Sept 15-Oct 15 "Daniel's Running Formula" Book Club (Page 22)
-
No new posts
Moderators: the bear, kaqphin, tinkerbeth, D001, k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2013-12-09 3:15 PM in reply to: Asalzwed |
Expert 4929 Middle River, Maryland | Subject: RE: Sept 15-Oct 15 "Daniel's Running Formula" Book Club Originally posted by Asalzwed Originally posted by popsracer While there was a certain amount of HTFU with the weather, the 10k didn't go so well overall. It is a very tough two loop course with two hills on each loop which I figured might account for a minute and the weather maybe a minute but I was four minutes overall off where I should have been. I ended up closer to HM pace. My last two recent 5k's have averaged 21:30 so even 46 for 10k would be a little conservative according to the calculators. I paced the first lap well and was right about 23:00 but then the first hill of the second lap zapped me. I recovered and ran the last mile ok but 4 and 5 were horrible. Granted I could not feel my toes at this point and my thighs were numb but I thought I had a little more in me then that. I think more tempo work would help but I'm not ready to go there. I have one more 5k in about three weeks that I want to do well in and then I transition to my marathon plan (March 1st race). I don't know, maybe the extra miles in the marathon build will help me out. After that I need to really work on 10k distance if I want to get anywhere close to qualifying for AG Nationals. So the question is are tempo and I workouts the key to a good 10k or is it just getting more miles in?
Heh, you are opening a whole can of worms there re: "how can I get faster" thread in TT. There are many ways to get faster in the form of different types of training stress. I PRed in everything from 5K to M in every Marathon training cycle I did with just easy volume. So, there is my experience. But yeah, more intensity types of workouts with lots of tempo runs and longer reps are going to be pretty specifically good workouts for 10K. We do very similar workouts for our 6K XC stuff. Have you looked at Daniel's plan? Remember, as you add more intensity (and longer tempo runs) it's a good idea to have the proper amount of volume to support it.
What do you feel is your limitor? And I just PR'd 5K, 5 M, and 10K running a max of 20 miles/week with some very focused quality work, adding to the notion that there is more than one way to skin this cat. I find that the tempo/threshold run is the most effective for me, plus being consistent week-in/week-out. Frequency also made a big difference. I'll be interested when I push out my run volume to 30+ mpw (while also cycling and swimming) during my build phase. Like you, Steve, I need to rock that 10K to have a prayer at making AGN. I will be careful to manage the quality work percentage in line with JD's recommendations. |
|
2013-12-09 3:18 PM in reply to: jmhpsu93 |
Seattle | Subject: RE: Sept 15-Oct 15 "Daniel's Running Formula" Book Club Also Matt (and Steve) it's important to keep your entire training load in perspective. While you might not be logging high miles, you have the swimming and biking training load to account for. |
2013-12-09 3:34 PM in reply to: Asalzwed |
Extreme Veteran 2263 Ridgeland, Mississippi | Subject: RE: Sept 15-Oct 15 "Daniel's Running Formula" Book Club Originally posted by Asalzwed Also Matt (and Steve) it's important to keep your entire training load in perspective. While you might not be logging high miles, you have the swimming and biking training load to account for. That's very true. I wish I had a better idea of how much it affects the load of my run training, but it definitely does. |
2013-12-09 4:23 PM in reply to: Asalzwed |
Pro 6520 Bellingham, WA | Subject: RE: Sept 15-Oct 15 "Daniel's Running Formula" Book Club Originally posted by Asalzwed Originally posted by msteiner Originally posted by Asalzwed Originally posted by popsracer While there was a certain amount of HTFU with the weather, the 10k didn't go so well overall. It is a very tough two loop course with two hills on each loop which I figured might account for a minute and the weather maybe a minute but I was four minutes overall off where I should have been. I ended up closer to HM pace. My last two recent 5k's have averaged 21:30 so even 46 for 10k would be a little conservative according to the calculators. I paced the first lap well and was right about 23:00 but then the first hill of the second lap zapped me. I recovered and ran the last mile ok but 4 and 5 were horrible. Granted I could not feel my toes at this point and my thighs were numb but I thought I had a little more in me then that. I think more tempo work would help but I'm not ready to go there. I have one more 5k in about three weeks that I want to do well in and then I transition to my marathon plan (March 1st race). I don't know, maybe the extra miles in the marathon build will help me out. After that I need to really work on 10k distance if I want to get anywhere close to qualifying for AG Nationals. So the question is are tempo and I workouts the key to a good 10k or is it just getting more miles in?
