More Manatee Mayhem - 2017 Edition - Closed (Page 50)
-
No new posts
Moderators: alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2017-03-14 2:09 PM in reply to: amd723 |
Master 10208 Northern IL | Subject: RE: More Manatee Mayhem - 2017 Edition - Closed Originally posted by amd723 I use those too.Originally posted by jmkizer Originally posted by johnthecat So after my last race in October where I had a hard time finding my bike coming out of the water due to my prescription goggles fogging up I promised myself I'd get Lasik, which I finally did in Februrary in the midst of all the other issues. (Gotta have at least something positive going on). So now that my right eye is 20/20 already and left eye is slowly getting there I should be able to navigate around a lot better before races and during the swim to bike transition. Since I've always had to wear prescription goggles I've never paid too much attention to other goggles. Any recommendations for a good pair of goggles? Went inline skating the other day just to try something different than just walking. Other than navigating through wet spots on streets and side walks it went pretty well. I have a bone marrow biopsy coming up tomorrow, that will probably keep me from doing things for a few days. Eventually I'll get back into the full swing of things. One day at a time right now. Markus I like the Aquasphere Kaiman. Fingers crossed that the bone marrow biopsy gives you the results that you are hoping for! Those are the googles i use too. And, I agree with the whole fingers crossed for good results thing too!! |
|
2017-03-14 5:11 PM in reply to: brigby1 |
Champion 14677 | Subject: RE: More Manatee Mayhem - 2017 Edition - Closed Originally posted by brigby1 Originally posted by amd723 I use those too.Originally posted by jmkizer Originally posted by johnthecat So after my last race in October where I had a hard time finding my bike coming out of the water due to my prescription goggles fogging up I promised myself I'd get Lasik, which I finally did in Februrary in the midst of all the other issues. (Gotta have at least something positive going on). So now that my right eye is 20/20 already and left eye is slowly getting there I should be able to navigate around a lot better before races and during the swim to bike transition. Since I've always had to wear prescription goggles I've never paid too much attention to other goggles. Any recommendations for a good pair of goggles? Went inline skating the other day just to try something different than just walking. Other than navigating through wet spots on streets and side walks it went pretty well. I have a bone marrow biopsy coming up tomorrow, that will probably keep me from doing things for a few days. Eventually I'll get back into the full swing of things. One day at a time right now. Markus I like the Aquasphere Kaiman. Fingers crossed that the bone marrow biopsy gives you the results that you are hoping for! Those are the googles i use too. And, I agree with the whole fingers crossed for good results thing too!! I use those too. and x3 on the biopsy!!! |
2017-03-14 6:33 PM in reply to: ceilidh |
Master 7712 Orlando | Subject: RE: More Manatee Mayhem - 2017 Edition - Closed I've decided to be optimistic about my ability to actually start training for IM Lou (in a month) and started looking at the training plan i decided to use. I'm not a big fan of training by time and this plan does that, so, those of you who have trained for HIM or IM distances, how do you train: time or distance? If time, why? If you have or had a coach whose plan call by training by time, did he or she give an explanation for why?
