Why Do We Argue?
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
![]() |
Sensei ![]() | ![]() Other than the fact it's fun... I was sitting here pondering of a lifetime of debates/arguments I have had or observed. On-line, family, political, with friends, with strangers, and can't really recall changing minds/opinions (or having mine changed). Yeah, if it's an argument over a fact, and you can get proof, that's one thing. But if it's based on opinion, do you REALLY change (or change someone else)? I can't imagine anyone with strong stance on race, guns, gay rites, politics, etc are going to change their mind in an argument. I'm sure you won't can't even get someone to change their mind in an argument between pizza and burgers, beer brand, or chevy vs ford, trains vs planes. In almost every instance, people walk away after the exchange, and nothing REALLY changes. Agree to disagree or just get tired. Can you think of more than a rare occurrence where you have "won" an argument and change someone's beliefs? So why do we (as a people) do it? Just part of being a social species? Community? Exchanging information? Or is it ego driven? The need to be "right" or superior? It's obviously important or almost natural to do so since it's so common - and it can be a good thing especially if you are an onlooker and can glean some knowledge from it. Shoot, it would be a pretty boring world if everyone REALLY just politely let people believe what they want and never debate. So, feel free to disagree and let the argument begin! |
|
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Because I'm right and you're wrong! I haven't done a full 180 on any topics, but some arguments in COJ have opened my eyes to another perspective. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() For me, I like hearing the other perspective on things. I may not agree with it. But on most things it will at least explain why people think like they do. I present my position (the right one) for the same reason. So they can understand why I feel the way I do. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Kido - 2013-03-19 12:59 PM Other than the fact it's fun... I was sitting here pondering of a lifetime of debates/arguments I have had or observed. On-line, family, political, with friends, with strangers, and can't really recall changing minds/opinions (or having mine changed). Yeah, if it's an argument over a fact, and you can get proof, that's one thing. But if it's based on opinion, do you REALLY change (or change someone else)? I can't imagine anyone with strong stance on race, guns, gay rites, politics, etc are going to change their mind in an argument. I'm sure you won't can't even get someone to change their mind in an argument between pizza and burgers, beer brand, or chevy vs ford, trains vs planes. In almost every instance, people walk away after the exchange, and nothing REALLY changes. Agree to disagree or just get tired. Can you think of more than a rare occurrence where you have "won" an argument and change someone's beliefs? So why do we (as a people) do it? Just part of being a social species? Community? Exchanging information? Or is it ego driven? The need to be "right" or superior? It's obviously important or almost natural to do so since it's so common - and it can be a good thing especially if you are an onlooker and can glean some knowledge from it. Shoot, it would be a pretty boring world if everyone REALLY just politely let people believe what they want and never debate. So, feel free to disagree and let the argument begin! Snert |
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() while I cannot offer much in the way of a dirrect answer Kido, I can say that the best outcome I have had from arguements/heated discussions is either bringing understanding to myself, or to the other person, about the view from the other side. A lot of times people only see their side of the argument. Whether they change their minds or even agree with a different view point or not, I think getting them (or someone getting myself) to at least recognize the other viewpoint and understand it is an important piece of the puzzle. |
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I think it helps (me) to examine/re-examine my OWN beliefs. I'm with Josh, in that I haven't ever flopped 180 degrees on any topic, but I've gained an appreciation for other points of view. AND I've realized some folks are just dumb. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Sensei ![]() | ![]() GomesBolt - 2013-03-19 10:06 AM For me, I like hearing the other perspective on things. I may not agree with it. But on most things it will at least explain why people think like they do. I present my position (the right one) for the same reason. So they can understand why I feel the way I do. And that's what I would hope happens. Many times I can see valid points of an argument that goes completely against my opinion and acknowledge that. Give credit where credit is due, you might say. I don't think it undermines my argument or changes my mind even if I say "that's a good point" to the other side. The difficult arguments are with people that no matter what evidence or perspective you give them, if it's opposed, it's wrong and they don't even listen. If both are like that, then you don't get a discussion, you get two people simply shouting their thoughts to the other person without consideration of what's being said. