Flu shot? (Page 2)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2010-12-08 10:47 AM in reply to: #3240869 |
Pro 6011 Camp Hill, Pennsylvania | Subject: RE: Flu shot? No. I've always had bad reactions to vaccinations. It was bad enough that I never had all of the ones they normally give children before starting school. My wife gets one every year.
|
|
2010-12-08 10:50 AM in reply to: #3241229 |
Champion 18680 Lost in the Luminiferous Aether | Subject: RE: Flu shot? Bmel - 2010-12-08 11:45 AM trinnas - 2010-12-08 10:41 AM Bmel - 2010-12-08 11:38 AM Sorry I don't believe in them. My wife and three sons never get them either and no one has ever gotten the flu in my household (knock on wood for this year) Unlike Santa and the Easter Bunny, Flu shots really do exist. Ha-ha, I should have said I don't believe they really work. I've seen plenty of people get flu shots and still get the flu and plenty of people don't get flu shots and never get the flu. It's really just a crap shoot. Also: "Do flu shots have mercury in them? Yes, says the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, commonly referred to as the CDC, in their facts on the flu shot question and answer guide. Opinions about whether mercury in flu shots is a threat to human health may vary, but no one can deny the facts on the flu shot. Mercury is used in the manufacturing of and as a preservative in most flu shot vaccines. Even those vaccines that are labeled preservative free have trace amounts of mercury left over from the manufacturing process, but because the content is too low to act as a preservative, they are called preservative free." **sigh** Meh pass the popcorn please. |
2010-12-08 10:52 AM in reply to: #3241236 |
Champion 14571 the alamo city, Texas | Subject: RE: Flu shot? trinnas - 2010-12-08 11:50 AM Bmel - 2010-12-08 11:45 AM trinnas - 2010-12-08 10:41 AM Bmel - 2010-12-08 11:38 AM Sorry I don't believe in them. My wife and three sons never get them either and no one has ever gotten the flu in my household (knock on wood for this year) Unlike Santa and the Easter Bunny, Flu shots really do exist. Ha-ha, I should have said I don't believe they really work. I've seen plenty of people get flu shots and still get the flu and plenty of people don't get flu shots and never get the flu. It's really just a crap shoot. Also: "Do flu shots have mercury in them? Yes, says the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, commonly referred to as the CDC, in their facts on the flu shot question and answer guide. Opinions about whether mercury in flu shots is a threat to human health may vary, but no one can deny the facts on the flu shot. Mercury is used in the manufacturing of and as a preservative in most flu shot vaccines. Even those vaccines that are labeled preservative free have trace amounts of mercury left over from the manufacturing process, but because the content is too low to act as a preservative, they are called preservative free." **sigh** Meh pass the popcorn please. don't touch the caramel! |
2010-12-08 10:58 AM in reply to: #3240869 |
Expert 715 PA | Subject: RE: Flu shot? flu shots are for quitters. never had one, or will have one. im rarely sick with anything, so why change my habits. |
2010-12-08 10:58 AM in reply to: #3241238 |
Champion 18680 Lost in the Luminiferous Aether | Subject: RE: Flu shot? meherczeg - 2010-12-08 11:52 AM trinnas - 2010-12-08 11:50 AM Bmel - 2010-12-08 11:45 AM trinnas - 2010-12-08 10:41 AM Bmel - 2010-12-08 11:38 AM Sorry I don't believe in them. My wife and three sons never get them either and no one has ever gotten the flu in my household (knock on wood for this year) Unlike Santa and the Easter Bunny, Flu shots really do exist. Ha-ha, I should have said I don't believe they really work. I've seen plenty of people get flu shots and still get the flu and plenty of people don't get flu shots and never get the flu. It's really just a crap shoot. Also: "Do flu shots have mercury in them? Yes, says the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, commonly referred to as the CDC, in their facts on the flu shot question and answer guide. Opinions about whether mercury in flu shots is a threat to human health may vary, but no one can deny the facts on the flu shot. Mercury is used in the manufacturing of and as a preservative in most flu shot vaccines. Even those vaccines that are labeled preservative free have trace amounts of mercury left over from the manufacturing process, but because the content is too low to act as a preservative, they are called preservative free." **sigh** Meh pass the popcorn please. don't touch the caramel! I'll go with the cheese popcorn then. |
2010-12-08 11:07 AM in reply to: #3241210 |
Master 1440 | Subject: RE: Flu shot? trinnas - You are not getting vacinated with one strain to prevent all strains. You are getting vacinated with a combination of 3 strains to protect against those strains. The vaccination may provide limited protection against other flue strains depending on how highly concerved the target is. The 3 strains are chosen each year by the CDC as the strains most likly to show up in the coming flu season and yes they are wrong sometimes. Years ago they advocated smoking to prevent a number of lung diseases, Then Tareynton (Sp?) cigarettes put "micronite filters" (asbestos) on their cigarettes to make them safer. Do you need to be reminded about the problems with the "Miracle drug" DES? How long do you suppose it will be before we find out the tragic side effects of these flu shots? |
