How much faster? (Page 3)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
![]() ![]() |
Not a Coach ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Daremo - 2009-06-22 4:08 PM I'm a short course guy now. So if I get a flat, my race is over, so who cares how long it takes to change them out. I'll still do it, but at that point I'm out of the race anyway for placing. When it comes to speed, you go for what makes you faster and NOT what might be faster if you should have a problem!! So you're riding some EVO Corsa Cronos or some Velo Flex Records? Glued with 3 coats of Mastik 1 on the rim and another 2 on the tire? Fine. ![]() I choose a balance of speed, durability, ease of use & affordability. For me, that's clinchers & latex tubes. I'm OK with people coming to a different conclusion for themselves. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Expert![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Craig Alexander and Chrissy Wellington didn't use aero helmets.... Who won Kona last year? |
![]() ![]() |
Not a Coach ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() supa-powa - 2009-06-22 4:19 PM Craig Alexander and Chrissy Wellington didn't use aero helmets.... Who won Kona last year? Helpful, because...? |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() This user's post has been ignored. |
![]() ![]() |
Resident Curmudgeon![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() PennState - 2009-06-22 3:29 PM supa-powa - 2009-06-22 4:19 PM Craig Alexander and Chrissy Wellington didn't use aero helmets.... Who won Kona last year? Ernie keeps a banana in his ear too. Works just as well. Yeah? What year did Ernie win at Kona? |
![]() ![]() |
Pro![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Donskiman - 2009-06-22 2:03 PM rayd - 2009-06-22 1:35 PM the bear - 2009-06-22 1:10 PM rayd - 2009-06-22 1:58 PM I can't tell you how much faster it would make a rider because I don't have race wheels or aero helment. I ride my road bike with clip-on aerobars and pretty standard Mavic wheels. It may make people somewhat faster though or else why would they invest the money? Personally, it would not be worth it to me. I'm an older guy and can usually avg 21 - 23 in a sprint...that's passing guys that may have race wheels and an aero helmet. I get some satisfaction that I have not invested several grand in my bike and equipment and can still hang or pass many guys that have. The issue isn't that you can pass guys who do, but, of course, will you be faster with than without. I pass people with race wheels, as well as those younger than me, those lighter than me, and those who train more than me. That doesn't mean I wouldn't be faster if I were younger, lighter, and trained more. of course someone will be faster with than without! my point is I would rather spend the time training than buying more equipment...the return just isn't worth it to me to move up maybe one or to AG spots. nothing wrong if someone wants to invest the money...lots do! I'm just not one of them. rayd, you and I are fairly similar in ability. The reason I have a tri-bike now is a tri club friend was getting rid of his bike for a low price. I'm not totally convinced I'm any faster. However, my road bike is so old now that getting parts is difficult. I did the 5430 sprint yesterday and I passed a bunch of people just like always, but it seemed like everyone who passed me had a disc and an aero helmet. I was also a bit sore from a 10K the day before so both my bike and run weren't as fast as they should have been. No doubt that most of the people passing me also trained much more so the fact they all seemed to have disc and aero helmets was just coincidence. It seems like a bunch of people also are using some sort of power meter. Again, no doubt it would be nice to have, but well beyond what I'm willing to pay. Speaking of bike computers, the one I have is mounted on the top of the stem and when I'm riding aero it's under my chest where I can't even see it. Where are people mounting these things where they can be easily seen when riding aero? yea, it is noticable when someone passes you with aero helmet and disc wheel...you can usually hear them coming. It can be frustrating! I just looked at you logs and you only have a little over 300 miles saddle time for the year. If that's correct I would be very happy with the bike time from yesterday as well as the run. It just seems to be a minimal cycling base to try to get out and hammer even a sprint! I'd try to increase the bike mileage and maybe back off the run a bit. I think you will see a great improvement in your bike time. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Expert![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() rayd - 2009-06-22 2:45 PM Donskiman - 2009-06-22 2:03 PM rayd - 2009-06-22 1:35 PM the bear - 2009-06-22 1:10 PM rayd - 2009-06-22 1:58 PM I can't tell you how much faster it would make a rider because I don't have race wheels or aero helment. I ride my road bike with clip-on aerobars and pretty standard Mavic wheels. It may make people somewhat faster though or else why would they invest the money? Personally, it would not be worth it to me. I'm an older guy and can usually avg 21 - 23 in a sprint...that's passing guys that may have race wheels and an aero helmet. I get some satisfaction that I have not invested several grand in my bike and equipment and can still hang or pass many guys that have. The issue isn't that you can pass guys who do, but, of course, will you be faster with than without. I pass people with race wheels, as well as those younger than me, those lighter than me, and those who train more than me. That doesn't mean I