Kona Qualifying- What it takes.. (Page 7)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() This user's post has been ignored. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() JeepFleeb - 2007-08-20 7:11 PM No where did he mention time or pace. The point is to get to the finish line as fast as I can. If I win my AG, I won. If there are two slots and I get 2nd, I won. If I get 4th and a slot rolls down, I won. That's because time and pace is already done. You execute the race based on HR (or power, or whatever metrics you tain with) not on pace. We are discussing the nuances of race day in regards to pace, but in no way should anyone look to race based on splits, that applies to everyone. My race was very simple, Stay between 138-148 bpm. That's all. At the end of 9:43:42 I had averaged 148 bpm. There's no buid on the run. You are not going to negative split the run, you have to go right now to try and get that slot. The last 1/2 of the run isn't a victory lap of negative splits for a qaulifier, it's a WAR. You win if you cnba hold on, you loose if you start to walk. Don't give up but don't race for the rolldwon either, race to do it RIGHT NOW. |
![]() ![]() |
Not a Coach![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() bryancd - 2007-08-20 8:42 PM JohnnyKay - 2007-08-20 7:25 PM OK, agreed. But this is how I aim to perform in almost any race, i.e., leave it all out on the course. Unfortunately, my current "all" isn't Kona material yet. Doesn't mean I don't train and race to try to maximize my CURRENT potential. I know not everybody races like this. Ah, but you do, and that's why you are participating in this thread. ![]() Sure. I am total agreement that that is part of "what it takes". Go back to my first post and you'll also see consistancy and quality in training. Along with race-day execution. All part of it as well. I work on all of that all the time. I can't tell you whether I have the requisite genes or not (I believe I do), but otherwise I'm confident I'll get my shot one day if I want it enough. But since I clearly don't have your genes or any background in running (or swimming or biking), I'm on the long-term plan. |
![]() ![]() |
Master![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() JohnnyKay - 2007-08-21 10:00 AM bryancd - 2007-08-20 8:42 PM JohnnyKay - 2007-08-20 7:25 PM OK, agreed. But this is how I aim to perform in almost any race, i.e., leave it all out on the course. Unfortunately, my current "all" isn't Kona material yet. Doesn't mean I don't train and race to try to maximize my CURRENT potential. I know not everybody races like this. Ah, but you do, and that's why you are participating in this thread. ![]() Sure. I am total agreement that that is part of "what it takes". Go back to my first post and you'll also see consistancy and quality in training. Along with race-day execution. All part of it as well. I work on all of that all the time. I can't tell you whether I have the requisite genes or not (I believe I do), but otherwise I'm confident I'll get my shot one day if I want it enough. But since I clearly don't have your genes or any background in running (or swimming or biking), I'm on the long-term plan. This brings up an interesting question. Do you think there is a certain time period that most people who qualify for Kona need to train/race before they get there? I know there are exceptions but for most who qualify for Kona, have they been doing triathlons for 2 years, 5 years, 10 years? Is it possible to get there in a year or two years if you only have a background in one sport? In none of the sports? |
![]() ![]() |
Expert![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() docswim24 - 2007-08-21 10:26 AM JohnnyKay - 2007-08-21 10:00 AM This brings up an interesting question. Do you think there is a certain time period that most people who qualify for Kona need to train/race before they get there? I know there are exceptions but for most who qualify for Kona, have they been doing triathlons for 2 years, 5 years, 10 years? Is it possible to get there in a year or two years if you only have a background in one sport? In none of the sports?bryancd - 2007-08-20 8:42 PM JohnnyKay - 2007-08-20 7:25 PM OK, agreed. But this is how I aim to perform in almost any race, i.e., leave it all out on the course. Unfortunately, my current "all" isn't Kona material yet. Doesn't mean I don't train and race to try to maximize my CURRENT potential. I know not everybody races like this. Ah, but you do, and that's why you are participating in this thread. ![]() Sure. I am total agreement that that is part of "what it takes". Go back to my first post and you'll also see consistancy and quality in training. Along with race-day execution. All part of it as well. I work on all of that all the time. I can't tell you whether I have the requisite genes or not (I believe I do), but otherwise I'm confident I'll get my shot one day if I want it enough. But since I clearly don't have your genes or any background in running (or swimming or biking), I'm on the long-term plan. OK. Now I'm interested too. I too have no background in any of the three disciplines. I learned how to swim (enough to go 400m freestyle without stopping for breath), bought a bike and did my first Sprint in 2006 followed by a 4:00 marathon in the fall. This year I got semi-serious, comfortably finishing a 5:46 HIM and 2:39 Oly (I know if I want to KQ, "comfortably finishing" becomes an oxymoron). I have Kona dreams at this point but realize I'm 4+ years off. Shorter term goals include pushing marathon time down to a 3:15 BQ in 2009 (planning a 3:45 in Oct'07). Continued work on other disciplines to finish a IM in 2010 under 12 hours. Then hitting it hard (including upgrade of my $800 roadie to a full carbon lighter-than-air crotch-rocket) for a "few" years to KQ while I'm still in my 40's (currently 37). I imagine there are A LOT of Kona dreamers like me. The intital pages of this thread really lent some valuable perspective - mostly how that training time is purposefully spent. I'm looking for JohnnyKay and others without backgrounds in running, swimming, biking to lend insight on the JOURNEY from Kona-dreamer to making it a realistic goal. Brian with an "i" |
![]() ![]() |
Expert![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() BaitBoy - 2007-08-21 11:17 AM Anything is possible. Welcome to the Kona doomasday thread, where if you miss a workout you probably won't ever make it to Kona. Nice contribution.....very insightful. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Not a Coach![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() BaitBoy - 2007-08-21 10:17 AM Anything is possible. Welcome to the Kona doomasday thread, where if you miss a workout you probably won't ever make it to Kona. Gee, aren't we a bit melodramtic this morning?
