BT Development Mentor Program Archives » Fred D Mentor Group - Part II Rss Feed  
Moderators: alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 104
 
 
2012-09-14 7:37 PM
in reply to: #4333512

User image

Pro
4482
20002000100100100100252525
NJ
Subject: RE: Fred D Mentor Group - Part II

Question for the bike gurus.  I've been looking at a new road bike and am comparing the Specialized Ruby Expert Di2 vs the Ruby Pro with new DuraAce. The Pro is more expensive, but almost 1.5 lbs lighter (according to guy at LBS, need to confirm that).  They don't have either bike in stock so I can't compare other than by spec.  He's going to let me take his bike with Di2 tomorrow for a test after the morning group ride, although it's a Venge so not sure how much that will help.

My motivation for a new bike is mostly about fit. I've been riding a 2006 Roubaix that is a too big (58) because I'm just too tall/long inseam for any 56 I've tried. The Ruby now comes in a 57 and with the upright geometry might be a better choice.  I may also make a trip into NYC this weekend to try a few other options. 

I know there's been some discussion on the Di2 but haven't been able to find it via search.  Is this the technology of now and is it worth a bit of extra weight?  I'm sort of ignoring price at the moment.

 

Fred, GREAT looking bike! 

Tx, Kim



Edited by kcarroll 2012-09-14 7:42 PM


2012-09-14 7:44 PM
in reply to: #4412268

User image

Elite
3779
20001000500100100252525
Ontario
Subject: RE: Fred D Mentor Group - Part II
kcarroll - 2012-09-14 8:37 PM

I know there's been some discussion on the Di2 but haven't been able to find it via search.  Is this the technology of now and is it worth a bit of extra weight?  I'm sort of ignoring price at the moment.

 

Di2 is definitely the "it" thing at the moment and I would love to have it.  ON a roadie though you'll also have the Ui2 option which could save you some dollars.

I was going to ask Fred why he didn't seem to be considering the Di2 option.

2012-09-14 7:48 PM
in reply to: #4412261

User image

Master
2621
2000500100
Mechanicsburg, PA
Subject: RE: Fred D Mentor Group - Part II
Fred D - 2012-09-14 8:20 PM

 

I remember that frame.  I can't wait to see it built!

 

 

2012-09-14 7:50 PM
in reply to: #4412277

User image

Elite
7783
50002000500100100252525
PEI, Canada
Subject: RE: Fred D Mentor Group - Part II
tasr - 2012-09-14 9:48 PM
Fred D - 2012-09-14 8:20 PM

 

I remember that frame.  I can't wait to see it built!

 

 

+1 - that's a sweet looking ride!  

2012-09-14 7:51 PM
in reply to: #4412258

User image

Elite
7783
50002000500100100252525
PEI, Canada
Subject: RE: Fred D Mentor Group - Part II
Fred D - 2012-09-14 9:19 PM

More about my bike (let me know if you get sick of me rambling here, but I love bikes)

  1. It comes with highly adjustable carbon integrated aero bars.
  2. I will be using my old Sella Italia seat.
  3. I have decided on Dura Ace FD, RD.
  4. Ultegra wheels, which I can switch to the road bike for Strava hunting this fall.
  5. Look carbon pedals.

 

By selling the Slice and the Quarq (and crank) I should be only spending in the low to mid 3K range (no not cheap), but again I got a good deal.

I will be handing the Quarq in tomorrow am after my ride and swapping to the old SRAM force crank for the road bike. However I don't plan on riding the tri bike after October so I may put the nicer crank on the roadie until the bad weather comes.

The computrainer bike for Dec-Feb will be the Roubaix.

 

Definitely stoked!

When will you be able to take it out for a spin?

2012-09-14 7:54 PM
in reply to: #4412260

User image

Elite
7783
50002000500100100252525
PEI, Canada
Subject: RE: Fred D Mentor Group - Part II
Fred D - 2012-09-14 9:19 PM
Goosedog - 2012-09-14 8:18 PM
Fred D - 2012-09-14 8:12 PM

Shane is the ONLY person on this site who I would consider as a coach. I'm not looking personally right now, but I would highly, highly recommend him to anyone, and have had several friends with success with him.

Not to mention he has the patience of Job.

 

Yes, he is one of the few who actually tries to answer stuff in TT without any hyperbole.

