General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Kona Qualifying- What it takes.. Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 10
 
 
2007-08-20 2:45 PM
in reply to: #932727

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.


2007-08-20 2:46 PM
in reply to: #922334

Champion
9600
500020002000500100
Fountain Hills, AZ
Subject: RE: Kona Qualifying- What it takes..
I'm sorry, Rick, I couldn't hear you over the sound of my own laughter at gadzinm's comment that training for Ironman is as easy as adding some mileage to your 70.3 training!

BUT, it does bring us back on topic, which is good. Training for IM is a whole world different from 70.3. It's 2x the distance and will take more than 2x as long. Training for a Kona slot at IM is a whole different universe, as I said in my initial post of this thread. Maybe that's reason enough to make Kona slots only available through IM racing. It also would preclude the situation, which has occured, wher Kona is an athletes first IM distance race. I still contend that I would rather Kona qualifiers have qualified at an IM.
2007-08-20 2:48 PM
in reply to: #932727

Elite
3235
2000100010010025
San Diego
Subject: RE: Kona Qualifying- What it takes..

First, I have no desire to race in Kona, so take what I say with a grain of salt.

Lottery: I don't have a problem with it. Some of us will never qualify and Kona is a very popular race. This gives those of us that would love to be there, a chance.

Half IM slots: Undecided. At first I agreed, there is a champioship race for this level, let them race there. But, the point was brought up about 2 IM's in one season. Even if you don't factor in the recovery time and loss of "B" races while training for 2 IM's, the expense alone would be enough to exclude quite a few. Again, not sure.

Kona as a first IM: My buddy got in through the lottery on his first attempt in his first real season. He lost 200 pounds and decided to get into triathlons. He applied because he thought "Would I ever want to go to Kona? If the answer is yes, then I will apply now and never wonder, what if". He trained his butt off, so he didn't embarrass himself out there and he did quite well. (don't remember his time). But, this race killed the sport for him. Afterwards, he thought "What's left?". He will never qualify nor win the lottery again. And he couldn't see himself doing a bunch of sprints for the rest of his life, so he pretty much dropped out of the sport.

Now, he is the only person I know that did Kona first, and he didn't qualify, so other's experiences may differ.

For me, I'll just focus on going longer, until I can't

 

2007-08-20 2:54 PM
in reply to: #932757

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2007-08-20 2:57 PM
in reply to: #932801

Champion
9430
50002000200010010010010025
No excuses!
Subject: RE: Kona Qualifying- What it takes..
madcow - 2007-08-20 3:48 PM

First, I have no desire to race in Kona, so take what I say with a grain of salt.

Lottery: I don't have a problem with it. Some of us will never qualify and Kona is a very popular race. This gives those of us that would love to be there, a chance.

Half IM slots: Undecided. At first I agreed, there is a champioship race for this level, let them race there. But, the point was brought up about 2 IM's in one season. Even if you don't factor in the recovery time and loss of "B" races while training for 2 IM's, the expense alone would be enough to exclude quite a few. Again, not sure.

Kona as a first IM: My buddy got in through the lottery on his first attempt in his first real season. He lost 200 pounds and decided to get into triathlons. He applied because he thought "Would I ever want to go to Kona? If the answer is yes, then I will apply now and never wonder, what if". He trained his butt off, so he didn't embarrass himself out there and he did quite well. (don't remember his time). But, this race killed the sport for him. Afterwards, he thought "What's left?". He will never qualify nor win the lottery again. And he couldn't see himself doing a bunch of sprints for the rest of his life, so he pretty much dropped out of the sport.

Now, he is the only person I know that did Kona first, and he didn't qualify, so other's experiences may differ.

For me, I'll just focus on going longer, until I can't

 



Well that is partially how Ironman came to be. People do something and then wonder what now can I challenge myself with. I personally come from a pure running background. I have done 17 marathons including Boston twice and now need something more.