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Kido - 2013-03-19 11:59 AM Other than the fact it's fun... I was sitting here pondering of a lifetime of debates/arguments I have had or observed. On-line, family, political, with friends, with strangers, and can't really recall changing minds/opinions (or having mine changed). Yeah, if it's an argument over a fact, and you can get proof, that's one thing. But if it's based on opinion, do you REALLY change (or change someone else)? I can't imagine anyone with strong stance on race, guns, gay rites, politics, etc are going to change their mind in an argument. I'm sure you won't can't even get someone to change their mind in an argument between pizza and burgers, beer brand, or chevy vs ford, trains vs planes. In almost every instance, people walk away after the exchange, and nothing REALLY changes. Agree to disagree or just get tired. Can you think of more than a rare occurrence where you have "won" an argument and change someone's beliefs? So why do we (as a people) do it? Just part of being a social species? Community? Exchanging information? Or is it ego driven? The need to be "right" or superior? It's obviously important or almost natural to do so since it's so common - and it can be a good thing especially if you are an onlooker and can glean some knowledge from it. Shoot, it would be a pretty boring world if everyone REALLY just politely let people believe what they want and never debate. So, feel free to disagree and let the argument begin! I’ve definitely come to better understand the pro-gun side through my (many) arguments on BT. My overall position, philosophically, hasn’t changed much, though I do understand their position much better. There are even a few areas with respect to the gun debate, on which I’ve come to agree with them. Like most people, I form my opinions from the information that most readily available. I don’t really know anyone who owns guns, outside of law enforcement, and most of the LEO’s I know are of the opinion that fewer guns would be better. Without having had much exposure to people who feel strongly about the opposite opinion, it’s hard not to get entrenched in your views. Having had the opportunity on BT to get a clearer picture of where their opinion comes from, I think I’m in a much better position to define my own opinion. I think most people spend most of their time with people who feel exactly the same way about things as they do. Given that, is it any wonder that most people think that there’s only one right way of looking at things? |
![]() ![]() |
Sensei ![]() | ![]() I used to not stand whiskey, but after a discussion of the nuances of it (and perhaps an acquired taste) I am now a connoisseur. So maybe we CAN change, when it's important enough? |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Wonder how many people flipfloped on their opinion of Obama from Election 1 to Election 2. Either direction. |
![]() ![]() |
Sensei ![]() | ![]() From the limited responses so far, the general theme is acquiring knowledge through argument, not actually changing view points. Logical. I wonder if there is better ways to acquire knowledge than debate? I'm generally non confrontational, so I tend to read and seek out rather than go toe to toe with someone. Just my approach I guess. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I think the benefit of arguing is to test ideas and to see if our thoughts are fully developed. Ideas have a sort of Darwinian survival of the fittest in the communal mind. In these discussions, the person being swayed is probably not the two engaged in debate but the bystanders who may be less informed and act as a sort of informal jury to the discussion. The better idea is adopted by the bystanders and is thus propagated. In online forums, I see another motivation to rise consistently in support of a particular political point of view as a way of demonstrating numerical superiority to the opposing point of view. These discussions endure beyond the point that any new information is revealed or any bystanders exist. The point is not to sway anyone but to convince the other viewpoint that they are outnumbered and defeated. We have these motivations argue at a very low level of rational stimulation. We see or hear arguments counter to our own and speak out without ever thinking if there is a useful point to be made with our listeners. I do anyway. |
![]() ![]() |
Sensei ![]() | ![]() velocomp - 2013-03-19 10:22 AM Wonder how many people flipfloped on their opinion of Obama from Election 1 to Election 2. Either direction. I would say that would be more based on personal experience each individual had rather that a specific argument. IF they don't like him now, it's more likely because they had a rough 4 years, not because someone talked them into it during a discussion. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() Socrates would say there is no better way to learn than to debate. |
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I think the answer lies partially in the fact we are emotional creatures that want others to share thier beliefs. unfortnately we process quickly through discussion, debate, argue .... all the way to pointless namecalling. I do believe that people could change their position on a topic more often (not always) if we could keep things at the discussion / debate level and keep emotions in check or ideally out of it.
