by car: Trapped by bureaucrats, HELP!

Rogillio - 2008-08-07 11:36 AM  I even had the insurance adjuster arguing with her boss when her boss mentioned depreciation.  She said "What depreciation?  The bike was only a month old!"

Big difference between a month-old bike and the four-year-old frame the OP had destroyed.

2008-08-07 11:43 AM
in reply to: #1587460

User image

Master
1356
10001001001002525
Subject: RE: Hit by car: Trapped by bureaucrats, HELP!
you might try telling the lady who hit you that you will take her to small claims court if her insurance does not cover your lossfairly - make her convince the insurance company of the validity.  Dunno if it would help...
2008-08-07 11:44 AM
in reply to: #1587786

User image

Champion
16151
50005000500010001002525
Checkin' out the podium girls
Subject: RE: Hit by car: Trapped by bureaucrats, HELP!
the bear - 2008-08-07 12:40 PM

pitt83 - 2008-08-07 10:15 AM
the bear - 2008-08-07 11:05 AM It's not reasonable to expect a new bike as compensation for damage to a used bike.
How do you set the value, eBay? There's none like mine if you search current or recently closed sales.

You have yet to tell us what they offered, or on what they say they base that offer. As someone said earlier, this may shape up as a negotiation, they offer X, you counter with Y, and settle for Z somewhere in the middle. On which end of the spectrum it settles may depend on how well either side substantiates the value.



Right, they haven't yet offered any figure as settlement. But I know it's very likely going to be a first offer lower than my accounting dictates. I realize that it'll likely be negotiation, but I want no part of that. Fix my s#it which you broke doesn't seem unreasonable to me.

Susbstantiating the value I hope is in my favor: At least you know the retail price of each piece, depreciation w/o a standard is arbitrary. At least with a car you have a KBB or a standard to judge against.
2008-08-07 11:45 AM
in reply to: #1587795

User image

Champion
16151
50005000500010001002525
Checkin' out the podium girls
Subject: RE: Hit by car: Trapped by bureaucrats, HELP!
movingsouth - 2008-08-07 12:43 PM

you might try telling the lady who hit you that you will take her to small claims court if her insurance does not cover your lossfairly - make her convince the insurance company of the validity.  Dunno if it would help...


There I'd reject any offer the insurance gives and sue the driver. Max in CT is $5K which is close enough to my losses. Might be a viable back-up position.


2008-08-07 12:01 PM
in reply to: #1587808

User image

Elite
3088
20001000252525
Austin, TX
Gold member
Subject: RE: Hit by car: Trapped by bureaucrats, HELP!
pitt83 - 2008-08-07 11:45 AM

There I'd reject any offer the insurance gives and sue the driver. Max in CT is $5K which is close enough to my losses. Might be a viable back-up position.


This.

Sue the driver in small claims. Let her fight the insurance company to recoup the losses.
2008-08-07 12:34 PM
in reply to: #1587691

User image

Master
1678
1000500100252525
Olney, MD
Subject: RE: Hit by car: Trapped by bureaucrats, HELP!
Whizzzzz - 2008-08-07 11:56 AM

My suggestion:

It is your responsibility to present and support your claim for damages. Put together an airtight package of information.

Go to a couple of different bike shops. Tell them what you had. Get quotes to replace what you had. I'm assuming these quotes will all be in the same ballpark. Obtain a written opinion from the bike shop regarding the depreciation of bicycles. They probably DO depreciate a bit. Not as much as a car, but I wouldn't pay as much for a used bike as I would for a new one. I don't think there is a correlation to auto depreciation, but I'm willing to bet there is some depreciation on a bicycle. The Insurance Company owes you to replace what you HAD. Not get you a brand new bike. For example, if you had a 2003 Trek, replacing it with a 2008 Trek would essentially put you in a better position than you were before the accident. They owe you for a comparable 2003 Trek.

Of course, it's difficult to find a 2003 Trek hanging around. So, if they replace your bike with a 2008, a certain amount of "betterment" might be charged. It's reasonable.