Heh, you are opening a whole can of worms there re: "how can I get faster" thread in TT. There are many ways to get faster in the form of different types of training stress. I PRed in everything from 5K to M in every Marathon training cycle I did with just easy volume. So, there is my experience. But yeah, more intensity types of workouts with lots of tempo runs and longer reps are going to be pretty specifically good workouts for 10K. We do very similar workouts for our 6K XC stuff. Have you looked at Daniel's plan? Remember, as you add more intensity (and longer tempo runs) it's a good idea to have the proper amount of volume to support it.
What do you feel is your limitor? I'm more on the other side of the spectrum where only two of my training days (well 3 if you count the long run) are ran at an "easy" pace. My other days have intervals at either 10k pace, 5k pace, or all out. I'm definitely in the camp that says you don't need to run 70mpw to run a quick marathon. Heck I have only flirted with 50 up to this point. I do wonder though, with his injuries and the fact that he will already be marathon training, if it's more appropriate to run on the more mileage vs intensity side. Steve, have you had injury issues with mileage? Do you have a plan set for M training? I was following JD's 5k to 15k plan and was just about through phase II a few weeks back when I tweeked a tendon (not seriously) that I feel was due to the Q2 I or T workout. I was fine with the R workouts and decided that I would stick with those and cut out Q2 for a while and just build on Q1 for now. I think have a few key limiters that I am trying to figure out. I've made great strides with my speed which I've been focusing on and my endurance (hit 40 miles week before last) which resulted in a breakthrough in my marathon time in October. It's the in between stuff that seems to be a limitor. Would that be my Lactate Threshold? I think I'm OK with building miles and while I have not finalized a marathon plan I'd like to be up around 50-60 miles because I'll still be doing some cycling and a little swimming. Another limitor has been running strength. Not speed but strength. I am learning that cycling does not seem to be a great builder of strength for running. I think I relied on this assumption in the past. I did my first trail HM last month and found out just deficient I was in running strength. I'm thinking about adding some hill repeats to one of my easy days since I'm not doing a Q2. |
2013-12-09 4:44 PM in reply to: 0 |
Pro 6520 Bellingham, WA | Subject: RE: Sept 15-Oct 15 "Daniel's Running Formula" Book Club Originally posted by switch I'm sorry your race didn't go the way you wanted it to. Maybe the cold is a bigger factor than you're thinking--did you feel really warmed up? I guess I would just caution you with the intensity based on that flirt with the achilles/calf thing. I think you had pretty much decided that too much intensity too soon had contributed to that, right? Part of our conversation in the "faster" thread was about how different athletes need different things. I think that's important, and maybe the best take-home from that thread. As we get older, we really need to take that into account with intensity. I know I could do things both in terms of volume and intensity (even just 10 years ago) that I just can't do now. You've had a remarkable recovery from some really serious health stuff. On the one hand, I bet that can make you feel invincible in many ways--and I hope it does OTOH, that wasn't too long ago, and I hope you're giving yourself a little latitude when it comes to training and expectations. You've had some really remarkable times and improvements. An "off" race once in a while, though a bummer, is totally OK too. Warming up was not possible. As soon as I got out of my car it was a losing battle to build or retain any heat. I think the hills and my lack of running strength also contributed. I did decide I would not do T and I workouts as a Q2. Maybe after my marathon base running I'll dabble back into this cautiously as my weekly miles drop and I start into a later Spring tri focus with an emphasis on what it takes to run a good 10k. The health stuff does play in as well. Four years ago, after my surgeries my left leg was not strong enough (and some nerve damage) to lift it into my car without reaching down and pulling it in with my hand. I've made a lot of progress but it is still a bit compromised. The human body is extremely adaptive but it has created strength imbalances that I have to be careful of. I think its what has caused some of my right calf/tendon issues. Maybe I'll find a flatter 10k in above freezing conditions and try to redeem myself. It was just very baffling to me how I could be so far off the calculator. Edited by popsracer 2013-12-09 4:45 PM |
2013-12-09 4:53 PM in reply to: jmhpsu93 |
