Weights and cycling/running in "1" workout
-
No new posts
| Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2008-10-25 9:02 AM |
Expert 1394![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Wilmington, NC | Subject: Weights and cycling/running in "1" workoutSo I would like to throw in some weight work to help kickstart my cycling. My problem is that I leave to go to work at 5am so I can only train once a day, when I get home at about 2/2:30pm. I do not want to eliminate a run or cycling workout for weights because I would rather do the primary exercise to get better at it. What are peoples thoughts about doing a weight session and then going out for a ride or run or doing the ride or run and then doing weights. I want to do something like in Friels training bible, because I think that being new to the bike I really need to develop the force component of my riding. Do you think I am better off just leaving the weights out of a 1 a day routine or will there be benefit from adding them into "1 bigger" workout? Thanks for your thoughts. |
|
2008-10-25 9:22 AM in reply to: #1765535 |
Cycling Guru 15134![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Fulton, MD | Subject: RE: Weights and cycling/running in "1" workoutqrkid - 2008-10-25 10:02 AM I do not want to eliminate a run or cycling workout for weights because I would rather do the primary exercise to get better at it. You've already answered your own question. You want to get better at cycling, ride more as you mentioned. The extra 20 - 30 minutes you would spend doing the weights are far better served out on the bike or in a run. |
2008-10-25 9:29 AM in reply to: #1765535 |
Resident Curmudgeon 25290![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() The Road Back | Subject: RE: Weights and cycling/running in "1" workoutIf you want to combine cycling and strength training, then ride up hills. Skip the weights if you don't have the time. |
2008-10-27 10:10 PM in reply to: #1765535 |
Coach 9167![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Stairway to Seven | Subject: RE: Weights and cycling/running in "1" workoutDo you think I am better off just leaving the weights out of a 1 a day routine or will there be benefit from adding them into "1 bigger" workout? Thanks for your thoughts. Given what you've described, you are far better off simply "leaving" the weights. Friel is an excellent coach and his books do a great job of teaching the basics of planning your own training schedule and basic biochemistry of working out. but his ideas of turning "general" strength from the weight room into "functional" strength on the bike only work for a very limited set of people (couch potatoes). Even then...if those couch potatoes devoted that time to training on the bike, they'd probably be better bike riders. I do weight work because I enjoy it...not because I think it will make me a better or faster cyclist. Training is very specific to the activity you are doing, so if you want to be a better biker, then ride your bike! |
2008-10-28 8:10 AM in reply to: #1765535 |
Coach 10487![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Boston, MA | Subject: RE: Weights and cycling/running in "1" workoutqrkid - 2008-10-25 9:02 AM So I would like to throw in some weight work to help kickstart my cycling. My problem is that I leave to go to work at 5am so I can only train once a day, when I get home at about 2/2:30pm. I do not want to eliminate a run or cycling workout for weights because I would rather do the primary exercise to get better at it. What are peoples thoughts about doing a weight session and then going out for a ride or run or doing the ride or run and then doing weights. I want to do something like in Friels training bible, because I think that being new to the bike I really need to develop the force component of my riding. Do you think I am better off just leaving the weights out of a 1 a day routine or will there be benefit from adding them into "1 bigger" workout? Thanks for your thoughts. to add of what Rick said; cycling and any endurance sport in general are not about muscular strength, they are all about muscular power = work over time, IOW ride at a higher power output over a longer period of time. Even if you were to sprint all out (maximum muscular power) for as long as you could sustain the muscular strength demands are minimal when compared to your 1 repetition-maximum. It is all about specificity! Also muscular strength resistance training such as weight lifting produce a series of adaptations that are the opposite on what we produce and adapt through endurance training hence one training can/will negate the adaptations of the other. It is true untrained athletes can experiment