Letter To Princeton Women (CNN) (Page 2)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() trinnas - 2013-04-02 3:29 PM mr2tony - 2013-04-02 4:21 PM trinnas - 2013-04-02 2:40 PM “For most of you, the cornerstone of your future and happiness will be inextricably linked to the man you marry, and you will never again have this concentration of men who are worthy of you. Here’s what nobody is telling you: Find a husband on campus before you graduate.” and “Smart women can’t (shouldn’t) marry men who aren’t at least their intellectual equal. As Princeton women, we have almost priced ourselves out of the market. There is a very limited population of men who are as smart or smarter than we are. … You will never again be surrounded by this concentration of men who are worthy of you.” I know it's a matter of interpretation but this, to me, sounds like she's saying that the only men worthy of Ivy League women are Ivy League men. mr2tony - 2013-04-02 3:29 PM I think her `Find a man now because there are no good ones outside of Princeton.' is a bit misogynistic and elitist. First, the women I know don't need a husband to get through life, even the ones who are married. Second, to say that you'll never find your intellectual equal outside of an Ivy League school just perpetuates the a-hole East Coaster stereotype. I pity her daughters-in-law. I do not think the idea is that Princeton is the only place to find them except that that is where the talk was being given. Had the talk been at UCLA it would have been "find a man at UCLA". At no point did she say you needed a husband to get through life but the reality is most of us will marry at some point. As such, a large part of our future happiness will be linked to the person we marry. I see what you are saying but I think it is more a matter of concentration than exclusivity. If you are in the top 10 % of schools academically in the country then the likelyhood is that you are within say the top 20% of intellectis in the country. Where else are you going to get a significant concentration of males of like intellect except in one of the top 10% of the schools in the country. Those males exist elsewhere but they are more spread out in the "elsewhere"
Yeah I know what she was trying to say, I just think she didn't say it very well. Perhaps ... ``One hundred percent of the men in your classes are Princeton men. The odds are good that if you should choose to find a husband while here, he will be a Princeton man and therefore you know beyond any reasonable doubt that he is your intellectual equal.'' |
|
![]() ![]() |
Sensei ![]() | ![]() mr2tony - 2013-04-02 1:43 PM Yeah I know what she was trying to say, I just think she didn't say it very well. Perhaps ... ``One hundred percent of the men in your classes are Princeton men. The odds are good that if you should choose to find a husband while here, he will be a Princeton man and therefore you know beyond any reasonable doubt that he is your intellectual equal.''Heck, we live in a society where we think we should be able to find a soul mate in a group of 20 women over 30 days via rose ceremonies whilst being televised. Maybe that was her reasoning. Is it that far a stretch to think you should be able to find a good man in an entire male graduating class from Princeton? |
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Kido - 2013-04-02 3:49 PM mr2tony - 2013-04-02 1:43 PM Yeah I know what she was trying to say, I just think she didn't say it very well. Perhaps ... ``One hundred percent of the men in your classes are Princeton men. The odds are good that if you should choose to find a husband while here, he will be a Princeton man and therefore you know beyond any reasonable doubt that he is your intellectual equal.'' Heck, we live in a society where we think we should be able to find a soul mate in a group of 20 women over 30 days via rose ceremonies whilst being televised. Maybe that was her reasoning. Is it that far a stretch to think you should be able to find a good man in an entire male graduating class from Princeton? I think it's the writers tone of "get yourself a good husband while you're at Princeton, or you'll be screwed later" that mr2tony is talking about. It does come across with the elitism I would expect from an Ivy League Alum. |
![]() ![]() |
Sensei ![]() | ![]() msteiner - 2013-04-02 1:54 PM Kido - 2013-04-02 3:49 PM mr2tony - 2013-04-02 1:43 PM Yeah I know what she was trying to say, I just think she didn't say it very well. Perhaps ... ``One hundred percent of the men in your classes are Princeton men. The odds are good that if you should choose to find a husband while here, he will be a Princeton man and therefore you know beyond any reasonable doubt that he is your intellectual equal.'' Heck, we live in a society where we think we should be able to find a soul mate in a group of 20 women over 30 days via rose ceremonies whilst being televised. Maybe that was her reasoning. Is it that far a stretch to think you should be able to find a good man in an entire male graduating class from Princeton? I think it's the writers tone of "get yourself a good husband while you're at Princeton, or you'll be screwed later" that mr2tony is talking about. It does come across with the elitism I would expect from an Ivy League Alum. I know. I was using it as a segway to a The Bachelor joke. As for ivy league elitism? meh... It's there and everyone jokes about it. I don't care. