BT Development Mentor Program Archives » JohnnyKay and Fred Doucette's HIM/IM focused Mentor group-CLOSED Rss Feed  
Moderators: alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 65
 
 
2011-04-13 7:56 PM
in reply to: #3435035

User image

Expert
1121
1000100
Menomonee Falls, WI
Subject: RE: JohnnyKay and Fred Doucette's HIM/IM focused Mentor group-CLOSED
I recognize the importance of experience in the longer distance triathlons, so this question will allow you to reminisce a bit about your first HIMs.  What kind of % of FTP did you shoot for on the bike in that first race?  What would be a good target you would now recommended for someone's first?  I have heard people go at 85% on the bike and others struggle with high 70's.  I'll obviously use my longer training rides & BRICKS to help take some of the guesswork out of it, but I'm sure it will still be a big guess.  Just curious what some of you did as HIM virgins?


2011-04-13 8:37 PM
in reply to: #3435035

User image

Subject: RE: JohnnyKay and Fred Doucette's HIM/IM focused Mentor group-CLOSED
I'm in the same boat as you.  Not quite sure what to shoot for, so in training, I'm shooting for 80% on my long rides.  The verdict is still out though.  Twice 80% felt too hard, but I also did some hard riding in those weeks.  Another time 80% felt really good, and noticed it was likely due to me skipping a ride a couple days prior.
2011-04-13 9:31 PM
in reply to: #3445304

User image

Elite
3779
20001000500100100252525
Ontario
Subject: RE: JohnnyKay and Fred Doucette's HIM/IM focused Mentor group-CLOSED
JohnnyKay - 2011-04-13 7:32 PM

1) I have raced HIMs from ~78% to 84%.  The difference is largely due to the nature of the course.  Hilly courses take longer so I ride at a lower percentage.  I've sort of calibrated to a TSS range that I feel comfortable with.  I will say that there is a BIG difference between 78% and 84% and if I rode 84% for a 3hr ride (I've done HIMs with 3+ hr bike legs), I would be toast for the run.

This is a good takeaway for me.  Muskoka is a really hilly course, so it makes sense to aim for the lower end of the range.  Especially since they throw in a tough run after a tough ride.

2011-04-13 10:42 PM
in reply to: #3435035

User image

Expert
2355
20001001001002525
Madison, Wisconsin
Subject: RE: JohnnyKay and Fred Doucette's HIM/IM focused Mentor group-CLOSED

Here are my approx splits from my 3 past HIM's. I am currently at a VDOT of 44 after testing a 46:xx 10k last year. With regards to the link sent on running at certain percentages it is clear I am not reaching my potential on the run. While my times have gone down, they have not by a significant amount. On all three of these HIM's only High Cliff did I not feel "fresh" for the run (I was sick all week prior) but for the other 2 I felt great getting off the bike, but still when the run came I couldn't deliver. Is this possible because of bad fitness on either of the three disciplines? Lack of base? Speedwork? Or was I just overpushing my bike? I ask this because I feel that I should be able to run under 2 hours but I seem to come up well short, and now as I am writing my training schedule for this summer I need more insight to what my limiter is to produce a solid run.

 

2009 Lake Geneva HIM: Bike 3:00:00 (flat), Run 2:20:00 (Very hilly)

2010 High Cliff HIM: Bike 2:58:00 (flat w/ rollers), Run 2:10:00 (large hill ran once, XC course)

2010 Racine 70.3:  Bike 2:39:00 (flat), Run 2:06:00 (Flat)

2011-04-13 10:54 PM
in reply to: #3435035

User image

Expert
2355
20001001001002525
Madison, Wisconsin
Subject: RE: JohnnyKay and Fred Doucette's HIM/IM focused Mentor group-CLOSED
One question about HR. When I train inside I am easily able to push myself to hit all zones and I can sustain 4 and 5 for stretches of time. When it comes to the outdoors I can't seem to hit those zones, mainly 4 and 5. Can anyone shed some light onto possible reasons for this? I am using to high of a gear, not pushing hard enough, rpms, or is it possibly as simple as I am not digging deep enough to produce the effort? I ask this because I seem to really struggle to get my HR above 160 outside and am curious to why this is, and with this summer and adding more intensity into my training it will be needed to reach those zones.
2011-04-14 5:08 AM
in reply to: #3445720

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.