|
2010-12-08 11:09 AM in reply to: #3240869 |
Pro 4612 MA | Subject: RE: Flu shot? For those who said they had never got the flu - how do you know? I have to say most of the time one can fight a mild flu with a strong enough immune system. I consider myself pretty healthy and young enough to have a good immunute system. Then why, in years I didn't get the flu shot, I would get something that has the classic flu symptoms*? If it wasn't the flu then what was it? It is the experiment I have done to myself: my company provide free flu shots every fall. There are years that I don't get them for different reasons - one year was the global flu vaccine shortage and we "low risk" people got the low priority. A few years I chose not to get one thinking I was healthy enough. I live by myself, and generally don't see kids, elderly or people with long term illness. I took notes of how my body reacted to the shot or the lack of shot. Years I got flu shots = no report sick days at work. May have have mild illness that resembles more to a cold than the flu*. Years I didn't get the shot = at least a few sick days. Usually complicated by my travelling - twice I had it during my Xmas visiting home that involves 16-hour long flight. THis may be just N = 1, but it's good enough to convince myself to get the shots. And I did for this year. * How I tell the differences. Cold = slow onset with a couple days of small discomfort that escalates, sinus irritation, watery eyes (always ), if migrated to beneath the head and started coughing, will take a while to get better. Flu = fast onset discomfort that develops in matter of hours. Would knock me out for a good week, complete with high fever, lost voice, achy body that felt like it pain was from deep inside the body and would take me a few more weeks to get back to normal. |
2010-12-08 11:13 AM in reply to: #3241267 |
Champion 8936 | Subject: RE: Flu shot? verga - 2010-12-08 11:07 AM trinnas - You are not getting vacinated with one strain to prevent all strains. You are getting vacinated with a combination of 3 strains to protect against those strains. The vaccination may provide limited protection against other flue strains depending on how highly concerved the target is. The 3 strains are chosen each year by the CDC as the strains most likly to show up in the coming flu season and yes they are wrong sometimes. Years ago they advocated smoking to prevent a number of lung diseases, Then Tareynton (Sp?) cigarettes put "micronite filters" (asbestos) on their cigarettes to make them safer. Do you need to be reminded about the problems with the "Miracle drug" DES? How long do you suppose it will be before we find out the tragic side effects of these flu shots? Are you really comparing flu shots to cigarettes? |
2010-12-08 11:14 AM in reply to: #3240869 |
Champion 8936 | Subject: RE: Flu shot? And I'll have extra butter please. |
2010-12-08 11:15 AM in reply to: #3240869 |
Master 4101 Denver | Subject: RE: Flu shot? I'm trying NOT to get the flu, why would I voluntarily inject myself with it? |
2010-12-08 11:19 AM in reply to: #3241267 |
Champion 18680 Lost in the Luminiferous Aether | Subject: RE: Flu shot? verga - 2010-12-08 12:07 PM trinnas - You are not getting vacinated with one strain to prevent all strains. You are getting vacinated with a combination of 3 strains to protect against those strains. The vaccination may provide limited protection against other flue strains depending on how highly concerved the target is. The 3 strains are chosen each year by the CDC as the strains most likly to show up in the coming flu season and yes they are wrong sometimes. Years ago they advocated smoking to prevent a number of lung diseases, Then Tareynton (Sp?) cigarettes put "micronite filters" (asbestos) on their cigarettes to make them safer. Do you need to be reminded about the problems with the "Miracle drug" DES? How long do you suppose it will be before we find out the tragic side effects of these flu shots? A) What exactly does that have to do with anything I said? I simply disabused the poster I was answering of the notion he had about how the vaccine works and is chosen. B) Really are you kidding me. Let's all disavow all medical advancements and go with leeches cause you know those mamagram machines and chemotharapy drugs and diabetes meds may all have unknown tragic side effects that have not shown up yet with repeated testing. But you know they must be coming cause other bad stuff happened. C) I wonder what tragic consequences will found for breathing all these years or maybe tomato soup will kill us all in the future. |
|
2010-12-08 11:41 AM in reply to: #3241296 |
