Other Resources My Cup of Joe » What is the point of Women's Only Tri's? Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 11
 
 
2005-07-12 4:56 PM
in reply to: #196464

User image

Pro
5153
50001002525
Helena, MT
Subject: RE: my 2 cents

Great post Mr. Eff.

I have a pink (but still mostly brown) running skirt. I figure I shouldn't care what I look like while I run.



2005-07-12 5:00 PM
in reply to: #195297

User image

Champion
5495
5000100100100100252525
Whizzzzzlandia
Silver member
Subject: RE: What is the point of Women's Only Tri's?

Holy Crap. Let's just cool it, people. My eyes can't even focus. I'm dizzy... I like pink... I've done Women Only events... I like to ogle men in cycling shorts... I don't care who rescues me from a burning building... Dragged out the door or thrown over a shoulder, take your pick, just please don't drop me or let me burn. I have nothing against Jewish people and what Hitler & the Nazi's did is just plain wrong and disgusting. I've got nothing against lesbians... two of my best friends were lesbians... not with each other, (one from College and one from work...) and I never thought of setting them up... hmmmmm.

Anyway, I digress. Let's get back to training, people! Where are you on your July goals?

Whizzzzzzzzzzzz

2005-07-12 5:03 PM
in reply to: #196453

User image

Champion
5495
5000100100100100252525
Whizzzzzlandia
Silver member
Subject: RE: What is the point of Women's Only Tri's?
Thanks,  Tania!!!
2005-07-12 5:07 PM
in reply to: #195297

User image

Elite
3235
2000100010010025
San Diego
Subject: RE: What is the point of Women's Only Tri's?
I have no problem with Lesbians...some of my best friends are actors
2005-07-12 5:09 PM
in reply to: #196435

User image

Regular
75
252525
Subject: RE: What is the point of Women's Only Tri's?
amiine - 2005-07-12 4:28 PM

TripleThreat - 2005-07-12 12:40 PM Wouldn't it make more sense to have "Beginner's Triathlons",rather than "women only". I say this, b/c the "beginner-focused triathlon" is a suggestion I made elsewhere awhile ago. Seems like a great idea. It would also go a ways at elimiinating the animosity some "faster folks" have towards over-crowding, blocking, etc in races.

I AGREE!

That’s exactly what I am seeking to accomplish with my new Dash & Bash Sprint Race: To promote the sport among newbies regardless of their gender. Plus, to create a fun venue for athletes to meet & socialize. BTW from the total registrations so far 65%, women and 35% men...That throw away many arguments presented on this thread…



As a female beginner- I not really intimidated by men in races- I'm intimidated by experienced triathletes. What a fabulous idea!
2005-07-12 5:13 PM
in reply to: #196435

Veteran
293
100100252525
The Emerald City
Subject: RE: What is the point of Women's Only Tri's?
amiine - 2005-07-12 2:28 PM

TripleThreat - 2005-07-12 12:40 PM Wouldn't it make more sense to have "Beginner's Triathlons",rather than "women only". I say this, b/c the "beginner-focused triathlon" is a suggestion I made elsewhere awhile ago. Seems like a great idea. It would also go a ways at elimiinating the animosity some "faster folks" have towards over-crowding, blocking, etc in races.

I AGREE!

That’s exactly what I am seeking to accomplish with my new Dash & Bash Sprint Race: To promote the sport among newbies regardless of their gender. Plus, to create a fun venue for athletes to meet & socialize. BTW from the total registrations so far 65%, women and 35% men...That throw away many arguments presented on this thread…

I just completed "My First Tri" this past weekend.  It's a triathlon designed for first timers, hence the name. Their brochure says that the participant ratio is Men 38% and Women 62%.  They also have a "My Next Tri".  During the race, I saw both types; competitive racers and those who just seemed to be having fun (including me). 



2005-07-12 5:17 PM
in reply to: #195297

User image

Got Wahoo?
5423
5000100100100100
San Antonio
Subject: RE: What is the point of Women's Only Tri's?

Did someone say pink camisole?