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Kido - 2013-04-02 4:12 PM msteiner - 2013-04-02 1:54 PM Kido - 2013-04-02 3:49 PM mr2tony - 2013-04-02 1:43 PM Yeah I know what she was trying to say, I just think she didn't say it very well. Perhaps ... ``One hundred percent of the men in your classes are Princeton men. The odds are good that if you should choose to find a husband while here, he will be a Princeton man and therefore you know beyond any reasonable doubt that he is your intellectual equal.'' Heck, we live in a society where we think we should be able to find a soul mate in a group of 20 women over 30 days via rose ceremonies whilst being televised. Maybe that was her reasoning. Is it that far a stretch to think you should be able to find a good man in an entire male graduating class from Princeton? I think it's the writers tone of "get yourself a good husband while you're at Princeton, or you'll be screwed later" that mr2tony is talking about. It does come across with the elitism I would expect from an Ivy League Alum. I know. I was using it as a segway to a The Bachelor joke. As for ivy league elitism? meh... It's there and everyone jokes about it. I don't care. I work with a ton of Ivy Leaguers and none of them in my experience have been elitist. The ones who were elitist were the Oxford and Cambridge people in London I worked with. Or maybe it's that they're British and when they talk, they just sound pretentious, no matter what they say. ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Sensei ![]() | ![]() Brits always sound snooty, unless they have a Cockney accent... Then I just assume they are chimney sweeps. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Kido - 2013-04-02 1:37 PM I would agree that fundamentally, we are responsible for our own happiness. But in reality? The people and events around us have a huge impact and somewhat determine our happiness. If your spouse cheated on you and took your kids and half the belongings? Sure, you are responsible for your own happiness and can choose to not be sad. But is that realistic? He/she is walking away with everything that's important to you so laugh and smile because you simply choose to be happy? I guess they didn't MAKE you be sad, but sure made it difficult to not be. A drunk driver kills your family. Yeah, you are responsible for your happiness and can laugh it off if you want. I guess the drunk drive didn't MAKE you be sad by killing your family. That was your choice. Your son becomes a drug addict and steals and uses you. Yes, again, you can choose to be happy. They didn't MAKE you be sad, disapointed, angry or hurt. If your life is better and filled with more joy by finding someone wonderful to be with? Yeah, maybe you can choose to be happy with that or not. But do they give you the ability to be more happy? I can't imagine being happier without my wife. I would be happy, because that's up to me, but perhaps she provide the opportunity for more happiness? We are responsible for our lives and happiness and can choose to surround ourselves with the people and things that give us joy... But do they really give us joy if we can simply choose to take joy? So when someone says their spouse or children or job makes them happy, I know what they mean and don't get on them for not being responsible for their happiness. They mean that they are happy, and possibly sad, because of the people/events in their life. Yes! And if happiness as a married or dating couple isn't "linked" to the other person, why in the world spend so much time and energy looking for "the one". Why bother to divorce or break up? People should just be happy with whatever they end up with! |
![]() ![]() |
Sensei ![]() | ![]() 4agoodlife - 2013-04-02 3:36 PM Kido - 2013-04-02 1:37 PM I would agree that fundamentally, we are responsible for our own happiness. But in reality? The people and events around us have a huge impact and somewhat determine our happiness. If your spouse cheated on you and took your kids and half the belongings? Sure, you are responsible for your own happiness and can choose to not be sad. But is that realistic? He/she is walking away with everything that's important to you so laugh and smile because you simply choose to be happy? I guess they didn't MAKE you be sad, but sure made it difficult to not be. A drunk driver kills your family. Yeah, you are responsible for your happiness and can laugh it off if you want. I guess the drunk drive didn't MAKE you be sad by killing your family. That was your choice. Your son becomes a drug addict and steals and uses you. Yes, again, you can choose to be happy. They didn't MAKE you be sad, disapointed, angry or hurt. If your life is better and filled with more joy by finding someone wonderful to be with? Yeah, maybe you can choose to be happy with that or not. But do they give you the ability to be more happy? I can't imagine being happier without my wife. I would be happy, because that's up to me, but perhaps she provide the opportunity for more happiness? We are responsible for our lives and happiness and can choose to surround ourselves with the people and things that give us joy... But do they really give us joy if we can simply choose to take joy? So when someone says their spouse or children or job makes them happy, I know what they mean and don't get on them for not being responsible for their happiness. They mean that they are happy, and possibly sad, because of the people/events in their life. Yes! And if happiness as a married or dating couple isn't "linked" to the other person, why in the world spend so much time and energy looking for "the one". Why bother to divorce or break up? People should just be happy with whatever they end up with! If you can't be with the one you love, love the one your with?
