General Discussion Triathlon Talk » TOTW: Running.. A failure to train. Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 3
 
 
2008-09-10 4:30 PM
in reply to: #1657968

User image

Master
1730
100050010010025
Atlanta, GA
Subject: RE: TOTW: Running.. A failure to train.

ok guys....as Sargent Big Toe says in Stripes "lighten up Francis" :-)

 On my person experence, running is by far the hardest to get good at for me.  this comment is completely shaded by my background.  I swam in HS and college at a fairly high level.  Picking back up after 20 years has been a blast.  I raced road bikes for over 8 or 9 years in my 30's.  Getting back to big mileage weeks was fun.  Running consistantly for the first time in my life - crap this is hard.  If I came from a running background, I would have a completely different view on running.

I walked every race last year - at least a little.  I was injured all the time or fighting something.  I was training as hard (often too hard), yet i had to walk.  

Turn the page to this year, I ran the whole 10K at the Peachtree International and PR'ed by 20 minutes.  The point?  If you have no running background, it takes time to build the running endurance to always run every inch of a OLY or HIM or IM.  there is limits to how much you can train before injury takes over.

I get Ron's comments.  I think a little more context needs to be applied to the thread and comments relative to walking or not training enough to avoid walking.



2008-09-10 5:34 PM
in reply to: #1657968

Master
1391
1000100100100252525
Subject: RE: TOTW: Running.. A failure to train.
I have a number of friends that do triathlons that walk instead of run...because their sport is walking. Not running, but walking. To me walking is no less of a sport than running and when I see them cross the finish, I'm proud of them whether they walked, run or crawled. BTW...some of them finish well ahead of people that run the entire run.

For me, I do combined run/walk. Why? Because I literally happened into it a few years ago. I was having a rough day running, so I decided to add some walk breaks. I slowly noticed that my time was not so different. By doing combined run/walk I went from a 2:03 half marathon to a 1:56 half marathon, knocking 7 minutes off my time. By choice I do run/walk and I feel most comfortable doing this because that's what works best for me. If walking works best for someone, more power to them.

Remember that if you walk the entire run, but decide to sprint the last bit, you have every right to because you paid the entrance fee.

Now...do I need to be a better runner or combined run/walker? Yes I do. However, my running has improved greatly since I'm running a bit more during the week with 2 bricks and 3 regular runs. In order to get better at running you do have to put the work in. The same goes with cycling and swimming. I know for me, the running portion of the tri is easiest for me. I have a running background and even if I'm having a horrible race, I know I can get through it.




Edited by nighthawk 2008-09-10 5:37 PM
2008-09-10 8:59 PM
in reply to: #1664837

User image

Expert
697
500100252525
Atlanta, GA
Subject: RE: TOTW: Running.. A failure to train.
Sluggo312 - 2008-09-10 2:13 PM

There really has been no accounting for progress in this thread. While my training has been lacking, I'll use myself as an example anyway.

In a couple weeks I'll be doing my first HIM. I WILL be walking. I know that from the couple bricks I've done. While I'll probably walk quite a bit, I hope that next year I'll walk much less in a spring HIM and maybe not at all in a late summer HIM.

I suspect that I'd still be 60 lbs heavier and on the couch if I ever thought that I couldn't walk at all in a triathlon.


I totally agree with this, and I'm glad you posted it.  It's kind of what I was trying to get at.  It takes time to make progress and sometimes you just want to get out and race, even if you aren't there yet.  You know?   So you might be slower than others, but you'll still finish and for me, it gives me the push to get better each time.

2008-09-11 3:34 PM
in reply to: #1657968

User image

Expert
828
50010010010025
Subject: RE: TOTW: Running.. A failure to train.
Briefly my experience level: 3 tri's under my belt. 2 sprints, 1 Oly.