Master 1440 | Subject: RE: Flu shot? trinnas - 2010-12-08 12:19 PM A) What exactly does that have to do with anything I said? I simply disabused the poster I was answering of the notion he had about how the vaccine works and is chosen. B) Really are you kidding me. Let's all disavow all medical advancements and go with leeches cause you know those mamagram machines and chemotharapy drugs and diabetes meds may all have unknown tragic side effects that have not shown up yet with repeated testing. But you know they must be coming cause other bad stuff happened. C) I wonder what tragic consequences will found for breathing all these years or maybe tomato soup will kill us all in the future. And here Trinnas has provided a perfect example of the logical fallacy of reducto ad absurdium. I present legitimate facts about practices that were advocated for years by the medical and scientific community that later were found to have tragic consequences and you try to twist it to the ridiculous. And BTW leeches are still used to stimulate blood flow following various surgeries for reattaching fingers and hands. |
2010-12-08 11:45 AM in reply to: #3241330 |
Champion 8936 | Subject: RE: Flu shot? verga And here Trinnas has provided a perfect example of the logical fallacy of reducto ad absurdium. I present legitimate facts about practices that were advocated for years by the medical and scientific community that later were found to have tragic consequences and you try to twist it to the ridiculous. No, she actually presented a very valid point to which you have no response apparently. There's nothing twisted or ridiculous about what she posted. I would actually accuse you of posting ridiculous things given your examples. ETA Aside from her obvious joking last sentence. |
2010-12-08 11:48 AM in reply to: #3241340 |
Master 1440 | Subject: RE: Flu shot? DerekL - 2010-12-08 12:45 PM verga And here Trinnas has provided a perfect example of the logical fallacy of reducto ad absurdium. I present legitimate facts about practices that were advocated for years by the medical and scientific community that later were found to have tragic consequences and you try to twist it to the ridiculous. No, she actually presented a very valid point to which you have no response apparently. There's nothing twisted or ridiculous about what she posted. I would actually accuse you of posting ridiculous things given your examples. Were any of my examples in error? Did the science and medical community advocate the practices I used as examples? Did each and every one of them result in tragtic consequences? This is the part where you say "Wow Verga really did raise some valid concerns." |
2010-12-08 11:50 AM in reply to: #3241340 |
Melon Presser 52116 | Subject: RE: Flu shot? DerekL - 2010-12-09 12:45 AM verga And here Trinnas has provided a perfect example of the logical fallacy of reducto ad absurdium. I present legitimate facts about practices that were advocated for years by the medical and scientific community that later were found to have tragic consequences and you try to twist it to the ridiculous. No, she actually presented a very valid point to which you have no response apparently. There's nothing twisted or ridiculous about what she posted. I would actually accuse you of posting ridiculous things given your examples. ETA Aside from her obvious joking last sentence. *yawn* never mind popcorn ... pass the poptarts, and a picture of you in a tutu, please. Derek, you can put valid and substantiated information out there. But when there's no common ground of understanding regarding basic science and medicine ... it's like two people trying to speak different languages to each other. |
2010-12-08 11:51 AM in reply to: #3241330 |
Champion 18680 Lost in the Luminiferous Aether | Subject: RE: Flu shot? verga - 2010-12-08 12:41 PM trinnas - 2010-12-08 12:19 PM A) What exactly does that have to do with anything I said? I simply disabused the poster I was answering of the notion he had about how the vaccine works and is chosen. B) Really are you kidding me. Let's all disavow all medical advancements and go with leeches cause you know those mamagram machines and chemotharapy drugs and diabetes meds may all have unknown tragic side effects that have not shown up yet with repeated testing. But you know they must be coming cause other bad stuff happened. C) I wonder what tragic consequences will found for breathing all these years or maybe tomato soup will kill us all in the future. And here Trinnas has provided a perfect example of the logical fallacy of reducto ad absurdium. I present legitimate facts about practices that were advocated for years by the medical and scientific community that later were found to have tragic consequences and you try to twist it to the ridiculous. And BTW leeches are still used to stimulate blood flow following various surgeries for reattaching fingers and hands. You take 3 mistaken ideologies of the past and use it to condem something that is all but completly unrealated and you want to accuse me of a fallacious argument. By the way you missed one of the real biggies Thalidomide - Which is now used to treat other diseases because it is a potent anti-angiogenisis drug. Just don't give it to pregnant women. |
|
2010-12-08 11:51 AM in reply to: #3240869 |
