Ironman 70.3 Boise : Official Thread (Page 7)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2012-05-10 11:50 AM in reply to: #3940536 |
Regular 789 | Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 Boise : Official Thread 836 -- uhh nothing interesting came up on the first page of Google for this number. |
|
2012-05-10 12:29 PM in reply to: #4202433 |
Pro 6520 Bellingham, WA | Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 Boise : Official Thread spie34 - 2012-05-10 9:50 AM 836 -- uhh nothing interesting came up on the first page of Google for this number. Found this for you to contemplate. I think bottomline it means you are going to kick a$$ too: Number 836 is a combination of the energies and attributes of the numbers 8, 3 and 6. Number 8 vibrates to the energies of Karma – the Universal Spiritual Law of Cause and Effect, giving and receiving, personal power and force, and successfully manifesting wealth and abundance. Number 3 brings the influences of the Ascended Masters, manifesting your desires, creativity and joy, confidence, optimism, enthusiasm and consideration for others. Number 6 adds its attributes of the material and monetary aspects of life, love of home, family and domesticity, compromise, providing and provision. Edited by popsracer 2012-05-10 12:32 PM |
2012-05-10 1:21 PM in reply to: #3940536 |
Extreme Veteran 724 | Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 Boise : Official Thread Back to non-number related posts for a second. I'm debating running a franken cassette for Boise. Basically spreading out the slower gears a bit for the benefit of a top end on the false flats going down. I'll keep the 25 (instead of a 11-23 config) for any hills that I need to jump into that easier gearing, but I don't really see myself riding much in the 25. Thinking about this: 11-25 11-12-13-14-15-16 -17-19-22-25 Currently have a 12-25 12-13-14-15-16-17-19-21-23-25 and 11-28 11-12-13-14-15-17-19-22-25-28 I could easily run this as an 11-23 by switching the 25 on the 12-25 out for the 11. 11-12-13-14-15-16-17-19-21-23 A lot to think about this? I figured I could test it out over the weekend. I'm just not sure I need the 11, but since I run a compact it would be nice for the longer straight downhills. |
2012-05-10 3:58 PM in reply to: #3940536 |
Veteran 439 Denver area | Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 Boise : Official Thread I'm 679 Because I'm a science nerd, I thought it was funny that a google search yielded this:
Dimethyl Sulfoxide - Compound Summary (CID 679) Also known as: DMSO, Methyl sulfoxide, Dimethyl sulphoxide, Methylsulfinylmethane, Demasorb, Dimexide, Domoso, Dimethylsulfoxide, Methane, sulfinylbis- Molecular Formula: C2H6OS Molecular Weight: 78.13344 InChIKey: IAZDPXIOMUYVGZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N A highly polar organic liquid, that is used widely as a chemical solvent. Because of its ability to penetrate biological membranes, it is used as a vehicle for topical application of pharmaceuticals. It is also used to protect tissue during CRYOPRESERVATION. Dimethyl sulfoxide shows a range of pharmacological activity including analgesia and anti-inflammation. |
2012-05-11 2:06 AM in reply to: #4202683 |
Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
2012-05-11 9:12 AM in reply to: #4202683 |
Veteran 930 Morgan Hill, California | Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 Boise : Official Thread PeteDin206 - 2012-05-10 11:21 AM Back to non-number related posts for a second. I'm debating running a franken cassette for Boise. Basically spreading out the slower gears a bit for the benefit of a top end on the false flats going down. I'll keep the 25 (instead of a 11-23 config) for any hills that I need to jump into that easier gearing, but I don't really see myself riding much in the 25. Thinking about this: 11-25 11-12-13-14-15-16 -17-19-22-25 Currently have a 12-25 12-13-14-15-16-17-19-21-23-25 and 11-28 11-12-13-14-15-17-19-22-25-28 I could easily run this as an 11-23 by switching the 25 on the 12-25 out for the 11. 11-12-13-14-15-16-17-19-21-23 A lot to think about this? I figured I could test it out over the weekend. I'm just not sure I need the 11, but since I run a compact it would be nice for the longer straight downhills. I run a 12-25 on both my road bike (compact) and tri bike (standard) I rarely feel like I'm out of gears on either end. I think, for me, on the Boise course, a 25 is enough. I don't recall a section wishing I had an 11. Rather, judging by how my run went, in retrospect, I wish I hadn't pushed as much as I did. |