(I stole that! :p ) |
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Kido - 2013-04-02 4:49 PM mr2tony - 2013-04-02 1:43 PM Yeah I know what she was trying to say, I just think she didn't say it very well. Perhaps ... ``One hundred percent of the men in your classes are Princeton men. The odds are good that if you should choose to find a husband while here, he will be a Princeton man and therefore you know beyond any reasonable doubt that he is your intellectual equal.''Heck, we live in a society where we think we should be able to find a soul mate in a group of 20 women over 30 days via rose ceremonies whilst being televised. Maybe that was her reasoning. Is it that far a stretch to think you should be able to find a good man in an entire male graduating class from Princeton? Kido, love your posts in this thread...but dissing The Bachelor!?? Sir, you're now on double secret probation. Of course the lady came off as snooty, no doubt...but the message was a good one. I think in a way she was saying, "Hey ladies, get your noses out of your books for more than a few minutes each month. There are some great catches out there!" As for intellectual equals, of course an Ivy Leaguer can find an intellectual equal outside the hallowed walls of ivy, but it may be a bit tougher. I'll also add the speaker was off-base limiting the gals to men in their own graduating class. My now wife was a sophomore when she initially met me ( a freshman).
|
![]() ![]() |
Sensei ![]() | ![]() ChineseDemocracy - 2013-04-02 4:35 PM Kido - 2013-04-02 4:49 PM mr2tony - 2013-04-02 1:43 PM Yeah I know what she was trying to say, I just think she didn't say it very well. Perhaps ... ``One hundred percent of the men in your classes are Princeton men. The odds are good that if you should choose to find a husband while here, he will be a Princeton man and therefore you know beyond any reasonable doubt that he is your intellectual equal.'' Heck, we live in a society where we think we should be able to find a soul mate in a group of 20 women over 30 days via rose ceremonies whilst being televised. Maybe that was her reasoning. Is it that far a stretch to think you should be able to find a good man in an entire male graduating class from Princeton? Kido, love your posts in this thread...but dissing The Bachelor!?? Sir, you're now on double secret probation. Of course the lady came off as snooty, no doubt...but the message was a good one. I think in a way she was saying, "Hey ladies, get your noses out of your books for more than a few minutes each month. There are some great catches out there!" As for intellectual equals, of course an Ivy Leaguer can find an intellectual equal outside the hallowed walls of ivy, but it may be a bit tougher. I'll also add the speaker was off-base limiting the gals to men in their own graduating class. My now wife was a sophomore when she initially met me ( a freshman).
