Subject: RE: M-Dot tat only for full Ironman?medic1962 - 2008-09-15 10:02 PM JeepFleeb - 2008-09-11 8:09 AM JBrashear - 2008-09-11 1:44 AM Is it considered bad form to use the M-Dot tat for completing a 70.3? ....do people do some variation of the M-Dot for 70.3? Yes. Yes. No way! There isn't anything wrong with using the IM dot in some sort of fashion for completing an HIM. Who says it is just for a full IM? Did IM hire you to be the IM Dot Police? HA I'm completely with Mr. Fleeb on this one. If you do a 70.3, then get a 70.3 tattoo. That is a hell of an accoplishment and if you want to show it off, then do so. But, I wouldn't want to go around explaining to the world, when someone asks, "Did you do an Ironman?". The eternal response will be, "No, I did a half Ironman". I'll guess that most folks will say, "oh, I see", thinking to themselves, "pretender". It immediately devalues your real achievement, which is the completion of a 70 mile race. The subject of the conversation changes from your suffering and training to complete the 70.3 to the fact that you only did half of a whole Ironman. I (me) did not put an Mdot on anything I owned until I'd completed a 140.6 race. It's the same as wearing the race shirt before you've crossed the finish line. There's gotta be some sanctity in not wearing the badge until you've earned the honor. But, you get to do what you want. In my opinion, it becomes an issue of character. Edited by Motivated 2008-09-16 6:27 AM
|