March Madness (Page 3)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2014-03-21 1:20 PM in reply to: bradleyd3 |
Champion 16151 Checkin' out the podium girls | Subject: RE: March Madness Originally posted by bradleyd3 Duke down by 6 with 53 sec left..... Warren Buffet is making damn sure no one wins $1 b |
|
2014-03-21 1:24 PM in reply to: pitt83 |
2014-03-21 1:29 PM in reply to: Left Brain |
Elite 4564 Boise | Subject: RE: March Madness Well at least I had Duke losing in the 2nd rd. |
2014-03-21 1:30 PM in reply to: Left Brain |
Sensei Sin City | Subject: RE: March Madness I believe the billion is officially not going anywhere now. |
2014-03-21 1:41 PM in reply to: Kido |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: March Madness After 2012 against Lehigh, and now this....I will NEVER pick Duke to win a single game again. EVER! |
2014-03-21 1:45 PM in reply to: Kido |
Elite 4564 Boise | Subject: RE: March Madness Originally posted by Kido I believe the billion is officially not going anywhere now. ESPN still has at least 50 perfect brackets. |
|
2014-03-21 1:49 PM in reply to: JoshR |
Master 6834 Englewood, Florida | Subject: RE: March Madness Originally posted by JoshR Originally posted by Kido ESPN still has at least 50 perfect brackets. I believe the billion is officially not going anywhere now. Good gravy, who picks Mercer, Harvard, ND St, and Dayton???? Over Duke, Cinncinati, OSU, and Ok? Not that those 4 are brutal, but that is a stretch! |
2014-03-21 4:21 PM in reply to: cdban66 |
Elite 4564 Boise | Subject: RE: March Madness Originally posted by cdban66 Originally posted by JoshR Originally posted by Kido ESPN still has at least 50 perfect brackets. I believe the billion is officially not going anywhere now. Good gravy, who picks Mercer, Harvard, ND St, and Dayton???? Over Duke, Cinncinati, OSU, and Ok? Not that those 4 are brutal, but that is a stretch! Down to 18 people. |
2014-03-22 8:38 PM in reply to: #4967224 |
Elite 4564 Boise | Subject: RE: March Madness Who could have predicted Dayton to the sweet 16? Oh wait this guy! |
2014-03-23 2:26 PM in reply to: JoshR |
Master 1730 Straight outta Compton | Subject: RE: March Madness Originally posted by JoshR Who could have predicted Dayton to the sweet 16? Oh wait this guy! Nicely done. My upset special was supposed to be New Mexico, and they choked in the most epic way. Dayton will give Stanford a run for the $, but the dream will end with Florida. |
2014-03-23 3:43 PM in reply to: mcgilmartin |
Elite 4564 Boise | Subject: RE: March Madness Originally posted by mcgilmartin Originally posted by JoshR Who could have predicted Dayton to the sweet 16? Oh wait this guy! Nicely done. My upset special was supposed to be New Mexico, and they choked in the most epic way. Dayton will give Stanford a run for the $, but the dream will end with Florida. I had NM going too far as well. Definitely my worst pick. |
|
2014-03-23 5:17 PM in reply to: 0 |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: March Madness Now I remember why I hate everything about Kansas. And Wichita St. (which is now most decidedly NOT a state) down without getting by even the first test. Bubbeye. Edited by Left Brain 2014-03-23 5:34 PM |
2014-03-23 6:29 PM in reply to: Left Brain |
Master 1730 Straight outta Compton | Subject: RE: March Madness Originally posted by Left Brain Now I remember why I hate everything about Kansas. And Wichita St. (which is now most decidedly NOT a state) down without getting by even the first test. Bubbeye. Proof that "The Valley" is not a competitive conference. It was a cool run but lesson reinforced- never credit a non-major conference like that. |
2014-03-23 6:33 PM in reply to: mcgilmartin |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: March Madness Originally posted by mcgilmartin Originally posted by Left Brain Proof that "The Valley" is not a competitive conference. It was a cool run but lesson reinforced- never credit a non-major conference like that. Now I remember why I hate everything about Kansas. And Wichita St. (which is now most decidedly NOT a state) down without getting by even the first test. Bubbeye. Eh...I never thought much of them (props to an undefeated season though, that's tough no matter what), but I gave them a win over KU....but not surprised that KU beat them. On another note....that KU team of freshmen look like they are starting to gel, from the SEC conference game through the present......could be scary. |
2014-03-23 6:53 PM in reply to: Left Brain |
Alpharetta, Georgia | Subject: RE: March Madness I knew these comments would be here... you guys are too predictable Not like it was a blowout, friends. 2 points was the only difference and EASILY could have gone either way. Even though my team came out on the short end, it was a great game! |
2014-03-23 7:50 PM in reply to: 0 |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: March Madness Originally posted by lisac957 I knew these comments would be here... you guys are too predictable Not like it was a blowout, friends. 2 points was the only difference and EASILY could have gone either way. Even though my team came out on the short end, it was a great game! 2 points is a basketball game........and a loss is a loss. Lots of 2 point losses in the records of every team in that tournament....you know that. In the end the truth is the truth.....WS was a very good basketball team propped up by playing in a mid-major conference. Not a special team or a team for the ages....just a really good team in a weak conference. Congrats to your team on a great season......now sit down and watch the big boys play. Edited by Left Brain 2014-03-23 7:51 PM |
|
2014-03-23 9:08 PM in reply to: cdban66 |
Master 2802 Minnetonka, Minnesota | Subject: RE: March Madness All I can say is GO STANFORD! |
2014-03-23 9:21 PM in reply to: 0 |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: March Madness Damn.....Baylor and Dougie McBucket 's cold hand just killed my bracket. Edited by Left Brain 2014-03-23 9:21 PM |