When I was graduating college, my wife was in 5th grade! Just to clarify, I didn't even meet my wife till 11 years after that... Edited by Kido 2013-04-02 6:44 PM |
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Kido - 2013-04-02 7:44 PM ChineseDemocracy - 2013-04-02 4:35 PM Kido - 2013-04-02 4:49 PM mr2tony - 2013-04-02 1:43 PM Yeah I know what she was trying to say, I just think she didn't say it very well. Perhaps ... ``One hundred percent of the men in your classes are Princeton men. The odds are good that if you should choose to find a husband while here, he will be a Princeton man and therefore you know beyond any reasonable doubt that he is your intellectual equal.'' Heck, we live in a society where we think we should be able to find a soul mate in a group of 20 women over 30 days via rose ceremonies whilst being televised. Maybe that was her reasoning. Is it that far a stretch to think you should be able to find a good man in an entire male graduating class from Princeton? Kido, love your posts in this thread...but dissing The Bachelor!?? Sir, you're now on double secret probation. Of course the lady came off as snooty, no doubt...but the message was a good one. I think in a way she was saying, "Hey ladies, get your noses out of your books for more than a few minutes each month. There are some great catches out there!" As for intellectual equals, of course an Ivy Leaguer can find an intellectual equal outside the hallowed walls of ivy, but it may be a bit tougher. I'll also add the speaker was off-base limiting the gals to men in their own graduating class. My now wife was a sophomore when she initially met me ( a freshman).
When I was graduating college, my wife was in 5th grade! Just to clarify, I didn't even meet my wife till 11 years after that... Suuuure you didn't. Chris Hanson from Dateline NBC would beg to differ. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() KateTri1 - 2013-04-02 8:39 AM ChineseDemocracy - 2013-04-02 8:04 AM KateTri1 - 2013-04-02 7:53 AM 1) Since the author of that letter is recently divorced, I'm sure there's a lot of baggage driving her words. So I take them with a grain of salt. 2) NO ONE can have it all. (not even ivy leaguers) 3) I feel bad for her 2 boys. They were the fruit of her.. regretful marriage? Sometimes parents say/do/write really dumb things. Point one could be true to some extent. Point two is incorrect...I know because I do believe I have it all. I was fortunate enough to meet the love of my life at college over 20 years ago. We married over 15 years ago. I would put forth circumstances may change, but people don't. I don't think the speaker was advocating these Ivy Leaguers all drop everything and elope...she was just reminding ladies in the audience there's nothing wrong with recognizing the amazing opportunities that surround them at this time. People change all the time. Sickness, depression, job loss, addiction. I can understand your sentiments and agree in the sense that I've been married almost 17year to a wonderful caring man that I love very much.. But it hasn't always been all hearts and roses. If you've been able to carry a 20 year marriage of all hearts and roses.. wonderful. I certainly wasn't ready for marriage when I graduated from college. I didn't even know where I wanted to live, much less was I ready to commit to a lifetime of matrimony. Thanks, it's been a blast! Yeah, I'd say we're definitely the kind of folks people see as regularly pooping rainbows. As for the "sickness, depression, job loss, addiction" possibilities you brought up as examples of how people change...perceptive folks out there can probably pick up on risk factors that would predispose a significant other to #2, #3, and #4 on that list...and #1 doesn't matter because illness happens. If illness drives a couple apart, I'd put forth that union wasn't as strong as initially thought. Along with job loss, isn't the wording still the same? "In sickness, and in health, for richer or for poorer." |
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I can't believe I just wasted time reading this! |
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() hrliles - 2013-04-02 8:07 PM I can't believe I just wasted time reading this! and with that kind of attitude, how do you ever expect to land yourself a suitable husband? |
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() ChineseDemocracy - 2013-04-02 8:03 PM KateTri1 - 2013-04-02 8:39 AM ChineseDemocracy - 2013-04-02 8:04 AM KateTri1 - 2013-04-02 7:53 AM 1) Since the author of that letter is recently divorced, I'm sure there's a lot of baggage driving her words. So I take them with a grain of salt. 2) NO ONE can have it all. (not even ivy leaguers) 3) I feel bad for her 2 boys. They were the fruit of her.. regretful marriage? Sometimes parents say/do/write really dumb things. Point one could be true to some extent. Point two is incorrect...I know because I do believe I have it all. I was fortunate enough to meet the love of my life at college over 20 years ago. We married over 15 years ago. I would put forth circumstances may change, but people don't. I