It's nice to know that he will be able to handle any stupid questions I may throw at him.  Laughing



2012-09-14 8:08 PM
in reply to: #4412268

User image

Subject: RE: Fred D Mentor Group - Part II
kcarroll - 2012-09-14 2:37 PM

Question for the bike gurus.  I've been looking at a new road bike and am comparing the Specialized Ruby Expert Di2 vs the Ruby Pro with new DuraAce. The Pro is more expensive, but almost 1.5 lbs lighter (according to guy at LBS, need to confirm that).  They don't have either bike in stock so I can't compare other than by spec.  He's going to let me take his bike with Di2 tomorrow for a test after the morning group ride, although it's a Venge so not sure how much that will help.

My motivation for a new bike is mostly about fit. I've been riding a 2006 Roubaix that is a too big (58) because I'm just too tall/long inseam for any 56 I've tried. The Ruby now comes in a 57 and with the upright geometry might be a better choice.  I may also make a trip into NYC this weekend to try a few other options. 

I know there's been some discussion on the Di2 but haven't been able to find it via search.  Is this the technology of now and is it worth a bit of extra weight?  I'm sort of ignoring price at the moment.

 

Fred, GREAT looking bike! 

Tx, Kim

Kim...by "new Dura Ace", are we talking the DA-9000 group that just got released this summer?  Just so you know, that's 11 speed, and you will be forced to use a DA chain, cassette and compatible 11 speed hub until the 3rd party market fully adobts it.  But...from what I have heard from my mechanic who got a chance to play around with it...the new DA is AWESOME.  Shift the FD from small ring to big ring with one swipe of your left pinky.

As far as the Pro model being 1.5 pounds lighter...I find that hard to believe unless there is significant upgrades in the wheels, stem, seatpost, saddle, and handlebars.  The difference in weight between DA 9000 and Di2 7970 should only be 150 grams...or .33 pounds.  I doubt there is much if at all difference in frame weight.

2012-09-14 8:11 PM
in reply to: #4412283

User image

Member
5452
50001001001001002525
NC
Subject: RE: Fred D Mentor Group - Part II
axteraa - 2012-09-14 8:54 PM

It's nice to know that he will be able to handle any stupid questions I may throw at him.  Laughing

I'm pretty simple, but god that struck me as funny.

 

2012-09-14 8:32 PM
in reply to: #4412268

User image

Master
2621
2000500100
Mechanicsburg, PA
Subject: RE: Fred D Mentor Group - Part II
kcarroll - 2012-09-14 8:37 PM

Question for the bike gurus.  I've been looking at a new road bike and am comparing the Specialized Ruby Expert Di2 vs the Ruby Pro with new DuraAce. The Pro is more expensive, but almost 1.5 lbs lighter (according to guy at LBS, need to confirm that).  They don't have either bike in stock so I can't compare other than by spec.  He's going to let me take his bike with Di2 tomorrow for a test after the morning group ride, although it's a Venge so not sure how much that will help.

My motivation for a new bike is mostly about fit. I've been riding a 2006 Roubaix that is a too big (58) because I'm just too tall/long inseam for any 56 I've tried. The Ruby now comes in a 57 and with the upright geometry might be a better choice.  I may also make a trip into NYC this weekend to try a few other options. 

I know there's been some discussion on the Di2 but haven't been able to find it via search.  Is this the technology of now and is it worth a bit of extra weight?  I'm sort of ignoring price at the moment.

 

Fred, GREAT looking bike! 

Tx, Kim

 

Kim,
 
Have you been properly measured and fitted? 
 
The reason I ask is usual a person can get fitted on a bike in-between frame sizes say 58-56cm by spacers on the steer tube, flipping the stem and longer or shorter stem.  Of course saddle fore and aft position, as well as height.
 
Anyways the Ruby is a very relaxed geometry.  If that is what you are after, then my best advice is definitely ride the bike.  As far as Di2, I recently pasted on Ui2 on my recent roadie purchase.  Di2 is sweet no doubt but cost for me was not in the sweet spot.  By all means my next TT bike will have Di2 or its successor.


TX to NYC for bike shopping? 

