SBR Utopia - OPEN (Page 152)
-
No new posts
Moderators: alicefoeller | Reply |
|
![]() ![]() |
Master![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I think the metrics do have value in cycling, but things change with the additional tactics going on. It's much more complicated and one could easily get into paralysis by analysis. Especially when out on the ride. It can help in analyzing later for working on areas to improve, as things may not really be what we think. But all of us here could improve quite a bit in that type of riding simply by going hard enough in the rides that we might collapse, and we'll improve on things we need. It doesn't take metrics to do that. If the additional analysis is detracting from that enjoyment, then no, it's not worth having them. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() Isn't really the point of training by metric, be it power or HR, to ideally pace oneself so the run is not a death march? Obviously not applicable to cycling, where there is also the opportunity to sit in the draft |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() This user's post has been ignored. Edited by Fred D 2013-04-23 5:39 AM |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() This user's post has been ignored. |
![]() ![]() |
Expert![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() 3rd week of Trainer Road and it super rocks!!!! |
![]() ![]() |
Master![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Goosedog - 2013-04-22 8:40 PM tri808 - 2013-04-22 8:08 PM
Kid update, sorry. The 7yo is a fast swimmer, but I had the privilege of taking the just recently 4yo to swim today. We've spoken to her instructor about summer league that requires them to swim 25yd unassisted. So today, in the big pool (that's competitive temp - freezing), the instructor sends her off by herself. First time. The girl proceeds to swim 50 back (break at the wall) and 50 free (break at the wall) unassisted. I was shocked/thrilled. Since a 25 is no problem, she going to race her first triathlon this weekend. Just to clarify, she's beyond excited about racing like her big brother. It's going to be spectacular. That is pure awesome! |
|
![]() ![]() |
Master![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Fred D - 2013-04-22 4:42 PM Btw I am really enjoying the riding these days on the road bike. I have no idea of cadence, speed or power anymore, but I still track my HR. honestly it's been enlightening to ride this way. I highly doubt it's the best way to get fast and definitely not the most scientific approach to training, but it has essentially brought me full circle from starting only with HR, then cadence, then GPS, then power and now back to mainly just HR. (I do ride with GPS on for strava segments of course, but even then I'm just pushing hard and not paying attention to speed). I have a few friends that ride a lot but don't even track distance. They just ride by time. I'm not quite there, but that's probably the ultimate 'zen' experience for cyclists. Also been learning how to draft in cycling groups better. One thing that has become apparent is that being immediately behind the cyclist in front is not usually the lowest draft zone to be in. It's a pretty good discussion topic, but anyone interested in this discussion on drafting? I guess I have found my Zen already Fred. No metrics, just riding these days. I wear the cheap Garmin 10 watch so I can upload to Strava at home but it doesn't show mph or anything out on the road. I did invest in a bike computer which I turn on in the group so I maintain pace when I am pulling. Other than that, each ride is completely unique. It depends on the weather, who shows up to ride and like Jason said, the teams strategies and tactics vary on any given day. Even when I ride solo, I mix it up by doing hills, some sprints etc but nothing that is written down and must be followed. I want to make a bet that the riding you are doing will make you a stronger cyclist and a happier one! I hope you find your Zen |
![]() ![]() |
Veteran![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() KateTri1 - 2013-04-23 5:04 AM 3rd week of Trainer Road and it super rocks!!!! Awesome, I love TrainerRoad as well! Do you have any favorite workouts yet? If you have the Sufferfest videos, they pair with TR quite nicely. |
![]() ![]() |
Elite![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() ChrisM - 2013-04-22 12:25 PM Chris - question on your bottle position between the bars. From this angle it looks like yours is set quite a bit back. Do you have any issues pulling/replacing the bottle when in aero with that setup? I ask, because mine is set a lot further forward but I want to move it back so I can figure out a mount to put my garmin up near my hands. (It's on my stem at the moment). |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() Today's run was cut super duper short as I got chased by some wild animal in the dark. No way I was going back around for a second run in, especially with my dog who thinks he can take on everything. I'm nursing a sore quad muscle so perhaps this was the worlds way of saying "rest you idiot". |