|
2017-03-14 7:00 PM in reply to: amd723 |
Master 10208 Northern IL | Subject: RE: More Manatee Mayhem - 2017 Edition - Closed Originally posted by amd723 I've decided to be optimistic about my ability to actually start training for IM Lou (in a month) and started looking at the training plan i decided to use. I'm not a big fan of training by time and this plan does that, so, those of you who have trained for HIM or IM distances, how do you train: time or distance? If time, why? If you have or had a coach whose plan call by training by time, did he or she give an explanation for why? I look more at time, but am still aware of distance. I've also been aware of about how fast I might go over that distance, maybe needing to adjust some. When looking at the stress incurred, it's due to how long you went for not how far you went as that's what you're body understands. When riding, centuries are a fairly regular occurrence. More locally I can finish up the distance an hour faster than some rather hilly ones up in Wisconsin. Those took a lot longer and when the intensity ends up similar, the amount of stress incurred will be greater. A friend of mine rode 75 miles point to point once to meet up with his family. Of course there was a headwind, so he was out there for longer than than normal for that distance. I'll do some riding on the (slower) mountain bike using the pathway system. A favorite ride of ~57 miles would take maybe 3:45-4 hrs to finish there. I'll clear 70 in that on my tri bike, maybe 80. I chose the bike for examples as that's usually the easiest to see. There is even a formula for it. The Training Stress Score in Training Peaks. It can be approximated with HR there, but power is still most accurate. TSS=Intensity^2 x Duration x 100 |
2017-03-14 7:08 PM in reply to: brigby1 |
Master 7712 Orlando | Subject: RE: More Manatee Mayhem - 2017 Edition - Closed Originally posted by brigby1 Originally posted by amd723 I've decided to be optimistic about my ability to actually start training for IM Lou (in a month) and started looking at the training plan i decided to use. I'm not a big fan of training by time and this plan does that, so, those of you who have trained for HIM or IM distances, how do you train: time or distance? If time, why? If you have or had a coach whose plan call by training by time, did he or she give an explanation for why? I look more at time, but am still aware of distance. I've also been aware of about how fast I might go over that distance, maybe needing to adjust some. When looking at the stress incurred, it's due to how long you went for not how far you went as that's what you're body understands. When riding, centuries are a fairly regular occurrence. More locally I can finish up the distance an hour faster than some rather hilly ones up in Wisconsin. Those took a lot longer and when the intensity ends up similar, the amount of stress incurred will be greater. A friend of mine rode 75 miles point to point once to meet up with his family. Of course there was a headwind, so he was out there for longer than than normal for that distance. I'll do some riding on the (slower) mountain bike using the pathway system. A favorite ride of ~57 miles would take maybe 3:45-4 hrs to finish there. I'll clear 70 in that on my tri bike, maybe 80. I chose the bike for examples as that's usually the easiest to see. There is even a formula for it. The Training Stress Score in Training Peaks. It can be approximated with HR there, but power is still most accurate. TSS=Intensity^2 x Duration x 100 Thanks! After I posted i found this post by Joel Friel that pretty much says the same thing as you! http://www.joefrielsblog.com/2015/02/train-for-duration-or-distance.html It makes sense, it's just hard to get rid of my distance mentality! |
2017-03-15 5:18 AM in reply to: amd723 |
Master 8249 Eugene, Oregon | Subject: RE: More Manatee Mayhem - 2017 Edition - Closed I have pretty much always run by time, because I just don't enjoy running when I know how fast (well, slow) I am going. It's a mental hangup that has to do with being a lot faster when I was younger. I will look at the Garmin, think, "That sucks," and just feel discouraged. There is NO HOPE that I will ever not think that....I could be running two minutes a mile faster than I usually do, and I would still think I was slow! I do speed and tempo work almost entirely with heart rate. My plans from my coach now are almost all by time (along with heart rate or power targets) except for swimming, which is by distance (though I do record my total swim time and sometimes the range of times I hit for a set in Training Peaks). I would assume that in this case it's because time, not distance, along with some measure of intensity like power or heart rate, is used to calculate values like training stress, cumulative training load, etc. in that program. That being said, I do record distance when I am riding outside, and I would want to make sure I was doing some long runs/rides at (or probably beyond) race distance when training for a longer event. |
|
2017-03-15 6:32 AM in reply to: Hot Runner |
Master 8249 Eugene, Oregon | Subject: RE: More Manatee Mayhem - 2017 Edition - Closed Too late to edit so will reply to myself--it really only becomes an issue if you are following a generic training program meant for considerably faster people. For example, for my first HIM, I never would have ridden the race distance if I had followed the recommended durations on the plan, which I think maxed out at 3 hours, which they assumed would be "race distance" for users but wasn't for me. Instead I made sure to do several 90 km rides, a couple of 100 km ones, and one (keeping a friend company who was training for a century) of about 125 km. The latter took me well over four hours. In the actual race, I had a 3:27 bike split. The course was hilly and a bit longer than standard, and I had a few chain issues that may have cost me five minutes--probably about a 3:20 without those complications. I really don't think I would have been as prepared or felt as confident if my longest ride had been three hours. However, if I was doing 2:45 ("maybe" a goal for this year) splits on the bike, I might have felt better about my longest ride being 3 hours. (In reality, though, even now when I have ridden close to/just under a 2:50 bike split, my longest rides have been in the 4-hour range.) |