Docswim--I imagine it all depends on what you bring to the starting table--for example, athletic background (maybe not in the 3 sports, but perhaps something else that gives you a leg up), or genes (Bryan for example apparently has an amazing aerobic capacity, so even if he's far from his limit he may be above many others). Then it depends how you train and build your base. I doubt there is any easy, generic answer. Brian with an "i"--I don't think there is anything special you need to do other than develop consistency in training and continue to work on addressing your weaknesses. Could require swim lessons and some focus time in the water. Building run durability through gradually increasing frequency and duration. Improving endurance on the bike through consistent long rides through the year and pushing the pace when you have the opportunity. One note is that I don't necessarily think focusing on marathons (or IM) now is the most efficient way to get there. I actually think it's probably better to focus on getting FASTER at shorter distances versus worrying about going LONG now and then trying to add FAST on top of it. Do the long training runs, but race half-marathons and 10Ks. So to make the goal "realistic", wirte it down as a long-term goal. Then figure out how you can get a little bit faster than you are today. Keep reassessing that "little bit" and keep on chipping away. One day you will wake up to find that you're long-term goal has moved quite a bit closer. |
![]() ![]() |
Cycling Guru![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() What it takes?? Getting up at 4:30 this morning to start my run in a torrential downpour and pushing on to finish all 18 miles even though it sucked most of the time ..... and still do it at a 7:43 pace ....... At least that is one small portion of it. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Daremo - 2007-08-21 11:02 AM What it takes?? Getting up at 4:30 this morning to start my run in a torrential downpour and pushing on to finish all 18 miles even though it sucked most of the time ..... and still do it at a 7:43 pace ....... At least that is one small portion of it. Awesome. I was at the track at 4:45am to do my 200 interval workout! |
![]() ![]() |
Elite![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() bryancd - 2007-08-21 10:35 AM Daremo - 2007-08-21 11:02 AM Awesome. I was at the track at 4:45am to do my 200 interval workout!What it takes?? Getting up at 4:30 this morning to start my run in a torrential downpour and pushing on to finish all 18 miles even though it sucked most of the time ..... and still do it at a 7:43 pace ....... I think we are getting to the heart of what it REALLY takes with these two posts.
|
![]() ![]() |
Cycling Guru![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Insanity?? ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() This user's post has been ignored. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Daremo - 2007-08-21 11:54 AM Insanity?? ![]() ...sorry, did you say something, I was down on the floor in my office stretching....... ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Cycling Guru![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() PennState - 2007-08-21 1:04 PM (although I noticed his pace was faster than it's supposed to be for a long run... That's because I'm reading this thread too damn much ....... |
![]() ![]() |
Elite![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Daremo - 2007-08-21 10:54 AM Insanity?? ![]() Let's see: "getting up at 4:30am to run 18miles in the rain is:" to the average non-athlete: "insanity" to the average triathlete: "dedication" to the kona hopeful: "what it takes"
|
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() One of my swim coaches just qualified for Kona... I think I'll start asking him for workouts ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() "Train like you race, because you race like you train." Great quote sharp4850, very true. Edited by bryancd 2007-08-21 1:08 PM |
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I am taking parts of this thread and going on an across the country motivational speaking tour. I am sure I can sucker in plenty of Kona hopefuls to drop some loot to hear all these inspiring thoughts ![]() Like Brian said " Train like you race because you race like you train" DEAD ON!!! |
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() A quote I first heard from my swimming coach, who is going to Kona ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() This user's post has been ignored. |
![]() ![]() |
Expert![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Man, I go off and have a kid, and when I come back I have 6 pages of threads to read through. Let me chime in on a few of the key topics/questions posed and perhaps stir the pot a bit. Coaching - I think they are really good if you don't have a decent grip on how to train or you prefer to be given your workouts. Plain ole advice can be just as good. Training for Hawaii isn't as confusing as most make it out to be. 80% of it is volume and time. 20% can occasionally be tricky. Biking is the most important of the 3 sports to train for. TOTALLY DISAGREE. Why don't you ask Scott Tinley, Dave Scott, Mark Allen, Greg Welch, Lothar Leder, Tim Deboom, Luc Vanleirde, Macca, Peter Reid, etc what a strong Ironman comes down to. Dave used to say that the Ironman starting line was at mile 13 of the run. Norman got lucky by about 65 seconds (even though by almost all standards, he had a strong run as well). Kona Roll Down - I think it's needed as too many of the top guys travel to many IM qualifiers. The fact its a qualifer will make the race field strong enough. Non IM distance Qualifiers - Some who have been in this sport a while may remember that almost every