![]() ![]() |
Elite![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() GoFaster - 2013-04-23 10:04 AM Chris - question on your bottle position between the bars. From this angle it looks like yours is set quite a bit back. Do you have any issues pulling/replacing the bottle when in aero with that setup? I ask, because mine is set a lot further forward but I want to move it back so I can figure out a mount to put my garmin up near my hands. (It's on my stem at the moment). I rigged a home made mount that puts my Garmin between my aerobars up where they start to bend up. It sits just below the plane of the bottle so when I take it out the bottle comes out above the computer and I can see and access the computer easily with my hands in aero. My bottle sits farther forward than what it appears as Chris's does. Basically the back of the bottle is right around where my elbows are. Edit for pics: http://i652.photobucket.com/albums/uu243/Zenmaster28/garmin-mount.jpg http://i652.photobucket.com/albums/uu243/Zenmaster28/side-view.jpg Edited by axteraa 2013-04-23 8:18 AM |
|
![]() ![]() |
Master![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() bzgl40 - 2013-04-23 6:04 AM Today's run was cut super duper short as I got chased by some wild animal in the dark. No way I was going back around for a second run in, especially with my dog who thinks he can take on everything. I'm nursing a sore quad muscle so perhaps this was the worlds way of saying "rest you idiot". Oh boy! The challenges of rural living! There's no way I'd go back out! |
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Fred D - 2013-04-23 5:38 AM brigby1 - 2013-04-23 12:02 AMI think the metrics do have value in cycling, but things change with the additional tactics going on. It's much more complicated and one could easily get into paralysis by analysis. Especially when out on the ride. It can help in analyzing later for working on areas to improve, as things may not really be what we think. But all of us here could improve quite a bit in that type of riding simply by going hard enough in the rides that we might collapse, and we'll improve on things we need. It doesn't take metrics to do that. If the additional analysis is detracting from that enjoyment, then no, it's not worth having them. . Good points! My personal feeling is that paralysis by analysis is a factor for some in triathlon and cycling and I'm not just talking about power meters! Have you ever read the book 'Blink' by Malcolm Gladwell? He talks about limiting ones data to make better decisions. Now watts may well be that useful data for some , but for others not. I am being intentionally philosophical but hopefully making some point. I have run into more than my share of triathletes who even blame their lack of performance in some way on their training tools (I definitely laid some blame on my quarq, although truthfully it did not function well for me for a long period of time....but still, it became a confounder for me). I guess in the end I'm more anti 'paralysis by analysis' right now than pro watts or HR etc. this seems to change over time for me, but its where I'm at now. Hoping I was somewhat clear here, but maybe I wasn't?
What's interesting is that there is debate on the merits of a power meter to quantify effort yet there isn't a swim coach in the world that would question the value of a pace clock for training. Aren't they the same thing ? I can tell you, the pace clock at the pool takes away from my swim enjoyment :-) |
![]() ![]() |
![]() Fred D - 2013-04-23 12:25 AM ChrisM - 2013-04-23 12:43 AMIsn't really the point of training by metric, be it power or HR, to ideally pace oneself so the run is not a death march? Obviously not applicable to cycling, where there is also the opportunity to sit in the draft . Agree, yet to be honest pro cyclists use HR and power quite a bit in training and racing. There are different reasons I suspect, but having read Tyler Hamiltons book, they give the impression that cycling really does come down to numbers (and doping, for instance they tracked hematocrit) more than anything. Then again they had the best people analyzing their watts and HR etc.... Not something they did themselves as cyclists as much as the team wanted them to do. Eta I specifically remember in the book that they felt the winner of the tdf came down almost purely to numbers (W/Kg, BMI, Hct) and little else!Pro cyclists do use HR and power a lot. For training, it's likely prescribed directly by their coaches. But while racing...I highly doubt that pro cyclists are racing while using HR and power as a strategy unless they are using the race as a tune up (like training). My guess is that the coaches still want them to wear HR straps and use power meters to monitor their training stress though. After a week long stage race, or 3 week long grand tour, that info can become extremely useful to a coach on how to help them recover...or who on the team might be best suited for the upcoming race, and who needs to sit out. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() Chris - question on your bottle position between the bars. From this angle it looks like yours is set quite a bit back. Do you have any issues pulling/replacing the bottle when in aero with that setup? I ask, because mine is set a lot further forward but I want to move it back so I can figure out a mount to put my garmin up near my hands. (It's on my stem at the moment). With the caveat that my setup is purely logistical and not based on the optimum aero setup.... I tried mounting the bottle on the bars, but didn't like it for several reasons. Because of the ski bends and stem setup, I could not fit a cage in between them unless it was facing backwards, meaning the flat bottle bottom is in the wind. Even the A2 setup didn't work. Plus I didn't like the extra eight on the bars. So now it is mounted on a stem mount. It is a little far back, and I sometimes rub it with my knee as it comes forward, but when I am in aero the bottle is nestled right between my arms, and when I use the A2 the straw is just below my mouth, maybe a little behind so it could stand to come forward a couple inches. I am trying to figure out how to switch to a different cockpit, i.e., how do you test out what is comfortable without a full install? That will change things up a bit. |
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() tri808 - 2013-04-23 11:36 AM
Pro cyclists do use HR and power a lot. For training, it's likely prescribed directly by their coaches. But while racing...I highly doubt that pro cyclists are racing while using HR and power as a strategy unless they are using the race as a tune up (like training). My guess is that the coaches still want them to wear HR straps and use power meters to monitor their training stress though. After a week long stage race, or 3 week long grand tour, that info can become extremely useful to a coach on how to help them recover...or who on the team might be best suited for the upcoming race, and who needs to sit out. I wonder how much the race director in his car is looking at power of one of his guys who is in a break out to gauge if he should get his team in the peloton working. I wonder if they do it by speed/gap or by power/hr. I wonder how much having a guy in the break out pack is useful for gauging the effort they are putting and if they will blow up or not. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() This user's post has been ignored. |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() This user's post has been ignored. |
![]() ![]() |
Master![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() marcag - 2013-04-23 11:45 AM tri808 - 2013-04-23 11:36 AM
Pro cyclists do use HR and power a lot. For training, it's likely prescribed directly by their coaches. But while racing...I highly doubt that pro cyclists are racing while using HR and power as a strategy unless they are using the race as a tune up (like training). My guess is that the coaches still want them to wear HR straps and use power meters to monitor their training stress though. After a week long stage race, or 3 week long grand tour, that info can become extremely useful to a coach on how to help them recover...or who on the team might be best suited for the upcoming race, and who needs to sit out. I wonder how much the race director in his car is looking at power of one of his guys who is in a break out to gauge if he should get his team in the peloton working. I wonder if they do it by speed/gap or by power/hr. I wonder how much having a guy in the break out pack is useful for gauging the effort they are putting and if they will blow up or not. I could see loads of situations like this where power would be useful, but at the same time it could also simply overwhelm a rider out on the course. Fred mentioned Blink before, I have read it and also think it would be very applicable here. With the pro teams, I would be surprised if they were not doing analysis such as these example from the cars. Their incentive to learn how would be quite high. |
![]() ![]() |
Master![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I've found a lot of utility in my power meter for *training*, not so much for racing. It's easy to get caught up in sticking to your numbers when your brain is telling you that something's not quite right with how you feel. And then suddenly you're toast even though you supposedly stuck to the plan. As a training tool, though it has been very helpful. After my PE I was pretty depressed and felt like I'd never get back to "par" with my biking ability. I was mostly stuck with indoor trainer work for the past 6 months. The power meter has been a great way to track my progress and helped motivate me to stick with it. And it has helped target my workouts so I didn't overextend myself early on. I agree a PM expense is not for everyone, but it has worked well for me. Oh, side note: I am fortunate to live about 1 mile from a velodrome, so I've used the PM to help fine-tune my position on the bike, also. When I rode IM Canada last year, I didn't mention this in my race report but I averaged only 143 watts for the course, and came in under 6 hours. Aero matters |