2017-03-15 7:47 AM in reply to: Hot Runner |
Master 9705 Raleigh, NC area | Subject: RE: More Manatee Mayhem - 2017 Edition - Closed I sent out the CBS Bracket Challenge this morning. It went to all of the folks who played last year (plus Kevin and my mom). If you would like to be added or have any friends/family added, just let me know, Remember that the brackets will lock before the first game starts on Thursday. I left the rules as the default:
Feel free to invite friends and family to the group. If you have an opinion about using a multiply seed bonus (rather than the default add seed), please speak up, The same goes for the maximum number of brackets per player. If you want to submit more than two brackets, let me know. P.S. This is for the NCAA men's basketball tournament. If you don't know what that ism, please ignore! |
2017-03-15 8:09 AM in reply to: amd723 |
Master 9705 Raleigh, NC area | Subject: RE: More Manatee Mayhem - 2017 Edition - Closed Originally posted by amd723 I've decided to be optimistic about my ability to actually start training for IM Lou (in a month) and started looking at the training plan i decided to use. I'm not a big fan of training by time and this plan does that, so, those of you who have trained for HIM or IM distances, how do you train: time or distance? If time, why? If you have or had a coach whose plan call by training by time, did he or she give an explanation for why?
When I was working with Maija, most of the runs were by time. Her thought on that was two-fold. After a certain amount of time, there are diminishing returns and sometimes rides are flat with no wind and sometimes they are up the side of a mountain. 30 miles of flat is not the same as 30 miles on the Blue Ridge Parkway and that was her way of leveling things out. For running, I couldn't even tell you because if a plan says time, I just translate that to how far to I need to run. Regarding plans, I think the Be Iron Fit ones tend to be pretty popular. I'm sure that you can get them into Training Peaks as a starting point and you an Susan can adjust from there. |
2017-03-15 8:21 AM in reply to: Hot Runner |
Master 9705 Raleigh, NC area | Subject: RE: More Manatee Mayhem - 2017 Edition - Closed Originally posted by Hot Runner I have pretty much always run by time, because I just don't enjoy running when I know how fast (well, slow) I am going. It's a mental hangup that has to do with being a lot faster when I was younger. I will look at the Garmin, think, "That sucks," and just feel discouraged. There is NO HOPE that I will ever not think that....I could be running two minutes a mile faster than I usually do, and I would still think I was slow! I do speed and tempo work almost entirely with heart rate. My plans from my coach now are almost all by time (along with heart rate or power targets) except for swimming, which is by distance (though I do record my total swim time and sometimes the range of times I hit for a set in Training Peaks). I would assume that in this case it's because time, not distance, along with some measure of intensity like power or heart rate, is used to calculate values like training stress, cumulative training load, etc. in that program. That being said, I do record distance when I am riding outside, and I would want to make sure I was doing some long runs/rides at (or probably beyond) race distance when training for a longer event. I hear you on the how fast/slow thing. It's easy for me to beat myself up on a ride or run when I am worrying about that. It can kinda suck all the joy out of training. That being said, I need to figure out something about How Far in order to select and appropriate route. |
2017-03-15 8:22 AM in reply to: jmkizer |
Master 9705 Raleigh, NC area | Subject: RE: More Manatee Mayhem - 2017 Edition - Closed What is happening to this group? We are discussing tri training! Quick, someone post something about Pop-Tarts! |
|
2017-03-15 9:12 AM in reply to: jmkizer |
Master 7712 Orlando | Subject: RE: More Manatee Mayhem - 2017 Edition - Closed Originally posted by jmkizer I sent out the CBS Bracket Challenge this morning. It went to all of the folks who played last year (plus Kevin and my mom). If you would like to be added or have any friends/family added, just let me know, Remember that the brackets will lock before the first game starts on Thursday. I left the rules as the default:
Feel free to invite friends and family to the group. If you have an opinion about using a multiply seed bonus (rather than the default add seed), please speak up, The same goes for the maximum number of brackets per player. If you want to submit more than two brackets, let me know. P.S. This is for the NCAA men's basketball tournament. If you don't know what that ism, please ignore! I think for march madness the less you know about college basketball the better! |
2017-03-15 9:18 AM in reply to: jmkizer |
Master 7712 Orlando | Subject: RE: More Manatee Mayhem - 2017 Edition - Closed Originally posted by jmkizer Originally posted by amd723 I've decided to be optimistic about my ability to actually start training for IM Lou (in a month) and started looking at the training plan i decided to use. I'm not a big fan of training by time and this plan does that, so, those of you who have trained for HIM or IM distances, how do you train: time or distance? If time, why? If you have or had a coach whose plan call by training by time, did he or she give an explanation for why?
