General Discussion Triathlon Talk » rollers vs. trainer Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
2007-12-29 12:27 AM

User image

Extreme Veteran
326
10010010025
Zephyrhills, FL
Subject: rollers vs. trainer
im trying to decide on which one to buy. if money was no object, i'd probably go for the inside ride e-motion rollers, but i dont have $800 to spend. im wondering why you BTers bought one instead of the other. what information helped you make your decision? i would think that the rollers require quite a bit of concentration to avoid a spill, but is it possible to ride the rollers for EXTENDED periods of time? do the rollers really allow you a much more "realistic" ride? thanks in advance for the info


2007-12-29 5:01 AM
in reply to: #1121667

Expert
936
50010010010010025
Salisbury
Subject: RE: rollers vs. trainer
I bought a CycleOps fluid trainer. I liked the idea of being able to ride and not have to concentrate if I wanted to. Not the best workout but better than sitting on the couch.
2007-12-29 7:33 PM
in reply to: #1121667

User image

Master
1848
100050010010010025
Canandaigua
Subject: RE: rollers vs. trainer
I just got a set of rollers, $160.  I'm still getting use to them.  No falls yet.  They give a good ride and challenge my balance and pedaling techniques.  It's kinda like bicycling on ice skates.  I have to pay close attention.  I can see an hour ride on rollers is going to be enough for a very long time.  Haven't done that yet.  Talking to the LBS guy he said even after riding years and years an hour is enough.  I have trainer which I figure to use for long trainer hour or more.  As I newbie to indoor training I would reccomend a trainer. 
2007-12-31 10:19 AM
in reply to: #1121667

User image

Regular
96
252525
Subject: RE: rollers vs. trainer
I have a set of rollers with a removable front fork mount and a magnetic resistance unit. You can use it just as rollers for developing balance and a smooth pedal stroke, can use it with the mag unit for simulating hills and with the front fork mount for when you want to just zone out or watch tv. I think apart from the Emotion rollers its probably the best setup. It costs more for all the parts, but Performance and Nashbar have inexpensive rollers and you could probaly get the whole setup for less than a high end trainer like the Cyclops or Kurt Kinetic.
2008-10-22 6:50 AM
in reply to: #1121667

User image

Extreme Veteran
349
10010010025
Burke, VA
Subject: RE: rollers vs. trainer
I was set on getting a trainer, but now am thinking I should go with the rollers. I have only been biking for a year now, so I am not 100% confident clipping in and out or moving hands to get water bottle. Rollers might help work on confidence and control, where a trainer would just get me pedaling.
2008-10-22 6:58 AM
in reply to: #1121667

User image

Master
1996
1000500100100100100252525
Woodbridge , Virginia
Subject: RE: rollers vs. trainer
trainer.. if you lose focus for a second on the rollers, it won't be pretty


2008-10-22 7:51 AM
in reply to: #1121667

User image

Extreme Veteran
580
500252525
Kansas City, MO
Subject: RE: rollers vs. trainer
I fell off my trainer once...rollers scare me. 
2008-10-22 8:04 AM
in reply to: #1121700

User image

Champion
19812
50005000500020002000500100100100
MA
Subject: RE: rollers vs. trainer

Rencor - 2007-12-29 6:01 AM I bought a CycleOps fluid trainer. I liked the idea of being able to ride and not have to concentrate if I wanted to. Not the best workout but better than sitting on the couch.

I have same fluid trainer.

I work hard on the trainer in winter to improve my power. I need to be able to 100% focus on going hard and hitting my watt goals for my intervals. Rollers wouldn't allow me to do that and just spending time riding indoors is sort of waste of time. I am using winter to improve and get faster.

This will be my 5th indoor winter. I do ride outside often though when it is 20 or above. First two years just used trainer and did time. In '06 I bought power meter and I learned how to train smart in the winter and actually improved. Now I know winter trainer rides are very very challenging but oh so good for me.

 

2008-10-22 8:09 AM
in reply to: #1121667

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2008-10-22 8:12 AM
in reply to: #1121667

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2008-10-22 8:27 AM
in reply to: #1121667

Master
1410
1000100100100100
White Plains NY
Subject: RE: rollers vs. trainer
Can somone recommend a quiet-ish trainer? I used to have one years ago, but the dang thing was so loud I couldn't imagine using it in an apartment.


2008-10-22 8:43 AM
in reply to: #1758598

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2008-10-22 8:48 AM
in reply to: #1121667

Regular
168
1002525
Southern Maryland
Subject: RE: rollers vs. trainer

I just got the Kurt Kinetic Road Machine about 2 weeks ago, I paid $270 including the shipping. Love it so far. It is very quiet imo. I watch TV at a reasonable level, talk to my wife, etc. I love the feel of it so far also, feels very much like riding on a very flat course. If I want to up the intensity, I simply shift gears.  I can certainly see myself surviving the longer workouts in my upcoming schedule on it.