certain gains when adding weight lifting to their program but that's because: 1) they are so untrained specifically to endurance sports that any training will help them improve, even walking from the far end of the parking to the door at the mall and 2) They don’t do enough endurance training to begin with that adding any extra stimulus (such as resistance training) helps. There is certain resistance training that has shown positive effects on endurance sports such as plyomentrics for running economy but not so much fro swimming/biking. Still this kind of training will have minimal impact when compared to the rate of return you can get from focusing on s/b/r The reality is that if you want to become a better cyclist, you need to ride and ride and ride and you need to increase your power. To do that you can focus on doing interval sessions at your VO2 max (Z5) or functional threshold (Z4). You can get a great bang for your buck doing 60 min, 2-3x weeks, over the base phase (6-8 weeks). You should work on one intensity type for 4-6 weeks and then focus on the other to maximize gains. If you have limited time Z4 is the most important aspect for endurance athletes. Some samples: For both intensity sessions add 10-15 min of warm up and 5-10 min as cool down. ETA: Adventurebear beat me to the punch! Edited by amiine 2008-10-28 8:11 AM |
2008-10-28 8:41 AM in reply to: #1765535 |
Elite 3779![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Ontario | Subject: RE: Weights and cycling/running in "1" workoutJorge, What happens if you skip the intervals, and just focus a lot of time riding - but with varying intensity as if you were outside. I have a Tacx i-magic trainer, and plan to ride 3 times a week, and I'll mostly ride the Real Life Videos, or race against previous times in the Virtual tracks? Riding in the real life videos I know that I'll spend a lot of time riding "hard" since I'll be climbing a mountain somewhere in Europe. A lot of my effort may fall into Z3-Z4, even Z5, for most of the ride. I'll also plan to do one "easy" ride a week. But if I skip out on doing the intervals, is that a fundamental mistake? Thanks |
|
2008-10-28 8:52 AM in reply to: #1770003 |
Coach 10487![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Boston, MA | Subject: RE: Weights and cycling/running in "1" workoutGoFaster - 2008-10-28 8:41 AM as long as you are riding at different instensities and specifically focusing on 1) increasing your power threshold (Z4) and 2) as you move through the season to target the specific intensity you will race at then you should be ok. There is no one 'right' way to train, you can play with the sessions in many ways to make it work for you. Jorge, What happens if you skip the intervals, and just focus a lot of time riding - but with varying intensity as if you were outside. I have a Tacx i-magic trainer, and plan to ride 3 times a week, and I'll mostly ride the Real Life Videos, or race against previous times in the Virtual tracks? Riding in the real life videos I know that I'll spend a lot of time riding "hard" since I'll be climbing a mountain somewhere in Europe. A lot of my effort may fall into Z3-Z4, even Z5, for most of the ride. I'll also plan to do one "easy" ride a week. But if I skip out on doing the intervals, is that a fundamental mistake? Thanks I am not familiar with the videos you mentioned but as long as you spend time riding 'hard' or close to Z4, some times at Z5 and definitely longer periods of times at Z3 (which is more specific to the intensity you'll climb at) you should be ok. You can do that on the trainer, outside or using hills or bigger gear to increase the intensity. For my athletes, the only time I add 'easy' or Z1 recovery rides are for those who are riding and training a lot or cyclists. If you only ride 3x a week you prob won't need a recovery ride as you might not generate such degree of fatigue that a recovery will benefit you considering time is a limter for most AGers. You can stick with 3x a week and if you want to add a 4th session start at steady pace (or Z2) which is not as intense but certainly not easy/recovery hence it will give you more return on investment. I am assuming you will also swim/run hence you'll have to find a balance to fit all 3 sports. |
2008-10-28 4:07 PM in reply to: #1765545 |
Champion 6999![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Chicago, Illinois | Subject: RE: Weights and cycling/running in "1" workoutthe bear - 2008-10-25 9:29 AM If you want to combine cycling and strength training, then ride up hills. Skip the weights if you don't have the time. You sound like Kristin Armstrong gold medalist in the women's time trial. She was saying the exact same thing this weekend.