wouldn't be faster if I were younger, lighter, and trained more. of course someone will be faster with than without! my point is I would rather spend the time training than buying more equipment...the return just isn't worth it to me to move up maybe one or to AG spots. nothing wrong if someone wants to invest the money...lots do! I'm just not one of them. rayd, you and I are fairly similar in ability. The reason I have a tri-bike now is a tri club friend was getting rid of his bike for a low price. I'm not totally convinced I'm any faster. However, my road bike is so old now that getting parts is difficult. I did the 5430 sprint yesterday and I passed a bunch of people just like always, but it seemed like everyone who passed me had a disc and an aero helmet. I was also a bit sore from a 10K the day before so both my bike and run weren't as fast as they should have been. No doubt that most of the people passing me also trained much more so the fact they all seemed to have disc and aero helmets was just coincidence. It seems like a bunch of people also are using some sort of power meter. Again, no doubt it would be nice to have, but well beyond what I'm willing to pay. Speaking of bike computers, the one I have is mounted on the top of the stem and when I'm riding aero it's under my chest where I can't even see it. Where are people mounting these things where they can be easily seen when riding aero? yea, it is noticable when someone passes you with aero helmet and disc wheel...you can usually hear them coming. It can be frustrating! I just looked at you logs and you only have a little over 300 miles saddle time for the year. If that's correct I would be very happy with the bike time from yesterday as well as the run. It just seems to be a minimal cycling base to try to get out and hammer even a sprint! I'd try to increase the bike mileage and maybe back off the run a bit. I think you will see a great improvement in your bike time. No doubt about it - I have not spent enough time in the saddle this year. What the logs don't show is the tens of thousands of miles of base I've accumulated over the past 40+ years. However, it's apparent I can't rely on just base alone and I must do more training. I guess I've ridden the same routes for so many years I just got burned out a bit. |
![]() ![]() |
Elite![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Donskiman - 2009-06-22 1:13 PM JorgeM - 2009-06-22 1:47 PM Of course the engine it IS the most important thing to work on; at races and in training I always get to see a lot of Ferrari type looking bikes (IOW super expensive, fast, aero looking) with the engine of a 1980 Toyota tercel ![]() That been said, if you can afford aero goods there is no reason not to use those in addition to working on the engine as they will make you faster. You can save some energy (riding with less power) by going at the same speed or going faster at the same power. how much? It will depend on the investment which of course that's another thing to conider. Is it a good ROI? well, that depends for each person I guess. You can get a great aero bang for your back without spending too much $$$, the key things IMO are: 1) Bike fit; your body acounts for up to 60-70% of the total drag when riding. Having a proper bike fit will allow you ride comfortable, generate power and slice through the air. 2) Low Crr Tires; something like Bontrager xxx lite, TT wings or Michellin Pro with latex tubes can offer great time savings. Tubies also work but the Crr can be great or bad depending on the glue and to maximize low Crr you pretty much have to glue them very well which can create a problem if you flat on a race. Pick whatever you prefer. 3) Aero wheels; you can get good deals on ebay/craig list and you don't need much. A 60+ mm front (or tri spoke) plus a deep rim back with an aero cover or a regular wheel w/ disc cover. This combo should suit most racing needs. 4) Aero Helmet; having a helmet that complements your bike fit can help diminish your CdA even more. Work on the engine, work on the things above (if you can/want) and you should be faster... Thanks for the tips. I've already had my bike professionally fit. The other things I have not done. So assuming I get low Crr tires, a disc cover and an aero helmet - how much faster? On my old road bike there was a huge gain by simply adding aerobars - easily 2-3 MPH. All these other things cost substantially more, yet I'm getting the sense they don't have such a dramatic benefit. That's because on your road bike, you significantly altered your body position to create much less drag. With the "go fast" goodies, for a rider that can typically average 21mph for a 40k (around 2:50ish per mile), I'd make a complete guess that you might get 1 mph out of it, so a savings of 2:50-3:00 for a 40k. John |
![]() ![]() |
Elite![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() http://i43.tinypic.com/1zx8ab5.jpg Zipp 1080 and Sub 9 disc run ~ $3000. How much is 1:48 worth to you? ![]() John |
![]() ![]() |
