General Discussion Triathlon Talk » The "ideal" physique for a triathlete Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 4
 
 
2008-04-18 11:30 AM
in reply to: #1347201

User image

Extreme Veteran
503
500
Lapel
Subject: RE: The "ideal" physique for a triathlete
lfrick - 2008-04-18 12:22 PM

Aparently it is not 6 ft 190.

x2

just have to remember that lack of bulging muscles doesn't mean not strong or powerful.
So I would say any size frame that is well conditioned and trained would be ideal for each individual.

Edited by G-Moose 2008-04-18 11:32 AM


2008-04-18 11:37 AM
in reply to: #1347188

User image

Master
3019
20001000
West Jordan, UT
Subject: RE: The "ideal" physique for a triathlete

running2far - 2008-04-18 10:20 AM Every muscles group is ripped except his pecs in that shot. I wish I looked that 'weak'

Maybe we have different definitions of "ripped".

I'm thinking of something like this body type when you call someone "ripped" or "built"

 

2008-04-18 11:43 AM
in reply to: #1347033

User image

Elite
2443
200010010010010025
Athens, Georgia
Subject: RE: The "ideal" physique for a triathlete
I think you need a little less muscle to weigh you down on the swim and drag around through the course.



(sumo.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
sumo.jpg (10KB - 26 downloads)
2008-04-18 11:46 AM
in reply to: #1347253

User image

Cycling Guru
15134
50005000500010025
Fulton, MD
Subject: RE: The "ideal" physique for a triathlete
tkbslc - 2008-04-18 12:37 PM

running2far - 2008-04-18 10:20 AM Every muscles group is ripped except his pecs in that shot. I wish I looked that 'weak'

Maybe we have different definitions of "ripped".

I'm thinking of something like this body type when you call someone "ripped" or "built"

 

And only running a 1/2 mile or less ............

2008-04-18 11:46 AM
in reply to: #1347253

User image

Champion
5850
50005001001001002525
Michigan
Subject: RE: The "ideal" physique for a triathlete
tkbslc - 2008-04-18 12:37 PM

running2far - 2008-04-18 10:20 AM Every muscles group is ripped except his pecs in that shot. I wish I looked that 'weak'

Maybe we have different definitions of "ripped".

I'm thinking of something like this body type when you call someone "ripped" or "built"

 

I bet he can do more than three push ups....

 

2008-04-18 11:53 AM
in reply to: #1347282

User image

Master
3019
20001000
West Jordan, UT
Subject: RE: The "ideal" physique for a triathlete
Daremo - 2008-04-18 10:46 AM
tkbslc - 2008-04-18 12:37 PM

running2far - 2008-04-18 10:20 AM Every muscles group is ripped except his pecs in that shot. I wish I looked that 'weak'

Maybe we have different definitions of "ripped".

I'm thinking of something like this body type when you call someone "ripped" or "built"

 

And only running a 1/2 mile or less ............

Agreed. But I am just trying to show you guys that good triathletes have no muscle.  The OP was about which body type is ideal for a triathlete.  Well you've got a pic of a pro triathlete and a pro track sprinter.   See the difference?  Freaking skinny for low power long distance, or muscle mass for short distance high power.   Even a sprint tri is a distance/endurance race, so those guys wanna be toothpicks, too.  



2008-04-18 12:01 PM
in reply to: #1347033

User image

Expert
3974
200010005001001001001002525
MA
Subject: RE: The "ideal" physique for a triathlete

Usually, "ripped" is just a description of bodyfat levels. You can be ripped and have no mass - you can be ripped and 270lb.

On the other hand, "built" is usually a descripion of mass. If you're built you are carrying muscle. You don't have to be ripped to be built.

Triathlons and being built usually don't go together because of the nature of endurance sports. Endurance sports eat mass and the weight that comes with mass is counterproductive to speed over distance.

That guy on the first page? Ripped to the damn bone. Not built at all. A great example of a successful endurance athlete.

2008-04-18 12:13 PM
in reply to: #1347253

User image

Champion
9600
500020002000500100
Fountain Hills, AZ
Subject: RE: The "ideal" physique for a triathlete
tkbslc - 2008-04-18 11:37 AM

running2far - 2008-04-18 10:20 AM Every muscles group is ripped except his pecs in that shot. I wish I looked that 'weak'

Maybe we have different definitions of "ripped".