Anyway, if you were injured in the accident, there's nothing wrong with getting yourself some treatment. Your injuries are what they are. If you have a scrape, you have a scrape, not a life threatening flesh wound requiring months of treatment and warranting thousands in pain and suffering. If you fractured your leg and lost several teeth, then obviously, that's worth more, and is going to require more treatment, more downtime, and therefore, more "pain and suffering" compensation.

Additionally, the Insurance Company should pay to replace your helmet, and anything else that was damaged in the accident. Gloves, shorts, etc etc. Keep receipts to prove what stuff costs.

If worse comes to worse, you might have coverage under your own insurance policy (probably homeowners, notsomuch the auto) for the damage to your bicycle. It will be subject to whatever your deductible is, and also subject to whatever your pre-determined limit is on sports equipment, etc etc. Unless you have a special endorsement.

What she said  

I work for an insurance agency and spoke with someone in our personal lines department about your situation.  The woman's auto insurance company knows she was at fault and they are going to try to get you to go away and pay as little as possible.   They technically do not owe you a new bike because insurance is there to compensate you for what you had before the accident occurred, not to make you better off than before.  

Don't leave it up to the insurance company to determine what the bike is worth.  You have to do your research and prove to them what the frame, components, etc are worth.  Do you have receipts?  Go to a few bike shops and ask them for estimates.  The insurance company doesn't want you to hire an attorney and they want to make sure you're happy and taken care of.  They're actually getting off easy since it could have been much worse if you were seriously injured.

See what their offer is and take it from there.  Most people have no idea how much bikes can cost.  That person you're talking to is probably a lower level claims adjuster.  If you're not happy with their offer, ask to speak with someone above them and keep at it.    Before I got into this sport, there is no way I would have ever thought a bike could cost that much   Don't knock the insurance company (yet) until you have an offer.

2008-08-07 12:52 PM
in reply to: #1587799

User image

Extreme Veteran
739
50010010025
Westlake, OH
Subject: RE: Hit by car: Trapped by bureaucrats, HELP!
pitt83 - 2008-08-07 12:44 PM
the bear - 2008-08-07 12:40 PM

pitt83 - 2008-08-07 10:15 AM
the bear - 2008-08-07 11:05 AM It's not reasonable to expect a new bike as compensation for damage to a used bike.
How do you set the value, eBay? There's none like mine if you search current or recently closed sales.

You have yet to tell us what they offered, or on what they say they base that offer. As someone said earlier, this may shape up as a negotiation, they offer X, you counter with Y, and settle for Z somewhere in the middle. On which end of the spectrum it settles may depend on how well either side substantiates the value.

Right, they haven't yet offered any figure as settlement. But I know it's very likely going to be a first offer lower than my accounting dictates. I realize that it'll likely be negotiation, but I want no part of that. Fix my s#it which you broke doesn't seem unreasonable to me. Susbstantiating the value I hope is in my favor: At least you know the retail price of each piece, depreciation w/o a standard is arbitrary. At least with a car you have a KBB or a standard to judge against.

Come back when they give you an offer. 

As far as: "Fix my crap which you broke" stuff.  It doesn't sound like that is what you want.  It seems to me that you are looking at this as "cool, I want a brand new bike and upgrade this from a 9 speed to a 10 speed while you are at it please" 

Again, 5.6K for a settlement as you described seems like a lot.   If they give you the 5.6K then great for you.  But I would suspect they don't and I don't think its unreasable that they don't give that to you. 

You asked for an opinion, I gave you mine.  Good luck to ya and I hope this gets settled quickly and fairly for ya.  Let us know how it ends.

2008-08-07 1:29 PM
in reply to: #1588075

User image

Expert
828
50010010010025
Subject: RE: Hit by car: Trapped by bureaucrats, HELP!
ohiost90 - 2008-08-07 12:52 PM

pitt83 - 2008-08-07 12:44 PM
the bear - 2008-08-07 12:40 PM

pitt83 - 2008-08-07 10:15 AM
the bear - 2008-08-07 11:05 AM It's not reasonable to expect a new bike as compensation for damage to a used bike.
How do you set the value, eBay? There's none like mine if you search current or recently closed sales.