2012-09-14 8:37 PM
in reply to: #4412295

User image

Pro
4482
20002000100100100100252525
NJ
Subject: RE: Fred D Mentor Group - Part II
tri808 - 2012-09-14 9:08 PM
kcarroll - 2012-09-14 2:37 PM

Question for the bike gurus.  I've been looking at a new road bike and am comparing the Specialized Ruby Expert Di2 vs the Ruby Pro with new DuraAce. The Pro is more expensive, but almost 1.5 lbs lighter (according to guy at LBS, need to confirm that).  They don't have either bike in stock so I can't compare other than by spec.  

Fred, GREAT looking bike! 

Tx, Kim

Kim...by "new Dura Ace", are we talking the DA-9000 group that just got released this summer?  Just so you know, that's 11 speed, and you will be forced to use a DA chain, cassette and compatible 11 speed hub until the 3rd party market fully adobts it.  But...from what I have heard from my mechanic who got a chance to play around with it...the new DA is AWESOME.  Shift the FD from small ring to big ring with one swipe of your left pinky.

As far as the Pro model being 1.5 pounds lighter...I find that hard to believe unless there is significant upgrades in the wheels, stem, seatpost, saddle, and handlebars.  The difference in weight between DA 9000 and Di2 7970 should only be 150 grams...or .33 pounds.  I doubt there is much if at all difference in frame weight.

Yeah, pretty sure it's the DA 9000. I know the cassette is an 11-28. I went in looking for the 2012 but they're gone, at least around here.  As for comparing weight, I agree that seemed like a bit difference. I have some more homework there. Great feedback on the DA though. Either one is a lot of bike for me but will see what I can work out. I cant dial the fit in any better on my current bike and it's not going to cut it comfort-wise for the mileage I'm hoping to start riding again. 

Thanks for the info on the DA. 

2012-09-14 8:45 PM
in reply to: #4333512

User image

Elite
3779
20001000500100100252525
Ontario
Subject: RE: Fred D Mentor Group - Part II

I snagged these little snipets of me from Muskoka.  The direct side shot is pretty poor, but gives an idea of my position.

Just looking for thoughts/feedback from the group. 





(Pic1.JPG)



(pic2.JPG)



Attachments
----------------
Pic1.JPG (16KB - 3 downloads)
pic2.JPG (23KB - 2 downloads)


2012-09-14 8:53 PM
in reply to: #4412316

User image

Pro
4482
20002000100100100100252525
NJ
Subject: RE: Fred D Mentor Group - Part II

 

Kim,
 
Have you been properly measured and fitted? 
 
The reason I ask is usual a person can get fitted on a bike in-between frame sizes say 58-56cm by spacers on the steer tube, flipping the stem and longer or shorter stem.  Of course saddle fore and aft position, as well as height.
 
Anyways the Ruby is a very relaxed geometry.  If that is what you are after, then my best advice is definitely ride the bike.  As far as Di2, I recently pasted on Ui2 on my recent roadie purchase.  Di2 is sweet no doubt but cost for me was not in the sweet spot.  By all means my next TT bike will have Di2 or its successor.


TX to NYC for bike shopping? 

.......

James

I've been measured and fitted. Properly? Good question. It was 3 years ago. I'm currently on a 58 Roubaix, which is also pretty relaxed geometry. Went that route because of disc issues. I'm 5'10" with a fairly long inseam. Don't have the file with measurements on this computer. I'm not in any hurry. Another fitting pre-purchase of anything is a good idea. 

BTW, NYC for any shopping is nbd and will probably include lunch. I live 30 miles away in NJ.  On the weekends it's a quick drive in. 



Edited by kcarroll 2012-09-14 8:56 PM
2012-09-14 8:57 PM
in reply to: #4333512

User image

Subject: RE: Fred D Mentor Group - Part II

Neil...I'm not a fit expert, but the one thing that jumps out that could use some improvement is your head position.  Notice how much your head sticks out above your shoulders and back.  That's all additional surface area exposed to the wind.

Try turtling your head a little more.  You don't need to hold it for the entire ride, but during the faster downhill portions or portions into the wind, it can make a big difference.

Check out how Wiggo keeps his head low to the point where it's pretty much in line with his back.  It doesn't look very comfortable, but this is obviously an extreme where he is sacrificing comfort for shaving a few seconds.

ETA:  Looking at some of my own race pictures, I should probably take my own advice. 