I'm thinking of something like this body type when you call someone "ripped" or "built"

 



No, that's not what I meant. Clearly triathletes are lean, but I have seen very competetive AG athletes who have a decent upper body build. Potts, as mentioned, is a big unit as is Sindballe. Built is relative in this discussion. Heck, I have bigger biceps than other local guys I know!
2008-04-18 12:28 PM
in reply to: #1347105

User image

Master
2115
2000100
Dothan, Al
Subject: RE: The "ideal" physique for a triathlete

KSH - 2008-04-18 11:01 AM Not having a fat roll on your belly when you go into areo. I really need to get rid of it. It's so annoying!

X 2. Or + 1....what ever...I agree.

2008-04-18 12:33 PM
in reply to: #1347164

User image

Veteran
300
100100100
Tacoma
Subject: RE: The "ideal" physique for a triathlete
scoobysdad - 2008-04-18 9:15 AM

After extensive trial and error, I have determined that 5'10", 185-pounds, with a 46-inch chest and 32-inch waist is not the ideal build for a triathlete. So, you know, you can just check that one off the list.



No Way!!! You can't crush my dreams like that. Then again, 43 probable isn't the ideal age either. Oh well, so much for the big Nike/Gaterade endorsement deal. I guess better get back to work.
2008-04-18 12:33 PM
in reply to: #1347304

User image

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: The "ideal" physique for a triathlete
tkbslc - 2008-04-18 11:53 AM

Agreed. But I am just trying to show you guys that good triathletes have no muscle.  The OP was about which body type is ideal for a triathlete.  Well you've got a pic of a pro triathlete and a pro track sprinter.   See the difference?  Freaking skinny for low power long distance, or muscle mass for short distance high power.   Even a sprint tri is a distance/endurance race, so those guys wanna be toothpicks, too.  

If by muscles you are referring to the buff bufferman types well of course not, it is not need it for endurance sports but to state athletes have no muscle is inaccurate. The good thing is that people have different perceptions of what a freaky body might look like; some might consider freaky someone thin and fit while for others might consider Stallone look-alikes in that category. In the end, no everyone is as shallow to be concern about how others perceive them and many can be perfectly happy with their body regardless of shape.


2008-04-18 1:07 PM
in reply to: #1347304

Regular
357
1001001002525
Subject: RE: The "ideal" physique for a triathlete
tkbslc - 2008-04-18 12:53 PM

Daremo - 2008-04-18 10:46 AM
tkbslc - 2008-04-18 12:37 PM

running2far - 2008-04-18 10:20 AM Every muscles group is ripped except his pecs in that shot. I wish I looked that 'weak'

Maybe we have different definitions of "ripped".

I'm thinking of something like this body type when you call someone "ripped" or "built"

 

And only running a 1/2 mile or less ............

Agreed. But I am just trying to show you guys that good triathletes have no muscle.  The OP was about which body type is ideal for a triathlete.  Well you've got a pic of a pro triathlete and a pro track sprinter.   See the difference?  Freaking skinny for low power long distance, or muscle mass for short distance high power.   Even a sprint tri is a distance/endurance race, so those guys wanna be toothpicks, too.  



Bjorn Andersson is pretty good and definitely isn't a tiny guy.
2008-04-18 1:08 PM
in reply to: #1347439

User image

Cycling Guru
15134
50005000500010025
Fulton, MD
Subject: RE: The "ideal" physique for a triathlete
Then again, sometimes you get the extremes that go well together ....... buff and skelotor ..... Tongue out



(Extremes.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Extremes.jpg (43KB - 33 downloads)
2008-04-18 1:11 PM
in reply to: #1347121

Subject: RE: The "ideal" physique for a triathlete
running2far - 2008-04-18 12:04 PM
tkbslc - 2008-04-18 11:02 AM

kproudfoot - 2008-04-18 10:00 AM
bryancd - 2008-04-18 10:56 AM to well built like Macca. 
Macca is well built?  I saw him at the WC on NBC and he looked like he had no chest muscles.  Granted he would destroy me even if I only had to swim/bike he would still beat me in an IM.

um, yeah, that is what I was thinking:

That looks ripped to me.

He actually looks a bit emaciated on top - you can see his entire rib cage. I mean, I know it's good to be small and not weigh a lot, but dang, that's actually kinda gross.

2008-04-18 1:16 PM
in reply to: #1347033

Regular
357
1001001002525
Subject: RE: The "ideal" physique for a triathlete
argh, help resizing a pic?