|
2008-10-28 4:19 PM in reply to: #1765535 |
New Haven, CT | Subject: RE: Weights and cycling/running in "1" workoutJorge - thanks for your post. It is good to know that 3-4 intense rides a week produce benefits. |
2008-10-28 5:30 PM in reply to: #1770024 |
Elite 3779![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Ontario | Subject: RE: Weights and cycling/running in "1" workout
I am not familiar with the videos you mentioned but as long as you spend time riding 'hard' or close to Z4, some times at Z5 and definitely longer periods of times at Z3 (which is more specific to the intensity you'll climb at) you should be ok. You can do that on the trainer, outside or using hills or bigger gear to increase the intensity. Thanks for the feedback - FYI, the Tacx real life videos play on your PC and feed the resistance back to the trainer, as the grade increases/decreases the trainer applies the right amount of resistance. Since I don't have any mountains around me, it really pushes you when you're forced to ride up a continual grade for extended periods. But everyone says climbing makes you stronger, and getting to watch the video of a mountain pass as you ride through it keeps the boredom away. Edited by GoFaster 2008-10-28 5:30 PM |
2008-10-29 12:12 PM in reply to: #1765535 |
Member 587![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Weights and cycling/running in "1" workoutI do this all the time. A couple of days a week, I complete my workouts prior to work in "1" workout. I lift first & then follow that up with either a run or a bike. The only thing I find very difficult is trying to follow up a weight workout with a swim. IMHO that is not a good idea. Others can debate the merits of lifting for triing but as I lift for other reasons as well, I will always have a need for weight workouts. I can get an excellent bike or run in after lifting & have done LSD days & sprint work after the weights. Again, for me, I like doing them together & I have not found a performance detriment to "1" workout. Whatever you choose, train well. |
|
2008-10-29 12:20 PM in reply to: #1765535 |
Extreme Veteran 406![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Weights and cycling/running in "1" workoutAt the risk of disagreeing with everyone here, I think strength training can benefit just about everyone. It will help build larger, stronger muscles, and can help with weight loss (if that's part of your goals), boost metabolism, ad infinitum. A couple of times a week I will run for 30 minutes or so (3-4 miles), and follow it up with a couple of quick circuits on the weight machines, mainly for upper body development. This would be 2-3 sets each of bench press, butterfly, incline rows, bicep curls, lat pull down, and tricep pull down. I usually throw in some core work in there too. The weights take me a total of 20 minutes or so, and I think they make me a better cyclist and runner. Nothing's gonna help my swim. |
2008-10-29 12:29 PM in reply to: #1765535 |
Master 1240![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Knightdale/Raleigh | Subject: RE: Weights and cycling/running in "1" workoutI find it difficult to argue with the experts above, they know much more than me and are far more successful triathletes. But, everyone is different, try it, see how it feels. I'm using my off season to try to add some muscle, not just for triathlons, but I hope to see some benefit. I'm just not into hill repeats and don't have any really hilly courses. Besides the risk of boredom, doing the same thing year after year leads to a plateau. In weight lifting you mix up the reps and weights to break through, maybe the same can work for tris. As for before or after, try each for a couple weeks and see which works better for you. |
2008-10-29 3:32 PM in reply to: #1765535 |
Expert 1394![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Wilmington, NC | Subject: RE: Weights and cycling/running in "1" workoutThanks for all the input. My goal would be cycling specific. I am just starting to ride again. (I rode a little about 6 years ago when I tried out 1 or 2 duathlons) so I want to get as much strength as possible for next year, because cycling will be a limiter. Swimming I just plain suck, so with limited time I would rather work on cycling and running. I will play around a little and see what I can come up with. Thanks for everyones time. oh yeah DMark I am just down the road from you in Raleigh Edited by qrkid 2008-10-29 3:35 PM |
2008-10-29 5:54 PM in reply to: #1765535 |
Extreme Veteran 669![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Olathe, Kansas | Subject: RE: Weights and cycling/running in "1" workoutWell I will also be one of those that disagrees with experts above. Since some general statements were made about endurance sports and weight training, I will have to chime in. I am no triathlon expert or coach, but have been coached in my younger life by olyimpian coach and a number of Eastern Eurpoean coaches while competing at elite level in flat water sprint kayaking. I have frequently attended camps along with our rowing national team memebers (not US national team), so I can witness to their methods as well. Both being endurance sports, weight lifting was used year around, even at elite level. I have trained with members of national teams of Hungary, Bulgaria, Norway. Every single athlete lifted weights year around. The practice still continues. I think those coaches may know something about weights in endurance sports. I will leave it at that. Yes, I use Joe Friel's routine, targeted to triathlon. I use it as prescribed in his book from periods to frequency to selection and order of rotuine. It works for me. I suggest if you are going to combine it with other activity to: swim or bike first, than lift do not lift after a long or high intensity run (injury risk high) do not lift before run, do not lift before skills run use targeted routine for triathlon, not body building Referrence Triathlete's Training Bible, Going Long, The Perfect Distance........... In the end, try it, see if it works for you and take it from there. If it does not, put time on the bike riding big gear and hills instead. |