2005-07-12 5:27 PM
in reply to: #195297

User image

Veteran
123
100
San Diego, CA
Subject: RE: What is the point of Women's Only Tri's?
Good night! How did I miss this one!

My first tri will be Reebok in October. Since swimming, biking AND running are all new to me, I thought the Reebok tri would be a bit more low key for starters.

I usually get a kick out of competing with guys even if I can't always keep up. Sometimes I beat them. Sometimes I don't. But it's all good at the end.



2005-07-12 5:39 PM
in reply to: #196502

User image

Elite
3235
2000100010010025
San Diego
Subject: RE: What is the point of Women's Only Tri's?

Happycow - 2005-07-12 3:27 PM Good night! How did I miss this one! My first tri will be Reebok in October. Since swimming, biking AND running are all new to me, I thought the Reebok tri would be a bit more low key for starters. I usually get a kick out of competing with guys even if I can't always keep up. Sometimes I beat them. Sometimes I don't. But it's all good at the end.

 Geeze Louise Happy. Nothing like jumping in while the topic is over hot & heavy.

2005-07-12 5:52 PM
in reply to: #195297

User image

Veteran
123
100
San Diego, CA
Subject: RE: What is the point of Women's Only Tri's?
I skipped some of the middle pages. They were WAY too serious.

How's this.

I like pink, too. I'm a bit more of a rosy pink not hot pink. But I like pink.
2005-07-12 5:53 PM
in reply to: #196441

User image

Giver
18427
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Subject: RE: What is the point of Women's Only Tri's?

cerveloP3 - 2005-07-12 4:32 PM
run4yrlif - 2005-07-12 5:19 PM Elicit, not Illicit. There is a dictionary near you somewhere, hell... you are on the internet for f%^*s sake. Illicit is an adjective, while elicit is a verb. Normally, I would not even respond to this as you have no idea what in the hell you are really saying, BUT.... Sure, many times you could put two things together like "Femi-Nazi" to ELICIT a response. The Republica-peodphile is a little stretch, as I really feel that Michael Jackson is more along the Jerry Brown Democrat line than the George Bush/Karl Rove Republican slant. Tears are actually running down my cheek, I am laughing so hard. That was genius.

Dude...I was typing fast and clearly not proofreading like I should have, but if you want to play grammar nazi (heh), there are three periods in an elipse, not four.  And my point was it's a rediculous, meaningless comparison (glad you got that point). But since you brought it up, how do you think most Catholic priests vote?



2005-07-12 5:58 PM
in reply to: #195297

User image

Master
1927
100050010010010010025
Chicago
Subject: RE: What is the point of Women's Only Tri's?

Wow Karl you've started a hot one here.

How did we disenigrate into name-calling and very rude behavior. Wow. What gives? This is not all that serious folks. I understand people who are offended by certain words - trust me I know all about that being black - and what they stand for.

But I also know that I just did a story about a child that eats once a day because his family can't afford to eat and he's dying of AIDS to boot through no fault of his own. I'm sure he doesn't mind what he's called he just wants food! That's reality not some political platform shoved over moveon.org or rushlimbaugh.com

It amazes me what gets people riled up. That they get upset over words, name-calling, etc., but when they see a starving child in front of their face - in their neighborhood etc., they aren't even fazed. They move on to buy that next LCD screen or new BMW all the while cursing about how someone offended them with their words. Not that I know of anyone on this thread that does that but I see it all the time in people I know.

As a writer I know that words are powerful. And it makes me cringe that we've diluted the potency of one of the worse massacre's in human history to a punchiline, a catch-phrase or a joke. It's not right and we shouldn't ignore the fact that femi-nazi, soup-nazi, Gestapo etc., lessen the impact of history.

And anyone who thinks the USA got involved in WWII because of our moral high ground is just plain ignorant - ignorant of history, ignorant of facts and ignorant of context. Let's not get me started on that.

So there's been a fair amount of hyperbole and ignorance running around this thread and I won't attempt to correct them all. But I will say that men's only and women's only tris, while an interesting topic, is not worth all the energy we're displaying here.