Results thus far, least as they pertain to the OP....The first 2 races, an oly and a sprint I biked as expected and ran as expected. MOP for both. Training was more heavily weighted to the bike. This was from loving to ride my bike and detesting any running. Before my oly, the longest run I did was 5 miles (brick workout). The last race I did I really backed off on the bike training. It was not intentional but secondary to Hurrciane Fay and numerous afternoon thunderstorms. (I am not a fan of standing water/skinny tires combo) I was therefore able to ramp up the running. I was typically doing 6-8 miles 3 or 4 days a week with strides 2 days/week. My mile times had been 9:10 aerobic in March. Going into the race last week, I could run 8:02's aerobic up to about 5 miles when my times slowed. Well, at the last race, I got off the bike (not working too hard....HR in the 140's), took my first step to run out of T2 and felt my left leg lock up...upper inner quad. Next step the right hammy grabbed, followed by right quad. I did keep running but I am sure it looked odd as my gait was all over the place trying to keep from cramping up. Mid way through the run, my legs loosened up and I had a good mile. Then the last mile, my right quad cramped worse than it has ever done. I managed a shuffle for 1/2 mi then it loosened a bit allowing me to hold off the next guy in my AG by 4 seconds....That NEVER happened when my bike training out did my run training. I posted a question in TT "which leg of race least/most important" b/c of my bad experience.

my .02 on this.....run training is important and maybe a lot do not hit it enough, but poor bike fitness will ruin a run in a heartbeat. Given the same effort on the bike, poor run fitness not won't be as detrimental....imho.

2008-09-11 3:46 PM
in reply to: #1657968

User image

Expert
828
50010010010025
Subject: RE: TOTW: Running.. A failure to train.
next point I wanted to keep separate from my other post....

In my next life as a single guy with no kids and stupid amounts of free time, ask and I will say I have no reason to walk in an IM...but the reality is, I have 4 kids and a wife who works 7pm-7am as a nurse...throw in gymnastics, swimming, piano, Wed. bible study...etc....I think that when it comes time to do an IM (my goal is a HIM in '09 and an IM in '10) my attitude will be, 'if I walk 26.2 miles, so be it'...I have a life and triathlon is way down on page one. Maybe even page 2 of priorities. Even if I or anyone else who has REAL things to worry about, finish an IM, you can bet your buhookey I am calling myself and all who finish, an IRONMAN....

(yes, to me, OP was elitist tone even though it didn't hit me personally)
2008-09-11 4:08 PM
in reply to: #1657968

User image

Alpharetta, GA
Subject: RE: TOTW: Running.. A failure to train.
Great topic. For me personally, every race I do I have a goal of no walking. Someone mentioned it above, it comes down to expectations going in. I ended up walking 4 aid stations during IMFL last year and I haven't forgiven myself for it yet (probably never will). And I don't even want to talk about Gulf Roast this year. I had to walk several times for fear of passing out in the heat. To me personally (about my own performance) these are all simply unexcusable! I find that when the going gets really tough, I have to concentrate on not walking otherwise I'll just start walking. I don't make a decision to walk, my brain just goes off and tells my legs to walk. It is crazy. If you saw someone walking their bike on the bike course you would think to yourself "they're crazy", yet it is normal to walk during the run. Hmmmmm.

I feel I am putting in the run training this year (injured last year) at about 50-60 MPW currently, some are saying too much running. So most definitely one of several race goals will be NO WALKING.

I did a quick and dirty calculation the other day and walking 5 aid stations is something like a mph on the bike. Walk the aid stations on the second lap and you could have backed off the bike 3 mph. Now that is a perspective.


2008-09-11 4:24 PM
in reply to: #1657968

User image

Extreme Veteran
488
100100100100252525
ATLANTA
Subject: RE: TOTW: Running.. A failure to train.

Through all of this discussion it appears that the real battle is should you train on the bike that will give you the energy left for the run or should you train the run so that you are more efficient and may not need as much leftover energy from the bike.  Certainly Brett's data indicates that properly training on the bike would give him more in the tank for the run.  One question that I have is how much impact (if any) does the fact that it is a three discipline event vs a run impact his mental approach to the run itself (ie psyched up for a run vs. psyched up for a swim, then bike, then a run).  Only Brett could answer that.