Edited by tri808 2012-09-14 9:04 PM




(Bradley-Wiggins-001.jpg)



(Tony Martin.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Bradley-Wiggins-001.jpg (32KB - 2 downloads)
Tony Martin.jpg (50KB - 1 downloads)
2012-09-15 5:28 AM
in reply to: #4333512

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2012-09-15 5:31 AM
in reply to: #4412328

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2012-09-15 5:35 AM
in reply to: #4333512

Elite
7783
50002000500100100252525
PEI, Canada
Subject: RE: Fred D Mentor Group - Part II
Is anyone racing this weekend?  I'm going to do a small Du this morning (1k/20k/5k) that is about 15 mins from my house.  The course is dead flat, straight out and back for the bike, very fast course.  The winds are forecast to be 25-30 km/hr crosswinds and there are sections of it that are completely exposed, should be fun!


2012-09-15 6:55 AM
in reply to: #4412463

Master
2621
2000500100
Mechanicsburg, PA
Subject: RE: Fred D Mentor Group - Part II

axteraa - 2012-09-15 6:35 AM Is anyone racing this weekend?  I'm going to do a small Du this morning (1k/20k/5k) that is about 15 mins from my house.  The course is dead flat, straight out and back for the bike, very fast course.  The winds are forecast to be 25-30 km/hr crosswinds and there are sections of it that are completely exposed, should be fun!

 

Good luck Arend!
 
I too am racing Savageman this weekend.  It's NOT flat.  Surprised  

Like you guys didn’t know.  Wink

 


 

 

2012-09-15 8:00 AM
in reply to: #4412219

Extreme Veteran
5722
5000500100100
Subject: RE: Fred D Mentor Group - Part II
tri808 - 2012-09-14 6:43 PM

Marc...thanks for your input.

I have a few locations in mind, but it's always breezy here in Hawaii.  To one of my original questions...will it screw up the testing significantly if I have to brake a few times on each loop?  If I know that I will always be braking at certain times, do I just adjust the crr and cda sliders to make the sections where I know I am not braking line up to the actual elevation change and ignore the sections where I was braking?

Also, I know it suggests some elevation change, but will the calculations be reliable if there are some short sections climbing at 5-6%?  I can still stay on my aerobars, but I'd be somewhat grinding in my easiest gear at 8-9 mph.  Should I be shooting for something a little more rolling where I can sustain speeds over 14-15 mph the whole time?

No problems for the braking. Hit the reset/lap button. This way GC will show you a little line where a split occurred and you can ignore that spot

Any terrains works. Doesn't matter if you come out of aero at 6%, CDA is not imporrtant at that point. best Terrain is where you get good speed and can apply constant power. So relatively steep rolling hills work well with a 11 tooth cassette for the downhills.

Try using GPX from rides you already did.

2012-09-15 8:04 AM
in reply to: #4412340

Extreme Veteran
5722
5000500100100
Subject: RE: Fred D Mentor Group - Part II
tri808 - 2012-09-14 8:57 PM

Neil...I'm not a fit expert, but the one thing that jumps out that could use some improvement is your head position.  Notice how much your head sticks out above your shoulders and back.  That's all additional surface area exposed to the wind.

Try turtling your head a little more.  You don't need to hold it for the entire ride, but during the faster downhill portions or portions into the wind, it can make a big difference.

Check out how Wiggo keeps his head low to the point where it's pretty much in line with his back.  It doesn't look very comfortable, but this is obviously an extreme where he is sacrificing comfort for shaving a few seconds.

ETA:  Looking at some of my own race pictures, I should probably take my own advice. 

This is gold.

Going lower provided much less value than closing my arms/shoulders a bit

Turtling made a huge difference. A little trick : cut you aero straw so that you can just touch it with your tongue when turtling and use that to check your head position as you ride. Turtle on the downhills, fast spots and relax on the uphills. Fred is right, 56miles of turtling is rough

2012-09-15 8:10 AM
in reply to: #4412268

Extreme Veteran
5722
5000500100100
Subject: RE: Fred D Mentor Group - Part II
kcarroll - 2012-09-14 7:37 PM

I know there's been some discussion on the Di2 but haven't been able to find it via search.  Is this the technology of now and is it worth a bit of extra weight?  I'm sort of ignoring price at the moment.

 

Fred, GREAT looking bike! 

Tx, Kim

 

I have Di2 on my tri bike and it is FANTASTIC. Shifting from the bullhorns while climbing is amazing

I like it so much I thought of upgrdading my Ultegra on the road bike but think it's kind of silly since the shifters are right there anyways.