When I was working with Maija, most of the runs were by time. Her thought on that was two-fold. After a certain amount of time, there are diminishing returns and sometimes rides are flat with no wind and sometimes they are up the side of a mountain. 30 miles of flat is not the same as 30 miles on the Blue Ridge Parkway and that was her way of leveling things out. For running, I couldn't even tell you because if a plan says time, I just translate that to how far to I need to run. Regarding plans, I think the Be Iron Fit ones tend to be pretty popular. I'm sure that you can get them into Training Peaks as a starting point and you an Susan can adjust from there. Thanks for all the replies on this! I think I will try to follow the plan and go by time with the intensity indicated for each workout and see how that translates! However, at least at first I know that i will not be able to do intense workouts as i either will still be recovering from my tendon injury or trying not to re-injure it! Regarding the plan, I've decided to use one by Gale Bernhardt. I used Be Iron Fit for my first HIM (just stopped before I got to IM distance!) and liked it, but I think i like Gale's plan better. And, as you suggested, I'm counting on Susan adjusting for my limiters as needed. We'll see how things go! |
2017-03-15 9:18 AM in reply to: jmkizer |
Master 7712 Orlando | Subject: RE: More Manatee Mayhem - 2017 Edition - Closed Originally posted by jmkizer What is happening to this group? We are discussing tri training! Quick, someone post something about Pop-Tarts! pop tarts are yucky!! |
2017-03-15 9:44 AM in reply to: jmkizer |
Master 10208 Northern IL | Subject: RE: More Manatee Mayhem - 2017 Edition - Closed Originally posted by jmkizer Originally posted by Hot Runner I have pretty much always run by time, because I just don't enjoy running when I know how fast (well, slow) I am going. It's a mental hangup that has to do with being a lot faster when I was younger. I will look at the Garmin, think, "That sucks," and just feel discouraged. There is NO HOPE that I will ever not think that....I could be running two minutes a mile faster than I usually do, and I would still think I was slow! I do speed and tempo work almost entirely with heart rate. My plans from my coach now are almost all by time (along with heart rate or power targets) except for swimming, which is by distance (though I do record my total swim time and sometimes the range of times I hit for a set in Training Peaks). I would assume that in this case it's because time, not distance, along with some measure of intensity like power or heart rate, is used to calculate values like training stress, cumulative training load, etc. in that program. That being said, I do record distance when I am riding outside, and I would want to make sure I was doing some long runs/rides at (or probably beyond) race distance when training for a longer event. I hear you on the how fast/slow thing. It's easy for me to beat myself up on a ride or run when I am worrying about that. It can kinda suck all the joy out of training. That being said, I need to figure out something about How Far in order to select and appropriate route. Wondering how I'll be handling this too. I'm not nearly as fast as a few years ago, but it's still realistic to get back to that for now. So not quite the same thing. It's still fun being out there now, but have to see as the hope gradually fades away. |
2017-03-15 10:02 AM in reply to: Hot Runner |
Master 10208 Northern IL | Subject: RE: More Manatee Mayhem - 2017 Edition - Closed Originally posted by Hot Runner Too late to edit so will reply to myself--it really only becomes an issue if you are following a generic training program meant for considerably faster people. For example, for my first HIM, I never would have ridden the race distance if I had followed the recommended durations on the plan, which I think maxed out at 3 hours, which they assumed would be "race distance" for users but wasn't for me. Instead I made sure to do several 90 km rides, a couple of 100 km ones, and one (keeping a friend company who was training for a century) of about 125 km. The latter took me well over four hours. In the actual race, I had a 3:27 bike split. The course was hilly and a bit longer than standard, and I had a few chain issues that may have cost me five minutes--probably about a 3:20 without those complications. I really don't think I would have been as prepared or felt