I think that training the bike like Brett combined with training the run for the distance and efficiency, you have a winning combo.  that being said, there are a ton of coaches out there that have alot more knowledge on the subject.

In regards to walking/running, etc, if I had trained my butt off for a year to do an Ironman, felt like hell off the bike and had to walk the entire run portion, I wouldn't stop and quit because I couldn't "run".  I would gut it out like Rutger Beke and call myself an Ironman upon crossing the finish line.  I may not have won, but I certainly didn't lose.  In my opinion, the race is part but not all of the triathlon journey.  The willingness to go out and train everyday, hours on end, regardless of weather, sacrificing everything else to prove to yourself that you can push yourself beyond your limits with a sole goal of finishing (walk or run), that the essence an Ironman, or any triathlete for that matter. Just my late Thursday philosophy.

2008-09-11 5:34 PM
in reply to: #1668675

User image

Pro
3883
20001000500100100100252525
Woodstock,GA
Subject: RE: TOTW: Running.. A failure to train.
JBD - 2008-09-11 5:24 PM

Through all of this discussion it appears that the real battle is should you train on the bike that will give you the energy left for the run or should you train the run so that you are more efficient and may not need as much leftover energy from the bike.  Certainly Brett's data indicates that properly training on the bike would give him more in the tank for the run.  One question that I have is how much impact (if any) does the fact that it is a three discipline event vs a run impact his mental approach to the run itself (ie psyched up for a run vs. psyched up for a swim, then bike, then a run).  Only Brett could answer that.

I think that training the bike like Brett combined with training the run for the distance and efficiency, you have a winning combo.  that being said, there are a ton of coaches out there that have alot more knowledge on the subject.

In regards to walking/running, etc, if I had trained my butt off for a year to do an Ironman, felt like hell off the bike and had to walk the entire run portion, I wouldn't stop and quit because I couldn't "run".  I would gut it out like Rutger Beke and call myself an Ironman upon crossing the finish line.  I may not have won, but I certainly didn't lose.  In my opinion, the race is part but not all of the triathlon journey.  The willingness to go out and train everyday, hours on end, regardless of weather, sacrificing everything else to prove to yourself that you can push yourself beyond your limits with a sole goal of finishing (walk or run), that the essence an Ironman, or any triathlete for that matter. Just my late Thursday philosophy.

 

Jon,

Great response and I will answer your questions as best as I can. As far as being "psyched up"  for a run vs swim/bike/run, there is certainly a difference there. That being said the two Half Marathons that I did in the Spring were "checkpoint" races for me to gauge my training and fitness for Gulf Coast, in fact had Courtney not talked me into it I probably wouldn't have done Alpharetta at all. I actually PR'ed that race by quite a bit coming off of a hard 52 mile bike the day before, so I wouldn't say that I was necessarily psyched to run the race (I hope that I answered your question...)

I still firmly believe that it is bike fitness that allows you to run well off the bike.

I do have a question for Ron T. (and this isn't to single you out or anything, I am just curious). At Gulf Coast this year how did your run compare to the '07 race? I know you came off marathon training for ING so you theoretically would have been in top running shape. Secondly how did your bike fitness compare between the two years also? I am just curious since you had such a great race in '07 and (by your own admission) not such a great race in '08.

2008-09-11 10:35 PM
in reply to: #1657968

User image

Extreme Veteran
311
100100100
Subject: RE: TOTW: Running.. A failure to train.
My coach has mentioned to me several times that my efficiency on the bike makes me a better runner. High cadence, proper gears, all leave you fresh for the run. I'm certainly no expert, but I hope to put all this to the test come November
2008-09-12 8:12 AM
in reply to: #1668826

User image

Master
2499
2000100100100100252525
Atlanta, Georgia
Gold member
Subject: RE: TOTW: Running.. A failure to train.
Rocket Man - 2008-09-11 6:34 PM

I do have a question for Ron T. (and this isn't to single you out or anything, I am just curious). At Gulf Coast this year how did your run compare to the '07 race? I know you came off marathon training for ING so you theoretically would have been in top running shape. Secondly how did your bike fitness compare between the two years also? I am just curious since you had such a great race in '07 and (by your own admission) not such a great race in '08.