I suggest you guys stop reading and go out and help a young kid struggling with school, or make sure an elderly lady eats today or take care of someone else's needs because it's acts like those that can help prevent a repeat of what Hitler, Stalin did.

And as far men and women go - I like that men are different. I like that I'm different from them. I also like that we can agree to disagree without foaming at the mouth and taking sides.

I don't label myself a feminist because I'm not for feminism. I'm for the human race and for all women and men to have the equal opportunity to succeed at whatever their hearts desire. Thank God I live in a country that allows me this chance. Because I know of lots of countries that don't. But I'm not stupid either. I know that men like to do business with men.They like to spend their money with men. That there's a good ole boys club where men trust men more. I know that being a woman in a male-dominated field makes many men uncomfortable.

I don't compete with men. I roll over them. I steam roll anyone who gets in the way of what I want. Men, women, I don't care.

I am an equal-opportunity ball breaker and I don't care who you are. If you are in between me and what I want watch out. I wish I could treat men differerntly. My goal is to learn to love them the way that God intended. But I've been so screwed up by years of lectures and talk about competing with them and going after what I want that I see men as obstacles that I need to pummel. I don't like feeling this way. I don't like looking at them this way. I don't like feeling so intimidated by them that I run to women-only events to feel nutured and care for. I don't like the separation. I want the harmony. Where is the harmony? Can we achieve that? Is that possible?

Sorry about the rant but this is an issue that cuts deep. I like men. I hate that I have to choose sides against them when it comes to my career, sports, friends etc. I don't like that feeling. How can I change it?

2005-07-12 6:27 PM
in reply to: #195297

User image

Master
1938
100050010010010010025
La Crosse
Subject: RE: What is the point of Women's Only Tri's?
Wow. Wow. Uhmm . . . . just wow. I'm new here, and I've been really enjoying this board as an escape from the other demands of my life. However, this thread has seriously undermined the sense of comfort and enjoyment I've taken from this forum. I didn't expect my other life to intrude here, but it has. Sigh. Kudos to possum, renee, kimj81, The Bear, and others.

For those of you just turning in, I'm going to try to recap this, from my POV:

Motivated asked a well-intentioned questioned that nonetheless triggered an emotional debate. There were several equally well-intentioned responses.

bballer2tri followed up with a fairly inflammatory post that nevertheless got to some fundamental distinctions between political viewpoints. Along the way, he used an exceptionally insulting term.

possum wrote a brilliant riposte to bballer's use of the term.

bballer2tri apologized and the thread seemed to get back on course, and some funny posts were made, some insightful posts were made, a few posts went haywire, and the discussion rolled along.

cerveloP3 came out of nowhere and started posting a long series of really patronizing rants on the history of the 20th century. These have nothing to do with either the original thread, bballer's use of the term, possum's post, the re-energized thread, or life on planet earth. Highlights:

cerveloP3 - 2005-07-12 5:45 PM

Let's not get me started on you being on the recieving end of a political-economics lesson.


Yes, having seen your lesson plan, Cervelo, I second that. Let's not.

cerveloP3 - 2005-07-12 3:37 PM

Please note that the people offended by the nazi term are both from socialist states.


I hereby declare CerveloP3 to be a troll. Cervelo, I dub thee Herr Cervelo-Nazi. Go forth, and do not multiply.

Some other highlights:

igbomb - 2005-07-12 10:05 AM

I was just trying to help the women understand the men's perspective.


igbomb, don't you dare speak for me. Just don't.

Gwendal - 2005-07-12 11:34 AM

I think the people objecting to Danskin are confusing a bunch of different issues in their heads. They've got publically-funded Title IX stuff confused with private recreational activities confused with workplace "affirmative action". It's quite a melange of sexism all stirring around in their brain.

I'm feeling like I have to look away.


Yeah, I agree that this is the case, Gwendal. And I wanted to turn away, too, but instead I've wasted a half an hour here. But I feel that I had to do something. What I've seen on this thread is a particularly malignant stew of anecdotal evidence, fearmongering, historical untruths and partisan politics. (Cervelo, I'm looking at you.) I'd like to briefly write out my simplistic explanation of the fundamental struggle here:

In the United States, there are two broad philosophies, constantly at war with one another. One philosophy has a vision of the way society should be. One philosophy is more concerned with how society actually is.