as confident if my longest ride had been three hours. However, if I was doing 2:45 ("maybe" a goal for this year) splits on the bike, I might have felt better about my longest ride being 3 hours. (In reality, though, even now when I have ridden close to/just under a 2:50 bike split, my longest rides have been in the 4-hour range.) That is a good point in checking that the plan matches up with ability and goals. A good plan for some would be terrible for others. Be careful with the need to go race distance, or even duration. It's not necessarily a bad thing in itself, but how one goes about it can cause some issues. Fitness should be built up to where that big of a workout makes sense. That's not going to be the case for everyone, not in the middle of a (relatively) solid block of training. The expenditure may be great enough that subsequent workouts become compromised. Not to say one gets hurt, just the fatigue is sufficient that it becomes more getting out of the hole instead of making gains. Also know that plans can be more to just be out there for a long time. They don't necessarily match the race duration. This will become even more true with the longer races. 12, 13, 14, 15 hours is all just a really long time being up and active. |
|
2017-03-15 10:03 AM in reply to: amd723 |
Master 9705 Raleigh, NC area | Subject: RE: More Manatee Mayhem - 2017 Edition - Closed Originally posted by amd723 Originally posted by jmkizer Originally posted by amd723 I've decided to be optimistic about my ability to actually start training for IM Lou (in a month) and started looking at the training plan i decided to use. I'm not a big fan of training by time and this plan does that, so, those of you who have trained for HIM or IM distances, how do you train: time or distance? If time, why? If you have or had a coach whose plan call by training by time, did he or she give an explanation for why?
When I was working with Maija, most of the runs were by time. Her thought on that was two-fold. After a certain amount of time, there are diminishing returns and sometimes rides are flat with no wind and sometimes they are up the side of a mountain. 30 miles of flat is not the same as 30 miles on the Blue Ridge Parkway and that was her way of leveling things out. For running, I couldn't even tell you because if a plan says time, I just translate that to how far to I need to run. Regarding plans, I think the Be Iron Fit ones tend to be pretty popular. I'm sure that you can get them into Training Peaks as a starting point and you an Susan can adjust from there. Thanks for all the replies on this! I think I will try to follow the plan and go by time with the intensity indicated for each workout and see how that translates! However, at least at first I know that i will not be able to do intense workouts as i either will still be recovering from my tendon injury or trying not to re-injure it! Regarding the plan, I've decided to use one by Gale Bernhardt. I used Be Iron Fit for my first HIM (just stopped before I got to IM distance!) and liked it, but I think i like Gale's plan better. And, as you suggested, I'm counting on Susan adjusting for my limiters as needed. We'll see how things go! Gale's plans are in TP as well. ;-) |
2017-03-15 10:47 AM in reply to: jmkizer |
436 | Subject: RE: More Manatee Mayhem - 2017 Edition - Closed I find time as training an interesting and surprising way to train. When I was training for my 1st marathon a few months ago, everything was based on distance. I can't imagine why "run 1 hour" would make sense when 1 person could run 10 miles and another 5 miles in 1 hour. Maybe if it's a customized training plan based on a specific athlete's ability it's a different story. For my HIM's (I've only done 2), I did all my training based on distance and HR. |
2017-03-15 11:02 AM in reply to: jmkizer |
Master 7712 Orlando | Subject: RE: More Manatee Mayhem - 2017 Edition - Closed Originally posted by jmkizer Originally posted by amd723 Originally posted by jmkizer Originally posted by amd723 I've decided to be optimistic about my ability to actually start training for IM Lou (in a month) and started looking at the training plan i decided to use. I'm not a big fan of training by time and this plan does that, so, those of you who have trained for HIM or IM distances, how do you train: time or distance? If time, why? If you have or had a coach whose plan call by training by time, did he or she give an explanation for why?