2008-10-29 6:06 PM in reply to: #1774436 |
Coach 10487![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Boston, MA | Subject: RE: Weights and cycling/running in "1" workoutatasic - 2008-10-29 5:54 PM Well I will also be one of those that disagrees with experts above. Since some general statements were made about endurance sports and weight training, I will have to chime in. I am no triathlon expert or coach, but have been coached in my younger life by olyimpian coach and a number of Eastern Eurpoean coaches while competing at elite level in flat water sprint kayaking. I have frequently attended camps along with our rowing national team memebers (not US national team), so I can witness to their methods as well. Both being endurance sports, weight lifting was used year around, even at elite level. I have trained with members of national teams of Hungary, Bulgaria, Norway. Every single athlete lifted weights year around. The practice still continues. I think those coaches may know something about weights in endurance sports. I will leave it at that. or they are just like many coaches out there purely coaching based on anecdotal evidence and with little physiology understanding. if you don't believe endurance sports are all about power and not about strenght then you are no very informed either (no offense). Ironically it could be a good idea to include some resistance training for Elite athletes, but the reason it is not to increase strenght to increase power. For triathlon AGers who are far from training enough and consistently, the benefits will be very little unless they are untrained (off the coach). I've read tow out of the 3 books that you mentioned and while they present good ideas/info they also present some innacurate data, concepts and worst, they state anecdotes or opinions as evidence. I will leave it at that |
|
2008-10-29 6:28 PM in reply to: #1771486 |
Coach 9167![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Stairway to Seven | Subject: RE: Weights and cycling/running in "1" workoutchirunner134 - 2008-10-28 3:07 PM the bear - 2008-10-25 9:29 AM If you want to combine cycling and strength training, then ride up hills. Skip the weights if you don't have the time. You sound like Kristin Armstrong gold medalist in the women's time trial. She was saying the exact same thing this weekend.
They kind of look similar too, don't they? |
2008-10-29 6:29 PM in reply to: #1773357 |
Coach 9167![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Stairway to Seven | Subject: RE: Weights and cycling/running in "1" workoutbaldmanrunning - 2008-10-29 11:20 AM At the risk of disagreeing with everyone here, I think strength training can benefit just about everyone. It will help build larger, stronger muscles, and can help with weight loss (if that's part of your goals), boost metabolism, ad infinitum. No one will disagree with your statements. But the OP was specifically asking about becoming a better cyclist when one has limited time. Only one answer...ride your bike! |
2008-10-29 6:32 PM in reply to: #1765535 |
Extreme Veteran 669![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Olathe, Kansas | Subject: RE: Weights and cycling/running in "1" workout"Anecdotal Evidence". I like that. No, Jorge, in order to coach the national teams of Hungary, Poland, Bulgaria, Norway, Russia and a few others takes a "little more" than a few-day USAT Level 1 clinic and a test, if that is what you wanted to say. |
2008-10-29 6:44 PM in reply to: #1765535 |
Master 2460![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Weights and cycling/running in "1" workoutI'm personally an experiment of one, but I think I'm a pretty good case example of how strength training beyond a basic minimal level doesn't improve your aerobic performance much. I trained hard for 5k-10k-HMs for about 10 years. At this time, I did play some basketball and included some heavy upper & lower body training depending on the season. I was fairly strong for my size, and at peak, I could leg press over 1000lbs. While this helped a LOT for the fast-changing directional sprint sports (like basketball), my running got worse. Not by a lot, but I think all the time spent lifting and fatiguing from the soreness would have been much more effective from an aerobic standpoint by just running. For sure, the added strength did not help my 5ks, and even did not help my mtn biking after about 5 minutes of hard climbing. Fast forward to the past 18 months, where I really devoted myself to the run at the cost of weights. I lost about 10 lbs of muscle mass (a lot for me) but definitely became a much stronger runner and mtn biker. I'm definitely much worse at basketball, and can't sprint or change directions anywhere near the speeds I used to, but those actions seem to be irrelevant for racing over 15 minutes in duration. Also, if you look at the world champion triathletes, cyclists, and runners, they all have surprisingly slender builds. Although cyclists do have large quads, their quad size pales in comparison to a football running back or a dedicated weightlifter.
