Electronic voting machine glich
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Personally, I think it is fake. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Could be fake, could be real. But if somebody was trying to purposely manipulate the process, would they really make it that obvious? |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I've heard a lot of complaints (on both sides) of these machines doing this. I think it's legitimate and the excuse that is often cited is that the machines need to have their screens calibrated. Kind of like the old school touchscreen phones that you had to touch all the dots to calibrate the screen. The good news is it's very obvious if your guy doesn't get selected so I doubt it's causing very many wrong votes, but it's still not cool. I personally HATE the idea of electronic voting machines. How the heck can they do a true recount without paper ballots. i don't get into conspiracy theories about people changing votes on them, but seriously if somebody did how could you go back and audit them? You can't. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() tuwood - 2012-11-06 10:48 AM I personally HATE the idea of electronic voting machines. How the heck can they do a true recount without paper ballots. i don't get into conspiracy theories about people changing votes on them, but seriously if somebody did how could you go back and audit them? You can't. I completely agree with you on this one. I like my district. we have a scan tron. fast to count and paper so it can be recounted. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() chirunner134 - 2012-11-06 10:53 AM tuwood - 2012-11-06 10:48 AM I personally HATE the idea of electronic voting machines. How the heck can they do a true recount without paper ballots. i don't get into conspiracy theories about people changing votes on them, but seriously if somebody did how could you go back and audit them? You can't. I completely agree with you on this one. I like my district. we have a scan tron. fast to count and paper so it can be recounted. yeah. I'm the same. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() chirunner134 - 2012-11-06 10:53 AM tuwood - 2012-11-06 10:48 AM I personally HATE the idea of electronic voting machines. How the heck can they do a true recount without paper ballots. i don't get into conspiracy theories about people changing votes on them, but seriously if somebody did how could you go back and audit them? You can't. I completely agree with you on this one. I like my district. we have a scan tron. fast to count and paper so it can be recounted. We do too and I think it's a good system. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() tuwood - 2012-11-06 10:48 AM I've heard a lot of complaints (on both sides) of these machines doing this. I think it's legitimate and the excuse that is often cited is that the machines need to have their screens calibrated. Kind of like the old school touchscreen phones that you had to touch all the dots to calibrate the screen. The good news is it's very obvious if your guy doesn't get selected so I doubt it's causing very many wrong votes, but it's still not cool. I personally HATE the idea of electronic voting machines. How the heck can they do a true recount without paper ballots. i don't get into conspiracy theories about people changing votes on them, but seriously if somebody did how could you go back and audit them? You can't. My district uses a hybrid system. You make your selections electronically, then it prints a paper ballot, which you confirm is accurate with your choices, and that goes into the "box" and your vote is recorded. You don't handle the paper, you only view it through a window, but it's a decent method imho for dealing with the auditability and backup aspect of electronic voting. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() coredump - 2012-11-06 3:12 PM tuwood - 2012-11-06 10:48 AM I've heard a lot of complaints (on both sides) of these machines doing this. I think it's legitimate and the excuse that is often cited is that the machines need to have their screens calibrated. Kind of like the old school touchscreen phones that you had to touch all the dots to calibrate the screen. The good news is it's very obvious if your guy doesn't get selected so I doubt it's causing very many wrong votes, but it's still not cool. I personally HATE the idea of electronic voting machines. How the heck can they do a true recount without paper ballots. i don't get into conspiracy theories about people changing votes on them, but seriously if somebody did how could you go back and audit them? You can't. My district uses a hybrid system. You make your selections electronically, then it prints a paper ballot, which you confirm is accurate with your choices, and that goes into the "box" and your vote is recorded. You don't handle the paper, you only view it through a window, but it's a decent method imho for dealing with the auditability and backup aspect of electronic voting. Yeah, I've seen those. Probably the best compromise. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() Looks like something similar happened in my city - once on one machine at least: Dave Brubaker, who voted at Countryside Christian Church, 1919 S. Rock Road, experienced technical problems with his machine when it repeatedly switched his vote from Mitt Romney to Barack Obama. “I don’t think it’s any kind of conspiracy like people on the Web write about,” Brubaker said in a phone interview.
|
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() In Texas you're not allowed to vote Dem. The machine tells you you're wrong and shames you publicly with a loud siren. Then marks your vote as Rep. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I miss the old gray machines with the clunky levers. I used to feel such a sense of accomplishment when I was done making my selections and I'd pull back on the big lever and the curtain would swing open. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() mrbbrad - 2012-11-06 3:39 PM I miss the old gray machines with the clunky levers. I used to feel such a sense of accomplishment when I was done making my selections and I'd pull back on the big lever and the curtain would swing open. I never got to vote on one of those. I remember seeing them when I was in middle and high school and thinking they were very cool. The term "pulling the lever" for someone just doesn't translate anymore. |
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() mrbbrad - 2012-11-06 4:39 PM I miss the old gray machines with the clunky levers. I used to feel such a sense of accomplishment when I was done making my selections and I'd pull back on the big lever and the curtain would swing open. Same here. The electronic machines that my district/county has are pretty simple, no touch screen, just simple LEDs next to the candidates. Still an uneasy feeling when you press that "Vote" button, and the thing turns off. It just doesn't exude confidence that the vote really goes anywhere. And on the issues people have with the touchscreens, displaying a different vote makes no sense if you're trying to steal votes; seems you would not want to attract any attention. |