Triathlon Dating Thread (Page 7)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller |
Reply CLOSED
|
|
2012-04-10 9:50 AM in reply to: #4140492 |
Buttercup 14334 | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Saw this Geico commercial; great idea for your Karaoke dating profile. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQNE0QTIItE&feature=youtu.be Let's hear your dating song parody. |
|
2012-04-10 9:54 AM in reply to: #4140522 |
Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
2012-04-10 9:58 AM in reply to: #4140491 |
Elite 5145 Cleveland | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread NRG42 - 2012-04-10 10:42 AM cgregg - 2012-04-10 9:37 AM DeannaS - 2012-04-10 10:26 AM so I had to take matters into my own hands Yeah, been there a lot.Good to know you need both hands. Just saying |
2012-04-10 10:16 AM in reply to: #4140460 |
Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
2012-04-10 10:28 AM in reply to: #4140606 |
Buttercup 14334 | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Teejaay - 2012-04-10 11:16 AM DeannaS - 2012-04-10 7:34 AM trinnas - 2012-04-10 9:28 AM Yah, that's usually a red flag for me, too.Muskrat37 - 2012-04-10 10:16 AM looking for a younger woman. LOL And people wonder why they don't get dates from Match.com. That line right there would be a non-starter for me even if I was younger. I would rather someone be brutally honest about what they do and don't want ... even if it is off putting to me ... if I saw that I would just move on to the next profile without a second thought. And if you see it as non-starter or red flag then it's a win/win for you that no time was invested in someone that doesn't like what you have to offer. I concur. I don't even find that kind of honesty brutal, it's just what he wants. We're entitled to our preferences. I have no interest in someone younger than me and make no apologies for it. |
2012-04-10 10:33 AM in reply to: #4140437 |
Master 1890 Gig Harbor | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread trinnas - 2012-04-10 7:28 AM Muskrat37 - 2012-04-10 10:16 AM DeannaS - 2012-04-10 7:12 AM briderdt - 2012-04-10 9:07 AM I'm just here to see where the Mr Gig Harbor and Miss Kansas thing is going... That DOES seem to be the most interesting thing going on...I don't think so - not with all the talk about the couples spanking each other - and the picture that I can't tell if that is a dude or a chick throwing gang signs. On another note - I got "winked" at on match.com the other day, by a 61 year old lady with no profile picture who stated in her profile that she likes to snuggle by the fire. She clearly can't read either, because my profile says that I am very active and looking for a younger woman. LOL And people wonder why they don't get dates from Match.com. That line right there would be a non-starter for me even if I was younger. I have dated older women my entire life - Not on purpose, just because I did not use age as a qualifier. My ex wife was 8 years older than me - the woman I lived with before here was 10 years older. This time around, I decided I was going to date a woman younger than me. BTW - I just looked and my profile actually says Seeking women 30-42 - so I did allow for a couple years older than I. You have to draw the line somewhere - and 61 is way over the line! LOL |
|
2012-04-10 10:35 AM in reply to: #4140671 |
Champion 12759 Chicago | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Muskrat37 - 2012-04-10 10:33 AM trinnas - 2012-04-10 7:28 AM Muskrat37 - 2012-04-10 10:16 AM DeannaS - 2012-04-10 7:12 AM briderdt - 2012-04-10 9:07 AM I'm just here to see where the Mr Gig Harbor and Miss Kansas thing is going... That DOES seem to be the most interesting thing going on...I don't think so - not with all the talk about the couples spanking each other - and the picture that I can't tell if that is a dude or a chick throwing gang signs. On another note - I got "winked" at on match.com the other day, by a 61 year old lady with no profile picture who stated in her profile that she likes to snuggle by the fire. She clearly can't read either, because my profile says that I am very active and looking for a younger woman. LOL And people wonder why they don't get dates from Match.com. That line right there would be a non-starter for me even if I was younger. I have dated older women my entire life - Not on purpose, just because I did not use age as a qualifier. My ex wife was 8 years older than me - the woman I lived with before here was 10 years older. This time around, I decided I was going to date a woman younger than me. BTW - I just looked and my profile actually says Seeking women 30-42 - so I did allow for a couple years older than I. You have to draw the line somewhere - and 61 is way over the line! LOL Being post menopausal has many perks! |
2012-04-10 10:36 AM in reply to: #4140510 |