2014-03-23 9:45 PM in reply to: Left Brain |
Elite 4564 Boise | Subject: RE: March Madness Originally posted by Left Brain Damn.....Baylor and Dougie McBucket 's cold hand just killed my bracket. Me too. I was planning on riding Mcbucket to the final four! |
2014-03-24 6:55 AM in reply to: JoshR |
Master 6834 Englewood, Florida | Subject: RE: March Madness Originally posted by JoshR Originally posted by Left Brain Me too. I was planning on riding Mcbucket to the final four! Damn.....Baylor and Dougie McBucket 's cold hand just killed my bracket. Add me to the list of crushed Creighton believers. Dougie McBuckets proves that it is the rare player that can carry his team the whole way. And that is how the West was lost. |
2014-03-24 10:28 AM in reply to: cdban66 |
Sensei Sin City | Subject: RE: March Madness I originally had KU knocking off WS in my bracket but changed it in the last second to go with my heart. I mentioned I had them going one game too far in my bracket in another thread. Not to say I wasn't hoping them to win the entire game. To me, of all the games I watched, that was one of the most enjoyable. So far so good in most of my bracket. Got al the 12-5 games write and a couple other upsets. A couple missteps was missing Mercer (but who would get that one?, Baylor, and the Kansas loss (the ending of THAT game almost made the "one shining moment" montage - just one bucket short). Not leading my bracket, but still within range of the leaders.
|
|
2014-03-24 10:44 AM in reply to: Left Brain |
Alpharetta, Georgia | Subject: RE: March Madness Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by lisac957 I knew these comments would be here... you guys are too predictable Not like it was a blowout, friends. 2 points was the only difference and EASILY could have gone either way. Even though my team came out on the short end, it was a great game! 2 points is a basketball game........and a loss is a loss. Lots of 2 point losses in the records of every team in that tournament....you know that. In the end the truth is the truth.....WS was a very good basketball team propped up by playing in a mid-major conference. Not a special team or a team for the ages....just a really good team in a weak conference. Congrats to your team on a great season......now sit down and watch the big boys play. Totally agree. I guess I was reacting more to someone else's words "never credit a non-major conference like that." |
2014-03-24 10:46 AM in reply to: 0 |
Pro 5761 Bartlett, TN | Subject: RE: March Madness Originally posted by Left Brain Now I remember why I hate everything about Kansas. And Wichita St. (which is now most decidedly NOT a state) down without getting by even the first test. Bubbeye. Hey Wichita St might not have won , but they played a very competitive game, one of the best games of the tournament. Give them some credit...
My Memphis Tigers ran into a hot Virginia team that was not missing. Think UVA shot 75% for the game. They could be tough if they continue to play like that, not hearing much talk about UVA! Edited by jford2309 2014-03-24 10:50 AM |
2014-03-24 10:49 AM in reply to: lisac957 |
Champion 16151 Checkin' out the podium girls | Subject: RE: March Madness Originally posted by lisac957 Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by lisac957 I knew these comments would be here... you guys are too predictable Not like it was a blowout, friends. 2 points was the only difference and EASILY could have gone either way. Even though my team came out on the short end, it was a great game! 2 points is a basketball game........and a loss is a loss. Lots of 2 point losses in the records of every team in that tournament....you know that. In the end the truth is the truth.....WS was a very good basketball team propped up by playing in a mid-major conference. Not a special team or a team for the ages....just a really good team in a weak conference. Congrats to your team on a great season......now sit down and watch the big boys play. Totally agree. I guess I was reacting more to someone else's words "never credit a non-major conference like that." WS was a victim of poor seeding. Kentucky was stronger than a 8 seed and WS shouldn't have faced them that early. Louisville is underseeded, Syracuse and Nova were overseeded. Duke probably was as well. These aren't purely upsets, but seem to be lack of accuracy in seeding. |
2014-03-24 10:52 AM in reply to: pitt83 |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: March Madness Originally posted by pitt83 Originally posted by lisac957 WS was a victim of poor seeding. Kentucky was stronger than a 8 seed and WS shouldn't have faced them that early. Louisville is underseeded, Syracuse and Nova were overseeded. Duke probably was as well. These aren't purely upsets, but seem to be lack of accuracy in seeding. Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by lisac957 I knew these comments would be here... you guys are too predictable Not like it was a blowout, friends. 2 points was the only difference and EASILY could have gone either way. Even though my team came out on the short end, it was a great game! 2 points is a basketball game........and a loss is a loss. Lots of 2 point losses in the records of every team in that tournament....you know that. In the end the truth is the truth.....WS was a very good basketball team propped up by playing in a mid-major conference. Not a special team or a team for the ages....just a really good team in a weak conference. Congrats to your team on a great season......now sit down and watch the big boys play. Totally agree. I guess I was reacting more to someone else's words "never credit a non-major conference like that." I agree.....the seeding this year was goofy. And WS was doomed from the start with the bracket they potentially faced. If they made it all the way i would have called them the greatest team ever. St. Louis as a 5 seed while Michigan St. is a 4? Dumb. That's just the most glaring example. Maybe Warren Buffet paid off the selection comittee. |
|
MARCH MADNESS, BAAABY! Pages: 1 2 | |||