2011-04-14 5:12 AM
in reply to: #3445629

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2011-04-14 5:14 AM
in reply to: #3435035

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.

Edited by Fred Doucette 2011-04-14 5:22 AM
2011-04-14 5:37 AM
in reply to: #3445832

Pro
4672
200020005001002525
Nutmeg State
Subject: RE: JohnnyKay and Fred Doucette's HIM/IM focused Mentor group-CLOSED
Fred Doucette - 2011-04-14 6:14 AM

OK, for those without power meters I apologize for the focus here.

We can discuss HR on the bike or RPE as well.

Can I ask the group (please each chime in) what you plan to use to pace your HIM or IM?

1. The swim? have you done a 500 yard or 1,000 yard (or meter) Time trial? If not I would suggest doing this at some point to get an idea of pacing. It's hard to pace during the actual OWS, but after sometimes you can look at results and see if you paced roughly correctly (assuming distance measured semi-ok)

2. Bike? RPE, HR, Power, Pace? Do you use any of these and what are your thoughts?

I think what I'm getting at is discussing PACING which is appropriate for your fitness would be a great discussion today.

Please EVERYONE chime in. I'm interested

 

1. On the swim I have problems pacing.  All of the pacing in my swim workouts is based on my 800 TT time, so I generally train at 1:30 - 1:40 per one hundred and should swim in a race in the 1:20s / 100.  The problem is I'm really bad at holding a pace in a race.  If I find a good set of feet, I can maintain my race pace.  Without someone around to "help" me pace, I tend to go out too slow. 

 

2. I have a Quark, but I train solely based on HR (but I record watts for my coach -- just like in the run, I train based solely on HR but record paces for my coach).  I have no watts targets when training (I also have no idea what my FTP is) but I race according to power.  Based on my training watts, my coach sets a watts target for races.  For a HIM my watts targets are generally about what I put out for 20 Min intervals.  For a full IM the watts target is slightly less. 

My corresponding HR for a HIM effort is high Z3/low Z4 on the Friel scale, for a full its high Z2/lowZ3 on the Friel scale.  I'm racing Rev 3 Quassy in June, which is a super hilly course, its going to be really interesting for me to see how well I can maintain my watts target with the hills.

 

In other thoughts, I arrived in Clermont, FL last night.  I'm here for a 4 day camp at the National Training Center.  It should be a really great four days -- I'm battling a little with allergies/asthma at the moment so I'm hoping it doesn't affect me too much.

2011-04-14 7:41 AM
in reply to: #3445045

Master
1420
1000100100100100
Reston, VA
Subject: RE: JohnnyKay and Fred Doucette's HIM/IM focused Mentor group-CLOSED
Fred Doucette - 2011-04-13 4:44 PM

My Max HR (guessing) for the run is about 175. Z2 for me (using Friel) ends at 149.

149/175 is 85%. I run my HIMs (run) close to 160 (high 150s). My LT=164.

So in essence I ran my HIM at 90% of MAX HR and just 5bpm below LT. This was Eagleman and HR were a bit distorted with the heat.



I ran the first 5 miles at Eagleman at the same pace I did all of Syr at (7:15ish). At Syr this was Z2 (cool), at Eagleman this was high Z3 early, moving into Z4. Knowing that I run an open half in Z4 (last open half I averaged 88% of my max), I thought I might blow up at Eagleman (I did) but took the risk as I was sitting in 4th with the top three guys in my AG in sight. Running by HR and pace seems to work for me coming off the bike - it did at Syr and TTT and even Eagleman I knew I was taking a big risk that I had not tried before (racing at that high of HR for a 1/2 IM).
2011-04-14 7:44 AM
in reply to: #3445970

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.


2011-04-14 7:48 AM
in reply to: #3445728

Master
1420
1000100100100100
Reston, VA
Subject: RE: JohnnyKay and Fred Doucette's HIM/IM focused Mentor group-CLOSED
chasingkona - 2011-04-13 11:54 PM

One question about HR. When I train inside I am easily able to push myself to hit all zones and I can sustain 4 and 5 for stretches of time. When it comes to the outdoors I can't seem to hit those zones, mainly 4 and 5. Can anyone shed some light onto possible reasons for this? I am using to high of a gear, not pushing hard enough, rpms, or is it possibly as simple as I am not digging deep enough to produce the effort? I ask this because I seem to really struggle to get my HR above 160 outside and am curious to why this is, and with this summer and adding more intensity into my training it will be needed to reach those zones.