don't think the speaker was advocating these Ivy Leaguers all drop everything and elope...she was just reminding ladies in the audience there's nothing wrong with recognizing the amazing opportunities that surround them at this time. People change all the time. Sickness, depression, job loss, addiction. I can understand your sentiments and agree in the sense that I've been married almost 17year to a wonderful caring man that I love very much.. But it hasn't always been all hearts and roses. If you've been able to carry a 20 year marriage of all hearts and roses.. wonderful. I certainly wasn't ready for marriage when I graduated from college. I didn't even know where I wanted to live, much less was I ready to commit to a lifetime of matrimony. Thanks, it's been a blast! Yeah, I'd say we're definitely the kind of folks people see as regularly pooping rainbows. As for the "sickness, depression, job loss, addiction" possibilities you brought up as examples of how people change...perceptive folks out there can probably pick up on risk factors that would predispose a significant other to #2, #3, and #4 on that list...and #1 doesn't matter because illness happens. If illness drives a couple apart, I'd put forth that union wasn't as strong as initially thought. Along with job loss, isn't the wording still the same? "In sickness, and in health, for richer or for poorer." Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but I'd question that generalized and IMHO, high on the horse sort of statement. Anyway I didn't imply that sickness would automatically cause marriages to break up.. I questioned your "people don't change" statement. Sometimes... they do. Edited by KateTri1 2013-04-02 8:39 PM |
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() ChineseDemocracy - 2013-04-02 8:14 PM hrliles - 2013-04-02 8:07 PM I can't believe I just wasted time reading this! and with that kind of attitude, how do you ever expect to land yourself a suitable husband? I doubt that Harold is. Edited by KateTri1 2013-04-02 8:54 PM |
|
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() KateTri1 - 2013-04-02 9:41 PM ChineseDemocracy - 2013-04-02 8:14 PM hrliles - 2013-04-02 8:07 PM I can't believe I just wasted time reading this! and with that kind of attitude, how do you ever expect to land yourself a suitable husband? I doubt that Harold is. even up on this high horse, I like to make funnies. ...and of course there's no surefire, 100% successful strategy to ensure a relationship will be perfect prior to marriage, I get that. What I was getting at is that if couples demonstrate the type of devotion to each other, truly getting to know the person well prior to marriage, they can definitely improve their odds of success, or, prevent a marriage that is doomed to eventually fail from happening in the 1st place. I believe for the most part at their core, people do not change. Environments, places in life, money, clothes, tendencies, how people react to stressors, those things can change...but people themselves are pretty consistent. Yes, there are exceptions (there always are) but for the most part people are pretty predictable. You mentioned depression, job loss, and addiction. I'd argue addictions generally don't pop up out of nowhere. I'd argue they're likely to be more prevalent in folks with addictive tendencies. That's just one example, there are many others. Now how'd we get here from the Princeton women again?
Edited by ChineseDemocracy 2013-04-02 9:40 PM |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Kido - 2013-04-02 3:37 PM I would agree that fundamentally, we are responsible for our own happiness. But in reality? The people and events around us have a huge impact and somewhat determine our happiness. If your spouse cheated on you and took your kids and half the belongings? Sure, you are responsible for your own happiness and can choose to not be sad. But is that realistic? He/she is walking away with everything that's important to you so laugh and smile because you simply choose to be happy? I guess they didn't MAKE you be sad, but sure made it difficult to not be. A drunk driver kills your family. Yeah, you are responsible for your happiness and can laugh it off if you want. I guess the drunk drive didn't MAKE you be sad by killing your family. That was your choice. Your son becomes a drug addict and steals and uses you. Yes, again, you can choose to be happy. They didn't MAKE you be sad, disapointed, angry or hurt. If your life is better and filled with more joy by finding someone wonderful to be with? Yeah, maybe you can choose to be happy with that or not. But do they give you the ability to be more happy? I can't imagine being happier without my wife. I would be happy, because that's up to me, but perhaps she provide the opportunity for more happiness? We are responsible for our lives and happiness and can choose to surround ourselves with the people and things that give us joy... But do they really give us joy if we can simply choose to take joy? So when someone says their spouse or children or job makes them happy, I know what they mean and don't get on them for not being responsible for their happiness. They mean that they are happy, and possibly sad, because of the people/events in their life. You know, as much of that as I've seen, and even some that I have experienced firsthand, it never detracted from my basic happiness with this life and my place in it. You can't make me happy, my wife can't make me happy, my children can't make me happy.....each can give me joy and reasons to smile, but happiness is up to me. (I admit that I don't understand depression, although I believe it's real....so I can't comment with respect to that. I'm just grateful to not have it in my life.) I'm not swayed by anything I've read here. I am responsible for my own happpiness.....as is the woman who wrote the letter. |