Question was for Ron but I had a similar race arc so I'll volunteer my own times:

2007 - Focused on ING-full through the spring and my highest ever run volumes..Virtually NO biking or swimming..Showed up at GCT with maybe 4 weeks of tri training and went 5:14.

2008 - Whole Winter prepping for IMAZ in April, lots of swimming and long bike rides and had very little post-IM fatigue..GCT - 5:28.

Data may not be worth much but that run base made the quick bike ramp up in '07 much quicker.

Full Disclosure: The weather was definitely more challenging this year in PCB.

2008-09-12 9:13 AM
in reply to: #1657968

User image

Master
1404
1000100100100100
Atlanta, Ga
Subject: RE: TOTW: Running.. A failure to train.

do have a question for Ron T. (and this isn't to single you out or anything, I am just curious). At Gulf Coast this year how did your run compare to the '07 race? I know you came off marathon training for ING so you theoretically would have been in top running shape. Secondly how did your bike fitness compare between the two years also? I am just curious since you had such a great race in '07 and (by your own admission) not such a great race in '08.


Fair question, and I certainly have my examples of race failures, so I am happy to detail my thoughts behind what happened in 08 vs 07.

O7 vs 08 training, is almost identicle. Did a lot of early season run work, hill repeats, short introduction of intervals,  HogPen, Run the Reagan half mary, ING Full.. both years, finished in the 3:2x's. From the bike standpoint, I missed a lot (if not all) of January in 08 due to not having a bike for the month, but starting in Feb, I was pretty much on point with the year before. ING 07 and 08 were similar outcomes, St. Anthony's 07 vs 08, were similar outcomes, but I PR'd St. Anthony's in 08 by a couple of minutes, and killed the bike (for me, averaging over 23 mph for the course), jumped off the bike and ran a 46 minute 10k.

So, what happened at Gulf Coast.. and trust me, post race, I analysed the result over and over and always came back to two reasons. First and formost, Heat on the run. I fall apart in the heat. throw in some humidity, and it's usually game over as far as performance goes. Heat has been an issue for me since my beginning days. Second, is mental. I pretty much fell apart mentally from a race standpoint after St. Anthony's. .. nothing felt as it should, and actually, I am just now getting past all that. The mental game has always interested me, but actually experiencing the ups and downs of being mentally there, focused, ready to race, this season, has been a real battle and only increased my interest in the topic.

Net Result: Gulf Coast 07, 5:20. Gulf Coast 08, 5:50. Difference makers, Heat / Mental.

So, similar early seasons, very promising start.. not so much after that. Since then my focus has changed to my BQ attempt.



2008-09-12 11:57 AM
in reply to: #1669835

User image

Extreme Veteran
488
100100100100252525
ATLANTA
Subject: RE: TOTW: Running.. A failure to train.
alltom1 - 2008-09-12 9:12 AM
Rocket Man - 2008-09-11 6:34 PM

I do have a question for Ron T. (and this isn't to single you out or anything, I am just curious). At Gulf Coast this year how did your run compare to the '07 race? I know you came off marathon training for ING so you theoretically would have been in top running shape. Secondly how did your bike fitness compare between the two years also? I am just curious since you had such a great race in '07 and (by your own admission) not such a great race in '08.

Question was for Ron but I had a similar race arc so I'll volunteer my own times: 2007 - Focused on ING-full through the spring and my highest ever run volumes..Virtually NO biking or swimming..Showed up at GCT with maybe 4 weeks of tri training and went 5:14. 2008 - Whole Winter prepping for IMAZ in April, lots of swimming and long bike rides and had very little post-IM fatigue..GCT - 5:28. Data may not be worth much but that run base made the quick bike ramp up in '07 much quicker. Full Disclosure: The weather was definitely more challenging this year in PCB.