You have yet to tell us what they offered, or on what they say they base that offer. As someone said earlier, this may shape up as a negotiation, they offer X, you counter with Y, and settle for Z somewhere in the middle. On which end of the spectrum it settles may depend on how well either side substantiates the value.

Right, they haven't yet offered any figure as settlement. But I know it's very likely going to be a first offer lower than my accounting dictates. I realize that it'll likely be negotiation, but I want no part of that. Fix my s#it which you broke doesn't seem unreasonable to me. Susbstantiating the value I hope is in my favor: At least you know the retail price of each piece, depreciation w/o a standard is arbitrary. At least with a car you have a KBB or a standard to judge against.

Come back when they give you an offer. 

As far as: "Fix my crap which you broke" stuff.  It doesn't sound like that is what you want.  It seems to me that you are looking at this as "cool, I want a brand new bike and upgrade this from a 9 speed to a 10 speed while you are at it please" 

Again, 5.6K for a settlement as you described seems like a lot.   If they give you the 5.6K then great for you.  But I would suspect they don't and I don't think its unreasable that they don't give that to you. 

You asked for an opinion, I gave you mine.  Good luck to ya and I hope this gets settled quickly and fairly for ya.  Let us know how it ends.



I don't have a dog in this fight, but if he says "fix my crap which you broke", that seems like he is being pretty easy. Replace the bike. I didn't see anything about wanting more than just the value of his bike (Yes, I know about depreciation...but bikes don't depreciate much from what I have seen) If they value it at (pick an arbitrary number) say 3k, is he really going to get a bike that is comprable? No.
FWIW Pitt, it is good to see you just asking for the hardware to be replaced. People are so quick to sit on the ground holding their neck with dollar signs in their eyes after something this. Good ethics on your part....
2008-08-07 1:39 PM
in reply to: #1587460

User image

Champion
16151
50005000500010001002525
Checkin' out the podium girls
Subject: RE: Hit by car: Trapped by bureaucrats, HELP!
Funny: I was disgusted after talking to an injury attorney yesterday. From his website, he seemed ethical. He's on the town council here and not some TV guy with the tag line "we mean business". He didn't say this directly, but highly implied, that, unless I trumped up my claims to include medical, time lost from work, punative, compensitory and lost opportunity damages, he couldn't help me. IOW: I had to trump up my claims to a big number before he'd get involved and we'd split the take. Or I pay him at $400 to represent me for the property only portion.

I have a hard time doing that. Yeah, if my hip were broken, knocked unconscious, in the hospital, etc. that would be different. The driver's mom offered me a tissue to wipe up some blood from my knee (I accepted). That's the "medical" we're talking about.

Not looking for "free upgrades" or a "new bike". "Fix my crap which you broke" is the operative for me. Do that, I'm done.

Edited by pitt83 2008-08-07 1:42 PM


2008-08-07 1:57 PM
in reply to: #1587460

User image

Elite
3371
200010001001001002525
Subject: RE: Hit by car: Trapped by bureaucrats, HELP!
The "Fix my crap which you broke" method alone just isn't going to get you back what you lost.  The second you leave the bike shop, your bike has depreciated.  In order to get "your crap fixed", you need to claim more.  Theres no way you'll (ethically) get a bike equal to the one you crashed without taking a loss.
2008-08-07 2:01 PM
in reply to: #1588184

User image

Champion
5498
5000100100100100252525
Whizzzzzlandia
Silver member
Subject: RE: Hit by car: Trapped by bureaucrats, HELP!

IOW: I had to trump up my claims to a big number before he'd get involved and we'd split the take. Or I pay him at $400 to represent me for the property only portion. I have a hard time doing that.

And this is why insurance costs so much in America. We btich about it, but continue to hire unethical lawyers to represent us in inflated claims in order to make a buck.

Thank you for trying to be part of the solution, and not part of the problem.