Coach![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Donskiman - 2009-06-22 3:13 PM JorgeM - 2009-06-22 1:47 PM Of course the engine it IS the most important thing to work on; at races and in training I always get to see a lot of Ferrari type looking bikes (IOW super expensive, fast, aero looking) with the engine of a 1980 Toyota tercel ![]() That been said, if you can afford aero goods there is no reason not to use those in addition to working on the engine as they will make you faster. You can save some energy (riding with less power) by going at the same speed or going faster at the same power. how much? It will depend on the investment which of course that's another thing to conider. Is it a good ROI? well, that depends for each person I guess. You can get a great aero bang for your back without spending too much $$$, the key things IMO are: 1) Bike fit; your body acounts for up to 60-70% of the total drag when riding. Having a proper bike fit will allow you ride comfortable, generate power and slice through the air. 2) Low Crr Tires; something like Bontrager xxx lite, TT wings or Michellin Pro with latex tubes can offer great time savings. Tubies also work but the Crr can be great or bad depending on the glue and to maximize low Crr you pretty much have to glue them very well which can create a problem if you flat on a race. Pick whatever you prefer. 3) Aero wheels; you can get good deals on ebay/craig list and you don't need much. A 60+ mm front (or tri spoke) plus a deep rim back with an aero cover or a regular wheel w/ disc cover. This combo should suit most racing needs. 4) Aero Helmet; having a helmet that complements your bike fit can help diminish your CdA even more. Work on the engine, work on the things above (if you can/want) and you should be faster... Thanks for the tips. I've already had my bike professionally fit. The other things I have not done. So assuming I get low Crr tires, a disc cover and an aero helmet - how much faster? On my old road bike there was a huge gain by simply adding aerobars - easily 2-3 MPH. All these other things cost substantially more, yet I'm getting the sense they don't have such a dramatic benefit. It is hard to quantify the speed gains accurately however with an investment in something like tires/tubes; going from high Crr tires and butyl tubes to premium low Crr tires and latex tubes can save you around a minute for a 40K or around 0.3-.5mph (per analytical cycling). Is 1 min x 40K worth $150.00 for new tires and tubes? I don't know, it is up to you... Add some extra gains here and there for wheels, heltmet, etc then you can guesstimate the gains and determine if it is a good ROI for you or not. You can spend some $$ to gain some free speed but @ 300 Mi cycling for the year the more time you spend in the saddle the greater your gains. |
![]() ![]() |
Expert![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() JorgeM - 2009-06-22 3:36 PM Donskiman - 2009-06-22 3:13 PM JorgeM - 2009-06-22 1:47 PM Of course the engine it IS the most important thing to work on; at races and in training I always get to see a lot of Ferrari type looking bikes (IOW super expensive, fast, aero looking) with the engine of a 1980 Toyota tercel ![]() That been said, if you can afford aero goods there is no reason not to use those in addition to working on the engine as they will make you faster. You can save some energy (riding with less power) by going at the same speed or going faster at the same power. how much? It will depend on the investment which of course that's another thing to conider. Is it a good ROI? well, that depends for each person I guess. You can get a great aero bang for your back without spending too much $$$, the key things IMO are: 1) Bike fit; your body acounts for up to 60-70% of the total drag when riding. Having a proper bike fit will allow you ride comfortable, generate power and slice through the air. 2) Low Crr Tires; something like Bontrager xxx lite, TT wings or Michellin Pro with latex tubes can offer great time savings. Tubies also work but the Crr can be great or bad depending on the glue and to maximize low Crr you pretty much have to glue them very well which can create a problem if you flat on a race. Pick whatever you prefer. 3) Aero wheels; you can get good deals on ebay/craig list and you don't need much. A 60+ mm front (or tri spoke) plus a deep rim back with an aero cover or a regular wheel w/ disc cover. This combo should suit most racing needs. 4) Aero Helmet; having a helmet that complements your bike fit can help diminish your CdA even more. Work on the engine, work on the things above (if you can/want) and you should be faster... Thanks for the tips. I've already had my bike professionally fit. The other things I have not done. So assuming I get low Crr tires, a disc cover and an aero helmet - how much faster? On my old road bike there was a huge gain by simply adding aerobars - easily 2-3 MPH. All these other things cost substantially more, yet I'm getting the sense they don't have such a dramatic benefit. It is hard to quantify the speed gains accurately however with an investment in something like tires/tubes; going from high Crr tires and butyl tubes to premium low Crr tires and latex tubes can save you around a minute for a 40K or around 0.3-.5mph (per analytical cycling). Is 1 min x 40K worth $150.00 for new tires and tubes? I don't know, it is up to you... Add some extra gains here and there for wheels, heltmet, etc then you can guesstimate the gains and determine if it is a good ROI for you or not. You can spend some $$ to gain some free speed but @ 300 Mi cycling for the year the more time you spend in the saddle the greater your gains. Thanks again. I'll train more. I'm not to the point where spending lots of money to go a minute faster would really do anything. I started this thread to see if by not having the goodies I was losing a whole bunch of time to those who do. Apparently not. It all comes down to doing the hard work of training and I haven't been doing anywhere near enough. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Expert![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() supa-powa - 2009-06-22 3:19 PM Craig Alexander and Chrissy Wellington didn't use aero helmets.... Who won Kona last year? and the year before Macca beat Crowie and he did wear an aero helmet. |
|