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() ChineseDemocracy - 2013-04-02 10:33 PM KateTri1 - 2013-04-02 9:41 PM ChineseDemocracy - 2013-04-02 8:14 PM hrliles - 2013-04-02 8:07 PM I can't believe I just wasted time reading this! and with that kind of attitude, how do you ever expect to land yourself a suitable husband? I doubt that Harold is. even up on this high horse, I like to make funnies. ...and of course there's no surefire, 100% successful strategy to ensure a relationship will be perfect prior to marriage, I get that. What I was getting at is that if couples demonstrate the type of devotion to each other, truly getting to know the person well prior to marriage, they can definitely improve their odds of success, or, prevent a marriage that is doomed to eventually fail from happening in the 1st place. I believe for the most part at their core, people do not change. Environments, places in life, money, clothes, tendencies, how people react to stressors, those things can change...but people themselves are pretty consistent. Yes, there are exceptions (there always are) but for the most part people are pretty predictable. You mentioned depression, job loss, and addiction. I'd argue addictions generally don't pop up out of nowhere. I'd argue they're likely to be more prevalent in folks with addictive tendencies. That's just one example, there are many others. Now how'd we get here from the Princeton women again? I thought it was kinda funny.. not sure about Harold We got to this place because you made the fatal error of diagreeing with part of my original response to the OP. One would think that after 20 years of pooping out rainbows you'd have learned to know better than try to argue with a woman. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() love this response http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/02/opinion/brazile-princeton-alum/ she voiced my thoughts, almost exactly. i was having too much fun in college to find a husband. i didn't get married until i was almost 28. i have an awesome career and an awesome life, and because i had that going for me, i was able to find an awesome match for me. at 22, when i graduated, i still needed to explore the world, start a career, live on my own, and make some mistakes. i was nowhere near ready for marriage at that point - my life was JUST beginning! |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() KateTri1 - 2013-04-02 8:39 AM ChineseDemocracy - 2013-04-02 8:04 AM KateTri1 - 2013-04-02 7:53 AM 1) Since the author of that letter is recently divorced, I'm sure there's a lot of baggage driving her words. So I take them with a grain of salt. 2) NO ONE can have it all. (not even ivy leaguers) 3) I feel bad for her 2 boys. They were the fruit of her.. regretful marriage? Sometimes parents say/do/write really dumb things. Point one could be true to some extent. Point two is incorrect...I know because I do believe I have it all. I was fortunate enough to meet the love of my life at college over 20 years ago. We married over 15 years ago. I would put forth circumstances may change, but people don't. I don't think the speaker was advocating these Ivy Leaguers all drop everything and elope...she was just reminding ladies in the audience there's nothing wrong with recognizing the amazing opportunities that surround them at this time. People change all the time. Sickness, depression, job loss, addiction. I can understand your sentiments and agree in the sense that I've been married almost 17year to a wonderful caring man that I love very much.. But it hasn't always been all hearts and roses. If you've been able to carry a 20 year marriage of all hearts and roses.. wonderful. I certainly wasn't ready for marriage when I graduated from college. I didn't even know where I wanted to live, much less was I ready to commit to a lifetime of matrimony. x2 - in fact, it is why people get divorced at all. Obviously unless you married at gunpoint, at some point, the person you married was good enough for to marry (or to have sex with, if the marriage is "for the kids" - but the same point holds). It is also why people who marry young get divorced more often - their identity is more fluid early in life and changes as they mature. I'm not saying they can't last - I have at least 2 sets of friends who have been married to their high school