Though I've never had to opportunity to ride on rollers.

2008-10-22 8:56 AM
in reply to: #1121667

Extreme Veteran
537
50025
Davidson, NC
Subject: RE: rollers vs. trainer

Get both if you can.  They both have their uses and benefits.  You can certainly ride hard on rollers (if you can push 300+ watts then just get the small diameter ones) and I do threshold workouts on my rollers without a problem.  However I wouldn't want to do tests on my rollers where I'm cross-eyed and just staring at a clock that's running backwards.  I just don't want to have to pay attention to anything but the pain & the clock.

I find riding the rollers more enjoyable.  You'll become much better about riding with a relaxed upper body and being able to hold your line.  There's a learning curve at the beginning, but once you get the hang of it after a few times it's not something terribly difficult to do.  I have them set up square in front of the computer so I just watch movies and stuff.  It's tricky for me to look around while riding them and I've had some funny experiences watching bike races where my body tries to lean into the curve that the people on TV are riding....  But I've never fallen off or even gotten especially close to falling.  Well there was the christmas day I got them and tried to ride them after a little too much celebratory beverages.....

2008-10-22 9:42 AM
in reply to: #1758684

Extreme Veteran
415
100100100100
Leander, Texas
Subject: RE: rollers vs. trainer
tzmitch - 2008-10-22 8:56 AM

Get both if you can. 



Second this. I use my trainer for long hard workouts and then cool down with 30 minutes on the rollers. Having the rollers will certainly improve your pedal stroke and your balance. A trainer can't really do that very well.
2008-10-22 10:18 AM
in reply to: #1121667

Extreme Veteran
590
500252525
Northern Virginia
Subject: RE: rollers vs. trainer

I called up e-Motion and found out the the InsideRide rollers can only handle wheelbases in the range of 36.5 to 42.5 inches (not quite enough for the 43.5 wheelbase of my hybrid bike).



2008-10-22 10:55 AM
in reply to: #1121667

Expert
1040
100025
SF Bay Area
Subject: RE: rollers vs. trainer
I have a trainer but I really don't like using it, I wish I would have gotten rollers, seems like more fun and staying more engaged. It would be nice if you could have both, trainer for power and rollers for technique.
2008-10-22 3:31 PM
in reply to: #1121667

Expert
1394
1000100100100252525
Wilmington, NC
Subject: RE: rollers vs. trainer

I got myself the emotion rollers, actually got them before I got a bike.(got it brand new for $100 off retail and I had just won the $700 playing poker so I figured lets do it)

I have not really spent any time on them yet, about 3 rides. I learnt very quick that you cannot watch tv like you can with a stand trainers or you find the floor quite quick. I have gone a hour on my 3rd ride and you have to concentrate all the time, so it might get interesting trying to go for 2+ hours.

I think it is a more realistic ride and I have found that even on the small ring just trying to ride normally it really gives me a workout.(I am obv not much of a cyclist having gotten rollers b4 a bike)

If money is not object I would get the emotions if you go with rollers or if I was going to get a stand type trainer I would definately go with a computrainer.

Good luck and don't forget to post about your 1st indoor fall if you go with rollers ;-)

2008-10-22 3:50 PM
in reply to: #1758598

Master
1718
1000500100100
Loughborough, England
Subject: RE: rollers vs. trainer

vrljc - 2008-10-22 2:27 PM Can somone recommend a quiet-ish trainer? I used to have one years ago, but the dang thing was so loud I couldn't imagine using it in an apartment.

CycleOps Fluid II

2008-10-22 9:07 PM
in reply to: #1759971

Elite
3498
20001000100100100100252525
Chicago
Subject: RE: rollers vs. trainer
tridantri - 2008-10-22 3:50 PM

vrljc - 2008-10-22 2:27 PM Can somone recommend a quiet-ish trainer? I used to have one years ago, but the dang thing was so loud I couldn't imagine using it in an apartment.

CycleOps Fluid II

x2.   and if you're in an apt, put your bike and trainer on a yoga mat to futher deaden sound for the folks living below you.

2008-10-23 10:00 AM
in reply to: #1121667

Expert
2547
200050025
The Woodlands, TX
Subject: RE: rollers vs. trainer
I had both. Got rid of the trainer. Rollers give a realistic ride and keep your attention. I still watched tv, but couldn't zone out.

Now I have a Kettler ergo racer. Hook it up to a laptop and it has the most realistic feel of anything I have ridden (50lb wheel like a spin bike), and it's almost dead silent. I'll never go back.


2008-10-23 1:36 PM
in reply to: #1121667

Member
297
100100252525
Subject: RE: rollers vs. trainer
I'd go with rollers if possible. In my opinion, they are the most realistic and beneficial.

Matt Cazalas
Technical Writer

Network Cables

 

New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » rollers vs. trainer Rss Feed