Pro 6520 Bellingham, WA | Subject: RE: Sept 15-Oct 15 "Daniel's Running Formula" Book Club Originally posted by jmhpsu93 Originally posted by Asalzwed Originally posted by popsracer While there was a certain amount of HTFU with the weather, the 10k didn't go so well overall. It is a very tough two loop course with two hills on each loop which I figured might account for a minute and the weather maybe a minute but I was four minutes overall off where I should have been. I ended up closer to HM pace. My last two recent 5k's have averaged 21:30 so even 46 for 10k would be a little conservative according to the calculators. I paced the first lap well and was right about 23:00 but then the first hill of the second lap zapped me. I recovered and ran the last mile ok but 4 and 5 were horrible. Granted I could not feel my toes at this point and my thighs were numb but I thought I had a little more in me then that. I think more tempo work would help but I'm not ready to go there. I have one more 5k in about three weeks that I want to do well in and then I transition to my marathon plan (March 1st race). I don't know, maybe the extra miles in the marathon build will help me out. After that I need to really work on 10k distance if I want to get anywhere close to qualifying for AG Nationals. So the question is are tempo and I workouts the key to a good 10k or is it just getting more miles in?
Heh, you are opening a whole can of worms there re: "how can I get faster" thread in TT. There are many ways to get faster in the form of different types of training stress. I PRed in everything from 5K to M in every Marathon training cycle I did with just easy volume. So, there is my experience. But yeah, more intensity types of workouts with lots of tempo runs and longer reps are going to be pretty specifically good workouts for 10K. We do very similar workouts for our 6K XC stuff. Have you looked at Daniel's plan? Remember, as you add more intensity (and longer tempo runs) it's a good idea to have the proper amount of volume to support it.
What do you feel is your limitor? And I just PR'd 5K, 5 M, and 10K running a max of 20 miles/week with some very focused quality work, adding to the notion that there is more than one way to skin this cat. I find that the tempo/threshold run is the most effective for me, plus being consistent week-in/week-out. Frequency also made a big difference. I'll be interested when I push out my run volume to 30+ mpw (while also cycling and swimming) during my build phase. Like you, Steve, I need to rock that 10K to have a prayer at making AGN. I will be careful to manage the quality work percentage in line with JD's recommendations. I think the problem with JD recommendations is that he does not have a table for age. The older you get the harder it is to bounce back for that second or third quality workout. My mini-training cycle is weekly to coincide with days off to do long runs/rides over the weekend but I think I would rather do something like a ten day cycle. |
|
2013-12-09 6:18 PM in reply to: popsracer |
Veteran 945 South Windsor, CT | Subject: RE: Sept 15-Oct 15 "Daniel's Running Formula" Book Club Originally posted by popsracer I think the problem with JD recommendations is that he does not have a table for age. The older you get the harder it is to bounce back for that second or third quality workout. My mini-training cycle is weekly to coincide with days off to do long runs/rides over the weekend but I think I would rather do something like a ten day cycle. Steve sorry you did not get a 10K PR, but sometimes weather throws you a curveball...it's one of many variables that we have to deal with on race day (which is why M days can kill PR dreams so quickly with a sudden change in the weather) insightful comment about aging, but again, we are all different I have a friend who made breakthroughs after he added lots of mileage then Q work-he could handle a lot of Q training and made quick improvements others fail with 2 Q workouts (like me when my overall volume is low) but we all need to just figure out what works Having done the training block you did, you have solid, if not higher, fitness than prior to that block and just because your 10K race did not justify it, I would not be deterred at all. I SUCK at cold weather races and hot weather races. I melt/sweat or freeze and lock up...so I never expect PR's during extreme weather conditions. Train on-you are doing just fine, just fine...What to do specifically? If you have the time, the answer is almost always 'a bit more volume with a bit more tempo'. The best standard answer for almost anyone... Originally posted by AsalzwedHeh, you are opening a whole can of worms there re: "how can I get faster" thread in TT. There are many ways to get faster in the form of different types of training stress. I PRed in everything from 5K to M in every Marathon training cycle