I want to run a marathon in every state and no way else do I want Hawaii than through Kona.

As far as training for an Ironman killing the rest of your season, it is a choice some have to make. You can't always have your cake and eat it too. I raced marathons and had to give up having fast 5k's in the process. Two different animals.
2007-08-20 2:58 PM
in reply to: #932794

Not a Coach
11473
5000500010001001001001002525
Media, PA
Subject: RE: Kona Qualifying- What it takes..

bryancd - 2007-08-20 2:46 PM I'm sorry, Rick, I couldn't hear you over the sound of my own laughter at gadzinm's comment that training for Ironman is as easy as adding some mileage to your 70.3 training!

BUT, it does bring us back on topic, which is good. Training for IM is a whole world different from 70.3. It's 2x the distance and will take more than 2x as long. Training for a Kona slot at IM is a whole different universe, as I said in my initial post of this thread. Maybe that's reason enough to make Kona slots only available through IM racing. It also would preclude the situation, which has occured, wher Kona is an athletes first IM distance race. I still contend that I would rather Kona qualifiers have qualified at an IM.

I disagree again.  Training to race a HIM is 90% the same as IM.  The 10% difference can be accomplished in a relatively short period of time--say 8-12 weeks.  You make it sound as if there's some enormous training difference at the IM (or at least Kona qualifying) level.  There is very little difference at all.



2007-08-20 2:59 PM
in reply to: #932813

Champion
9430
50002000200010010010010025
No excuses!
Subject: RE: Kona Qualifying- What it takes..
JeepFleeb - 2007-08-20 3:54 PM

Daremo - 2007-08-20 2:36 PM
...and I personally don't think it should be around either.

If there's any reason for it to be around, it's because that's what Ironman's founding father wanted.

From the 'Ironman: The Beginning' thread -

Ironically, Collins transferred out of Hawaii just as his baby hit the big time in 1980. He turned the event over to the owners of a local health club. No money changed hands, but Collins did receive assurance that he could race for free any year that he wanted, and that “they would save a few racing spots for the ‘common man,’ because these were the type of individuals who created the race.”

What other sport let's a handfull of everyday competitors race beside the world's best?
Both pro and age group.




In marathoning Boston does the same thing. From the 100 year anniversary to corporate spots. Greg Meyer the last American to win in 83 is from my area and he has got some people from my running club in through "different means".
2007-08-20 3:07 PM
in reply to: #932829

Not a Coach
11473
5000500010001001001001002525
Media, PA
Subject: RE: Kona Qualifying- What it takes..

Shermbelle - 2007-08-20 2:57 PM

As far as training for an Ironman killing the rest of your season, it is a choice some have to make. You can't always have your cake and eat it too. I raced marathons and had to give up having fast 5k's in the process. Two different animals.

But I bet your half-marathon times benefitted at the same time.

2007-08-20 3:31 PM
in reply to: #932859

Champion
9430
50002000200010010010010025
No excuses!
Subject: RE: Kona Qualifying- What it takes..
JohnnyKay - 2007-08-20 4:07 PM

Shermbelle - 2007-08-20 2:57 PM

As far as training for an Ironman killing the rest of your season, it is a choice some have to make. You can't always have your cake and eat it too. I raced marathons and had to give up having fast 5k's in the process. Two different animals.

But I bet your half-marathon times benefitted at the same time.



Well they should have with a good training plan but my training back then was all over the board. Racing 40+ weekends a year, never tapering, everything on a whim. That is why I need a coach for Ironmans. I am doing Redman Iron Distance next month and my training has been sh@@. Good days, great workouts then horrible weeks and just no consistency. No one to look over my shoulder and steer me back on track when I fall off.
2007-08-20 4:27 PM
in reply to: #932832

Champion
9600
500020002000500100
Fountain Hills, AZ
Subject: RE: Kona Qualifying- What it takes..
JohnnyKay - 2007-08-20 2:58 PM

bryancd - 2007-08-20 2:46 PM I'm sorry, Rick, I couldn't hear you over the sound of my own laughter at gadzinm's comment that training for Ironman is as easy as adding some mileage to your 70.3 training!