Did you grow up a runner?  My observation would indicate that you did not but I may be way off base.  The reason I ask is that I believe that running is like any sport, you need to do it a lot to excel.  Some people (not me by the way), grew up running and developed great running technique (like a long time swimmer).  It becomes ingrained in their run and as a result, they may tend to not be as impacted by the little things on a run (breakdown in form, twinge in the knee etc) that would impact others.  They have perfected their stroke so to speak, so they can get by with less training on the run per se, or at least get up to speed easier.  This might be the reason that in your case that using running as your base developer of fitness made you perform better in GCT...it better developed your form and kept you from breaking down. 

In Brett's case, I have seen him run in races, it is so smooth it is like he is ice skating.  So I assume he did grow up as a runner.  Given that, then certainly the biggest bang for buck would be time on the bike, and that seems to be the case.

If we assume that these broad generalizations about you are true, then I think the answer to the original posted question really has to take into account the long term training history of the triathlete.  Did you grow up as a runner that may have ingrained great running form?  If so, then there is certainly a case that you can get more out of less training on the run and build your fitness on the bike.  This would appear to yield a better net result than training heavily on what you excel at.  Seems pretty intuitive, but certainly if actually thought through, can be a real benefit to training for the year.  Again, not a coach, just making observations and love to hear opinions.



Edited by JBD 2008-09-12 11:58 AM
2008-09-12 1:22 PM
in reply to: #1657968

User image

Master
1404
1000100100100100
Atlanta, Ga
Subject: RE: TOTW: Running.. A failure to train.
While this may have evolved to bike vs run focused training, that was not the original intent or focus of the thread. I can see how saying there is a failure to train on the run could be taken as too much focus on the bike, heck I think I even said that, but I don't blame too much bike training for a lack of run training. As to why the lack of run training overall, I think there are a multitude of reasons.

In the end, if one person who read this thread pays even a little more attention to their run, then I think this TOTW has been a success.

2008-09-12 1:36 PM
in reply to: #1670777

User image

Extreme Veteran
488
100100100100252525
ATLANTA
Subject: RE: TOTW: Running.. A failure to train.
atl_runner - 2008-09-12 2:22 PM
While this may have evolved to bike vs run focused training, that was not the original intent or focus of the thread. I can see how saying there is a failure to train on the run could be taken as too much focus on the bike, heck I think I even said that, but I don't blame too much bike training for a lack of run training. As to why the lack of run training overall, I think there are a multitude of reasons.

In the end, if one person who read this thread pays even a little more attention to their run, then I think this TOTW has been a success.

 

Agreed.

2008-09-14 9:03 AM
in reply to: #1657968

User image

Veteran
224
100100
Cumming, GA
Subject: RE: TOTW: Running.. A failure to train.

I have been avoiding this thread.....out of guilt.  I know that, during the racing/summer season, I don't run enough.  My main thinking is that I have such a stong base from the off season (which is when I run ALL the time-2 1/2 marathons and a marathon this winter) that I just need to maintain in the summer.

Your thoughts on Bike Training VS Run Training?

I stink on the bike.  I'm slow as a turtle!  The more training on the bike that I can get the better.  I also think that, effort wise, biking is harder cardio-vascuolar wise. My heart rate is higher and stays higher at a lower effort. 

I seem to reap more benefits from the bike.  I lost 8 pounds in 6 weeks just focusing on the bike with no dietary changes.  My abs are also starting to really tighten up and feel strong.  Not to mention the fact that running is just harder on my knees than biking.

If applicable, why your run training is less than it should be.

The number one reason is time.  I LOVE to run!  It's so easy just to open the door and go, but I'm a stupid athlete.  I can't seem to figure out how to optimize my run work outs so that I don't have to run everyday to maintain/build.  I'm starting to figure out that speed/hill work outs are the way to go, but I have a tough time with the speed thing.  I've been running competitively since I was 7 y.o.  (I have picture of me finishing my first 5k with my mom).  However, I've always been slow and steady.  I've NEVER focused on speed (Yikes!).  Making this change is both physically and mentally difficult for me.  I usually look forward to my runs as relaxing and for recovery.