I did with just easy volume. So, there is my experience. But yeah, more intensity types of workouts with lots of tempo runs and longer reps are going to be pretty specifically good workouts for 10K. We do very similar workouts for our 6K XC stuff. Have you looked at Daniel's plan? Remember, as you add more intensity (and longer tempo runs) it's a good idea to have the proper amount of volume to support it Fun 'triathlon talk' thread huh? Did everyone get a chance to read it? Lots of good comments and I think we did a good job keeping LB and Coach R in line overall. Lots of ways to train and having a big resume doesn't not make your word gospel. And even if he is confrontational and always talks about 'that guy', I enjoy LB and his comments. I was having trouble with the coach, however, in the beginning...but there are lots of good comments by many people about training for sure. That was an excellent thread! |
2013-12-09 6:41 PM in reply to: dtoce |
Seattle | Subject: RE: Sept 15-Oct 15 "Daniel's Running Formula" Book Club Originally posted by dtoce Originally posted by popsracer I think the problem with JD recommendations is that he does not have a table for age. The older you get the harder it is to bounce back for that second or third quality workout. My mini-training cycle is weekly to coincide with days off to do long runs/rides over the weekend but I think I would rather do something like a ten day cycle. Steve sorry you did not get a 10K PR, but sometimes weather throws you a curveball...it's one of many variables that we have to deal with on race day (which is why M days can kill PR dreams so quickly with a sudden change in the weather) insightful comment about aging, but again, we are all different I have a friend who made breakthroughs after he added lots of mileage then Q work-he could handle a lot of Q training and made quick improvements others fail with 2 Q workouts (like me when my overall volume is low) but we all need to just figure out what works Having done the training block you did, you have solid, if not higher, fitness than prior to that block and just because your 10K race did not justify it, I would not be deterred at all. I SUCK at cold weather races and hot weather races. I melt/sweat or freeze and lock up...so I never expect PR's during extreme weather conditions. Train on-you are doing just fine, just fine...What to do specifically? If you have the time, the answer is almost always 'a bit more volume with a bit more tempo'. The best standard answer for almost anyone... Originally posted by AsalzwedHeh, you are opening a whole can of worms there re: "how can I get faster" thread in TT. Fun 'triathlon talk' thread huh? Did everyone get a chance to read it? Lots of good comments and I think we did a good job keeping LB and Coach R in line overall. Lots of ways to train and having a big resume doesn't not make your word gospel. And even if he is confrontational and always talks about 'that guy', I enjoy LB and his comments. I was having trouble with the coach, however, in the beginning...but there are lots of good comments by many people about training for sure. That was an excellent thread! There are many ways to get faster in the form of different types of training stress. I PRed in everything from 5K to M in every Marathon training cycle I did with just easy volume. So, there is my experience. But yeah, more intensity types of workouts with lots of tempo runs and longer reps are going to be pretty specifically good workouts for 10K. We do very similar workouts for our 6K XC stuff. Have you looked at Daniel's plan? Remember, as you add more intensity (and longer tempo runs) it's a good idea to have the proper amount of volume to support it Yeah, thank you for your thoughtful responses, Dale. I agree. I was trying to take a more roundabout approach (rather than arguing, because it was clear they weren't all that interested in other views) and just plucked away with more specitivity. I still never really got answers but that's alright. It was some generally good conversation (and some REALLY bad.) At this point I have derailed the whole thing though
I am not going to post it in that particular thread, but I think this is a pretty good read in terms of the different marathon philosophies: http://www.runnersworld.com/race-training/masterminding-the-marathon |
2013-12-09 6:54 PM in reply to: Asalzwed |
Seattle | Subject: RE: Sept 15-Oct 15 "Daniel's Running Formula" Book Club And Steve, there is nothing wrong with a sub par race. That's just part of all of this, ya know? I think some people might think I'm a little soft when I don't give really hard time goals, but it's generally because there are SO many variables (like weather!) that you can't control and in my opinion it's a much better idea (for me) to make my goal to run the best I can THAT day and let the numbers fall where they will.