sweethearts for 25 or more years; and mrs gearboy and I met at 18, married at 22, and are now.... well, much older than that. As one small example of the changes we have, when we married, I was not interested in anything athletic, and mrs gearboy was a devout catholic. Now I do all kinds of physical activities, and she is an atheist. But we still have a strong and stable relationship, because we accepted that change is normal, and that we are each responsible for our own happiness, even as we build a life together. Back to the original letter - I feel bad for her kids, who have to face all their peers. I have to wonder if she wasn't prompted to write because one of them got dumped or could not get a date - in which case, it might have more to do with HIS personality, and not that of the girls at princeton... |
|
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() KateTri1 - 2013-04-03 6:15 AM ChineseDemocracy - 2013-04-02 10:33 PM KateTri1 - 2013-04-02 9:41 PM ChineseDemocracy - 2013-04-02 8:14 PM hrliles - 2013-04-02 8:07 PM I can't believe I just wasted time reading this! and with that kind of attitude, how do you ever expect to land yourself a suitable husband? I doubt that Harold is. even up on this high horse, I like to make funnies. ...and of course there's no surefire, 100% successful strategy to ensure a relationship will be perfect prior to marriage, I get that. What I was getting at is that if couples demonstrate the type of devotion to each other, truly getting to know the person well prior to marriage, they can definitely improve their odds of success, or, prevent a marriage that is doomed to eventually fail from happening in the 1st place. I believe for the most part at their core, people do not change. Environments, places in life, money, clothes, tendencies, how people react to stressors, those things can change...but people themselves are pretty consistent. Yes, there are exceptions (there always are) but for the most part people are pretty predictable. You mentioned depression, job loss, and addiction. I'd argue addictions generally don't pop up out of nowhere. I'd argue they're likely to be more prevalent in folks with addictive tendencies. That's just one example, there are many others. Now how'd we get here from the Princeton women again? I thought it was kinda funny.. not sure about Harold We got to this place because you made the fatal error of diagreeing with part of my original response to the OP. One would think that after 20 years of pooping out rainbows you'd have learned to know better than try to argue with a woman. What was I thinking! I enjoy your posts even when we have a disagreement. btw, Gearboy brought up a good point regarding "change." Belief in an afterlife, changing from sedentary to active in the examples he gave. I think I really poorly phrased my earlier assertion that people, in general, don't change. I should have specified, core personalities, tend to remain static...at least from my personal observation. (so, as usual, another convo with a lady where I find myself apologizing for my mistake...an important trait for husbands interested in maintaining happiness in the home) btw, Left Brain, I totally get what you were saying regarding you being in charge of your own happiness. I truly believe that and agree with you. Tying it back in to the original post, I have a young daughter who I will do my best to teach should never rely on others to make her happy. One of the most pathetic things out there is a member of either sex who NEEDS to have a significant other. We've all seen them...and honestly, they scream out red flag to me, always have.
|
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Core personality traits - I can get behind the idea that those don't change. Barring significant life events or brain injury, there are a number of "temperamental" traits that are well known to be stable. Approach or avoidance of novelty, risk seeking, adaptability, activity levels, etc, have all been well described and seen as stable. There may be some aspects that are culturally influenced, but we all have a basic style of engaging the world. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I know a few Ivy League married couples from the same school who met after graduation. In a couple of cases, the two were in college at the same time but either never met or didn't start dating until after they graduated. In one case, they didn't know each other in school at all. |
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() gearboy - 2013-04-03 7:14 PM Core personality traits - I can get behind the idea that those don't change. Barring significant life events or brain injury, there are a number of "temperamental" traits that are well known to be stable. Approach or avoidance of novelty, risk seeking, adaptability, activity levels, etc, have all been well described and seen as stable. There may be some aspects that are culturally influenced, but we all have a basic style of engaging the world. Well, some of my most educated friends married some people that I wouldn't even consider.. There is that crazy L word..... |
|