Edited by Stephen T 2008-04-18 1:21 PM
2008-04-18 1:18 PM
in reply to: #1347439

User image

Champion
9600
500020002000500100
Fountain Hills, AZ
Subject: RE: The "ideal" physique for a triathlete
amiine - 2008-04-18 12:33 PM

tkbslc - 2008-04-18 11:53 AM

Agreed. But I am just trying to show you guys that good triathletes have no muscle.  The OP was about which body type is ideal for a triathlete.  Well you've got a pic of a pro triathlete and a pro track sprinter.   See the difference?  Freaking skinny for low power long distance, or muscle mass for short distance high power.   Even a sprint tri is a distance/endurance race, so those guys wanna be toothpicks, too.  

If by muscles you are referring to the buff bufferman types well of course not, it is not need it for endurance sports but to state athletes have no muscle is inaccurate. The good thing is that people have different perceptions of what a freaky body might look like; some might consider freaky someone thin and fit while for others might consider Stallone look-alikes in that category. In the end, no everyone is as shallow to be concern about how others perceive them and many can be perfectly happy with their body regardless of shape.


Right, that's what I meant.


2008-04-18 1:21 PM
in reply to: #1347033

User image

Expert
892
500100100100252525
Subject: RE: The "ideal" physique for a triathlete
This is a ripped triathlete.



Edited by LJR 2008-04-18 1:23 PM
2008-04-18 1:46 PM
in reply to: #1347033

Regular
90
252525
Dalton, GA
Subject: RE: The "ideal" physique for a triathlete
so is this trixie:



Photobucket

good lord.....thats hot!

Edited by j.burnette 2008-04-18 2:06 PM
2008-04-18 1:47 PM
in reply to: #1347608

Subject: RE: The "ideal" physique for a triathlete

LJR - 2008-04-18 2:21 PM This is a ripped triathlete.

I'd have to agree. Dang, I'd kill to look like that - she looks like she could break you in half with her thighs.

2008-04-18 2:03 PM
in reply to: #1347033

Regular
90
252525
Dalton, GA
Subject: RE: The "ideal" physique for a triathlete
When I think of a male I think of this photo. Its acualy what is hanging on my bathroom mirror for motivation every morning. Not even sure who this guy is.

Photobucket

for a female build its hard to top Jessie Stensland:

Photobucket




Then you have D. Flicker:
Photobucket

and good old Fernanda:
Photobucket

Edited by j.burnette 2008-04-18 2:07 PM
2008-04-18 2:07 PM
in reply to: #1347033

Subject: RE: The "ideal" physique for a triathlete

After seeing all those women, I feel fat and lazy.

Note to self: force self to stop adoring french fries...



Edited by wurkit_gurl 2008-04-18 2:09 PM


2008-04-18 2:33 PM
in reply to: #1347675

User image

Champion
5850
50005001001001002525
Michigan
Subject: RE: The "ideal" physique for a triathlete

j.burnette - 2008-04-18 2:46 PM so is this trixie: Photobucket

good lord.....thats hot!

 

Yep, it is me.  And I would say that I'm a ripped triathlete but I'm more of a ripped DUathlete And I look faster than I am... 

2008-04-18 2:39 PM
in reply to: #1347033

Regular
90
252525
Dalton, GA
Subject: RE: The "ideal" physique for a triathlete
trixie.......thats just hot. Thats a mid-section that 99.9% of women would die for!


Its better than Jessie's or any of the others posted above!!
2008-04-18 2:50 PM
in reply to: #1347822

Subject: RE: The "ideal" physique for a triathlete

j.burnette - 2008-04-18 3:39 PM trixie.......thats just hot. Thats a mid-section that 99.9% of women would die for! Its better than Jessie's or any of the others posted above!!

I dunno - I'd take the abs of any of those girls. It's much harder for women to get a 6-pack - some of that is probably genetic. Seems as though "ripped abs" on women come in more varieties than do men (most men get the generic 6-pack). I'd be happy with any of the above options Not to downplay Trixie's abs by any means, I mean, they're ridiculously awesome! Just saying that a lot of women can't achieve that exact look.



Edited by wurkit_gurl 2008-04-18 2:52 PM
2008-04-18 2:55 PM
in reply to: #1347033

User image

Champion
5575
5000500252525
Butler
Subject: RE: The "ideal" physique for a triathlete
Man I opend a can of worms saying that Macca is not ripped. 
New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » The "ideal" physique for a triathlete Rss Feed  
 
 
of 4