tri808 - 2012-08-17 12:05 PM
Has the difference between you Quarq and PT measurements been closer together in the past? I wouldn't doubt that they could be up to 20 watts different, but what is important is that they are consistantly different. I am assuming all your testing and training this year was with your Quarq?
Was this the exact same course as last year (loop, out and back, point to point)? Were course conditions the same? Did you tweak anything with your position or equipment?
I also find that anytime I do a test or TT...if there is any point in the ride where I mentally give up...I find that my results are way off from what I expect. Even if I try to pour it on at the end. There's just something about that mental strength. If you're mentally committed...you can push so much more than if you're doubting yourself...even if it the pain feels the same.
It seems you've got a lot of factors that are contributing to these weird results. I would start by doing more testing with your PT and Quarq to see if there is any more variation between them...or maybe they simply are 20 watts appart.
Normally my PT will read about 10 watts lower, which is normal given a bit of loss in the drivetrain and slight differences in the measure. So if the PT is 200, the Quarq will be about 210. It does vary a bit.
But yesterday was the opposite.
Today I calibrated, it came back with normal calibration numbers and all behaved as expected. Very weird. Last night calibration numbers were strange.
I am in correspondence with Quarq. Their customer service is amazing
Last year's numbers were with the Quarq.
I will redo the TT next week. Nothing like 20 mins of pain to debug a powermeter.
It does go to show you that a backup plan, RPE or HR is a good thing. That's why I like to look at my HR for a given wattage. HR is my plan B