2008-08-07 2:51 PM
in reply to: #1588153

User image

Extreme Veteran
739
50010010025
Westlake, OH
Subject: RE: Hit by car: Trapped by bureaucrats, HELP!
Rad-Onc PA - 2008-08-07 2:29 PM
ohiost90 - 2008-08-07 12:52 PM
pitt83 - 2008-08-07 12:44 PM
the bear - 2008-08-07 12:40 PM

pitt83 - 2008-08-07 10:15 AM
the bear - 2008-08-07 11:05 AM It's not reasonable to expect a new bike as compensation for damage to a used bike.
How do you set the value, eBay? There's none like mine if you search current or recently closed sales.

You have yet to tell us what they offered, or on what they say they base that offer. As someone said earlier, this may shape up as a negotiation, they offer X, you counter with Y, and settle for Z somewhere in the middle. On which end of the spectrum it settles may depend on how well either side substantiates the value.

Right, they haven't yet offered any figure as settlement. But I know it's very likely going to be a first offer lower than my accounting dictates. I realize that it'll likely be negotiation, but I want no part of that. Fix my s#it which you broke doesn't seem unreasonable to me. Susbstantiating the value I hope is in my favor: At least you know the retail price of each piece, depreciation w/o a standard is arbitrary. At least with a car you have a KBB or a standard to judge against.

Come back when they give you an offer. 

As far as: "Fix my crap which you broke" stuff.  It doesn't sound like that is what you want.  It seems to me that you are looking at this as "cool, I want a brand new bike and upgrade this from a 9 speed to a 10 speed while you are at it please" 

Again, 5.6K for a settlement as you described seems like a lot.   If they give you the 5.6K then great for you.  But I would suspect they don't and I don't think its unreasable that they don't give that to you. 

You asked for an opinion, I gave you mine.  Good luck to ya and I hope this gets settled quickly and fairly for ya.  Let us know how it ends.

I don't have a dog in this fight, but if he says "fix my crap which you broke", that seems like he is being pretty easy. Replace the bike. I didn't see anything about wanting more than just the value of his bike (Yes, I know about depreciation...but bikes don't depreciate much from what I have seen) If they value it at (pick an arbitrary number) say 3k, is he really going to get a bike that is comprable? No. FWIW Pitt, it is good to see you just asking for the hardware to be replaced. People are so quick to sit on the ground holding their neck with dollar signs in their eyes after something this. Good ethics on your part....

 

I don't have a dog in this fight either, then again, I didn't think it was a fight. 

He wants what the value of a NEW bike is, not what the value of HIS bike is.  That is the difference....

Go wreck a 2005 Honda and see if you will be able to buy a 2008 Honda with the check the ins company cuts you.  You are going to be a few hundred...err...thousand short. 

All that being said, he very well maybe entitled to replacement value for the bike under CT law.  I have no idea.  I hope he does and that this gets resolved quickly. 

2008-08-07 2:54 PM
in reply to: #1588238

User image

Extreme Veteran
739
50010010025
Westlake, OH
Subject: RE: Hit by car: Trapped by bureaucrats, HELP!
Whizzzzz - 2008-08-07 3:01 PM

IOW: I had to trump up my claims to a big number before he'd get involved and we'd split the take. Or I pay him at $400 to represent me for the property only portion. I have a hard time doing that.

And this is why insurance costs so much in America. We btich about it, but continue to hire unethical lawyers to represent us in inflated claims in order to make a buck.

Thank you for trying to be part of the solution, and not part of the problem.

Who is to blame more, the lawyers or the clients that use them in an unethical way? 

I agree, hats off to Pitt for not wanting to this.

2008-08-07 3:00 PM
in reply to: #1588382

User image

Expert
828
50010010010025
Subject: RE: Hit by car: Trapped by bureaucrats, HELP!
ohiost90 - 2008-08-07 2:51 PM

Rad-Onc PA - 2008-08-07 2:29 PM
ohiost90 - 2008-08-07 12:52 PM
pitt83 - 2008-08-07 12:44 PM
the bear - 2008-08-07 12:40 PM

pitt83 - 2008-08-07 10:15 AM
the bear - 2008-08-07 11:05 AM It's not reasonable to expect a new bike as compensation for damage to a used bike.
How do you set the value, eBay? There's none like mine if you search current or recently closed sales.