![]() ![]() |
Member![]() ![]() | ![]() Greetings all! I am hoping that it is not too late to join in. Here is my info: NAME: Andy Kalish STORY: I have never done a tri but am signing up for a local sprint in August 2013. I am 51 years old and have been doing half (2) and full (4) marathons for the past 3 years. Not very well, mind you, just doing them. And loving it. Would like to progress up to longer distance tri's as time goes on. I guess you could say I am in it for the long haul. Over the last few months I have been using TI's drill progression to learn to swim better, complementing TI with info and tips from Taormina's SSS. Lot of work to do here. I got a reasonable road bike and have been getting it on an indoor trainer for a little over a month. All great fun! FAMILY STATUS: I ive in upstate NY. I am 51 years old and single so I do have the time to train! I have two step-daughters and a daughter, all very wonderful. CURRENT TRAINING: After (hopefully) getting better at swimming and some good SBR base training down, I will be preparing for my first sprint tri later this year. In parallel I will be getting ready for the Berlin Marathon with my older step-daughter. I am usually a 6-7x per week runner but this year will modify that to weekly 5x run, 3x bike, 3-4x swim. 2012 RACES: Bataan Death March Memorial Marathon, Flower City Half Marathon, Rochester Half Marathon, Chicago Marathon. 2013 RACES: Rochester Sprint Triathlon, Berlin Marathon. WHAT WOULD MAKE ME A GOOD MEMBER OF THIS GROUP: As a newbie I currently visit the BT forum daily to learn as much as I can. I have a little bit of running experience to share but can't contribute much in the swimming and biking categories. However, as a mentee I think I can provide a service to the more experienced mentors in the group: if you can explain it to me you can explain it to anyone! |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() Welcome Andy! |
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Fred D - 2013-04-23 11:57 AM @ Marc. I'm not sure there is a debate as to whether power is a bike metric to track, rather that it has other issues. A pace clock (or watch) is a very low cost investment for almost all of us, while power meters cost much much more. Clocks also don't have the device to device variability that power meters often suffer from. Everyone in competitive swimming uses a pace clock because its low cost and reproducible. Power meters are not low cost. They can be reliable, but my personal experience was that this was not always the case. Apples and oranges. I agree there is a huge cost difference. But when people start talking about power numbers taking the enjoyment out of training, data analysis/paralysis, being held back by the power meter...I don't think they are talking about the price. Measurement of performance and load is key to improving fitness and a power meter is, in my opinion, the best tool out there (on the bike). Just like a pace clock is in the pool Now, if it gets in the way of enjoyment then the cons outweigh the pros. Just like the cost (con) can easily outweigh the pros for some people. So I am unplugging the pace clock. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() Two weeks will be the first time I am racing with power, and it is on a tough hilly course (Wildflower Oly). Last time I raced the WF long course, my coach at the time basically told me to leave the HR monitor at home, because it would just be too frustrating trying to stick to zones on such a difficult course. We'll see what happens in two weeks, I guess. The CT is incredible for training, as I am sure a PM on a trainer would be. I can't imagine going back and training on a trainer with just HR. |
![]() ![]() |
Master![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() marcag - 2013-04-23 9:51 AM What's interesting is that there is debate on the merits of a power meter to quantify effort yet there isn't a swim coach in the world that would question the value of a pace clock for training. Aren't they the same thing ? I can tell you, the pace clock at the pool takes away from my swim enjoyment :-) Well, in addition to what Fred said, they're not quite the same thing even though they both measure an output. Power measures a work rate whereas the pace clock is how long to get from one point to another. They're both tools to help achieve the same thing (performance gains) but not quite the same as one another. ETA: I don't always like what the pace clock is telling me either, but have enjoyed the performance gains more than enough to compensate. Edited by brigby1 2013-04-23 12:22 PM |
|