|
2008-10-29 7:00 PM in reply to: #1774507 |
Elite 2608![]() ![]() ![]() Denver, Colorado | Subject: RE: Weights and cycling/running in "1" workoutatasic - 2008-10-29 6:32 PM "Anecdotal Evidence". I like that. No, Jorge, in order to coach the national teams of Hungary, Poland, Bulgaria, Norway, Russia and a few others takes a "little more" than a few-day USAT Level 1 clinic and a test, if that is what you wanted to say. I don't often agree with Jorge but your example comes from rowing, which requires a bigger base of strength and power than the triathlon sports. I doubt you'd find a successful rowing team that doesn't incorporate power cleans into their programs. Also, Russia has an interesting theory in the preparation of their athletes. Under the old Soviet system, kids were trained in "general physical preparation" as opposed to specialization at an early age. Future weightlifters might be seen doing gymnastics, swimming, or playing basketball. There was no "concern" about whether these activities would help or hurt their future careers as weightlifters. The idea was to develop a whole and complete athlete who would be competent in several physical qualities, which had value in itself. The idea was that this base of multiple athletic attributes could then be used as a foundation for specialization. Poland and Hungary probably followed a similar system. Bulgaria was the complete opposite, at least in terms of training their weightlifters. They actually developed an algorithm that would, in theory, predict the best lifters at an early age. These kids would then do nothing but weightlifting. Both systems produced world class Olympic weightlifters. And despite the fact that the Bulgarians pulled their entire weightlifting team from these past Olympics due to drug use, don't tell me "it's all steroids." Olympic weightlifting actually requires technique, and you can't give gonzo amounts of roids to lifters in the lower weight classes or they'll bulk up and bump up into the next weight class. I lift weights because I believe that developing multiple physical qualities has value for general health and fitness. |
|
2008-10-29 7:23 PM in reply to: #1765535 |
Extreme Veteran 669![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Olathe, Kansas | Subject: RE: Weights and cycling/running in "1" workoutJorge could very well be correct when it comes down to weight training and triathlon. Even though some other coaches are in favor of it. Where we need to watch is when general statements are made such as weight lifting being useless for endurance sports. There are many more endurance sports beyond swim, bike, run. That is why I chimed in. I am no expert in triathlon, nor am I a coach either. I don't have the knowledge to debate this, related to triathlon. What I commonly see among coaches is how quickly they jump to bad mouth other coaches ie. "Anecdotal Evidence" type descriptions. It is ok to disagree with other coaches, but respectfully without this type of wording. By the way, excellent knowledge on Eastern European methods in training.Very cool. I don't want to take thread away from original intent. |
2008-10-30 3:19 AM in reply to: #1774558 |
Elite 2608![]() ![]() ![]() Denver, Colorado | Subject: RE: Weights and cycling/running in "1" workoutatasic - 2008-10-29 7:23 PM Jorge could very well be correct when it comes down to weight training and triathlon. Even though some other coaches are in favor of it. Where we need to watch is when general statements are made such as weight lifting being useless for endurance sports. There are many more endurance sports beyond swim, bike, run. That is why I chimed in. I am no expert in triathlon, nor am I a coach either. I don't have the knowledge to debate this, related to triathlon. What I commonly see among coaches is how quickly they jump to bad mouth other coaches ie. "Anecdotal Evidence" type descriptions. It is ok to disagree with other coaches, but respectfully without this type of wording. By the way, excellent knowledge on Eastern European methods in training.Very cool. I don't want to take thread away from original intent. First, let me commend you on a classy response. These things always turn ugly. Second, I agree with your point about anecdotal evidence. It's only recently been the trend to actually do research in sports science, and I can understand that. Given limited research funding, I'd rather see money go to finding a cure for cancer rather than improving triathlon times. And in some instances, designing a study has ethical implications. For instance, the anecdotal evidence from coaches and such is that weight training helps prevent injury. However, it would be hard to design an ethical study to test this out. Have one group lift weights, and another not lift, then have them go high volumes of endurance training and see which group gets injured first. Not good. However, what we do know is that strength training is frequently used in physical therapy to rehab an injury. So, is it that huge a leap to think that supplemental strength work will help prevent an injury? For me it's not. Third, you make a good point about blanket statements about weight training and endurance sports. It not only varies by sport, but by distance. Take running for instance. The benefits of weight training can be placed on a continuum starting with 400m runners showing the most performance benefits. Makes sense since the 400m distance is borderline anaerobic. Next come the 800m runners and milers. Benefits begin to drop off at the 5K distance but there are still some. Marathoners are last. |