Speaking of, this Max King XC course this weekend is going to be crazy. Still too soon to know if there will be snow to contend with or not. I am so, so excited! There is some serious star-power in this race, I am lucky to be lining up with some of these ladies, SHEESH!
|
2013-12-09 11:40 PM in reply to: Asalzwed |
Pro 6520 Bellingham, WA | Subject: RE: Sept 15-Oct 15 "Daniel's Running Formula" Book Club Originally posted by Asalzwed And Steve, there is nothing wrong with a sub par race. That's just part of all of this, ya know? I think some people might think I'm a little soft when I don't give really hard time goals, but it's generally because there are SO many variables (like weather!) that you can't control and in my opinion it's a much better idea (for me) to make my goal to run the best I can THAT day and let the numbers fall where they will.
Speaking of, this Max King XC course this weekend is going to be crazy. Still too soon to know if there will be snow to contend with or not. I am so, so excited! There is some serious star-power in this race, I am lucky to be lining up with some of these ladies, SHEESH!
I'm more puzzled than bummed out and I really didn't expect a lot from the race. I did a 6 mile penance run the next day and cruised along very comfortably so I know I'm still on the right track. All your comments and reading the other TT thread have given me a lot of food for thought. A lot of what the OP was looking for was similar to my upcoming phase so it was helpful though some of it just irritated me. Don't like to see CoJ type badgering spill into TT. Anybody should be able to give an opinion without being demeaned.
|
2013-12-10 9:39 AM in reply to: popsracer |
Regular 5477 LHOTP | Subject: RE: Sept 15-Oct 15 "Daniel's Running Formula" Book Club Originally posted by popsracer Originally posted by Asalzwed And Steve, there is nothing wrong with a sub par race. That's just part of all of this, ya know? I think some people might think I'm a little soft when I don't give really hard time goals, but it's generally because there are SO many variables (like weather!) that you can't control and in my opinion it's a much better idea (for me) to make my goal to run the best I can THAT day and let the numbers fall where they will.
Speaking of, this Max King XC course this weekend is going to be crazy. Still too soon to know if there will be snow to contend with or not. I am so, so excited! There is some serious star-power in this race, I am lucky to be lining up with some of these ladies, SHEESH!
I'm more puzzled than bummed out and I really didn't expect a lot from the race. I did a 6 mile penance run the next day and cruised along very comfortably so I know I'm still on the right track. All your comments and reading the other TT thread have given me a lot of food for thought. A lot of what the OP was looking for was similar to my upcoming phase so it was helpful though some of it just irritated me. Don't like to see CoJ type badgering spill into TT. Anybody should be able to give an opinion without being demeaned.
I should apologize for my contributions to the CoJ tone. I have a hard time walking the line sometimes. Sorry about that Steve :)
|
|
2013-12-10 11:22 AM in reply to: switch |
Pro 6520 Bellingham, WA | Subject: RE: Sept 15-Oct 15 "Daniel's Running Formula" Book Club Originally posted by switch Originally posted by popsracer Originally posted by Asalzwed And Steve, there is nothing wrong with a sub par race. That's just part of all of this, ya know? I think some people might think I'm a little soft when I don't give really hard time goals, but it's generally because there are SO many variables (like weather!) that you can't control and in my opinion it's a much better idea (for me) to make my goal to run the best I can THAT day and let the numbers fall where they will.
Speaking of, this Max King XC course this weekend is going to be crazy. Still too soon to know if there will be snow to contend with or not. I am so, so excited! There is some serious star-power in this race, I am lucky to be lining up with some of these ladies, SHEESH!
I'm more puzzled than bummed out and I really didn't expect a lot from the race. I did a 6 mile penance run the next day and cruised along very comfortably so I know I'm still on the right track. All your comments and reading the other TT thread have given me a lot of food for thought. A lot of what the OP was looking for was similar to my upcoming phase so it was helpful though some of it just irritated me. Don't like to see CoJ type badgering spill into TT. Anybody should be able to give an opinion without being demeaned.
