Other Resources My Cup of Joe » A Raving Liberal's Complaints About Obama Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 4
 
 
2012-06-22 3:27 PM
in reply to: #4275873

User image

Champion
7347
5000200010010010025
SRQ, FL
Subject: RE: A Raving Liberal's Complaints About Obama
morey000 - 2012-06-22 4:16 PM
TriRSquared - 2012-06-22 12:25 PM ...I stopped reading right there... that's the left's equivalent of "I think Glenn Beck..."

1.  Hardly.  Bill Maher is funny.  Glenn Beck is a conspiracy theorist.

2.  Stopping reading?  Interesting choice.   close your mind off to a different point of view much?

I was joking around.  I read it... I actually listen to him now and then.  But he's such a holier-than-thou, left wing, cry baby it's hard to take him even a little seriously.  Any time a conservative comes on his show and makes a valid point he brushes it off with a joke.



2012-06-22 3:38 PM
in reply to: #4275891

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: A Raving Liberal's Complaints About Obama
TriRSquared - 2012-06-22 2:27 PM
morey000 - 2012-06-22 4:16 PM
TriRSquared - 2012-06-22 12:25 PM ...I stopped reading right there... that's the left's equivalent of "I think Glenn Beck..."

1.  Hardly.  Bill Maher is funny.  Glenn Beck is a conspiracy theorist.

2.  Stopping reading?  Interesting choice.   close your mind off to a different point of view much?

I was joking around.  I read it... I actually listen to him now and then.  But he's such a holier-than-thou, left wing, cry baby it's hard to take him even a little seriously.  Any time a conservative comes on his show and makes a valid point he brushes it off with a joke.

Ya...  I used to like his show, but he is pretty hard to stomach these days. He is funnier than Glenn Beck though.

2012-06-22 4:04 PM
in reply to: #4275886

Master
2083
2000252525
Houston, TX
Subject: RE: A Raving Liberal's Complaints About Obama
tuwood - 2012-06-22 3:24 PM

jgaither - 2012-06-22 11:25 AM

Obama has nothing to do with that.  Price of oil is set on the world market.  It's a global commodity.

Basic economics, unless you're a conspiracy theorist, the price of oil going up is a good thing.  It means there is greater demand for it (or supply is diminishing, but we all know that is not the case here).  That demand is only created by increased economic activity.  It also means that the supply is slightly lower than the demand.  Higher prices incentivize other sources of fuel.  With the proliferation of those other sources, prices will even out as it has expanded the base supply to match demand.  Do yourself a favor and go buy stock in one of the oil companies or better yet oil field equipment companies now while their stock is low (relatively speaking) and that way when these dang oil companies turn in their record profits, you can benefit from it instead of feeling "squeezed at the pump".  If you don't like gas prices, buy a more fuel efficient car.

 

With exception of the oil speculators who never take delivery of the barrels.  I feel they're creating false demand and falsely inflate the price of oil.  It's not as bad today, but several years ago it was down right criminal.

I agree with you about oil being a global commodity, but the presidents policies can effect the price of oil on the supply side.  If President X were to say he's disbanning the EPA and approving every oil drilling permit request and refinery building permit the "global supply" will increase and therefore the price will drop assuming demand stays the same.

Alternatively, if the president's policies are to deny permits and increase regulation on the oil industry in the US the global oil supply will be less therefore increasing the cost of oil assuming demand stays the same.

Also we pay about $.50 per gallon in taxes on gas in the US so politicians control that amount as well.

 

I gave an oversimplified example above just for the sake of brevity as it is one of the more complicated industries out there.

I don't think that even the examples you gave would effect the price of oil enough to change prices too much.  We don't have a problem getting oil, gasoline, or diesel in the U.S.  While I understand you are saying that the policies CAN effect prices, yes I think there is truth to that, but this president's policies didn't because he didn't change anything for the oil companies.  The type of policies that would effect are the policies that would further shrink the supply on an extremely large basis, like what happened in the EU in 2003-08 where diesel consumption almost doubled due to policy and they started setting the price.  If someone needs it bad enough, it can effect the rest of us.

edit: and yes I know about him cutting permits in the gulf, that hurt jobs more than oil.  At the time oil was below $80 I think and they weren't exactly chomping at the bit for wells and new exploration.  It hurt the services though that service those rigs.