Have you walked in any Triathlon?

Oh lordy-lordy, yes!  My first tri, I literally elbowed and kneed my way through the run with no walk.  Since then, I've caved twice into walking.  Once because it was so $#^$%^*& hot.  The other because I was super-duper ill with a sinus infection.  Or these are my excuses at least.  The funny thing is, that even with the walking, my run spilts were 5k PRs (can you believe that sassiness?).  I'm so pysched for my next Sprint (next weekend).  I'm pumped to see what I can do in good health with the mental knowledge that I can grunt throught it for another pr!!!!!

Finally, do you intend to run more in the future?
I intend to run regularly for the rest of my life. I do think that I can continue to improve my running performance by doing more combo workouts (swim-run, bricks) focusing on speed, not distance.  At least until my off-season marathon training starts.

2008-09-14 9:07 AM
in reply to: #1669480

User image

Veteran
224
100100
Cumming, GA
Subject: RE: TOTW: Running.. A failure to train.

wmckean - 2008-09-11 10:35 PM My coach has mentioned to me several times that my efficiency on the bike makes me a better runner. High cadence, proper gears, all leave you fresh for the run. I'm certainly no expert, but I hope to put all this to the test come November

Is that what I'm doing wrong?  I have to figure out how to ride my bike to improve my run?  How interesting.  I think this validates my focus on the bike, at least until I get my technique down pat!



2008-09-15 9:07 AM
in reply to: #1657968

User image

Master
1404
1000100100100100
Atlanta, Ga
Subject: RE: TOTW: Running.. A failure to train.
Thanks everyone for a great thread.

Hopefully it introduced on some level, some critical thinking in terms of training. Training should never be a completely static routine, and should always be self analysed and questioned in terms of what you might need to change to become a better athlete, should you want that for yourself.

This was never a walk vs don't walk thread. It was completely designed to have participants assess their volume of run training, and determine for themselves, if it is enough.

Hope you got a laugh at my don't walk avatar, which was put up as a ice breaker to take out some of the tension this thread had generated. If you know me at all, you know my sense of humor.  I thought the glaring 'don't walk' sign was pretty funny. I went a step further and created a pretty funny animated gif that I will post to my blog later today. I may use that in the future as a message to myself... maybe before Chicago, or my next IM.

Again, thanks for a great topic of the week. 
2008-09-15 10:30 AM
in reply to: #1674252

User image

Pro
3705
20001000500100100
Vestavia Hills
Subject: RE: TOTW: Running.. A failure to train.

A good thread does cause some drama ... and I have to confess that there was some drama on the race course yesterday (The Nations Tri) as I was dog-cursing you beginning at mile 4 of the run - for being right about neglecting run volume (by mile 6 I was downright beligerent ).

In all seriousness, the amount of replies to the thread demonstrates how many people actually pay attention to and contribute to our Georgia forum ... which is a good thing.

atl_runner - 2008-09-15 10:07 AM Thanks everyone for a great thread.

Hopefully it introduced on some level, some critical thinking in terms of training. Training should never be a completely static routine, and should always be self analysed and questioned in terms of what you might need to change to become a better athlete, should you want that for yourself.

This was never a walk vs don't walk thread. It was completely designed to have participants assess their volume of run training, and determine for themselves, if it is enough.

Hope you got a laugh at my don't walk avatar, which was put up as a ice breaker to take out some of the tension this thread had generated. If you know me at all, you know my sense of humor.  I thought the glaring 'don't walk' sign was pretty funny. I went a step further and created a pretty funny animated gif that I will post to my blog later today. I may use that in the future as a message to myself... maybe before Chicago, or my next IM.

Again, thanks for a great topic of the week. 

New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » TOTW: Running.. A failure to train. Rss Feed  
 
 
of 3