Marathon...10 weeks enough time? (Page 2)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Daremo - 2009-07-09 2:46 PM There are many that feel that Hal's novice plan is not really enough to get to the finish happy and successfully. BUT .... plenty of people have and I've actually recommended it to a few with success. I get what you are saying though, and it makes sense in some ways. I just go back to "What's the rush?" I am not sure how many people here have run a marathon but I just have one saying for you: Respect the Distance. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() joshboots - 2009-07-09 2:27 PM I am not sure how many people here have run a marathon but I just have one saying for you: Respect the Distance. That makes no sense when compared to your first piece of advice. You first tell him he can do anything he sets his mind to and now you say respect the distance? Do you see how that would be confusing? There are plenty of marathoners here. I have only done two stand-alone, and as I crossed the finish line at each I was grateful for the miles I had put in. I wasn't over 100 miles per week or anything, but I was usually between 35 and 50, with rest weeks and plenty of periodization mixed in. Mike |
![]() ![]() |
Cycling Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() joshboots - 2009-07-09 4:27 PM I am not sure how many people here have run a marathon but I just have one saying for you: Respect the Distance. That I agree with. And many here have run them. I'd hazard that most offering advice have at least finished a few each. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Rollin' Thunder - 2009-07-09 3:32 PM joshboots - 2009-07-09 2:27 PM That makes no sense when compared to your first piece of advice. You first tell him he can do anything he sets his mind to and now you say respect the distance? Do you see how that would be confusing? There are plenty of marathoners here. I have only done two stand-alone, and as I crossed the finish line at each I was grateful for the miles I had put in. I wasn't over 100 miles per week or anything, but I was usually between 35 and 50, with rest weeks and plenty of periodization mixed in. MikeI am not sure how many people here have run a marathon but I just have one saying for you: Respect the Distance. He can do anything he puts his mind to... why not? I'm merely saying- don't think it will be easy. |
![]() ![]() |
Coach ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() KSH - 2009-07-09 12:43 PM to put it in a nice way that's just plain dumb...jmwebs - 2009-07-09 12:37 PM Ok, truth is, when I'm asking it means I have doubts that it would be smart but would like confirmation of that fact. I also failed to mention that a few years back I ramped up too quick for my first 1/2 mary and had issues with my IT band. So I should know better. Would rather do an Oct. Mary, but the ones around here don't work with my schedule or I farted around too long and are now closed (ie Chicago) Eh, I ramped up properly for my mary and got a stress fracture DURING the race. Started to hurt at mile 3. But mile 24 I had shooting pain in my foot. Couldn't walk on it the next day. So it sounds like the bottom line is that I could probably finish but would either risk hurting myself to be ready or be underprepared making for a pretty unpleasant experience. I guess I will look for a better alternative where I can ramp up in a proper fashion. ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I'll give you a different perspective. It's all about your body, you know what it can take injury free vs. your goals. However...just for perspective... it certainly can be done. I've run 10+ marathons without ever running 80 mpw. Two years ago I did 3 fall marathons, running no more than 20 mpw in the months leading up to them, some weeks not running. Not smart, but I know my body, I know I don't get hurt, and I knew that I wasn't going to go fast. So again, it's balancing your goals with what you're confident you can accomodate without injury. Reading your posts, it looks as though you're a bit nervous about injury, given your ITB. That's probably the loudest voice you should have in your head, because at the end of the day, that's what matters. I personally wouldn't have a qualm about doing it with your mileage. But it's you that has to believe and want that, and it doesn't sound like you're completely convinced. You probably shouldn't. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Daremo - 2009-07-09 4:37 PM joshboots - 2009-07-09 4:27 PM I am not sure how many people here have run a marathon but I just have one saying for you: Respect the Distance. That I agree with. And many here have run them. I'd hazard that most offering advice have at least finished a few each. A marathoner here - and I totally agree with Daremo. There are tons of marathons out there. No need to rush to this one. if you want to do one. Pick one where you have at least 16-18 weeks to build up sensibly with a training plan. |
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() So basically you have been running 10 miles a week for this year average. To finish your full mary sub 4 hours it would be nice to be running around 40 miles a week. My vote is just say no. Quadrupling your run distances over 10 weeks is not wise and there is the taper in there if you chose to for a week or 2. I would just pick a late season Mary and give it a decent 6 months to build for it. A mary isn't something you really want to get into if you are not appropriately trained for it... makes for a long day. I went 9 months between my first half may and a full mary and averaged 100 miles a month building to 140-150 miles per month prior to the race. So that is like 2-3x your distance. The last 6 miles still sucked. As always is your choice, but running is the most stressful on the body of the 3 events to increase distance in. |
|