You have yet to tell us what they offered, or on what they say they base that offer. As someone said earlier, this may shape up as a negotiation, they offer X, you counter with Y, and settle for Z somewhere in the middle. On which end of the spectrum it settles may depend on how well either side substantiates the value.

Right, they haven't yet offered any figure as settlement. But I know it's very likely going to be a first offer lower than my accounting dictates. I realize that it'll likely be negotiation, but I want no part of that. Fix my s#it which you broke doesn't seem unreasonable to me. Susbstantiating the value I hope is in my favor: At least you know the retail price of each piece, depreciation w/o a standard is arbitrary. At least with a car you have a KBB or a standard to judge against.

Come back when they give you an offer. 

As far as: "Fix my crap which you broke" stuff.  It doesn't sound like that is what you want.  It seems to me that you are looking at this as "cool, I want a brand new bike and upgrade this from a 9 speed to a 10 speed while you are at it please" 

Again, 5.6K for a settlement as you described seems like a lot.   If they give you the 5.6K then great for you.  But I would suspect they don't and I don't think its unreasable that they don't give that to you. 

You asked for an opinion, I gave you mine.  Good luck to ya and I hope this gets settled quickly and fairly for ya.  Let us know how it ends.

I don't have a dog in this fight, but if he says "fix my crap which you broke", that seems like he is being pretty easy. Replace the bike. I didn't see anything about wanting more than just the value of his bike (Yes, I know about depreciation...but bikes don't depreciate much from what I have seen) If they value it at (pick an arbitrary number) say 3k, is he really going to get a bike that is comprable? No. FWIW Pitt, it is good to see you just asking for the hardware to be replaced. People are so quick to sit on the ground holding their neck with dollar signs in their eyes after something this. Good ethics on your part....

 

I don't have a dog in this fight either, then again, I didn't think it was a fight. 

He wants what the value of a NEW bike is, not what the value of HIS bike is.  That is the difference....

Go wreck a 2005 Honda and see if you will be able to buy a 2008 Honda with the check the ins company cuts you.  You are going to be a few hundred...err...thousand short. 

All that being said, he very well maybe entitled to replacement value for the bike under CT law.  I have no idea.  I hope he does and that this gets resolved quickly. 




Don't have a dog in this fight...kind of a phrase I picked up living here in Savannah....agreed. No fight...just a phrase....


2008-08-07 3:36 PM
in reply to: #1588386

User image

Master
1240
100010010025
Knightdale/Raleigh
Subject: RE: Hit by car: Trapped by bureaucrats, HELP!

If companies just treated people fairly, lawyers would be involved so much. Instead they give people such a hard time and push them until they get a lawyer.

If I were the insurance company here, I'd pay quick if you'd sign quick. If you are in a face to face meeting you could gently say something like, "Look at me, we both know I can make a case for pain and suffering. Surely it's cheaper and easier for both of us to run down to the bike shop and get this year's model, or last year's if they have it."

2008-08-07 3:50 PM
in reply to: #1587460

Regular
59
2525
South Carolina
Subject: RE: Hit by car: Trapped by bureaucrats, HELP!

Get a estimate from several shops on the actual parts for the bike including frame and your clothing. List each item seperately and have the shop provide the build up cost. I am sure the individual parts will more then cover the price you expect after they depreciate it.

Also, they must replace the bike with "like kind or quality" as available. So a current model with similar equipment would be in order unless they can fond the exact one you had damaged.

2008-08-07 3:55 PM
in reply to: #1588386

User image

Champion
5498
5000100100100100252525
Whizzzzzlandia
Silver member
Subject: RE: Hit by car: Trapped by bureaucrats, HELP!
ohiost90 - 2008-08-07 2:54 PM
Whizzzzz - 2008-08-07 3:01 PM

IOW: I had to trump up my claims to a big number before he'd get involved and we'd split the take. Or I pay him at $400 to represent me for the property only portion. I have a hard time doing that.

And this is why insurance costs so much in America. We btich about it, but continue to hire unethical lawyers to represent us in inflated claims in order to make a buck.

Thank you for trying to be part of the solution, and not part of the problem.