Master 1890 Gig Harbor | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Teejaay - 2012-04-10 7:46 AM Muskrat37 - 2012-04-10 7:16 AM DeannaS - 2012-04-10 7:12 AM briderdt - 2012-04-10 9:07 AM I'm just here to see where the Mr Gig Harbor and Miss Kansas thing is going... That DOES seem to be the most interesting thing going on...I don't think so - not with all the talk about the couples spanking each other - and the picture that I can't tell if that is a dude or a chick throwing gang signs. On another note - I got "winked" at on match.com the other day, by a 61 year old lady with no profile picture who stated in her profile that she likes to snuggle by the fire. She clearly can't read either, because my profile says that I am very active and looking for a younger woman. LOL Hey ... I was just taking a chance! You look pretty damn good for 61 - I might make an exception! |
2012-04-10 10:37 AM in reply to: #4140671 |
Alpharetta, Georgia | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Muskrat37 - 2012-04-10 10:33 AM BTW - I just looked and my profile actually says Seeking women 30-42 - so I did allow for a couple years older than I. You have to draw the line somewhere - and 61 is way over the line! LOL The thing I don't like about Match is that while they will only send you people within YOUR preferences, YOU will get sent to people NOT in your preferences. For example, and for your amusement, I was matched with my Uncle recently - for serious. His criteria is women age 30-55 or some such. MY criteria is men ages 28-40. So while he did not fall in MY criteria, I fell in his, and Match sent him my profile. Creepy, eh? |
2012-04-10 10:37 AM in reply to: #4127973 |
Champion 7136 Knoxville area | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread just my opinion but "deciding" on things (like older/younger) is just a way to cut yourself off some good opportunities |
2012-04-10 10:37 AM in reply to: #4140676 |
Master 1890 Gig Harbor | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread NRG42 - 2012-04-10 8:35 AM Muskrat37 - 2012-04-10 10:33 AM trinnas - 2012-04-10 7:28 AM Muskrat37 - 2012-04-10 10:16 AM DeannaS - 2012-04-10 7:12 AM briderdt - 2012-04-10 9:07 AM I'm just here to see where the Mr Gig Harbor and Miss Kansas thing is going... That DOES seem to be the most interesting thing going on...I don't think so - not with all the talk about the couples spanking each other - and the picture that I can't tell if that is a dude or a chick throwing gang signs. On another note - I got "winked" at on match.com the other day, by a 61 year old lady with no profile picture who stated in her profile that she likes to snuggle by the fire. She clearly can't read either, because my profile says that I am very active and looking for a younger woman. LOL And people wonder why they don't get dates from Match.com. That line right there would be a non-starter for me even if I was younger. I have dated older women my entire life - Not on purpose, just because I did not use age as a qualifier. My ex wife was 8 years older than me - the woman I lived with before here was 10 years older. This time around, I decided I was going to date a woman younger than me. BTW - I just looked and my profile actually says Seeking women 30-42 - so I did allow for a couple years older than I. You have to draw the line somewhere - and 61 is way over the line! LOL Being post menopausal has many perks! Not enough to make me email a 61 year old who likes snuggling by the fire and has no profile picture. LMAO. |
|
2012-04-10 10:45 AM in reply to: #4140671 |
Pro 4675 Wisconsin near the Twin Cities metro | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Muskrat37 - 2012-04-10 10:33 AM trinnas - 2012-04-10 7:28 AM Muskrat37 - 2012-04-10 10:16 AM DeannaS - 2012-04-10 7:12 AM briderdt - 2012-04-10 9:07 AM I'm just here to see where the Mr Gig Harbor and Miss Kansas thing is going... That DOES seem to be the most interesting thing going on...I don't think so - not with all the talk about the couples spanking each other - and the picture that I can't tell if that is a dude or a chick throwing gang signs. On another note - I got "winked" at on match.com the other day, by a 61 year old lady with no profile picture who stated in her profile that she likes to snuggle by the fire. She clearly can't read either, because my profile says that I am very active and looking for a younger woman. LOL And people wonder why they don't get dates from Match.com. That line right there would be a non-starter for me even if I was younger. BTW - I just looked and my profile actually says Seeking women 30-42 - so I did allow for a couple years older than I. You have to draw the line somewhere - and 61 is way over the line! LOL Not sure why people are giving you a hard time with this. There's nothing wrong with putting the numeric age range that includes your age (or a couple yrs older) and younger (well, let's not get illegally so...). I'm assuming you're talking about the stats part of your match profile where you list other things like height, hair color, etc. It's not like you have "that line" in your profile narrative where you describe what type of person you are and what type of person you are seeking and then say "I'm looking for a younger woman"....yeah, now that would prolly be a turnoff. Men date younger women all the time....what's the bfd?