For me it is much easier to get my HR up inside on the trainer than outside as inside is warmer and you do not get the airflow that you do riding outdoors. Also inside you are not starting/stopping like some outside rides.

During the summer, when it is warm I can get my HR up more outside.

You also may need to push harder - have you tried riding with someone a bit faster than you. A lot of people are able get their HR up higher when training with others. That whole fear of getting dropped thing.
2011-04-14 7:48 AM
in reply to: #3445832

Elite
3779
20001000500100100252525
Ontario
Subject: RE: JohnnyKay and Fred Doucette's HIM/IM focused Mentor group-CLOSED
Fred Doucette - 2011-04-14 6:14 AM

OK, for those without power meters I apologize for the focus here.

We can discuss HR on the bike or RPE as well.

Can I ask the group (please each chime in) what you plan to use to pace your HIM or IM?

1. The swim? have you done a 500 yard or 1,000 yard (or meter) Time trial? If not I would suggest doing this at some point to get an idea of pacing. It's hard to pace during the actual OWS, but after sometimes you can look at results and see if you paced roughly correctly (assuming distance measured semi-ok)

Great question, and I'll be interested to know how people pace + what may/could work best.  I'm a slow swimmer, and even though I've tried to improve my times they don't seem to get quicker, so I want to mostly focus on swimming to be fresher for the bike/run.  Currently 1000yd TT sees me at 1:39/100Yd.  I'm assuming I should be able to hold close to this pace in a wetsuit for a HIM, or am I kidding myself a bit with this?

2. Bike? RPE, HR, Power, Pace? Do you use any of these and what are your thoughts?

Power on the bike, and I plan to base all my short race pacing against FTP/CP.  HIM later in the season, so I plan to use a combination of FTP/CP values + what I learn from longer rides at different intensities over the next few months.

I run with a Garmin, and up to this point have been of the mindset that I pay attention to pace, and unless HR is really out of whack then I don't give a lot of attention to it.  Zone 2 vs 3, little bit in 4, no big deal.  After spending time in Fred's last group I'm now revising that and am trying to focus on 4 runs per week, two with some intensity where pace is key, 1 shorter, easier run in Z1/2, and my long run in the week will be kept in Z1/2.  Although I may let this slide for a couple of short spells in the next couple of weeks to remind myself what a higher intensity feels like later in the run as I get ready for my HM.

I think what I'm getting at is discussing PACING which is appropriate for your fitness would be a great discussion today.

Please EVERYONE chime in. I'm interested

2011-04-14 7:51 AM
in reply to: #3445988

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2011-04-14 8:06 AM
in reply to: #3445832

Bronze member
Subject: RE: JohnnyKay and Fred Doucette's HIM/IM focused Mentor group-CLOSED
Fred Doucette - 2011-04-14 5:14 AM

OK, for those without power meters I apologize for the focus here.

We can discuss HR on the bike or RPE as well.

Can I ask the group (please each chime in) what you plan to use to pace your HIM or IM?

1. The swim? have you done a 500 yard or 1,000 yard (or meter) Time trial? If not I would suggest doing this at some point to get an idea of pacing. It's hard to pace during the actual OWS, but after sometimes you can look at results and see if you paced roughly correctly (assuming distance measured semi-ok)

2. Bike? RPE, HR, Power, Pace? Do you use any of these and what are your thoughts?

I think what I'm getting at is discussing PACING which is appropriate for your fitness would be a great discussion today.

Please EVERYONE chime in. I'm interested

1. Yes, I have done a 1000 m time trial. I have issues pacing in a longer race just like Kelly. In fact copy her answer word for word! I end up swimming at my comfortable pace instead of my race pace and always feel like I could have tried harder. Our race is two loops. We have to exit the water and shout out our race  number after the first loop then get back in. I was planning on wearing a watch and checking my time after the first loop to gauge my pace a little better. I hope to practice this in the lake at different effort levels so I can see what a realistic time should be. 

2. Bike pacing - I am trying RPE. It is hard for me to gauge though. We are always pushing against the wind here. I have a hard time watching my mph plummet when I'm riding into the wind. Then I always try to make up for the time lost when the wind is at my back. I wanted to learn how to train by heart rate this winter but I did not feel confident in my ability to complete a threshold test on my own and get accurate info from it.

