login
What's your inseam length compared to your height? (Page 4)
-
No new posts
|
 2008-09-23 6:01 AM in reply to: #1575799 |
Pro  4528    Norwalk, Connecticut |  Subject: RE: What's your inseam length compared to your height? |
| 2008-09-23 6:32 AM in reply to: #1688582 |
Iron Donkey 38643   , Wisconsin | Subject: RE: What's your inseam length compared to your height? Revbigdog - 2008-09-22 1:39 PM Interesting bump --- I will say looking over the data - it just confirms that I am in fact built bizzarely. I am 76' (6'4"  with a 30" inseam. for a .39 ratio. ...You ARE a FREAK, being 76 feet tall! |
| 2008-09-23 6:33 AM in reply to: #1689915 |
Pro 4827 Plano, Texas | Subject: RE: What's your inseam length compared to your height? anarky321 - 2008-09-23 3:19 AM also i wanted to correct that the torso as was measured for the aesthetics experiments You're assuming the original intent of the post was for the aesthetics experiments, which it is not. If you read the original post, it is in relation to bicycle fit. |
| 2008-09-23 8:50 AM in reply to: #1690000 |
Expert 724 Simi Valley | Subject: RE: What's your inseam length compared to your height? 1stTimeTri - 2008-09-23 4:32 AM Revbigdog - 2008-09-22 1:39 PM Interesting bump --- I will say looking over the data - it just confirms that I am in fact built bizzarely. I am 76' (6'4" with a 30" inseam. for a .39 ratio. ...You ARE a FREAK, being 76 feet tall!
Bah I was asked to use the SHIFT key at least 8 times in that sentence...which as we all know in forum posting is akin to Shakespearean English! |
| 2008-09-24 4:35 PM in reply to: #1690003 |
| New user 3 | Subject: RE: What's your inseam length compared to your height? KenD - 2008-09-23 7:33 AM anarky321 - 2008-09-23 3:19 AM also i wanted to correct that the torso as was measured for the aesthetics experiments You're assuming the original intent of the post was for the aesthetics experiments, which it is not. If you read the original post, it is in relation to bicycle fit. no i just thought id drop that in for the guy with the shortest legs |
| 2008-09-24 4:47 PM in reply to: #1575799 |
Extreme Veteran 638 Carlsbad, CA | Subject: RE: What's your inseam length compared to your height? |
| 2008-09-24 9:10 PM in reply to: #1575799 |
Veteran 256 Everett | Subject: RE: What's your inseam length compared to your height? |
| 2010-05-18 10:53 AM in reply to: #1686900 |
Master 1681 Rural Ontario | Subject: RE: What's your inseam length compared to your height? granted i dont know what your torso length is, but for your height the average inseam length for a male 70" is 33.74in (http://robyn.faeriemanor.org/BodyProportions.phtml), so you must be pretty close to the ideal....so i wouldnt worry about having short legs I'm 179cm tall and 86.5cm inseam. (for those of you who prefer to measure things around the groin using King George's thumbs that's 70.5" tall and a 34" inseam) I always though my legs were long relative to my body but I guess I'm kinda normal (at least in this one respect). From what I see on this thread, either the majority of BT'ers have short legs (relative to their bodies) or are not measuring proplerly. My understanding is that a cycling inseam measure is NOT the same as a tailor's inseam measure. To do a cycling inseam measure, take a big, thick book and stick the spine tightly between your legs to simulate sitting on a saddle. Then measure the distance from the bookspine to the floor. |
 2010-05-18 10:58 AM in reply to: #1575799 |
| Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
| 2010-05-18 11:13 AM in reply to: #1575799 |
| Champion 17756 SoCal | Subject: RE: What's your inseam length compared to your height? 71" height |
| 2010-05-18 11:21 AM in reply to: #1575799 |
| Champion 18680 Lost in the Luminiferous Aether | Subject: RE: What's your inseam length compared to your height? 69" height 33" inseam |
| 2010-05-18 11:27 AM in reply to: #1575799 |
| Pro 4578 Vancouver, BC | Subject: RE: What's your inseam length compared to your height? Inseam is 27.5", Height is 62.5". So I guess the ratio is 2.27. I think I have short legs compared to my torso. Not sure what the average is. Hmm, maybe my height is only 62.