|
2012-05-11 4:00 PM in reply to: #4202683 |
Regular 789 | Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 Boise : Official Thread PeteDin206 - 2012-05-10 11:21 AM Back to non-number related posts for a second. I'm debating running a franken cassette for Boise. Basically spreading out the slower gears a bit for the benefit of a top end on the false flats going down. I'll keep the 25 (instead of a 11-23 config) for any hills that I need to jump into that easier gearing, but I don't really see myself riding much in the 25. Thinking about this: 11-25 11-12-13-14-15-16 -17-19-22-25 Currently have a 12-25 12-13-14-15-16-17-19-21-23-25 and 11-28 11-12-13-14-15-17-19-22-25-28 I could easily run this as an 11-23 by switching the 25 on the 12-25 out for the 11. 11-12-13-14-15-16-17-19-21-23 A lot to think about this? I figured I could test it out over the weekend. I'm just not sure I need the 11, but since I run a compact it would be nice for the longer straight downhills. I'll be running what came stock on my bike which is just a bare bones specialized allez triple that I picked up last year for $375 . Maybe if I sign up for CDA for next year my wife will let me get a newer bike. About the 5 mile section is the longest uphill/downhill section of the race. It is not the steepest section however. Looking at the website's map, when you turn onto Pleasant Valley Road, that is a very gradual uphill there and then about where it makes that somewhat "J" shape, that is the steepest part but I would say maybe half mile to 3/4 mile long? Between there and 10 mile creek are the steepest sections. |
2012-05-11 4:52 PM in reply to: #3940536 |
Elite 4564 Boise | Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 Boise : Official Thread The only part you really even use an 11 is on the first downhill across the dam I think. The hill on pleasant valley is almost an 11 but not quite. I think a 12-25 should be fine for this course, assuming you are a half decent climber and a 25 is good enough. I run an 11-26 because that's what my bike came with and I don't really have any complaints on the hills around here. |
2012-05-12 12:11 PM in reply to: #3940536 |
Member 87 | Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 Boise : Official Thread Total Noob Question: Where's the link to obtain bib numbers? I, uh, can't find it. And what's this newfangled "internet" thingy everyone's talkin' 'bout? |
2012-05-12 12:37 PM in reply to: #4206194 |
Pro 6520 Bellingham, WA | Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 Boise : Official Thread rbhancock1 - 2012-05-12 10:11 AM Total Noob Question: Where's the link to obtain bib numbers? I, uh, can't find it. And what's this newfangled "internet" thingy everyone's talkin' 'bout? http://boiseic.namnori.com/files/2011/01/IM-70.3-Boise-Bib-List.pdf |
2012-05-12 1:00 PM in reply to: #3940536 |
Member 87 | Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 Boise : Official Thread Thanks, pops. Pretty good pro field coming: Tim O'Donnell, Linsey Corbin, Heather Jackson, Magali Tisseyre, Matt Lieto. Among many others. |
|
2012-05-12 9:25 PM in reply to: #3940536 |
Member 87 | Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 Boise : Official Thread And my number is easy to remember: 1234 :-) |
2012-05-13 7:58 PM in reply to: #4205452 |
Elite 4148 Utah | Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 Boise : Official Thread JoshR - 2012-05-11 3:52 PM The only part you really even use an 11 is on the first downhill across the dam I think. The hill on pleasant valley is almost an 11 but not quite. I think a 12-25 should be fine for this course, assuming you are a half decent climber and a 25 is good enough. I run an 11-26 because that's what my bike came with and I don't really have any complaints on the hills around here. So this is making me nervous. After today's ride and a discussion on cassettes, I just realized I'm maxing out at 23 :/ Of course last week I did about 2K of climbing... does going from a 23 to 25 REALLY make that much difference? It's only two little dinky cogs? I'm still in the school of thought "the only way to get better at climbing is to climb more" Do I need to switch schools????? |
2012-05-13 10:05 PM in reply to: #3940536 |