I should apologize for my contributions to the CoJ tone. I have a hard time walking the line sometimes. Sorry about that Steve
You certainly are not who I was referring to. |
2013-12-10 2:14 PM in reply to: popsracer |
Expert 4929 Middle River, Maryland | Subject: RE: Sept 15-Oct 15 "Daniel's Running Formula" Book Club Originally posted by popsracer Originally posted by switch Originally posted by popsracer Originally posted by Asalzwed And Steve, there is nothing wrong with a sub par race. That's just part of all of this, ya know? I think some people might think I'm a little soft when I don't give really hard time goals, but it's generally because there are SO many variables (like weather!) that you can't control and in my opinion it's a much better idea (for me) to make my goal to run the best I can THAT day and let the numbers fall where they will.
Speaking of, this Max King XC course this weekend is going to be crazy. Still too soon to know if there will be snow to contend with or not. I am so, so excited! There is some serious star-power in this race, I am lucky to be lining up with some of these ladies, SHEESH!
I'm more puzzled than bummed out and I really didn't expect a lot from the race. I did a 6 mile penance run the next day and cruised along very comfortably so I know I'm still on the right track. All your comments and reading the other TT thread have given me a lot of food for thought. A lot of what the OP was looking for was similar to my upcoming phase so it was helpful though some of it just irritated me. Don't like to see CoJ type badgering spill into TT. Anybody should be able to give an opinion without being demeaned.
I should apologize for my contributions to the CoJ tone. I have a hard time walking the line sometimes. Sorry about that Steve
You certainly are not who I was referring to. While I agree that some of the crosstalk was a little much, that was a really interesting thread with a very wide range of experiences and methodologies. At the end of the day, we are all experiments of one and we need to find out what works for ourselves. Sometimes that experience can be less than we had hoped, and sometimes it just clicks. And maybe some folks just never quite figure it all out.
|
2013-12-10 2:15 PM in reply to: 0 |
Veteran 945 South Windsor, CT | Subject: RE: Sept 15-Oct 15 "Daniel's Running Formula" Book Club Originally posted by popsracer I'm more puzzled than bummed out and I really didn't expect a lot from the race. I did a 6 mile penance run the next day and cruised along very comfortably so I know I'm still on the right track. I missed this comment-don't be bummed out at all-and good for you to say you didn't really expect a lot from the race, although it really appears that you did... lots of variables, lots of variables quick story-during the summer of my highest running volume (during one of my big blocks of marathon training and while I was setting PR's literally at any distance I did), I raced a 5K one night in very uncomfortable heat-an extremely challenging race-a terrible race time ensued, very slow compared to all my other times that year, several vdots lower...and yet, that was one of my highest placings ever-because I adjusted for the weather and raced based on the conditions. Although I did not achieve or prove what my best 5K potential was at that moment (on a flat course with cool weather), I did my best pace that night with a hilly course and 95 degree weather in the early evening. I was very happy with the placing as that proved to me that time is not always most important in a race. It is important to benchmark where you are at in the grand scheme of things but as I said before...lots of variables. I suppose it is normal to feel a little cheated when you don't get to show 'what you got'. and like Salty said already, just running your best race on race day is really all we can hope for. You're still right on track. Originally posted by jmhpsu93While I agree that some of the crosstalk was a little much, that was a really interesting thread with a very wide range of experiences and methodologies. At the end of the day, we are all experiments of one and we need to find out what works for ourselves. Sometimes that experience can be less than we had hoped, and sometimes it just clicks. And maybe some folks just never quite figure it all out.