Edited by jeng 2010-05-18 11:29 AM |
| 2010-05-18 12:14 PM in reply to: #1575799 |
| Extreme Veteran 1996 Halifax, Nova Scotia | Subject: RE: What's your inseam length compared to your height? 32 inseam at 74.5 inches tall. Finding shirts that stay tucked in can be a pain in the butt. |
| 2010-05-18 12:57 PM in reply to: #1575799 |
| Expert 790 Frisco | Subject: RE: What's your inseam length compared to your height? 70 - 30 |
| 2010-05-18 1:26 PM in reply to: #1575799 |
| Extreme Veteran 513 Albuquerque | Subject: RE: What's your inseam length compared to your height? 72" tall, 32" inseam. Average length legs, ridiculously long torso. Makes shopping for everything but pants a real PITA. Edited by megtrow 2010-05-18 1:27 PM |
| 2010-05-18 2:45 PM in reply to: #1575799 |
| Veteran 458 Minnesota | Subject: RE: What's your inseam length compared to your height? 34" 74 5/8" |
| 2010-05-18 2:53 PM in reply to: #1575799 |
| Master 1903 Portland, Oregon | Subject: RE: What's your inseam length compared to your height? |
| 2010-05-18 3:47 PM in reply to: #1575799 |
| Champion 5522 Frisco, TX | Subject: RE: What's your inseam length compared to your height? 72" and 33" - pretty normal... |
| 2010-05-18 3:55 PM in reply to: #2866481 |
| Pro 4827 Plano, Texas | Subject: RE: What's your inseam length compared to your height? ell-in-or - 2010-05-18 2:53 PM 34 inseam 69" height female. So are you compiling the data and will provide averages?  I did that back on page 2 and then again on page 3. You do realize this is a 2 yr old thread, right? |
| 2010-05-18 5:34 PM in reply to: #2866627 |
| Pro 4578 Vancouver, BC | Subject: RE: What's your inseam length compared to your height? KenD - 2010-05-18 1:55 PM I did that back on page 2 and then again on page 3. You do realize this is a 2 yr old thread, right? I didn't realize that and actually posted twice. Once two years ago. |
| 2010-05-18 5:38 PM in reply to: #1575815 |
| Champion 6503 NOVA - Ironic for an Endurance Athlete | Subject: RE: What's your inseam length compared to your height? vball03umd - 2008-08-01 10:20 AM 32" inseam and 70" height. I'm a female. Before I discovered pants in long lengths, I looked pretty hot in my high waters Phew, I thought that I was finding men attractive. I am 31" / 70" |
| 2010-05-18 6:33 PM in reply to: #1575799 |
| Elite 4547 | Subject: RE: What's your inseam length compared to your height? 33" inseam 75" height I love Kohl's Large Tall shirts...great for us long-torsoed freaks. btw, 33" inseams suck. I have to wear 34's because 32's are highwaters (bad), and I can never find 33" inseams anywhere. |
| 2010-05-21 11:09 AM in reply to: #1575799 |
| Member 51 Oklahoma City | Subject: RE: What's your inseam length compared to your height? 30" inseam 69" height |
| 2010-05-21 12:15 PM in reply to: #1575799 |
| Pro 3804 Seacoast, NH! | Subject: RE: What's your inseam length compared to your height? 35/75 |
| 2010-05-21 12:31 PM in reply to: #1575799 |
| Expert 715 PA | Subject: RE: What's your inseam length compared to your height? |
|
|
|
|
View profile
Add to friends
Go to training log
Go to race log
Send a message
View album
CONNECT WITH FACEBOOK