The should be folks have a very commendable vision of an ideal America, where all men are created equal, where individuals are all free to work towards their own goals, are rewarded in proportion to their efforts, and are largely unregulated by government. The should be people believe that everyone in America starts the race at the same starting line; and where you finish in the race is entirely dependent on your individual work. Some of the should be people also believe that America should be moral, and perhaps even virtuous, depending upon their perspective. The should be people often work to eliminate or restrict parts of society that don't meet their standards of what should be.

The folks who react to what they think actually is are likely to belive in very similar ideals as the should be people, but they note that what should be doesn't actually yet exist. Thus, not all people are free to work towards their goals; sometimes they are limited by poverty, or prejudice, or government policy, or longstanding cultural norms. The acutally is people note that not every American starts the race on the same point, and that during the race, some people have obstacles in their paths, or weights around their ankles. The acutally is people want to do what they can to try to remove those weights and flatten out those obstacles, and they'd like to do that by encouraging the runners -- all the runners, yes, and certain runners who really, really need it.

I believe that the shared hope between the acutally is and the should be people is that one day the racers will all start the race with the same chance of winning; the only disagreement is over when that will be.

Applying this hypothetical to the thread at hand: The should be people on this thread believe that, as a simple physical contest, triathlons should be the most equal thing in society; that is, everyone actually does start at the same point. The acutally is people know better, though. They know that America, the West in general and the whole world in fact, are patriarchal. They know that it was only recently in western society that women were even allowed to be a part of public events, let alone public events where they were supposed to show their bodies, be proud of their bodies, beat men with their bodies. The actually is people know that feminism is the "Belief in the social, political, and economic equality of the sexes," which cannot be equated with fascist government in any way. They know that you cannot compare "women's only" and "men's only" events, even if you think that the society that should be would eliminate "only" events, because until very recently, EVERY EVENT OF EVERY KIND IN THIS SOCIETY HAS BEEN A MEN'S ONLY EVENT.

Well, I've just wasted an hour that I could have spent more profitably in the pool. Sorry for the rant.
2005-07-12 6:34 PM
in reply to: #195297

Elite Veteran
781
500100100252525
Subject: RE: What is the point of Women's Only Tri's?
infosteward, I feel like we're learning a lot about you today. You can't live in harmony AND steamroll over people.

I liken female only tris to reading material. Sometimes I'm all about Catcher in the Rye, and sometimes I amjust plain all about Stephanie Plumb novels.
2005-07-12 6:40 PM
in reply to: #196557

User image

Champion
13323
5000500020001000100100100
Subject: RE: What is the point of Women's Only Tri's?

good lord.  lets keep this somewhat on-topic and if the tenants of national-socialism, feminism and affirmative action need to be continued, you know where to do it.

this is a great thread and i dont think anyone has stepped out of line from the context of reasonable civil discourse - and to this i thank you...but this is getting a little out-of-control.

2005-07-12 6:50 PM
in reply to: #196557

User image

Buttercup
14334
500050002000200010010010025
Subject: RE: What is the point of Women's Only Tri's?

Ovetta, thanks for contributing (just so we're clear, pink is not visual hyperbole. just saying.)

stupidnickname, I think you're kinda smart.

I don't know why I didn't think of this story before but here goes. My very good friend, Carlos, ran in the Boston Marathon with his brother back in the 60s. I believe there were only about 700 runners. He watched an illegally registered female dash into the race from her hiding place in the bushes and actually witnessed her boyfriend block the race officials who tried to forcibly remove her from running the Boston Marathon. Women were not allowed to run the Boston Marathon! She was subsequently DQ'd.

My how times have changed! I think it's so cool that Carlos witnessed this historic event and I think it's so cool that people have long since forgotten about those days - because they are, by and large, a thing of the past. So what if women want to tri together? So what if men want to burn things in the desert (I don't ask)? Ain't it nice we are learning - not there yet - to accept each other. Poco a poco.