Edited by Birkierunner 2012-04-10 10:48 AM |
2012-04-10 10:51 AM in reply to: #4140686 |
Buttercup 14334 | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Leegoocrap - 2012-04-10 11:37 AM just my opinion but "deciding" on things (like older/younger) is just a way to cut yourself off some good opportunities Some of us aren't looking for opportunities, we're looking for our equal. Whether that equal is defined by sports, age, religion, income, temperament, emotional maturity, etc., it's up to us to decide what criteria is important. Your priorities are not my priorities. My priorities are not your priorities. The outcome is that we winnow others out. We do that all the time. Why is this any different? |
2012-04-10 10:55 AM in reply to: #4140739 |
Champion 7136 Knoxville area | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread |
2012-04-10 10:59 AM in reply to: #4134690 |
Champion 11989 Philly 'burbs | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread djake80 - 2012-04-06 6:00 PM spudone - 2012-04-06 3:32 PM It's the dating thread, not the single thread Not that I really care, but the OP's first post makes it pretty clear that he's trying to start a "singles" thread.
OP fail.
And you do care, or you wouldn't have commented.
Ok, I'm off to get spanked on a lunch date with my wife. |
2012-04-10 11:00 AM in reply to: #4140739 |
Master 2099 Madison, WI | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Wowsers people are reading a lot into saying it's a red flag. From my perspective, it's part of my winnowing process. Most (and not all, but most) of the profiles I see where men say they're looking for a younger women involve men that will also rate themselves as "less mature than most their age" and/or are somehow behind the life curve - still in school, moved around a lot and not settled in anyway. There's nothing necessarily wrong with any of that. But, it's not really what I'm looking for for myself. That being said, the one relationship I've had post-marriage was with an older guy that had a stated preference for younger women. But, "younger" for him was 40-ish, because his kids are 13 and 11, and that most women his age have kids that are out of school/out of the house and his experience had been that he's more compatible with women that are in the same parenting stage. Totally understandable. Every one is an individual, and I try not to make quick judgments based on any one data point in a profile. But, some stated preferences do give me pause. |
|
2012-04-10 11:00 AM in reply to: #4140679 |
Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
2012-04-10 11:04 AM in reply to: #4140688 |
Pro 4675 Wisconsin near the Twin Cities metro | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Muskrat37 - Not enough to make me email a 61 year old who likes snuggling by the fire and has no profile picture. LMAO. I don't get the whole "no profile picture" thing on a dating site....they are either still married, in a witness protection program, extremely shy (I guess that's a valid one...but good luck with that on the interwebs), or they are waaaaay too confident in their ability to write a profile narrative intriguing enough to get you to contact them sight unseen. |
2012-04-10 11:04 AM in reply to: #4140685 |
Master 1890 Gig Harbor | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread lisac957 - 2012-04-10 8:37 AM Muskrat37 - 2012-04-10 10:33 AM BTW - I just looked and my profile actually says Seeking women 30-42 - so I did allow for a couple years older than I. You have to draw the line somewhere - and 61 is way over the line! LOL The thing I don't like about Match is that while they will only send you people within YOUR preferences, YOU will get sent to people NOT in your preferences. For example, and for your amusement, I was matched with my Uncle recently - for serious. His criteria is women age 30-55 or some such. MY criteria is men ages 28-40. So while he did not fall in MY criteria, I fell in his, and Match sent him my profile. Creepy, eh? Yes - very creepy. Also nice to know that I am not out of your demographic @ 40. Match.com doesn't "match" worth a sh*t. I think they should change their name to mismatch.com and have a new slogan about opposites attracting. |
2012-04-10 11:06 AM in reply to: #4140714 |