BUT, it does bring us back on topic, which is good. Training for IM is a whole world different from 70.3. It's 2x the distance and will take more than 2x as long. Training for a Kona slot at IM is a whole different universe, as I said in my initial post of this thread. Maybe that's reason enough to make Kona slots only available through IM racing. It also would preclude the situation, which has occured, wher Kona is an athletes first IM distance race. I still contend that I would rather Kona qualifiers have qualified at an IM.

I disagree again.  Training to race a HIM is 90% the same as IM.  The 10% difference can be accomplished in a relatively short period of time--say 8-12 weeks.  You make it sound as if there's some enormous training difference at the IM (or at least Kona qualifying) level.  There is very little difference at all.



Not in my world, my friend.

All right, NO MORE LOTTERY talk and I think we have vetted the 70.3 slots well enogh at this point. I want this discussion to continue as an analysis of Kona qualifying it what it takes.

Actuall, Johnny, I think you raised this point earlier on. Is there a difference between racing an IM for a Kona slot or racing to your own maximum potential or trying to achieve a PR? I said it was different, but we never continued that conversation. I was thinking about it the other day. It's often said that for an AG'er, Ironman is a race against yourself and the clock, whicj I think is very true. To race an IM with the goal of qualfying, it becomes an actual race between competitors. You can be headed towards a PR, but if a guy in your AG passes you, its suddenly matters. It forces you to make decisions differently as the race progresses.

I left T2 with a fellow 35-39'er directly behind me. I spent the first mile making sure I put some distance on him, I may not have done that had I just been going for a PR. Later, I was passed by another age grouper and had to respond. Being forced to respond to an attack at mile 17 of an IM run, that ain't easy, but I needed to continue to hold my position in the field. A very different mind set, at least for me.
2007-08-20 4:40 PM
in reply to: #932794

Expert
1296
1000100100252525
Subject: RE: Kona Qualifying- What it takes..
bryancd - 2007-08-20 3:46 PM

I'm sorry, Rick, I couldn't hear you over the sound of my own laughter at gadzinm's comment that training for Ironman is as easy as adding some mileage to your 70.3 training!

BUT, it does bring us back on topic, which is good. Training for IM is a whole world different from 70.3. It's 2x the distance and will take more than 2x as long. Training for a Kona slot at IM is a whole different universe, as I said in my initial post of this thread. Maybe that's reason enough to make Kona slots only available through IM racing. It also would preclude the situation, which has occured, wher Kona is an athletes first IM distance race. I still contend that I would rather Kona qualifiers have qualified at an IM.


First thanks to Aaron for sharing the input about his coach and Kona. That was what I was looking for. I have no desire to race IM any place other than Kona. Not sure why but that's just how I feel about it. I have felt that way for quite a long time too.

Second, may I ask you to settle the laughing down for just a minute. j/k

Seriously, here are my average weekly numbers for HIM training. Now as JK said with an 8-12 week increase in some cycling and running I firmly believe that someone with a solid background in the sport can make the jump from HIM to IM training and be successful at it. It's not for everyone nor the weak of heart. But if you have the background and can commit I firmly believe that it can be done within the framework of similar HIM training concepts minus some higher intensity stuff.

My strength is swimming so I see really no need to increase my swim volume. 15K a week is a joke. I use to swim 8K-15K a day 6 days a week when I was in college. The 15K merely provides me a feel for the water and maintenance work. In fact I would be willing to take a hit with the swim volume to up the run volume.

Weekly Numbers:
15000 Yard/Meters
150-200 Miles Biking
25-35 Miles Running
Strength Training, etc....