way to get to Kona was a non IM. Like I said above, the fact that a race is labeled a qualifer brings the strength of the field to the point that those who qualify deserve to go. This also segways nicely into my next thought/opinion.. You should have to do a full IM to get to Kona. TOTALLY DISAGREE. I think I may be a perfect example. I did just this last year, IMAZ then Kona. What happened? Complete burn out. I have cobwebs on my bike. I still workout, but only a fleeting thought about ramping up again to do any racing. I am not exactly new to this sport either. I've been racing tris since 1986, so for me to drop off the face of the sport is a bit of a change. Lottery - I think its great! I haven't signed up, but I cheer everyone on to do it. For those who have been to Kona, you know that lottery participants are the true spirit of the sport. They show more joy then anyone when they accomplish that race. Lottery is in keeping with the original Ironman spirit and hope it doesn't go away. Kona as a 1st IM - I see no issue with that . It was mine. If anyone had the choice, why wouldn't you pick the grandaddy of them all? If anything it humbles you for future IM races. 70.3 training the same as IM - True. with the exception of the long ride and long run, the training week is essentially the same. You can certainly do less to get through a 1/2, but I thought we were talking about Kona qualifers? (I own a 4:08 at BLST for the record). Number of Years of training - While it is possible to get hot quick, The #1 way to success is volume and time. Years under your belt are extremely important. So don't fret if you are still 2 hours from a IM slot. If you stick with it you will close in on that. guaranteed. volume and time. Just some thoughts from someone who has been Alii Drive more than once. Feel free to let me have it. TJ |
|
![]() ![]() |
Pro![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I think the bike focus is misunderstood. It's not spending time in the saddle to have a blazing bike split. It's spending time in the saddle so that you can get off the bike being able to back it up with a solid marathon. The stronger your bike fitness, the faster you can do that and still be able to run. It's not advice to train the bike in exclusion of training the run ( at least where I've heard it ), or that a superior bike split can mask insufficient run training. The other benefit to a large bike focus is the reduced recovery time. I can bounce back a lot faster after a 6 hour bike ride, than I can after a 2 hour run. The run takes more out of me. I can ramp up bike volume much faster than I ramp up run volume ( without courting injury ). But I'm new to running ( at least at any sort of distance over 5k and with any consistency ), so the physiological adaptions to being able to run long are still coming. As I can safely ramp up my running volume, I do. Compared to many people, I don't run a lot, but I'm working on it. And getting back to the other points in the thread, I did Kona last year ('06). It was my first IM. And I got in on the lottery. I'm completely and utterly hooked, and far from being burned out, am driven to be able to experience crossing that line on Ali'i again. I need to knock about 2 hours off my time to qualify ( I finished in 12:06 ). I've gone under 5 hours twice at the HIM distance, I just need to translate that to twice the distance now. I think it's achievable, but I'm realistic that it's going to take at least a few more years of consistent hard work for me to get there. I'm not blessed with a prior running background, great genes, just a stubbornness to follow through with the consistency and quality of training that I know will get me there. Oh, and I'll still be entering the lottery too. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Coredump just summed up my own feeling regarding the bike perfectly. Thank you for that post, awesome. TJ, I welcome you comments as well. You said Kona was your first IM, where did you qualify? And I am suprised that in 2006 at IMAZ 10th in the AG had slots, as I assume that's how you got back in '06. Funny as IMAZ this year was my first IM race and qualifier. All your points are well taken, although I disagree on some. As I mentioned above, the ky to the bike is well stated in coredump's comment. I rode a 5:05 bike at IMAZ even with getting a flat on the first loop and some brutal winds on Lap's 2 and 3 and still was able to run a 3:30 marathon. I came into triathlon as a fairly good runner, my first marathon was a 3:33, my second this year was a 2:59, but my coach was felt very strongly that the key to putting me in a position to run my way to a sub 10 IM and a slot was the bike. He tunred me from a runner who could bike to a cyclist who could run. There's not much difference between a 3:30 and 3:40 IM marathoner or a 55min swimmer and a 60min swimmer, but if you can be a 5 hour biker vs. a 5:30 biker, that's a lot of time off the course. Your are absolutley correct that biking has become so huge in todays IM races and yet nobody is beating the times set by the greats in the '80's and '90's who were runners. But for an AG'er to qualify, the bike presents the best bang for the aerobic buck in terms of time on the course and, as has been said, allows for a huge amount of aerobic training time volume without prolonged recovery. |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() This user's post has been ignored. |
![]() ![]() |
Elite![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() When racing IM what zone do you go for? I've read the plan in "Going Long" but was curious about everyone commenting here has done or is planning. Bryan, you said you were targeting between 138 and 148 and came in at 148? I don't believe that in Zone 1 for you, Where would it be? |
|