Mike I do so agree with you. Experiments of one, but there is a lot of experience out there and I found it quite interesting to read and hear about other's experiences. A few of those guys are not just 'average' marathoners...And to paraphrase you--'some people just dont' get it' Edited by dtoce 2013-12-10 2:20 PM |
2013-12-10 2:35 PM in reply to: dtoce |
Expert 4929 Middle River, Maryland | Subject: RE: Sept 15-Oct 15 "Daniel's Running Formula" Book Club I'm about to return to running next week after a self-imposed three week Transition period. I went from basically no running due to some nagging injuries to about 20 mpw through October and November, finishing with my 10K PR. I've spent the last 2 1/2 weeks getting really fat relaxing a bit and trying to not look like I'm drowning doing a little cross-training here and there. JD says for three weeks off with cross-training to take about 4 weeks to get back to the original mileage, and to drop a VDOT. I'm planning something like 8, 10, 12, 15, 18, 20, starting with 4 days/week and increasing to 5 eventually, no Q workouts until those first six weeks are done. I would ramp up faster but I'm scared to death of injuries, having spent most of 2011, and significant parts of 2012 and 2013 either not running or not training at all, due to some kind of injury. I'll be adding back in cycling and swimming with a four week Prep phase at the same time, plus Friel's recommended strength training and my Bikram. Does this sound, uh, sound?
|
2013-12-10 4:26 PM in reply to: jmhpsu93 |
Pro 6520 Bellingham, WA | Subject: RE: Sept 15-Oct 15 "Daniel's Running Formula" Book Club Originally posted by jmhpsu93 I'm about to return to running next week after a self-imposed three week Transition period. I went from basically no running due to some nagging injuries to about 20 mpw through October and November, finishing with my 10K PR. I've spent the last 2 1/2 weeks getting really fat relaxing a bit and trying to not look like I'm drowning doing a little cross-training here and there. JD says for three weeks off with cross-training to take about 4 weeks to get back to the original mileage, and to drop a VDOT. I'm planning something like 8, 10, 12, 15, 18, 20, starting with 4 days/week and increasing to 5 eventually, no Q workouts until those first six weeks are done. I would ramp up faster but I'm scared to death of injuries, having spent most of 2011, and significant parts of 2012 and 2013 either not running or not training at all, due to some kind of injury. I'll be adding back in cycling and swimming with a four week Prep phase at the same time, plus Friel's recommended strength training and my Bikram. Does this sound, uh, sound?
8,10 miles sounds pretty light for a guy who ran a 46 minute 10k not too long ago. If you are running four days a week that's 2-2.5 easy miles. I am all for a slow cautious build back but you didn't have any injuries after your race or during your rest period did you? I guess the cycling will add some stress that has to be considered. I don't know, just my gut reaction. |
|
2013-12-10 4:49 PM in reply to: popsracer |
Seattle | Subject: RE: Sept 15-Oct 15 "Daniel's Running Formula" Book Club Originally posted by popsracer Originally posted by jmhpsu93 I'm about to return to running next week after a self-imposed three week Transition period. I went from basically no running due to some nagging injuries to about 20 mpw through October and November, finishing with my 10K PR. I've spent the last 2 1/2 weeks getting really fat relaxing a bit and trying to not look like I'm drowning doing a little cross-training here and there. JD says for three weeks off with cross-training to take about 4 weeks to get back to the original mileage, and to drop a VDOT. I'm planning something like 8, 10, 12, 15, 18, 20, starting with 4 days/week and increasing to 5 eventually, no Q workouts until those first six weeks are done. I would ramp up faster but I'm scared to death of injuries, having spent most of 2011, and significant parts of 2012 and 2013 either not running or not training at all, due to some kind of injury. I'll be adding back in cycling and swimming with a four week Prep phase at the same time, plus Friel's recommended strength training and my Bikram. Does this sound, uh, sound?