Master 1890 Gig Harbor | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Birkierunner - 2012-04-10 8:45 AM Muskrat37 - 2012-04-10 10:33 AM trinnas - 2012-04-10 7:28 AM Muskrat37 - 2012-04-10 10:16 AM DeannaS - 2012-04-10 7:12 AM briderdt - 2012-04-10 9:07 AM I'm just here to see where the Mr Gig Harbor and Miss Kansas thing is going... That DOES seem to be the most interesting thing going on...I don't think so - not with all the talk about the couples spanking each other - and the picture that I can't tell if that is a dude or a chick throwing gang signs. On another note - I got "winked" at on match.com the other day, by a 61 year old lady with no profile picture who stated in her profile that she likes to snuggle by the fire. She clearly can't read either, because my profile says that I am very active and looking for a younger woman. LOL And people wonder why they don't get dates from Match.com. That line right there would be a non-starter for me even if I was younger. BTW - I just looked and my profile actually says Seeking women 30-42 - so I did allow for a couple years older than I. You have to draw the line somewhere - and 61 is way over the line! LOL Not sure why people are giving you a hard time with this. There's nothing wrong with putting the numeric age range that includes your age (or a couple yrs older) and younger (well, let's not get illegally so...). I'm assuming you're talking about the stats part of your match profile where you list other things like height, hair color, etc. It's not like you have "that line" in your profile narrative where you describe what type of person you are and what type of person you are seeking and then say "I'm looking for a younger woman"....yeah, now that would prolly be a turnoff. Men date younger women all the time....what's the bfd?
Yes - that's exactly what I am talking about. And if I see a woman that I would normally be interested in - but her "stats" say she is seeking a male 30-35, I don't email her...I am out of her desired demographic. Maybe those giving me a hard time don't understand the match profile. |
2012-04-10 11:07 AM in reply to: #4140766 |
Master 1890 Gig Harbor | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Teejaay - 2012-04-10 9:00 AM Muskrat37 - 2012-04-10 8:36 AM Teejaay - 2012-04-10 7:46 AM Muskrat37 - 2012-04-10 7:16 AM DeannaS - 2012-04-10 7:12 AM briderdt - 2012-04-10 9:07 AM I'm just here to see where the Mr Gig Harbor and Miss Kansas thing is going... That DOES seem to be the most interesting thing going on...I don't think so - not with all the talk about the couples spanking each other - and the picture that I can't tell if that is a dude or a chick throwing gang signs. On another note - I got "winked" at on match.com the other day, by a 61 year old lady with no profile picture who stated in her profile that she likes to snuggle by the fire. She clearly can't read either, because my profile says that I am very active and looking for a younger woman. LOL Hey ... I was just taking a chance! You look pretty damn good for 61 - I might make an exception! My AARP card gets me some pretty neat discounts and cheap eats at the Denny's. Just sayin'! Sweet! We could do our run and Finish @ a Denny's for our first date! |
|
2012-04-10 11:09 AM in reply to: #4127973 |
Master 1890 Gig Harbor | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Want to know a turn off for guys... (at least me). When I see a woman over 35 that has no kids, but "definitely" wants to have kids (and usually says she wants 3). Kind of scary - or is it just me? |
2012-04-10 11:10 AM in reply to: #4140800 |
Master 2099 Madison, WI | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Muskrat37 - 2012-04-10 11:09 AM Want to know a turn off for guys... (at least me). When I see a woman over 35 that has no kids, but "definitely" wants to have kids (and usually says she wants 3). Kind of scary - or is it just me? Ditto when I see that on a guy's profile. Eep! |
2012-04-10 11:11 AM in reply to: #4140800 |
Pro 5755 | Subject: RE: Triathlon Dating Thread Muskrat37 - 2012-04-10 12:09 PM Want to know a turn off for guys... (at least me). When I see a woman over 35 that has no kids, but "definitely" wants to have kids (and usually says she wants 3). Kind of scary - or is it just me? Tick, tick, tick... |
2012-04-10 11:12 AM in reply to: #4140794 |
Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
|