Who is to blame more, the lawyers or the clients that use them in an unethical way? 

Interesting question. I believe they are both to blame... possibly with the attorneys being MORE to blame, as they are guiding the (largely) hapless public.

Most of the general population does not have any idea how to present or substantiate a claim for injuries or property damage to an insurance company, and they look for guidance in how to do so.

Other people think an unfortunate accident is a meal ticket, and they find a like-minded attorney.

Sorry for the slight hijack. Carry on. Kiss 

2008-08-07 5:45 PM
in reply to: #1587460

User image

Champion
7558
500020005002525
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Subject: RE: Hit by car: Trapped by bureaucrats, HELP!

You've got a great summary of the damaged/potentially damaged parts.  Confirm the damage with your LBS along with estimates to replace these items with local retailers.  If you had a 200X Look 555 frame, the adjuster probably doesn't realize what that means (or how expensive it is to replace).  No big deal, they can either spend their time scouring the world for a replacement 200X Look 555 frame, or pony up some additional $$ for you to replace it yourself.  (Be sure to include the cost of a professional inspection/build as part of the reparations. )  It may not be enough to buy a 2008 Look 555 frame, but it might be pretty close. 

In the grand scheme of things, they'll be much better off settling with you quickly for a reasonable amount than dragging it out and nitpicking every detail (not that they won't try, but pushing the work back on them will discourage this tactic).  If they want to pay based on mail-order parts, have them order the parts delivered to your LBS for installation.  If they want to search Ebay for a replacement frame, make sure they know it must be inspected and cleared by the LBS mechanic before you'll accept it. 

2008-08-07 6:13 PM
in reply to: #1587460

User image

Expert
721
500100100
Subject: RE: Hit by car: Trapped by bureaucrats, HELP!

Lots of good advice here.  I would recommend going to your insurance company also and at least letting them know the situation.  If you can't recover the damages through her insurance they will be on the hook, so it's in their best interest to facilitate your getting paid by her insurance company.



2008-08-07 8:14 PM
in reply to: #1587460

User image

Veteran
132
10025
Newnan, GA
Subject: RE: Hit by car: Trapped by bureaucrats, HELP!
Where did the traffic citation get turned in to ?? If there is a prosecuting attorney associated with the citation you may be able to pursue restitution on the criminal side -- really depends on the laws in your state, but it would be worth looking. May also give the girl that hit you an incentive to press her insurance company to settle fairly with you if the prosecutor is able to get the restitution ordered as part of the criminal charge. Can't get double recovery - but if ordered to be paid she surely won't want to pay out of pocket - that's why she has insurance. Act quickly though b/c I would presume that such a citation could be paid off quickly - you have to raise the flag and tell them there is an issue. Good luck!
2008-08-07 8:26 PM
in reply to: #1588989

User image

Champion
16151
50005000500010001002525
Checkin' out the podium girls
Subject: RE: Hit by car: Trapped by bureaucrats, HELP!
Hmm, that's anew one on me! I think she got a ticket for "unsafe passing of a cyclist" or "failure to yield to a cyclist" at the scene. I merely overheard the officer telling her and wasn't included in the conversation. Don't know if it's a true taicket or a warning. She was veery cooperative as was I.

So, you're saying that I can contact the police and somehow become part of the prosecution and ask for my damages as part of her criminal offense? I've always thought of it as a purely civil matter.
2008-08-07 8:33 PM
in reply to: #1588731

User image

Champion
16151
50005000500010001002525
Checkin' out the podium girls
Subject: RE: Hit by car: Trapped by bureaucrats, HELP!
McFuzz - 2008-08-07 6:45 PM

You've got a great summary of the damaged/potentially damaged parts.  Confirm the damage with your LBS along with estimates to replace these items with local retailers.  If you had a 200X Look 555 frame, the adjuster probably doesn't realize what that means (or how expensive it is to replace).  No big deal, they can either spend their time scouring the world for a replacement 200X Look 555 frame, or pony up some additional $$ for you to replace it yourself.  (Be sure to include the cost of a professional inspection/build as part of the reparations. )  It may not be enough to buy a 2008 Look 555 frame, but it might be pretty close. 