Edited by jgaither 2012-06-22 4:10 PM
2012-06-22 4:11 PM
in reply to: #4275888

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2012-06-22 4:14 PM
in reply to: #4275999

Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC
Subject: RE: A Raving Liberal's Complaints About Obama

AcesFull - I think that the points Maher makes are similar to the ones I was making.  Obama has not been the radical leftist liberal socialist that the right said he would be and still says he is.  I wish he had been, because it's about time we did something right correct.  

So what would that be?

What exactly do you want?

2012-06-22 6:19 PM
in reply to: #4273345

Elite
4547
2000200050025
Subject: RE: A Raving Liberal's Complaints About Obama
Morey!  Thanks for the hilarious Maher post.  For God's sake, if my left-leaning self can listen to, read, and enjoy Dennis Miller, I think Righties can get a kick out of Mr. Maher's work.  That really was funny.  


2012-06-22 7:30 PM
in reply to: #4275888

Master
1440
100010010010010025
Subject: RE: A Raving Liberal's Complaints About Obama
tuwood - 2012-06-22 4:25 PM
morey000 - 2012-06-22 3:16 PM
TriRSquared - 2012-06-22 12:25 PM ...I stopped reading right there... that's the left's equivalent of "I think Glenn Beck..."

1.  Hardly.  Bill Maher is funny.  Glenn Beck is a conspiracy theorist.

2.  Stopping reading?  Interesting choice.   close your mind off to a different point of view much?

I find Glenn Beck funny too.  

Same here, Maher is just to nasty, Refering to Palin by the C-word is not funny, niether are his attacks on the Catholic Church. 

2012-06-22 8:47 PM
in reply to: #4273345

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: A Raving Liberal's Complaints About Obama
Well now that we have thrown Maher and Beck into the mix... it got me thinking. I realize the title of the thread may be tongue in cheek... but why is it OK for a raving liberal agenda for the country over a raving conservative agenda? Maher does bring up valid point... Obama has been no where near the liberal extremist the Right makes him out to be... but the liberal extremists in the country are actually pissed about it. Why should any extremist agenda be pushed through in this country?
2012-06-22 10:47 PM
in reply to: #4276283

Master
2702
2000500100100
CHINA GROVE N.C., North Carolina
Subject: RE: A Raving Liberal's Complaints About Obama
Sorry for more digression but Maher is just a complete jerk. I can handle most anyone's opinions but I honestly would like to..... no, actually I would like to spar with him for about 5 minutes. Can someone arrange that ?

Back on topic, sorta; the divide between liberals and conservatives is not shrinking.... oh, well, at least we all seemingly united for a short while after 9/11.
2012-06-23 12:30 PM
in reply to: #4276283

Pro
6011
50001000
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania
Subject: RE: A Raving Liberal's Complaints About Obama

powerman - 2012-06-22 9:47 PM Well now that we have thrown Maher and Beck into the mix... it got me thinking. I realize the title of the thread may be tongue in cheek... but why is it OK for a raving liberal agenda for the country over a raving conservative agenda? Maher does bring up valid point... Obama has been no where near the liberal extremist the Right makes him out to be... but the liberal extremists in the country are actually pissed about it. Why should any extremist agenda be pushed through in this country?

For the same reason it's ok for proponents of the extreme conservative agenda to complain when they feel GOP politicians aren't being conservative enough:  Freedom of Speech.  Everyone's entitled to their opinion, and has the right to voice it.

The reality is that a more moderate agenda is the compromise that is going to prevail the majority of the time in a democracy.  Positions at the far right or left are generally just too idealistic and not practical.

 

2012-06-23 2:04 PM
in reply to: #4273345


116
100
Subject: RE: A Raving Liberal's Complaints About Obama
Obummer!


2012-06-23 2:13 PM
in reply to: #4276690

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: A Raving Liberal's Complaints About Obama
TriMyBest - 2012-06-23 11:30 AM

powerman - 2012-06-22 9:47 PM Well now that we have thrown Maher and Beck into the mix... it got me thinking. I realize the title of the thread may be tongue in cheek... but why is it OK for a raving liberal agenda for the country over a raving conservative agenda? Maher does bring up valid point... Obama has been no where near the liberal extremist the Right makes him out to be... but the liberal extremists in the country are actually pissed about it. Why should any extremist agenda be pushed through in this country?

For the same reason it's ok for proponents of the extreme conservative agenda to complain when they feel GOP politicians aren't being conservative enough:  Freedom of Speech.  Everyone's entitled to their opinion, and has the right to voice it.

The reality is that a more moderate agenda is the compromise that is going to prevail the majority of the time in a democracy.  Positions at the far right or left are generally just too idealistic and not practical.