2007-08-20 4:53 PM
in reply to: #933079

Expert
1296
1000100100252525
Subject: RE: Kona Qualifying- What it takes..
bryancd - 2007-08-20 5:27 PM
Actuall, Johnny, I think you raised this point earlier on. Is there a difference between racing an IM for a Kona slot or racing to your own maximum potential or trying to achieve a PR? I said it was different, but we never continued that conversation. I was thinking about it the other day. It's often said that for an AG'er, Ironman is a race against yourself and the clock, whicj I think is very true. To race an IM with the goal of qualfying, it becomes an actual race between competitors. You can be headed towards a PR, but if a guy in your AG passes you, its suddenly matters. It forces you to make decisions differently as the race progresses.


Another interesting topic! Kind of along the "What it takes" lines but here is my question about the above points. A lot of people seem to know what time it takes to qualify at NA IM races. So lets say it's 10:0X to qualify at IMLP M30-34? Just a hypothetical. Not sure I know the exact trends and standards. Do you train to race 10:xx just to qualify for Kona or do you go out and train to race a PR and blow the standard away?

Does the mere fact that you are training based on target times for a Kona qualify in your age group become a limiter in that you may never fully perform to a PR or the best of your ability?

I know what my splits are going to be down to the minute but if for some reason I am going ba!!s out on race day and hitting everything spot on and crushing it do I slow down because I am way ahead of Kona qualify pace? I personally don't. I would rather see guy’s race ba!!s to the wall and fail, learn from their mistakes rather then say I knew I had to go 10:XX to qualify and then go out and go 10:XX when they could have actually gone 9:XX.

Kind of confusing explanation. Just blame the "SKI" at the end of my name if your confused. I am Polish....
2007-08-20 5:00 PM
in reply to: #922334

Champion
9600
500020002000500100
Fountain Hills, AZ
Subject: RE: Kona Qualifying- What it takes..
OK, the giggles have passed....
But seriously, let's move on with this discussion on Kona qualifying as opposed to HIM vs. IM training. People are free to work as hard or as little as they want to train. What I have seen in comparing MY Ironman training vs. the Half IM training my coach was providing other athletes was a much more dramatic difference in volume for me than 10%, that's all. Again, this is MY personal experience, your results may vary.
2007-08-20 5:44 PM
in reply to: #933120

Pro
4675
20002000500100252525
Wisconsin near the Twin Cities metro
Subject: RE: Kona Qualifying- What it takes..

gadzinm - 2007-08-20 4:53 PM  Another interesting topic! Kind of along the "What it takes" lines but here is my question about the above points. A lot of people seem to know what time it takes to qualify at NA IM races. So lets say it's 10:0X to qualify at IMLP M30-34? Just a hypothetical. Not sure I know the exact trends and standards. Do you train to race 10:xx just to qualify for Kona or do you go out and train to race a PR and blow the standard away?

In my case, no.  I just happen to focus on the avg Kona qualifying times for my AG at WI because I'm new to this game and want to know what the trends are for qualifying at WI.  My long-term goal is to get my IM time down below 9:30 (pretty ballsy for someone who is already 46 years old, eh   ), which would blow away the current qualifying times for my AG at WI (haven't analyzed other races yet).  My training is geared toward my long-term goal, but just like it took me several attempts to learn how to "race" a stand-alone marathon, it will take me a few tries to learn how to "race" an IM, learn how to swim and improve on the bike, and get below 9:30. 

2007-08-20 6:05 PM
in reply to: #922334

Champion
9430
50002000200010010010010025
No excuses!
Subject: RE: Kona Qualifying- What it takes..
I think it brings up the decsion of wanting to qualify or have an incredible time to qualify with. Me personally as I try to qualify next year, I want to just get in and everything else would be gravy. Maybe if someday I could get to that point of hammering an incredible time I would feel different.
2007-08-20 6:07 PM
in reply to: #933191

Expert
1296
1000100100252525
Subject: RE: Kona Qualifying- What it takes..
Birkierunner - 2007-08-20 6:44 PM

gadzinm - 2007-08-20 4:53 PM  Another interesting topic! Kind of along the "What it takes" lines but here is my question about the above points. A lot of people seem to know what time it takes to qualify at NA IM races. So lets say it's 10:0X to qualify at IMLP M30-34? Just a hypothetical. Not sure I know the exact trends and standards. Do you train to race 10:xx just to qualify for Kona or do you go out and train to race a PR and blow the standard away?