I am learning pace from race experience too. I have done the same Oly for the last 2 years. My first year I had no expectations and just maintained an easy pace. I had a great race and won my age group (I was the only one in my age group ). Last year I thought I should improve my time but we had 20 mph winds and I was knocked around a lot in the swim. I pushed too hard on the bike and my legs were shredded on the run. I improved my time by 4 minutes but was 4th in my age group and did not have one ounce of fun for the whole race. I'm realizing it is a trade off for me. I can either except that I am not as fast as I want to be and enjoy the race or continue to out pace myself and hate every minute!

2011-04-14 8:08 AM
in reply to: #3445270

Master
1420
1000100100100100
Reston, VA
Subject: RE: JohnnyKay and Fred Doucette's HIM/IM focused Mentor group-CLOSED
Fred Doucette - 2011-04-13 7:02 PM

Yup.

What do you think of his position in the limited angle pick?



Very interesting that many of the pros that come out of the wind tunnel test are going with their hands up so high. Jordan Rapp seems to believe that this is the most aero position for most people. I have tried it but can't get comfortable with it at all. Anyone else try it?


2011-04-14 8:12 AM
in reply to: #3435035

Expert
866
5001001001002525
Subject: RE: JohnnyKay and Fred Doucette's HIM/IM focused Mentor group-CLOSED
I'm quite novice at understanding power but am intrigued by the discussion and the articles I am starting to read. For the majority of my tri career I have been using primarily RPE but am beginning to accept that in order to move up to the next level I need to put more science into my training.This year I once again started using a HRM and have had some interesting findings which now have me set to have an ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation by an electrophysiologist. I will be running or biking then out of the blue my HR jumps to 220-240. I usually just push through it an it goes away. This doesn't happen with every session but it's annoying and makes heart rate calculations difficult. I did do a Bruce Protocol stress test and made it to level 8 with max HR of 173. I have been prescribed a beta blocker and flecainide to take if needed but it kills my workout. I tried to train with the Meds but my HR barely cleared 110 without excessive fatigue. So for now I'd rather live with it thru the season, then have the procedure. Of course, all this is with the blessing of the cardiologist. I usually log my swim times as 2 min per 100 yds (account for drills) but I did a 1000 TT at 1:46. I don't have very reliable bike/run data due to above, however when feeling race level RPE my run HR is around 150-160 and bike 140-150 range. I believe what I need to do is invest in a power meter, but for now RPE is what I will be using. Jim
2011-04-14 8:13 AM
in reply to: #3446038

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2011-04-14 8:23 AM
in reply to: #3445832

Expert
1187
1000100252525
Ontario
Subject: RE: JohnnyKay and Fred Doucette's HIM/IM focused Mentor group-CLOSED
Fred Doucette - 2011-04-14 6:14 AM

OK, for those without power meters I apologize for the focus here.

We can discuss HR on the bike or RPE as well.

Can I ask the group (please each chime in) what you plan to use to pace your HIM or IM?

1. The swim? have you done a 500 yard or 1,000 yard (or meter) Time trial? If not I would suggest doing this at some point to get an idea of pacing. It's hard to pace during the actual OWS, but after sometimes you can look at results and see if you paced roughly correctly (assuming distance measured semi-ok)

2. Bike? RPE, HR, Power, Pace? Do you use any of these and what are your thoughts?

I think what I'm getting at is discussing PACING which is appropriate for your fitness would be a great discussion today.

Please EVERYONE chime in. I'm interested

I'm a super slow swimmer and haven't done much over the winter.  My HIM plan has a couple 1000m TT to set training paces.  I really have no idea what pace I can swim with consistent training (plan has me swimming 3 - 4 times/9 day cycle) so these TT will be helpful in planning my training efforts.

On the bike and run I've used HR in the past and in my case I need it to ensure I'm working hard enough.  I have no problem staying in Zone 2 but need a lot of mental pushing to get up to Z4, and the HR monitor helps with this.  I plan to use HR to up my training intensity.  Not sure I'll use it to race though... Muskoka bike is so hilly I think attempting a constant effort by RPE will work better than HR monitoring.