 

I'm not talking about opinions and freedom of speech, I'm talking about extreme positions being advanced. This country would be no better under an extreme liberal agenda than it would be under an extreme conservative agenda.



Edited by powerman 2012-06-23 2:15 PM
2012-06-23 2:20 PM
in reply to: #4276781

Pro
6011
50001000
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania
Subject: RE: A Raving Liberal's Complaints About Obama
powerman - 2012-06-23 3:13 PM
TriMyBest - 2012-06-23 11:30 AM

powerman - 2012-06-22 9:47 PM Well now that we have thrown Maher and Beck into the mix... it got me thinking. I realize the title of the thread may be tongue in cheek... but why is it OK for a raving liberal agenda for the country over a raving conservative agenda? Maher does bring up valid point... Obama has been no where near the liberal extremist the Right makes him out to be... but the liberal extremists in the country are actually pissed about it. Why should any extremist agenda be pushed through in this country?

For the same reason it's ok for proponents of the extreme conservative agenda to complain when they feel GOP politicians aren't being conservative enough:  Freedom of Speech.  Everyone's entitled to their opinion, and has the right to voice it.

The reality is that a more moderate agenda is the compromise that is going to prevail the majority of the time in a democracy.  Positions at the far right or left are generally just too idealistic and not practical.

 

I'm not talking about opinions and freedom of speech, I'm talking about extreme positions being advanced. This country would be no better under an extreme liberal agenda than it would be under an extreme conservative agenda.

My point exactly, but there will always be people on the extremes who don't seem to realize that.

2012-06-23 4:17 PM
in reply to: #4273345

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: A Raving Liberal's Complaints About Obama
True enough.
2012-06-25 8:54 AM
in reply to: #4275763

New user
900
500100100100100
,
Subject: RE: A Raving Liberal's Complaints About Obama
morey000 - 2012-06-22 2:04 PM

Aces- I think Bill Maher summed up what you're feelings are pretty well a few weeks ago.

 

" New Rule: Ted Nugent has to tell me what Obama has done that he's so mad about so I have something to be happy about.  

Now, I refer to the famous proclamation Mr. Nugent made last month, when he said that if Obama is re-elected, it would be such an unthinkable catastrophe that he, Ted, would "either be dead or in jail." Or, as I call it, a "win-win."  

Now, Ted went on to say that Obama leads a - quote - "vile, evil, America-hating administration wiping its with the Constitution." As opposed to Ted, who uses his hand.  

Now, it somehow became an article of faith on the right that Obama is the most extreme president in American history. Although, when they say that, I think what they really mean is...he's black.   

Oh how I long for the day when Mr. Obama is out of office so I can go back to being just a plain old stupid redneck, who clings to his bible and guns, when I don't agree with leftist progressive policies, instead of the racist they now think I am.

 

 

2012-06-25 9:18 AM
in reply to: #4276781

Master
4101
20002000100
Denver
Subject: RE: A Raving Liberal's Complaints About Obama

powerman - 2012-06-23 1:13 PM 

I'm not talking about opinions and freedom of speech, I'm talking about extreme positions being advanced. This country would be no better under an extreme liberal agenda than it would be under an extreme conservative agenda.

I think extremists on both sides can serve a purpose - to ensure that there is someone who is concerned only with principle and ideology when putting together policies.  I like to think of myself as a pragmatist, but having watched Obama over the past few years has made me realize that there can be a downside, and that is valuing an outcome, any outcome above all else.  Sometimes no solution is better than a bad solution, and the 'extremists' can help hold accountable those in the middle to ensure they don't totally abandon their ideals or principles for the sake of a deal.  But this assumes that they don't have so much influence that they can block any sort of compromise.

 The catch to this is that the extremists and ideologues have to be a small minority, enough to make a ruckus, but not powerful enough to create policy rather than influence it. If they are able to scuttle any sort of a compromise or any policy that doesn't conform 100% to their extreme view you get a situation similar to the one we have now where nothing can get done. 



Edited by drewb8 2012-06-25 9:20 AM


2012-06-25 10:48 AM
in reply to: #4273345

Master
1795
1000500100100252525
Boynton Beach, FL
Subject: RE: A Raving Liberal's Complaints About Obama

My prediction:

2012 - Romney elected

2013-2015 - Similar discourse with the two party system after mixed results.

2016 - 3rd Party representative makes strong run for Presidency and frustration from both sides makes it a genuine posibility.  