When I was working with Maija, most of the runs were by time. Her thought on that was two-fold. After a certain amount of time, there are diminishing returns and sometimes rides are flat with no wind and sometimes they are up the side of a mountain. 30 miles of flat is not the same as 30 miles on the Blue Ridge Parkway and that was her way of leveling things out. For running, I couldn't even tell you because if a plan says time, I just translate that to how far to I need to run. Regarding plans, I think the Be Iron Fit ones tend to be pretty popular. I'm sure that you can get them into Training Peaks as a starting point and you an Susan can adjust from there. Thanks for all the replies on this! I think I will try to follow the plan and go by time with the intensity indicated for each workout and see how that translates! However, at least at first I know that i will not be able to do intense workouts as i either will still be recovering from my tendon injury or trying not to re-injure it! Regarding the plan, I've decided to use one by Gale Bernhardt. I used Be Iron Fit for my first HIM (just stopped before I got to IM distance!) and liked it, but I think i like Gale's plan better. And, as you suggested, I'm counting on Susan adjusting for my limiters as needed. We'll see how things go! Gale's plans are in TP as well. ;-) They are? I thought I looked for them, but maybe not! |
2017-03-15 11:33 AM in reply to: amd723 |
Champion 14677 | Subject: RE: More Manatee Mayhem - 2017 Edition - Closed I have nothing to add on the training info OR bracketing of any kind. So, Ill just add that Pop Tarts (for me) are only edible warm with a schmear of PB. (any kind). |
2017-03-15 11:49 AM in reply to: ceilidh |
310 Raleigh, North Carolina | Subject: RE: More Manatee Mayhem - 2017 Edition - Closed Originally posted by ceilidh I have nothing to add on the training info OR bracketing of any kind. So, Ill just add that Pop Tarts (for me) are only edible warm with a schmear of PB. (any kind). I'm still a novice so I'm no expert on time vs distance, however I did use the Secrets of Half Iron Distance book by people that ostensibly are experts. They recommended not just time, but time plus heart rate. Their rationale for time over distance was (1) it's less daunting to know you are going for time than distance, and (2) scheduling your training is much easier. However, the HR monitor is important to make sure your speed is where it should be (according to them). My own tendency was to want to run too fast in the base phase. That plan called for me to slow down so that I as more in the pure aerobic zone during base. I have to say though, I was really surprised at how much speed I picked up despite running kinda slowly for my training. Re: goggles. I had the Kaiman previously and the TYR Nest currently. The Kaiman were much better for sighting in open water. However, the Kaiman were also much more prone to both fogging and leaking than the TYR. The TYR has lasted a long time and have never once fogged on me nor leaked. Hurray for basketball brackets! Thanks for setting that up Janyne! |
|
2017-03-15 11:51 AM in reply to: amd723 |
Master 9705 Raleigh, NC area | Subject: RE: More Manatee Mayhem - 2017 Edition - Closed Originally posted by amd723 Originally posted by jmkizer Originally posted by amd723 Originally posted by jmkizer Originally posted by amd723 I've decided to be optimistic about my ability to actually start training for IM Lou (in a month) and started looking at the training plan i decided to use. I'm not a big fan of training by time and this plan does that, so, those of you who have trained for HIM or IM distances, how do you train: time or distance? If time, why? If you have or had a coach whose plan call by training by time, did he or she give an explanation for why?
