Joe Biden replaced?

I've been wondering this the last few days. Mainly due to my perception of the debates between Ryan and Biden.

I think Obama would welcome Hillary, but as you've stated and I agree I don't think she would accept.

I think Obama is having nightmares about the VP debates.

IMO I think Biden will come down with some type of illness or family thing that will require his attention and be unable to "serve".

Though they don't seem to like each other this would energize the party and also position Hilary for a run in 2016.

I would hate to see it because I'm not an Obama fan but I think it would be a gamechanger and guarantee a win in this election and probably the next. If Obama wins this year with Biden there is no way Uncle Joe will be a viable candidate in 16.

I think the OP hit the nail on the head as far what's to be considered.  It's probably Hillary's to turn down.

I agree with this.  I don't think too many people care one way or the other about Biden.  He's not doing anything to help the ticket, but I don't think he's really hurting it either.  He says stupid things, but he's not out getting busted with scandals or upsetting foreign leaders.  On the other hand, there's a good chunk of the population that just flat out hates Hillary. 

Since when is Paul Ryan a "RockStar"....He was hardly known outside his circles until he was nominated as MR running mate.

In regards to Hillary, i would love to see that happen but there are 0 percent chances of that happening, actually, 0.00001 as i need an out in case it does.

Is it possible they had to meet with the Secretary of State on a matter of the state?  I mean, it could be just work...?

I would personally love to see Hillary on the ticket.  That was my hope when she lost the nomination.   So why wasn't she then?   I think she didn't want to be.  Has anything changed for her?  It's possible she might think "Okay, this thing isn't going as well as planned, maybe I can help."   She might also think "I've have enough of this and I'm perfectly happy with my cool job where I get to lead this huge staff and travel around and have great experiences."

And, would whatever reason she lost the nomination before also mean it's  a problem for her on the ticket now?   I seriously feel that America said "I can deal with a minority, but a women is pushing it WAY too far."  Or, maybe it's ok if she's "only" the VP.   I honestly think that the First Lady, which is not an elected position, gets to make a greater impact than a VP.  Maybe Hillary can throw out that old stereotype, having had the tastes of power she's had.   I think she's great AND it would be a very good social experiment. 

You'd be surprised.

When you need a s---screen, and you have someone who is already known for making verbal blunders, it can work wonders for deflecting attention away from yourself.

ADMIN NOTE:

Let's make this really clear. Calling a person or group of people stupid due to their political beliefs or how they vote is NOT OK here.

It's an ad hominem and no less an insult than saying "If you vote for X you're an idiot".   Any future posts that try this tactic will be removed and forum timeouts will be handed out accordingly.

I miss all the fun.

This is nothing new.