2012-06-25 11:29 AM
in reply to: #4278896

Elite
4564
200020005002525
Boise
Subject: RE: A Raving Liberal's Complaints About Obama
cardenas1 - 2012-06-25 9:48 AM

My prediction:

2012 - Romney elected

2013-2015 - Similar discourse with the two party system after mixed results.

2016 - 3rd Party representative makes strong run for Presidency and frustration from both sides makes it a genuine posibility.  

 

I think you give too much credit to think outside the box to the average voter. I would love that though.

2012-06-25 12:26 PM
in reply to: #4278896

Champion
7347
5000200010010010025
SRQ, FL
Subject: RE: A Raving Liberal's Complaints About Obama
cardenas1 - 2012-06-25 11:48 AM

My prediction:

2012 - Romney elected

2013-2015 - Similar discourse with the two party system after mixed results.

2016 - 3rd Party representative makes strong run for Presidency and frustration from both sides makes it a genuine posibility.  

Sorry.  I don't give the average voter that much credit...

This is more likely...

2012-06-25 12:49 PM
in reply to: #4279121

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2012-06-25 12:57 PM
in reply to: #4278896

Champion
5529
500050025
Nashville, TN
Subject: RE: A Raving Liberal's Complaints About Obama
cardenas1 - 2012-06-25 11:48 AM

My prediction:

2012 - Romney or Obama elected

2013-2015 - The losing party spends years stalling any progress, offering no new ideas or solutions to the huge problems.  The winning party spends years blaming the losing party while offering no new ideas or solutions to the huge problems .

2016 - A weak Republican runs against a weak Democrat.  Someone wins.  The average citizen loses.  Nothing changes except the complaining.   

My prediction



2012-06-25 1:14 PM
in reply to: #4279199

Elite
4564
200020005002525
Boise
Subject: RE: A Raving Liberal's Complaints About Obama
ADollar79 - 2012-06-25 11:57 AM
cardenas1 - 2012-06-25 11:48 AM

My prediction:

2012 - Romney or Obama elected

2013-2015 - The losing party spends years stalling any progress, offering no new ideas or solutions to the huge problems.  The winning party spends years blaming the losing party while offering no new ideas or solutions to the huge problems .

2016 - A weak Republican runs against a weak Democrat.  Someone wins.  The average citizen loses.  Nothing changes except the complaining.   

My prediction

Are you a prophet by chance?

2012-06-25 1:55 PM
in reply to: #4276382

New user
66
2525
Raleigh, NC
Subject: RE: A Raving Liberal's Complaints About Obama

tri42 - 2012-06-22 11:47 PM Sorry for more digression but Maher is just a complete jerk. I can handle most anyone's opinions but I honestly would like to..... no, actually I would like to spar with him for about 5 minutes. Can someone arrange that ? Back on topic, sorta; the divide between liberals and conservatives is not shrinking.... oh, well, at least we all seemingly united for a short while after 9/11.

I was going to post the same thing, but I couldn't think of a nice way to say it.  Well said! I'd gladly pay an entry fee for that as well! 

2012-06-25 2:12 PM
in reply to: #4273345

New user
595
500252525
Connecticut Shore
Subject: RE: A Raving Liberal's Complaints About Obama

Bill Maher at his best: Shortly after Steve Irwin died tragically of a string ray sting, our friend Bill goes to a Halloween Party.

Bill Maher's

 

Ughh!!  The voice of a movement.  Any normal society would shun a fool like this.

2012-06-25 2:13 PM
in reply to: #4279365

Pro
5361
50001001001002525
Subject: RE: A Raving Liberal's Complaints About Obama
jp4ncsu - 2012-06-25 11:55 AM

tri42 - 2012-06-22 11:47 PM Sorry for more digression but Maher is just a complete jerk. I can handle most anyone's opinions but I honestly would like to..... no, actually I would like to spar with him for about 5 minutes. Can someone arrange that ? Back on topic, sorta; the divide between liberals and conservatives is not shrinking.... oh, well, at least we all seemingly united for a short while after 9/11.

I was going to post the same thing, but I couldn't think of a nice way to say it.  Well said! I'd gladly pay an entry fee for that as well! 

Well, first- you need to be somebody worth his time.  He did a great spar with Ann Coulter- I think it was at Radio City Music hall.  He wiped the floor with her. 

He's not someone who shies away from debating issues... he does it every week.

Frankly- I find that his show is most worth watching when he has 2 of his panel that represent the right.  When there is only one, I see him time and time again make sure that the conservative opinion gets heard  -and then he makes fun of it...  But- that's debate.

New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » A Raving Liberal's Complaints About Obama Rss Feed  
 
 
of 4