When I was working with Maija, most of the runs were by time. Her thought on that was two-fold. After a certain amount of time, there are diminishing returns and sometimes rides are flat with no wind and sometimes they are up the side of a mountain. 30 miles of flat is not the same as 30 miles on the Blue Ridge Parkway and that was her way of leveling things out. For running, I couldn't even tell you because if a plan says time, I just translate that to how far to I need to run. Regarding plans, I think the Be Iron Fit ones tend to be pretty popular. I'm sure that you can get them into Training Peaks as a starting point and you an Susan can adjust from there. Thanks for all the replies on this! I think I will try to follow the plan and go by time with the intensity indicated for each workout and see how that translates! However, at least at first I know that i will not be able to do intense workouts as i either will still be recovering from my tendon injury or trying not to re-injure it! Regarding the plan, I've decided to use one by Gale Bernhardt. I used Be Iron Fit for my first HIM (just stopped before I got to IM distance!) and liked it, but I think i like Gale's plan better. And, as you suggested, I'm counting on Susan adjusting for my limiters as needed. We'll see how things go! Gale's plans are in TP as well. ;-) They are? I thought I looked for them, but maybe not! You can buy them and it will load. I think that you can rearrange from there. https://www.trainingpeaks.com/training-plans/triathlon/ironman |
2017-03-15 12:14 PM in reply to: TXTriRook |
Master 10208 Northern IL | Subject: RE: More Manatee Mayhem - 2017 Edition - Closed Originally posted by TXTriRook I find time as training an interesting and surprising way to train. When I was training for my 1st marathon a few months ago, everything was based on distance. I can't imagine why "run 1 hour" would make sense when 1 person could run 10 miles and another 5 miles in 1 hour. Maybe if it's a customized training plan based on a specific athlete's ability it's a different story. For my HIM's (I've only done 2), I did all my training based on distance and HR. There are some other explanations above on how it does make more sense. What you just did in this is show how to make the workouts more the same for varying ability. Some do have an easy pace (as found by VDOT or other method) of about 12'/mi where some of the fastest elites can actually have an e-pace breaking 6'/mi. The one hour run incurs about the same amount of stress whereas going by distance would give the slower runner twice that of the faster one. This also shows up in the faster running. Over on ST awhile ago, there was a discussion on what Ben True does. One thing was a solid effort tempo that goes for 8-9 miles. This sounds really long for a tempo, but then his threshold pace is better than 5:00/mi. That means it's taking him about 40' to run this. This is on the longer side for a tempo, but much more normal to see. Most people can't come close to this. And can't keep up that intensity for that distance. It's physically impossible for them. They can run that intense for 40', however, which would be replicating that workout as appropriate to their ability because both the intensity and duration would be more the same. |
2017-03-15 1:37 PM in reply to: brigby1 |
Master 9705 Raleigh, NC area | Subject: RE: More Manatee Mayhem - 2017 Edition - Closed Happy birthday, Melanie!!! |
2017-03-15 1:54 PM in reply to: brigby1 |
436 | Subject: RE: More Manatee Mayhem - 2017 Edition - Closed Originally posted by brigby1 Originally posted by TXTriRook I find time as training an interesting and surprising way to train. When I was training for my 1st marathon a few months ago, everything was based on distance. I can't imagine why "run 1 hour" would make sense when 1 person could run 10 miles and another 5 miles in 1 hour. Maybe if it's a customized training plan based on a specific athlete's ability it's a different story. For my HIM's (I've only done 2), I did all my training based on distance and HR. There are some other explanations above on how it does make more sense. What you just did in this is show how to make the workouts more the same for varying ability. Some do have an easy pace (as found by VDOT or other method) of about 12'/mi where some of the fastest elites can actually have an e-pace breaking 6'/mi. The one hour run incurs about the same amount of stress whereas going by distance would give the slower runner twice that of the faster one. This also shows up in the faster running. Over on ST awhile ago, there was a discussion on what Ben True does. One thing was a solid effort tempo that goes for 8-9 miles. This sounds really long for a tempo, but then his threshold pace is better than 5:00/mi. That means it's taking him about 40' to run this. This is on the longer side for a tempo, but much more normal to see. Most people can't come close to this. And can't keep up that intensity for that distance. It's physically impossible for them. They can run that intense for 40', however, which would be replicating that workout as appropriate to their ability because both the intensity and duration would be more the same. I don't doubt this has been analyzed and discussed over and over. Maybe one day I'll be able to understand it and actually make a noticeable improvement in my fitness |
|