Extreme Veteran 724 | Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 Boise : Official Thread If you are ok with "climbing" in a 23, you should be fine. As others have mentioned Boise isn't a huge climbing course, but more long slow climbs. Below is an approximate map of the course. You can click elevation on the bottom to see a profile of the course. It doesn't seem to have too many steep climbs, but a few longer slight uphills. I haven't ridden the course, but I don't think I'll have any issues with the climbs in a 25, if I even get into that gear. http://www.mapmyfitness.com/routes/fullscreen/60955388/ |
2012-05-13 10:20 PM in reply to: #3940536 |
Extreme Veteran 724 | Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 Boise : Official Thread As I mentioned in another thread in the Triathlon forum, I had an awesome OWS today. It was the first time I've actually done more than 1 mile ever. There was a 6 min break that I stopped the watch, while we waited for a bunch of the group at the halfway point, plus a few other stops here and there so people could catch up. All in all it was a good workout though. I'm hoping that while swimming in a bit better pack that I'll be able to make up some extra time by drafting off a slightly faster swimmer. Here is to hoping for warm water at Boise! http://connect.garmin.com/activity/177863799 |
2012-05-14 2:39 AM in reply to: #4207779 |
Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
|
2012-05-14 7:32 AM in reply to: #3940536 |
Extreme Veteran 473 Chelsea, MI | Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 Boise : Official Thread Swim waves are up: http://boiseic.namnori.com/files/2011/05/Ironman70.3Boise_SwimWave5.12.12.pdf Looks like 12:31 for me with a sweet purple cap. Swam in my new wetsuit and thank God it was a good fit and felt great. I see the temps in Boise were pretty high last week. Maybe a few more days in the 80s will raise that lake temp. Good luck with prep this week everyone. Taper is coming I hope. |
2012-05-14 8:27 AM in reply to: #3940536 |
Extreme Veteran 724 | Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 Boise : Official Thread Looks like I'm starting 8 minutes ahead of my brother 12:19 to his 12:27. I was kind of hoping to start behind him. Oh well, now I just keep my head down and go. Hopefully he won't catch me though! |
2012-05-14 8:57 AM in reply to: #4207877 |
Elite 4148 Utah | Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 Boise : Official Thread gvey - 2012-05-14 1:39 AM PeteDin206 - 2012-05-13 10:05 PMIf you are ok with "climbing" in a 23, you should be fine. As others have mentioned Boise isn't a huge climbing course, but more long slow climbs. Below is an approximate map of the course. You can click elevation on the bottom to see a profile of the course. It doesn't seem to have too many steep climbs, but a few longer slight uphills. I haven't ridden the course, but I don't think I'll have any issues with the climbs in a 25, if I even get into that gear. http://www.mapmyfitness.com/routes/fullscreen/60955388/ Iwouldn't put too much faith in that elevation chart. I've raced it twice and I guarantee that the climbs are greater than 3%. After the descent off the reservoir, the climb out is probably closer to 6% (I'm guessing, but it's probably close) for at least a mile, and the second climb is similar, if not longer.Oh well... I've got what I've got, so I'll just suck it up and deal Fortunately, I AM used to climbing long and hard. Perhaps I'll get out for a few more canyon rides in before heading north. Last year I stressed and worried about the climb on Chaulk Hill for Vineman 70.3. I kept chugging up wondering when I'd hit the steep section. Then there was a guy w/ a cowbell yelling I was there, I thought he was lying. Everyone talks about that climb, and now I still can't help but wonder, what climb? |
2012-05-14 10:10 AM in reply to: #4208261 |
Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
2012-05-14 10:55 AM in reply to: #4208261 |
Pro 6520 Bellingham, WA | Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 Boise : Official Thread geauxtri - 2012-05-14 6:57 AM gvey - 2012-05-14 1:39 AM PeteDin206 - 2012-05-13 10:05 PMIf you are ok with "climbing" in a 23, you should be fine. As others have mentioned Boise isn't a huge climbing course, but more long slow climbs. Below is an approximate map of the course. You can click elevation on the bottom to see a profile of the course. It doesn't seem to have too many steep climbs, but a few longer slight uphills. I haven't ridden the course, but I don't think I'll have any issues with the climbs in a 25, if I even get into that gear. http://www.mapmyfitness.com/routes/fullscreen/60955388/ Iwouldn't put too much faith in that