2011-04-14 8:35 AM
in reply to: #3446062

Master
1420
1000100100100100
Reston, VA
Subject: RE: JohnnyKay and Fred Doucette's HIM/IM focused Mentor group-CLOSED
Fred Doucette - 2011-04-14 9:13 AM

trigal38 - 21. Yes, I have done a 1000 m time trial. I have issues pacing in a longer race just like Kelly. In fact copy her answer word for word! I end up swimming at my comfortable pace instead of my race pace and always feel like I could have tried harder. Our race is two loops. We have to exit the water and shout out our race  number after the first loop then get back in. I was planning on wearing a watch and checking my time after the first loop to gauge my pace a little better. I hope to practice this in the lake at different effort levels so I can see what a realistic time should be. 

2. Bike pacing - I am trying RPE. It is hard for me to gauge though. We are always pushing against the wind here. I have a hard time watching my mph plummet when I'm riding into the wind. Then I always try to make up for the time lost when the wind is at my back. I wanted to learn how to train by heart rate this winter but I did not feel confident in my ability to complete a threshold test on my own and get accurate info from it.

I am learning pace from race experience too. I have done the same Oly for the last 2 years. My first year I had no expectations and just maintained an easy pace. I had a great race and won my age group (I was the only one in my age group ). Last year I thought I should improve my time but we had 20 mph winds and I was knocked around a lot in the swim. I pushed too hard on the bike and my legs were shredded on the run. I improved my time by 4 minutes but was 4th in my age group and did not have one ounce of fun for the whole race. I'm realizing it is a trade off for me. I can either except that I am not as fast as I want to be and enjoy the race or continue to out pace myself and hate every minute!

I would like to here Dan's thoughts on how to pace a 1,000 TT as he is much more expert than me. My coach has me doing the following:

Start off at a certain effort below what I perceive as 1,000 TT pace. I then try to pick things up at 500 yards and really aim for faster the last 100-200 yards making sure I am pretty tired at the end.

OWS courses are rarely measured properly but I feel like tests like this take us out of our comfort zones in longer TTs. I think that is good practice as it reminds me that I can suffer in the water and I will still be ok. ie; I think it reassures me for OWS stuff.

Again, hopefully Dan will chime in.



Fred - I think your coach is right on. For a 1000 TT, mentally I am thinking about negative splitting it, even though in reality I am likely not. I would start out at a pace I would perceive to be slower than my 1000 TT pace (actually it is likely faster than my 1000 TT pace for the first 100-200), at the 200 pick it up a little and hold this comfortably hard pace until the five hundred. At the mid point I push to an uncomfortably hard pace and then the last 150 I start to really pick it up. My form may start to go a little in that last 150 but I expect it.
2011-04-14 9:15 AM
in reply to: #3445828

Expert
2355
20001001001002525
Madison, Wisconsin
Subject: RE: JohnnyKay and Fred Doucette's HIM/IM focused Mentor group-CLOSED
Fred Doucette - 2011-04-14 5:08 AM
chasingkona - 2011-04-13 11:42 PM

Here are my approx splits from my 3 past HIM's. I am currently at a VDOT of 44 after testing a 46:xx 10k last year. With regards to the link sent on running at certain percentages it is clear I am not reaching my potential on the run. While my times have gone down, they have not by a significant amount. On all three of these HIM's only High Cliff did I not feel "fresh" for the run (I was sick all week prior) but for the other 2 I felt great getting off the bike, but still when the run came I couldn't deliver. Is this possible because of bad fitness on either of the three disciplines? Lack of base? Speedwork? Or was I just overpushing my bike? I ask this because I feel that I should be able to run under 2 hours but I seem to come up well short, and now as I am writing my training schedule for this summer I need more insight to what my limiter is to produce a solid run.

 

2009 Lake Geneva HIM: Bike 3:00:00 (flat), Run 2:20:00 (Very hilly)

2010 High Cliff HIM: Bike 2:58:00 (flat w/ rollers), Run 2:10:00 (large hill ran once, XC course)

2010 Racine 70.3:  Bike 2:39:00 (flat), Run 2:06:00 (Flat)

Claerly something is wrong, because VDOT 44 would predict a HIM run of about 1:45 or so I think.