In my case, no.  I just happen to focus on the avg Kona qualifying times for my AG at WI because I'm new to this game and want to know what the trends are for qualifying at WI.  My long-term goal is to get my IM time down below 9:30 (pretty ballsy for someone who is already 46 years old, eh   ), which would blow away the current qualifying times for my AG at WI (haven't analyzed other races yet).  My training is geared toward my long-term goal, but just like it took me several attempts to learn how to "race" a stand-alone marathon, it will take me a few tries to learn how to "race" an IM, learn how to swim and improve on the bike, and get below 9:30. 



Seriously, I applaud this response. Nice!

Being cognizant of race times and knowing you can destroy them is a great feeling and it's the motivation that should fuel you to go fast. Practical thinking yet the abilty to not settle for other people's results.


2007-08-20 6:07 PM
in reply to: #933120

Champion
9600
500020002000500100
Fountain Hills, AZ
Subject: RE: Kona Qualifying- What it takes..
gadzinm - 2007-08-20 4:53 PM
Another interesting topic! Kind of along the "What it takes" lines but here is my question about the above points. A lot of people seem to know what time it takes to qualify at NA IM races. So lets say it's 10:0X to qualify at IMLP M30-34? Just a hypothetical. Not sure I know the exact trends and standards. Do you train to race 10:xx just to qualify for Kona or do you go out and train to race a PR and blow the standard away?

Does the mere fact that you are training based on target times for a Kona qualify in your age group become a limiter in that you may never fully perform to a PR or the best of your ability?


A good point. In my case, the answer is both as I had never done an IM race, so I had no previous experience. I knew that I would need a 10 hour flat race to make it (turns out it was a 9:59, so even using the previous years data you never really know). You don't train for a specific time, you train to minimize your time. So I never was given a workout that was geared towrards time goals, my only hope would be that through maximizing my training and my potential I would minimize the time spent on the course. What you WILL know from your training is, as you said, what your split times should be. Again, another reason I started this thread was to get people to be honest about what they put and and what their expectations are with what comes out at the end. You will start the race knowing if you are in range of that time goal of qualifying even though you didn't train based on the time goal.

It's during the race that it gets tricky. No one is going to pull up and say, "ok, I got it in the bag, time to cruise." What is more likely going to happen is ,"oh crap, I just got passsed by ANOTHER dude in my AG...how many does that make? How much further? What time is it? Why did I PAY for this?!" That's when the decision to go for it and risk blowing up comes into play. I don't think there are many AG'ers who cruise to a qualifying slot and I would say that AG'ers who do earn slots leave it all out there. I know I did and when I saw that 9:43 it was that much sweeter.
2007-08-20 6:09 PM
in reply to: #933222

Champion
9600
500020002000500100
Fountain Hills, AZ
Subject: RE: Kona Qualifying- What it takes..
Shermbelle - 2007-08-20 6:05 PM

I think it brings up the decsion of wanting to qualify or have an incredible time to qualify with. Me personally as I try to qualify next year, I want to just get in and everything else would be gravy. Maybe if someday I could get to that point of hammering an incredible time I would feel different.


They're not that much different, qualifying vs. hammering an incredible time. There are no walk on slots for Kona, people want them too much. The ONLY option is to show up with the attitude I'm going to crush this race and hope you beat enough of your competition to make the cut.
2007-08-20 6:23 PM
in reply to: #922334

Champion
9430
50002000200010010010010025
No excuses!
Subject: RE: Kona Qualifying- What it takes..
I think I am saying more staying within your game plan. Say I need 10:00 roughly at CDA ( of course you never know) and am on pace into the marathon. At the half way point do you continue on plan or risk it all by speeding up for no reason other than to see what is possible (unless of course someone in your age group is making a pass).