elevation chart. I've raced it twice and I guarantee that the climbs are greater than 3%. After the descent off the reservoir, the climb out is probably closer to 6% (I'm guessing, but it's probably close) for at least a mile, and the second climb is similar, if not longer.Oh well... I've got what I've got, so I'll just suck it up and deal Fortunately, I AM used to climbing long and hard. Perhaps I'll get out for a few more canyon rides in before heading north. Last year I stressed and worried about the climb on Chaulk Hill for Vineman 70.3. I kept chugging up wondering when I'd hit the steep section. Then there was a guy w/ a cowbell yelling I was there, I thought he was lying. Everyone talks about that climb, and now I still can't help but wonder, what climb? I had the pleasure of Chaulk Hill twice last summer and I think it is actually steeper than either of the Boise climbs. When I raced Boise in 2009, the Birds of Prey climb was the one everyone talked about and the other two were kind of intermediate climbs. Now that Birds of Prey is no longer part of the course these two get all the fear. I think the potential wind is going to be a bigger factor in how difficult the ride will be. |
|
2012-05-14 12:42 PM in reply to: #3940536 |
Extreme Veteran 724 | Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 Boise : Official Thread http://www.ktvb.com/news/local/Lucky-Dam-increases-flow-into-the-Bo... This does not help the cause for warming up the lake... |
2012-05-14 12:48 PM in reply to: #3940536 |
Extreme Veteran 473 Chelsea, MI | Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 Boise : Official Thread I'm going to go with the theory that they are only pulling out the cold water........... |
2012-05-14 1:32 PM in reply to: #4208560 |
Elite 4148 Utah | Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 Boise : Official Thread popsracer - 2012-05-14 9:55 AM geauxtri - 2012-05-14 6:57 AM gvey - 2012-05-14 1:39 AM PeteDin206 - 2012-05-13 10:05 PMIf you are ok with "climbing" in a 23, you should be fine. As others have mentioned Boise isn't a huge climbing course, but more long slow climbs. Below is an approximate map of the course. You can click elevation on the bottom to see a profile of the course. It doesn't seem to have too many steep climbs, but a few longer slight uphills. I haven't ridden the course, but I don't think I'll have any issues with the climbs in a 25, if I even get into that gear. http://www.mapmyfitness.com/routes/fullscreen/60955388/ Iwouldn't put too much faith in that elevation chart. I've raced it twice and I guarantee that the climbs are greater than 3%. After the descent off the reservoir, the climb out is probably closer to 6% (I'm guessing, but it's probably close) for at least a mile, and the second climb is similar, if not longer.Oh well... I've got what I've got, so I'll just suck it up and deal Fortunately, I AM used to climbing long and hard. Perhaps I'll get out for a few more canyon rides in before heading north. Last year I stressed and worried about the climb on Chaulk Hill for Vineman 70.3. I kept chugging up wondering when I'd hit the steep section. Then there was a guy w/ a cowbell yelling I was there, I thought he was lying. Everyone talks about that climb, and now I still can't help but wonder, what climb? I had the pleasure of Chaulk Hill twice last summer and I think it is actually steeper than either of the Boise climbs. When I raced Boise in 2009, the Birds of Prey climb was the one everyone talked about and the other two were kind of intermediate climbs. Now that Birds of Prey is no longer part of the course these two get all the fear. I think the potential wind is going to be a bigger factor in how difficult the ride will be. YES!!! THANK YOU!!!! That is EXACTLY what I want/needed to hear I just may be able to pull off my goal time now THANKS AGAIN!!! As long as the wind doesn't affect the swim (I'm paranoid of water) I'm okay with it. "Mr Wind is my Friend" |
2012-05-14 4:54 PM in reply to: #3940536 |
Extreme Veteran 724 | Subject: RE: Ironman 70.3 Boise : Official Thread Just a heads up for everyone. The shuttle tickets are now available on the www.ironmanboise.com website. I remember reading somewhere that they tend to sell out so you might want to grab them now. I picked up 2 for each shuttle because I'm not sure which I want to take. I figure I can either sell the extra's or if they end up being the later shuttle give them to a couple spectators or someone's family that forgot to buy the extra tickets. |
|