Here would be my guesses at causes of your poor run (in order of importance):
1. Bike fitness and pacing. What are your rides like. How hard are they. How hard an effort was the race bike split? How is your bike endurance?
2. Swim fitness and pacing? What were your swim splits? What is your best time in the pool for a 1,000 yard TT? How much do you swim?
3. Run fitness/endurance? Weekly miles, how many? How many longer runs?
4. Nutrition? I don't like to blame this one as it seems to be the triathlete crutch ("I could have ran better but I messed up my nutrition"). It can play a role for sure, but by far the least likely cause.

My guess if I were a betting man would be that it's all about the bike. Develop better bike fitness and pace your race more conservatively.

I might consider a power meter if you don't have one.

1. Bike fitness and pacing. What are your rides like. How hard are they. How hard an effort was the race bike split? How is your bike endurance?

Last year I wasn't as knowledgeable about the different ways to train on the bike and most of my rides would be either in zone 2 (long rides) or race pace (145-150). I would do some intervals and hill repeats as well, but my intervals were never more then 1-3 minutes. Looking back on this a year later with the knowledge I have gained I would say that a lot of my rides were" junk" miles. I plan on doing more TT'ing this year and adding in intervals into my longer rides as well and doing intervals of 15, 20, and maybe even 30 mins. I looked back and I rode my HIM splits last year at 143 and 145 bpm which seem to be low effort (my IM pace). My bike endurance seems to be strong, but that seems to be because I never push that hard and so my effort can sustain for a much longer time period. I can already tell that I have some work to do with the few intervals I have done outside of such 6x10 min where I am really hurting on that sisth interval.


2. Swim fitness and pacing? What were your swim splits? What is your best time in the pool for a 1,000 yard TT? How much do you swim?

My swim splits range from 35-40 min and I swam 1:15 at IM last year. A big note about this was I swam 100K TOTAL last year as I couldn't swim until April of last year due to a broken arm and dislocated shoulder. Still when I was swimming I would swim 4-5K a week and 6K would be huge for me. My 500 time was around 8:10, and I swam most of my other TT's around the 1:38 pace. This year with more time evoted in the water and doing masters I have lowered my 500 to a 7:08 time and I can swim strongly at a 1:30-1:32 pace but I still have to do a longer distance TT. Last year I swam 2-3 times a week this year right now is 3-4 and I am hoping to swim 4-5 during my training block for Racine.


3. Run fitness/endurance? Weekly miles, how many? How many longer runs?

Run is my weakness period. Generally I run about 20 miles a week in training and about 15 in my base. Long runs is where it gets hard for me, and last year I didn't have too many of those. My long runs in the spring last year were weekly around 6-10 miles, but once June started I didn't have many until August (After both HIM's). This year I am planning on doing 10-12 miles for my long runs in leading up to Racine. Would/should I need to go further then  13.1?


4. Nutrition? I don't like to blame this one as it seems to be the triathlete crutch ("I could have ran better but I messed up my nutrition"). It can play a role for sure, but by far the least likely cause. Yeah my nutrition was good for Racine last year, I think it was more of other factors, and that it was in the 90's on the run that led to a poor run. But I still do need to find a solid nutrition plan.

 

From this angle I would say that my bike and run fitness are the two main causes for my lack of a solid run. Feel free to look at my logs as well and get an idea of what I did last year. I think I have lots to improve on and know what I need to do in training this year to have more success this year as well.



2011-04-14 9:21 AM
in reply to: #3445832

Expert
2355
20001001001002525
Madison, Wisconsin
Subject: RE: JohnnyKay and Fred Doucette's HIM/IM focused Mentor group-CLOSED
Fred Doucette - 2011-04-14 5:14 AM

OK, for those without power meters I apologize for the focus here.

We can discuss HR on the bike or RPE as well.

Can I ask the group (please each chime in) what you plan to use to pace your HIM or IM?

1. The swim? have you done a 500 yard or 1,000 yard (or meter) Time trial? If not I would suggest doing this at some point to get an idea of pacing. It's hard to pace during the actual OWS, but after sometimes you can look at results and see if you paced roughly correctly (assuming distance measured semi-ok)

2. Bike? RPE, HR, Power, Pace? Do you use any of these and what are your thoughts?

I think what I'm getting at is discussing PACING which is appropriate for your fitness would be a great discussion today.

Please EVERYONE chime in. I'm interested

 

The swim? have you done a 500 yard or 1,000 yard (or meter) Time trial?

As mentioned in my above post I have done TT's in the pool and right now I know I can swim 7:08 with a hard effort for 500 yards. I use this as my barometer but mostly go off feel in the swim, If I feel good I will push a little, no so good and I will hold back.