8,10 miles sounds pretty light for a guy who ran a 46 minute 10k not too long ago. If you are running four days a week that's 2-2.5 easy miles. I am all for a slow cautious build back but you didn't have any injuries after your race or during your rest period did you? I guess the cycling will add some stress that has to be considered. I don't know, just my gut reaction. 8,10 does sound light. But then again, so does 20. I generally would recommend erring on the conservative side especially since you will be ramping up the other sports at the same time. |
2013-12-10 7:00 PM in reply to: jmhpsu93 |
Veteran 945 South Windsor, CT | Subject: RE: Sept 15-Oct 15 "Daniel's Running Formula" Book Club Originally posted by jmhpsu93 I'm about to return to running next week after a self-imposed three week Transition period. I went from basically no running due to some nagging injuries to about 20 mpw through October and November, finishing with my 10K PR. I've spent the last 2 1/2 weeks getting really fat relaxing a bit and trying to not look like I'm drowning doing a little cross-training here and there. JD says for three weeks off with cross-training to take about 4 weeks to get back to the original mileage, and to drop a VDOT. I'm planning something like 8, 10, 12, 15, 18, 20, starting with 4 days/week and increasing to 5 eventually, no Q workouts until those first six weeks are done. I would ramp up faster but I'm scared to death of injuries, having spent most of 2011, and significant parts of 2012 and 2013 either not running or not training at all, due to some kind of injury. I'll be adding back in cycling and swimming with a four week Prep phase at the same time, plus Friel's recommended strength training and my Bikram. Does this sound, uh, sound?
Dude Only you will know if it is sound... Increase the mileage cautiously, add in the multisport stuff and see how it goes. But PAY ATTENTION to your body. It will tell you if you need to back off and keep it 'light' for a while. You may find that you can do more than you think. Nice 10K time. But be wary of injuries, as they will set you back, as you well know... Remember that if you are designing your own plan, swimming/biking EASY is a nice recovery day with some added specificity to those disciplines and much easier on the chassis. Far less impact. GL. |
2013-12-11 7:47 AM in reply to: dtoce |
Expert 4929 Middle River, Maryland | Subject: RE: Sept 15-Oct 15 "Daniel's Running Formula" Book Club Thanks for the responses, folks. I'll pay attention to how I'm responding to the three sports. Everything is supposed to be easy for the six weeks, so I might be able to ramp up the run mileage a little quicker. We'll see! |
2013-12-11 5:02 PM in reply to: jmhpsu93 |
Seattle | Subject: RE: Sept 15-Oct 15 "Daniel's Running Formula" Book Club Originally posted by jmhpsu93 Thanks for the responses, folks. I'll pay attention to how I'm responding to the three sports. Everything is supposed to be easy for the six weeks, so I might be able to ramp up the run mileage a little quicker. We'll see! That's great that you are thinking that way, Mike. Let us know how it goes. |
2013-12-23 2:50 PM in reply to: Asalzwed |
Seattle | Subject: RE: Sept 15-Oct 15 "Daniel's Running Formula" Book Club Have any of y'all thought of becoming a mentor? |
|
2013-12-23 3:20 PM in reply to: Asalzwed |
Extreme Veteran 2263 Ridgeland, Mississippi | Subject: RE: Sept 15-Oct 15 "Daniel's Running Formula" Book Club Originally posted by Asalzwed Have any of y'all thought of becoming a mentor? I've thought about it. |
2013-12-23 5:27 PM in reply to: #4847515 |
Master 4452 | Subject: RE: Sept 15-Oct 15 "Daniel's Running Formula" Book Club Adrienne, I think if you feel like you have the time, you should definitely be a mentor. I have learned a TON from you. You have so much exp to offer and it always comes gently, even when it is a kick in the pants. Doooo eeeeeeet! |
2013-12-26 11:04 AM in reply to: bcraht |
Seattle | Subject: RE: Sept 15-Oct 15 "Daniel's Running Formula" Book Club Originally posted by bcraht Adrienne, I think if you feel like you have the time, you should definitely be a mentor. I have learned a TON from you. You have so much exp to offer and it always comes gently, even when it is a kick in the pants. Doooo eeeeeeet! Awww That was sweet! Yeah, I dunno ... I was considering it. But that is about as far as I have gotten. |
2014-01-06 4:32 PM in reply to: bcraht |
Master 6595 Rio Rancho, NM | Subject: RE: Sept 15-Oct 15 "Daniel's Running Formula" Book Club Thought I'd give this thread a bump. I'm still at it and loving it. I'm wondering, though, after about 8 weeks on the plan if I should do a 5k to see if I need to change my VDOT level. Also, DS2 started running again at the first of the year. He's been off since Rock N Roll Denver (Oct 20) with an injury so I bought him a hard copy of JD's book and he's using it now too. Happy New Year and happy running all! |
|
| ||||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
|