2005-07-12 6:52 PM
in reply to: #196525

User image

Buttercup
14334
500050002000200010010010025
Subject: RE: What is the point of Women's Only Tri's?

Happycow - 2005-07-12 5:52 PM I skipped some of the middle pages. They were WAY too serious. How's this. I like pink, too. I'm a bit more of a rosy pink not hot pink. But I like pink.

Happy, I knew you were good people. How can you be Happy and not like pink? Inconceivable.

2005-07-12 7:01 PM
in reply to: #196557

User image

Elite
3020
20001000
Bay Area, CA
Subject: RE: What is the point of Women's Only Tri's?

I liken female only tris to reading material. Sometimes I'm all about Catcher in the Rye, and sometimes I amjust plain all about Stephanie Plumb novels.

You know lynda, you have just summed up my exact feeling about women's only triathlons in one short, succint analogy. 

Thank you.

As far as pink, not really into it, but what's interesting is that I hate girly regular clothes but I LOVE girly workout gear - Flowers on my stuff?  Bring it on!

My favorite pair of running socks has Blue flowers with the words Flower Power! on them.  Still looking for a bike helmet with flowers.  I saw one in Triathlete Magazine with lipstick kisses all over it (I would have even put up with the pink) but, it was just an ad for that brand, not reality.

2005-07-12 7:02 PM
in reply to: #196580

User image

Buttercup
14334
500050002000200010010010025
Subject: RE: What is the point of Women's Only Tri's?
Shellee, pink is very controversial. No two ways about it.
2005-07-12 7:22 PM
in reply to: #196483

Extreme Veteran
573
5002525
IL
Subject: RE: What is the point of Women's Only Tri's?

madcow - 2005-07-12 5:07 PM I have no problem with Lesbians...some of my best friends are actors

You know, deep down I think I may be a lesbian trapped in a man's body!  lol

2005-07-12 7:37 PM
in reply to: #196586

User image

Elite
2796
2000500100100252525
Texas
Subject: RE: What is the point of Women's Only Tri's?
dibujob - 2005-07-12 7:22 PM

madcow - 2005-07-12 5:07 PM I have no problem with Lesbians...some of my best friends are actors

You know, deep down I think I may be a lesbian trapped in a man's body!  lol

Here ya go.... http://www.danskin.com/ 

We'll be looking for the race report. 



2005-07-12 7:42 PM
in reply to: #195297

Extreme Veteran
573
5002525
IL
Subject: RE: What is the point of Women's Only Tri's?

lol.  I'd rather be a body marker, as long as my wife doesn't find out. Then I'd be a dead lesbian trapped in a man's body!

2005-07-12 7:42 PM
in reply to: #195297

Extreme Veteran
573
5002525
IL
Subject: RE: What is the point of Women's Only Tri's?

d'oh.  double post.  I wish we had a delete feature on here.  Or if we do, someone please tell me how to use it!



Edited by dibujob 2005-07-12 7:44 PM
2005-07-12 7:53 PM
in reply to: #196557

User image

Master
1927
100050010010010010025
Chicago
Subject: RE: What is the point of Women's Only Tri's?

lynda - 2005-07-12 4:34 PM  You can't live in harmony AND steamroll over people. 

You can't? Wow! Yeah I know that and I'm really not a steam roller I just play one on tv. It's just that I've been conidtioned to play hardball and I tend to go there first instead of being benevolent and merciful as my Christianity demands of me. I don't like that. I don't like my first instinct being to be self-protecting, survival you know.

By the way you're right - Although I would say I feel more like Catcher in the Rye and Judy Bloom. But most times I feel like Native Son! Ok end of hijacked thread.



Edited by infosteward 2005-07-12 7:54 PM
2005-07-12 8:12 PM
in reply to: #195297

User image

Got Wahoo?
5423
5000100100100100
San Antonio
Subject: RE: What is the point of Women's Only Tri's?
WHERE ARE THE PINK CAMISOLES?!?!?!?!?!?
New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » What is the point of Women's Only Tri's? Rss Feed  
 
 
of 11