I got a good deal on 2012 DI2/DA. If you can get a good deal, do it, otherwise 2013 will have the 11 speed DA.

The mechanics told me Ultegra (which should be available for time trialing) in 2013 is very good, but not quite as smooth as DA. Not sure how true this is, but much cheaper. They said someone used to Di2/DA would feel the difference, but someone who never used electronic shifting would love it anyways.

2012-09-15 8:13 AM
in reply to: #4412462

Extreme Veteran
5722
5000500100100
Subject: RE: Fred D Mentor Group - Part II
Fred D - 2012-09-15 5:31 AM
GoFaster - 2012-09-14 9:45 PM

I snagged these little snipets of me from Muskoka.  The direct side shot is pretty poor, but gives an idea of my position.

Just looking for thoughts/feedback from the group. 

. Actually the worry I would have about getting the head too low is how it would affect your ability to stay comfortable and run after 56 miles on the bike? I wonder if Marc still has that tool to measure hip angles? Actually it would be better to get a true side view as I would like to have a closer look at your fit Neil as *I* think you could make some pretty big gains on the bike this off season. Btw HTFU and sign up for Quassy already, ok?

Yes, it's called Kinovea. It is open source so you can download. But I also don't mind running it/editing for group members. My pleasure.

A side video is best.



2012-09-15 11:45 AM
in reply to: #4412486

Elite
7783
50002000500100100252525
PEI, Canada
Subject: RE: Fred D Mentor Group - Part II
tasr - 2012-09-15 8:55 AM

axteraa - 2012-09-15 6:35 AM Is anyone racing this weekend?  I'm going to do a small Du this morning (1k/20k/5k) that is about 15 mins from my house.  The course is dead flat, straight out and back for the bike, very fast course.  The winds are forecast to be 25-30 km/hr crosswinds and there are sections of it that are completely exposed, should be fun!

 

Good luck Arend!
 
I too am racing Savageman this weekend.  It's NOT flat.  Surprised  

Like you guys didn’t know.  Wink

Oooooh, good luck!  For some reason I thought that wasn't until next weekend!

2012-09-15 11:54 AM
in reply to: #4412463

Elite
7783
50002000500100100252525
PEI, Canada
Subject: RE: Fred D Mentor Group - Part II

axteraa - 2012-09-15 7:35 AM Is anyone racing this weekend?  I'm going to do a small Du this morning (1k/20k/5k) that is about 15 mins from my house.  The course is dead flat, straight out and back for the bike, very fast course.  The winds are forecast to be 25-30 km/hr crosswinds and there are sections of it that are completely exposed, should be fun!

Race done!  There were only about 25 people racing, I finished 3rd OA behind two kids (ages ~16 or 17) who are competing to be part of our Canada Games team and probably ran in the 17-18 min range.  I was first off the bike and they ran me down.

I pushed things on the bike a bit just to see how it would go.  AP was 255w, speed 37.8.  I was over 260 and I'm sure speed was 38 something until the last bit when I was taking my feet out of my shoes and had to make a 90 degree turn right before the dismount line.  

Was hurting on the run but still ran just over 23 mins which is a decent run for me.

Lots of fun!

2012-09-15 11:56 AM
in reply to: #4333512

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2012-09-15 11:56 AM
in reply to: #4412486

Master
2912
2000500100100100100
...at home in The ATL
Subject: RE: Fred D Mentor Group - Part II
Arend - I am sure you are done by now - I hope it went well! James, good luck tomorrow even though that sissy bike is .3 of mile short- you gotta post a picture of your brick!

didn't race today, but I feel like I did. Rode the 68 mile option of a century that has a couple of thousand riders. Since I knew I was going short I did a lot of work at the front of the second group and was pretty well done-in by the time the through riders turned at the 55 mile mark. Just before the turn I went backwards through the group like sh*t through a goose and it turns out we had a couple of hundred folks sitting on. That is quite the crowd when you only have about 8 guys working.

Oh, and I made the mistake of wearing my "Aubun Tiarhletes" team kit. There was this jack-wad triathlete mixing it up with us on the front for about 30 miles and he kept blowing the pace line up. So I got grief from the other guys for both being a triathlete AND an Auburn fan. A brother just can't win for losing, it seems.

New Thread
BT Development Mentor Program Archives » Fred D Mentor Group - Part II Rss Feed  
 
 
of 104