2008-10-30 4:03 AM in reply to: #1770003 |
Extreme Veteran 454![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() OKC | Subject: RE: Weights and cycling/running in "1" workoutGoFaster - 2008-10-28 8:41 AM Jorge, What happens if you skip the intervals, and just focus a lot of time riding - but with varying intensity as if you were outside. I have a Tacx i-magic trainer, and plan to ride 3 times a week, and I'll mostly ride the Real Life Videos, or race against previous times in the Virtual tracks? Riding in the real life videos I know that I'll spend a lot of time riding "hard" since I'll be climbing a mountain somewhere in Europe. A lot of my effort may fall into Z3-Z4, even Z5, for most of the ride. I'll also plan to do one "easy" ride a week. But if I skip out on doing the intervals, is that a fundamental mistake? Thanks To paraphrase Hunter Allen from "Training & Racing With a Powermeter" - If you only have 3 x 1hr sessions available per week to train, stick it in Level 3 and call it good. Level 3 is also known as "brisk group ride" pace, which sounds a lot like what your videos will have you doing. There's nothing magical about intervals - they're just a human construct. Long "endurance" rides will also increase vo2 power, just (in most cases) not as effectively as a traditional vo2 type workout. |
2008-10-30 8:58 AM in reply to: #1774507 |
Coach 10487![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Boston, MA | Subject: RE: Weights and cycling/running in "1" workoutatasic - 2008-10-29 6:32 PM "Anecdotal Evidence". I like that. No, Jorge, in order to coach the national teams of Hungary, Poland, Bulgaria, Norway, Russia and a few others takes a "little more" than a few-day USAT Level 1 clinic and a test, if that is what you wanted to say. I though that any coach completing the USAT L1 clinic automatically become a sport physiologist! Anyway, the point I mentioned still stands; for endurance sports what really matters is power and not strength. The training adaptations that are important to us are how much work our muscles can do over a long period of time. Strength per say refers to maximal force we can generate in very short periods of time (seconds to up to 1-2 min tops). This will be beneficial for sprinters, 100m swimmers, etc. And the term of anecdotal evidence is nothing new or something I coined. It is used by scientists quite often to differentiate what’s just an opinion or a theory based on personal experience vs what’s is been studies and proved or not. Sorry if you find that term offensive but it is what it is. And it is real that many coaches from different sports who rely on this sort of evidence rather than science. It is not right or wrong but in many cases it is been proven this ‘common sense’ teaching wasn’t as sounds they originally believe. In the early years of the marathon coaches believed giving their athletes water wasn’t appropriate, it would decrease their performance and exhibit weakness. In triathlons unfortunately the boom of the sport is been rather fast and some of the coaching methods have been applied or borrowed from other sports. Many of the ‘known’ coaches today provide advice based on their opinions or experiences and many times little is backed up by actual physiology; many of these coaches were the 1st athletes in the sport or among the 1st coaches to provide some advice in the sport. For that they are important figures because thanks to them the sport has grown to where it is today. But that doesn’t mean that we have to take their words at face value or that some of the advice provide is 100% accurate. Today it is very easy to see very bad information on magazines, books and endless garbage on forums all based on this “it makes kind of sense’ line of thinking or because ‘x’ or ‘y’ said it or worked for him it must be true.Recently with the growth of the sport more people are taking interest in studying the ins and out of the sport. The quality of the instruction for coaches it seems it is finally beginning to improve because as you pointed out (knowing or not) the USAT certification is a joke. There is a new generation of coaches interested in not only the experience or anecdotal evidence collected over the time but also to look into what science actually has to say and how it applies to make better coaches/athletes. That to me what’s the real definition for the ‘art of coaching’; to have a thorough understanding of sport physiology and apply that in conjunction with your own experience to take each individual to accomplish his/her goals.
|
|
login




2008-10-25 9:02 AM


Wilmington, NC




View profile
Add to friends
Go to training log
Go to race log
Send a message
View album
CONNECT WITH FACEBOOK