In the grand scheme of things, they'll be much better off settling with you quickly for a reasonable amount than dragging it out and nitpicking every detail (not that they won't try, but pushing the work back on them will discourage this tactic).  If they want to pay based on mail-order parts, have them order the parts delivered to your LBS for installation.  If they want to search Ebay for a replacement frame, make sure they know it must be inspected and cleared by the LBS mechanic before you'll accept it. 



You're making sense by suggesting to put the onus on them. A few have suggested the LBS as a source for evaluation; I understand that. But why would the LBS pay an employee of theirs for an hour or more to look up each washer, bolt, screw and component I'm inquiring about? For the off handed chance I'd go back and buy the replacement bike from them? My estimate is a real cost to that shop. As it is, my local LOOK dealer could and likely would do this, but my next bike might be Pinarello and he's not a dealer. He'd put in that time and get nothing for it.

I hadn't accounted for the cost of estimates and labor. The labor would be mine since I enjoy wrenching, but still, my time isn't free.

As for the 2005 frame being available; it isn't currently or a closed auction on eBay. So if that's our source of info for what the depreciation is typical at this age, the data doesn't exist there.

I'll keep you all posted as things play out. It'll take months I'm guessing. So much for the late road racing season
2008-08-07 9:25 PM
in reply to: #1589018

User image

Champion
5498
5000100100100100252525
Whizzzzzlandia
Silver member
Subject: RE: Hit by car: Trapped by bureaucrats, HELP!
pitt83 - 2008-08-07 8:33 PM
McFuzz - 2008-08-07 6:45 PM

You've got a great summary of the damaged/potentially damaged parts.  Confirm the damage with your LBS along with estimates to replace these items with local retailers.  If you had a 200X Look 555 frame, the adjuster probably doesn't realize what that means (or how expensive it is to replace).  No big deal, they can either spend their time scouring the world for a replacement 200X Look 555 frame, or pony up some additional $$ for you to replace it yourself.  (Be sure to include the cost of a professional inspection/build as part of the reparations. )  It may not be enough to buy a 2008 Look 555 frame, but it might be pretty close. 

In the grand scheme of things, they'll be much better off settling with you quickly for a reasonable amount than dragging it out and nitpicking every detail (not that they won't try, but pushing the work back on them will discourage this tactic).  If they want to pay based on mail-order parts, have them order the parts delivered to your LBS for installation.  If they want to search Ebay for a replacement frame, make sure they know it must be inspected and cleared by the LBS mechanic before you'll accept it. 

You're making sense by suggesting to put the onus on them. A few have suggested the LBS as a source for evaluation; I understand that. But why would the LBS pay an employee of theirs for an hour or more to look up each washer, bolt, screw and component I'm inquiring about? For the off handed chance I'd go back and buy the replacement bike from them? My estimate is a real cost to that shop. As it is, my local LOOK dealer could and likely would do this, but my next bike might be Pinarello and he's not a dealer. He'd put in that time and get nothing for it. I hadn't accounted for the cost of estimates and labor. The labor would be mine since I enjoy wrenching, but still, my time isn't free. As for the 2005 frame being available; it isn't currently or a closed auction on eBay. So if that's our source of info for what the depreciation is typical at this age, the data doesn't exist there. I'll keep you all posted as things play out. It'll take months I'm guessing. So much for the late road racing season

That makes sense, sure, but in Illinois, at least, it's YOUR job as a claimant to present YOUR claim to the insurance company. The insurance company will evaluate the merits of what YOU present. SPECIFICALLY in a third party scenario. And you are a third party to her insurance contract. 

Garbage in, garbage out. If you present a load of unorganized, rag tag, unsubstantiated stuff and leave it up to them, you will get what they think looks good.

Put together an air-tight demand package, cross reference your quotes, know what you're talking about, and you will do better. In Illinois, at least. I know you're in CT... and insurance laws vary WILDLY by state. 

Been in the industry almost 16 years now. Handling the very types of scenarios you describe. 

New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Hit by car: Trapped by bureaucrats, HELP! Rss Feed  
 
 
of 4