COURT JESTER 12230 ROCKFORD, IL | Subject: RE: Flu shot? If I bring more drinks can I please share in the popcorn? |
2010-12-08 11:56 AM in reply to: #3240869 |
Champion 7821 Brooklyn, NY | Subject: RE: Flu shot? This is the part where I say, “I’m not really even sure what your point is.” Call me crazy, but your argument seems to sort of conveniently ignore the thousands of other medical advancements that were not proven to have harmful side effects later on. Edited by jmk-brooklyn 2010-12-08 11:58 AM |
2010-12-08 11:57 AM in reply to: #3241267 |
Champion 10668 Tacoma, Washington | Subject: RE: Flu shot? verga - 2010-12-08 9:07 AM trinnas - You are not getting vacinated with one strain to prevent all strains. You are getting vacinated with a combination of 3 strains to protect against those strains. The vaccination may provide limited protection against other flue strains depending on how highly concerved the target is. The 3 strains are chosen each year by the CDC as the strains most likly to show up in the coming flu season and yes they are wrong sometimes. Years ago they advocated smoking to prevent a number of lung diseases, Then Tareynton (Sp?) cigarettes put "micronite filters" (asbestos) on their cigarettes to make them safer. Do you need to be reminded about the problems with the "Miracle drug" DES? How long do you suppose it will be before we find out the tragic side effects of these flu shots? And years before that, the "cure" for syphilis was to spread an amalgam of butter and mercury on the sores... And in the mid-1800's and before, infection was so common that if a wound didn't weep and ooze for days, it would be re-opened because apparently it wasn't healing correctly. Oh, and yeah, don't forget the medically-approved practice of blood letting! All good reasons to forego flu imunizations. Because, as is obvious, the medical establishment doesn't know anything. |
2010-12-08 11:59 AM in reply to: #3241372 |
Champion 14571 the alamo city, Texas | Subject: RE: Flu shot? briderdt - 2010-12-08 12:57 PM And years before that, the "cure" for syphilis was to spread an amalgam of butter and mercury on the sores... And in the mid-1800's and before, infection was so common that if a wound didn't weep and ooze for days, it would be re-opened because apparently it wasn't healing correctly. note to self: never read COJ while eating... |
2010-12-08 12:02 PM in reply to: #3240869 |
Champion 11989 Philly 'burbs | Subject: RE: Flu shot? My sister's husband's brother's girlfriend's son got the swine flu from a flu shot so I'll never get a flu shot. They are just full of germs and stuff. Yuck. |
|
2010-12-08 12:05 PM in reply to: #3240869 |
Champion 7821 Brooklyn, NY | Subject: RE: Flu shot? "Waiter-- on second thought, no butter on that whole wheat toast, please!" |
2010-12-08 12:10 PM in reply to: #3240869 |
Champion 10550 Austin, Texas | Subject: RE: Flu shot? I was gonna ask Meh if I could have the butter part of the popcorn tin, but now I think not... I've made it through both the SARS and the Avian flu outbreaks in Vancouver without ever having a flu shot and I don't plan on having one now. |
2010-12-08 12:11 PM in reply to: #3241372 |
Champion 16151 Checkin' out the podium girls | Subject: RE: Flu shot? briderdt - 2010-12-08 12:57 PM verga - 2010-12-08 9:07 AM trinnas - You are not getting vacinated with one strain to prevent all strains. You are getting vacinated with a combination of 3 strains to protect against those strains. The vaccination may provide limited protection against other flue strains depending on how highly concerved the target is. The 3 strains are chosen each year by the CDC as the strains most likly to show up in the coming flu season and yes they are wrong sometimes. Years ago they advocated smoking to prevent a number of lung diseases, Then Tareynton (Sp?) cigarettes put "micronite filters" (asbestos) on their cigarettes to make them safer. Do you need to be reminded about the problems with the "Miracle drug" DES? How long do you suppose it will be before we find out the tragic side effects of these flu shots? And years before that, the "cure" for syphilis was to spread an amalgam of butter and mercury on the sores... And in the mid-1800's and before, infection was so common that if a wound didn't weep and ooze for days, it would be re-opened because apparently it wasn't healing correctly. Oh, and yeah, don't forget the medically-approved practice of blood letting! All good reasons to forego flu imunizations. Because, as is obvious, the medical establishment doesn't know anything. Yeah, that whole polio vaccine thing was very disappointing. Why doesn't the flu shot erradicate the flu then? Hmm? I bet it's a conspiracy to keep us sick so the medical community can make more money. |
2010-12-08 12:13 PM in reply to: #3241138 |
Pro 4578 Vancouver, BC | Subject: RE: Flu shot? jmk-brooklyn - 2010-12-08 7:58 AM Yes, always. I ride public transportation every day and come in contact with strangers every day as part of my job. Seems only prudent. But even if that weren’t the case, I’m not afraid of needles or allergic to eggs, and I’ve never had a bad reaction to the shot, so I don’t see the downside to getting one. x2 |
|