|
![]() ![]() |
Sensei ![]() | ![]() tech_geezer - 2013-03-19 10:23 AM I think the benefit of arguing is to test ideas and to see if our thoughts are fully developed. Ideas have a sort of Darwinian survival of the fittest in the communal mind. In these discussions, the person being swayed is probably not the two engaged in debate but the bystanders who may be less informed and act as a sort of informal jury to the discussion. The better idea is adopted by the bystanders and is thus propagated. In online forums, I see another motivation to rise consistently in support of a particular political point of view as a way of demonstrating numerical superiority to the opposing point of view. These discussions endure beyond the point that any new information is revealed or any bystanders exist. The point is not to sway anyone but to convince the other viewpoint that they are outnumbered and defeated. We have these motivations argue at a very low level of rational stimulation. We see or hear arguments counter to our own and speak out without ever thinking if there is a useful point to be made with our listeners. I do anyway. Ah wisdom! Fantastic point. If argument does anything for me is identify holes in my own point of view in which I need to educate myself further about for future discussions. No one likes to be steam rolled by someone far more knowledgeable (I'm not going to argue physics with Stephen Hawkings), but I prefer to have a discussion with someone who can test me (without trying to belittle me) than someone who I can push over. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Sensei ![]() | ![]() GomesBolt - 2013-03-19 10:25 AM Socrates would say there is no better way to learn than to debate. Thank the gawds he didn't have the internet. |
![]() ![]() |
Sensei ![]() | ![]() tcarlson78 - 2013-03-19 10:29 AM I think the answer lies partially in the fact we are emotional creatures that want others to share thier beliefs. unfortnately we process quickly through discussion, debate, argue .... all the way to pointless namecalling. I do believe that people could change their position on a topic more often (not always) if we could keep things at the discussion / debate level and keep emotions in check or ideally out of it.
Another good point. I agree. See how NON argumentative I am? |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I think there is a diference between argument and discourse/discussion. Discussion often leads to better perspective of others opinions. Arguments just make me turn away. For me there is very little reason to argue. I figure that if someone feels so very strongly about something, to the point of argument, then I have little chance of changing their opinion. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Argue or debate? (They may be different.) We argue because there are differing opinions of what constitutes "desirable" or acceptable behavior/action. It is possible both parties engaged in the argument are right because of the perspective each brings to the argument. The engagement can force us to reconsider the basis for our position and our position can mature as a result of the process. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
Sensei ![]() | ![]() bradleyd3 - 2013-03-19 11:02 AM I either resort to big words or name calling. What do you mean "resort"? Don't you just lead off with name calling? |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() cdban66 - 2013-03-19 12:34 PM I think there is a diference between argument and discourse/discussion. Discussion often leads to better perspective of others opinions. Arguments just make me turn away. For me there is very little reason to argue. I figure that if someone feels so very strongly about something, to the point of argument, then I have little chance of changing their opinion. You're wrong... Discussions are boring. Arguments are fun! |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() Kido - 2013-03-19 1:05 PM bradleyd3 - 2013-03-19 11:02 AM I either resort to big words or name calling. What do you mean "resort"? Don't you just lead off with name calling? He does... Well you do... It's the Texas Way!!! YeeHaw!!! |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Kido - 2013-03-19 1:05 PM bradleyd3 - 2013-03-19 11:02 AM I either resort to big words or name calling. What do you mean "resort"? Don't you just lead off with name calling? Troof.... |
|