Bike? RPE, HR, Power, Pace?

I do not have a powermeter and do not have the means to get one right now. But I do enjoy the purity of going off RPE and I am trying the best that I can to match RPE with HR. I use HR in training but only as a "Rule of thumb" and never solely go by what it says. In racing I try moreso to have a target HR and use RPE as well.

For running I will be using a garmin this year and HR as well and I will see where that takes me. Last year in the fall I used my Garmin and clocked in not only PR's in a 10K and HM but also what I thought were two of my most well paced and ran races.

2011-04-14 9:51 AM
in reply to: #3445837

Elite
3779
20001000500100100252525
Ontario
Subject: RE: JohnnyKay and Fred Doucette's HIM/IM focused Mentor group-CLOSED
kaburns1214 - 2011-04-14 6:37 AM

2. I have a Quark, but I train solely based on HR (but I record watts for my coach -- just like in the run, I train based solely on HR but record paces for my coach).  I have no watts targets when training (I also have no idea what my FTP is) but I race according to power.  Based on my training watts, my coach sets a watts target for races.  For a HIM my watts targets are generally about what I put out for 20 Min intervals.  For a full IM the watts target is slightly less. 

Why do you not use the PM for training and rely on HR, but you use the PM for racing?  And I'm assuming the 20min intervals are not at a very high exertion considering this are at your HIM pace.  Just trying to understand since I don't believe I've seen anyone using this approach before.

2011-04-14 9:58 AM
in reply to: #3446236

Not a Coach
11473
5000500010001001001001002525
Media, PA
Subject: RE: JohnnyKay and Fred Doucette's HIM/IM focused Mentor group-CLOSED
chasingkona - 2011-04-14 10:15 AM

Run is my weakness period. Generally I run about 20 miles a week in training and about 15 in my base. Long runs is where it gets hard for me, and last year I didn't have too many of those. My long runs in the spring last year were weekly around 6-10 miles, but once June started I didn't have many until August (After both HIM's). This year I am planning on doing 10-12 miles for my long runs in leading up to Racine. Would/should I need to go further then  13.1?

You are doing an awesome job with your swimming--getting more swims, swimming longer, harder, etc.  I think you would benefit by taking the same kind of approach to your running.  It's not the long runs that I'd focus on (though you should do more of those, as well), but just frequency and weekly mileage.  If you can, try to gradually edge that 15-20mpw towards 30mpw.  That should have you running 8-10mi long runs on a consistent basis and pushing out to 12-15 for a training block or two will not be a big deal.  Right now, any run in the 10mi area is going to be pretty stressful on you--let alone 13.1 after 1.2/56.

I can pretty much guarantee that if you do nothing else different but that (no speed work or even tempo running), you will get faster in races.  Especially as you look beyond this season.

 

2011-04-14 10:04 AM
in reply to: #3446343

Not a Coach
11473
5000500010001001001001002525
Media, PA
Subject: RE: JohnnyKay and Fred Doucette's HIM/IM focused Mentor group-CLOSED
GoFaster - 2011-04-14 10:51 AM
kaburns1214 - 2011-04-14 6:37 AM

2. I have a Quark, but I train solely based on HR (but I record watts for my coach -- just like in the run, I train based solely on HR but record paces for my coach).  I have no watts targets when training (I also have no idea what my FTP is) but I race according to power.  Based on my training watts, my coach sets a watts target for races.  For a HIM my watts targets are generally about what I put out for 20 Min intervals.  For a full IM the watts target is slightly less. 

Why do you not use the PM for training and rely on HR, but you use the PM for racing?  And I'm assuming the 20min intervals are not at a very high exertion considering this are at your HIM pace.  Just trying to understand since I don't believe I've seen anyone using this approach before.

She's using it only to provide info for her coach who is apparently 'reverse engineering' power zones from her training HRs.  Her coach appears to be assuming that HR efforts in training will be a good guage of stress, on average.  But that power will be a better measure on any single day (eg, HR could fluctuate simply due to 'race' excitement).  Unconventional, for sure.  She'll have to see how it works out.

 

New Thread
BT Development Mentor Program Archives » JohnnyKay and Fred Doucette's HIM/IM focused Mentor group-CLOSED Rss Feed  
 
 
of 65