I am more of a newbie to tris than Birkie so I am still trying to figure out where I should be and what is possible.
2007-08-20 6:34 PM
in reply to: #933250

Champion
9600
500020002000500100
Fountain Hills, AZ
Subject: RE: Kona Qualifying- What it takes..
Shermbelle - 2007-08-20 6:23 PM

I think I am saying more staying within your game plan. Say I need 10:00 roughly at CDA ( of course you never know) and am on pace into the marathon. At the half way point do you continue on plan or risk it all by speeding up for no reason other than to see what is possible (unless of course someone in your age group is making a pass).

I am more of a newbie to tris than Birkie so I am still trying to figure out where I should be and what is possible.


I understand, and what I am saying is that at the half way point of the run, you are not going to be feeling the way to described if you are on qualifying pace. You will be suffering and wanting the race to be over. This idea that you will get to the half way point on the run on track for a Kona qualifying time and be feeling like you have more to give is fantasy land so don't worry about it!
Your game plan SHOULD be one which places you on the ragged edge of performance if qualifying is your goal.

Edited by bryancd 2007-08-20 6:35 PM
2007-08-20 6:45 PM
in reply to: #922334

Champion
9430
50002000200010010010010025
No excuses!
Subject: RE: Kona Qualifying- What it takes..
Agreed!!


2007-08-20 7:11 PM
in reply to: #922334

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2007-08-20 7:25 PM
in reply to: #933326

Champion
9430
50002000200010010010010025
No excuses!
Subject: RE: Kona Qualifying- What it takes..
JeepFleeb - 2007-08-20 8:11 PM

The last 6 miles is an all out effort; don’t leave anything on the course.QUOTE]

Exactly!! Well put!!
2007-08-20 7:25 PM
in reply to: #933264

Not a Coach
11473
5000500010001001001001002525
Media, PA
Subject: RE: Kona Qualifying- What it takes..

bryancd - 2007-08-20 6:34 PM

Your game plan SHOULD be one which places you on the ragged edge of performance if qualifying is your goal.

OK, agreed.  But this is how I aim to perform in almost any race, i.e., leave it all out on the course.  Unfortunately, my current "all" isn't Kona material yet.  Doesn't mean I don't train and race to try to maximize my CURRENT potential.  I know not everybody races like this.  But maybe that's why I see very little difference in approaching IM/Kona qualifying training.  Once I get "in range", I'll know it's possible for me and it will be about race execution and who shows up that day.  The only difference I can see is during the race (not training).  And that is I might decide to push it earlier than if it were just for personal satisfaction if it seemed to serve some tactical purpose.  So maybe I'd take some added risks.  But if I were really confident in my abilities, I still think I would race my own race at least until the final 10k or so.

2007-08-20 8:42 PM
in reply to: #933343

Champion
9600
500020002000500100
Fountain Hills, AZ
Subject: RE: Kona Qualifying- What it takes..
JohnnyKay - 2007-08-20 7:25 PM
OK, agreed.  But this is how I aim to perform in almost any race, i.e., leave it all out on the course.  Unfortunately, my current "all" isn't Kona material yet.  Doesn't mean I don't train and race to try to maximize my CURRENT potential.  I know not everybody races like this.


Ah, but you do, and that's why you are participating in this thread. And you are correct, from a race standpoint, someone like you won't do anything differently come race day. Race day is ALWAYS about being the best. The difference will be in your preperation for that day that will determine whether or not you have what it takes. That hand is dealt BEFORE the gun for the most part, that's the startegic, the race is tactical.
New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Kona Qualifying- What it takes.. Rss Feed  
 
 
of 10