Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Execution by firing squad? Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 4
 
 
2010-04-23 9:49 PM

User image

Elite
4547
2000200050025
Subject: Execution by firing squad?
It's 2010 and apparently in Utah, a man is going to be executed by a firing squad.

I use to think barbaric executions only happened in countries like Saudi Arabia.  What a sad news story. 

I know the topic of the death penalty has been debated to death (pun clearly intended), but is anybody else a bit turned off by the method and confused as to why it's still being used?


2010-04-23 9:51 PM
in reply to: #2813382

User image

Elite
3972
200010005001001001001002525
Reno
Subject: RE: Execution by firing squad?

For having fake plants and decorative pillows on their bed?

2010-04-23 10:00 PM
in reply to: #2813382

User image

Veteran
184
100252525
Highland CA
Subject: RE: Execution by firing squad?
Is this a joke?

Who cares how they do it. The guy asked for the firing squad. Give it to him. Yesterday.
2010-04-23 10:02 PM
in reply to: #2813382

User image

Expert
1244
100010010025
New York
Subject: RE: Execution by firing squad?
Actually, I believe they no longer "offer" (ugh) the firing squad as an option, except for death row inmates who chose firing squad before the law was changed. This guy had a choice between lethal injection and firing squad and chose firing squad.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-firing-squad-20100424,0,6161645.story?track=rss

Gardner, who fatally shot a lawyer and wounded a court bailiff during an attempted courthouse escape in 1985, initially requested a firing squad, later changed his mind and asked for lethal injection, but on Friday confirmed his initial decision.

He told the Deseret News in 1996 that he would sue for the right to die by firing squad. "I guess it's my Mormon heritage," he told the paper. "I like the firing squad. It's so much easier … and there's no mistakes."

====

Anyway. Killing is wrong. That is all.
2010-04-23 10:03 PM
in reply to: #2813382

User image

Extreme Veteran
494
100100100100252525
DC Metro area
Subject: RE: Execution by firing squad?
If he requested it then I see absolutely no problem with it.
2010-04-23 10:03 PM
in reply to: #2813382

User image

Elite
5316
5000100100100
Alturas, California
Subject: RE: Execution by firing squad?
Probably to add a good dose of vengence to help the justice.  Those who feel that deterance of the threat of death by firing squad is more effective than the threat of death by poison or electricity advocate this.  I am sure if there were more visualy stunning ways of killing people that would not offend some people they would be used..... People tend to be barbaric, when pissed off about their family, daughters or friends, etc. getting raped and murdered and such. 

Ah or I type too slow and the puppy wanted it that way. 

Edited by Baowolf 2010-04-23 10:05 PM


2010-04-23 10:08 PM
in reply to: #2813382

User image

Master
2447
200010010010010025
White Oak, Texas
Subject: RE: Execution by firing squad?

Ronnie Lee Gardner, 49, was given the choice of being killed by lethal injection or shot by a five-man team of executioners firing from a set of matched rifles – a rarely used method of execution that harkens back to Utah's territorial history.

"I would like the firing squad, please," Gardner told state court Judge Robin Reese after hearing his avenues for appeal appear to be exhausted.


He had a choice the man he killed did not.

2010-04-23 10:11 PM
in reply to: #2813385

User image

Elite
4547
2000200050025
Subject: RE: Execution by firing squad?
bootygirl - 2010-04-23 10:51 PM

For having fake plants and decorative pillows on their bed?



Ha!  lmao bootygirl!

But seriously...why should we honor his request?  The last thing I want to do is grant murderers wishes.  The next thing ya know, they'll just wish for more wishes, then we're screwed! 

2010-04-23 10:47 PM
in reply to: #2813382

User image

Champion
7821
50002000500100100100
Brooklyn, NY
Subject: RE: Execution by firing squad?
I have reservations about the death penalty, although I'm for it in principle. I don't think you can support the death penalty but be squeamish about the methods used. To say, "Well, it's ok for the State to execute people, but I think they should do it in a sterile, bloodless, pain-free way," makes no sense to me. Homicide is brutal and ugly and horrifying, whether it's carried out by an individual or by the State.

I think more people would question whether capital punishment ought to exist if we weren't so clinical about the way we execute people. I have to believe that there are a lot of people who whole-heartedly support CP who might feel differently if they had to stand under a gallows and watch someone swing. Strapping someone down to a gurney and injecting them full of drugs isn't any less barbaric than putting someone in front of a wall and shooting them, IMO.

It's too easy for us to say, "we're not like those other countries (like Saudi Arabia)" because we sterilize the process, but the end result is the same.
2010-04-23 11:01 PM
in reply to: #2813433

User image

Elite
4547
2000200050025
Subject: RE: Execution by firing squad?
jmk-brooklyn - 2010-04-23 11:47 PM I have reservations about the death penalty, although I'm for it in principle. I don't think you can support the death penalty but be squeamish about the methods used. To say, "Well, it's ok for the State to execute people, but I think they should do it in a sterile, bloodless, pain-free way," makes no sense to me. Homicide is brutal and ugly and horrifying, whether it's carried out by an individual or by the State. I think more people would question whether capital punishment ought to exist if we weren't so clinical about the way we execute people. I have to believe that there are a lot of people who whole-heartedly support CP who might feel differently if they had to stand under a gallows and watch someone swing. Strapping someone down to a gurney and injecting them full of drugs isn't any less barbaric than putting someone in front of a wall and shooting them, IMO. It's too easy for us to say, "we're not like those other countries (like Saudi Arabia)" because we sterilize the process, but the end result is the same.


Nice post jmk.

Growing up I used to be pro capital punishment...but then I saw the research.  It's well-established that CP does not have a deterrent effect.  It just doesn't.  The typical criminal on the street, in that split-second before they decide to off somebody, is not thinking about what's going to happen next.  Heck, even the cold-blooded ones who are planning it all out are just trying to make it as clean as possible to avoid any finger implicating them as the trigger-man (or woman).

Killing the criminals doesn't bring loved ones back. 

2010-04-24 5:01 AM
in reply to: #2813382

User image

Champion
5575
5000500252525
Butler
Subject: RE: Execution by firing squad?

Do it.  He wants it.  Do it the day after he was found guilty (If it is obvious he did it).  I say line up the gun.  Make something that let's the person being executed push a button that fires the gun after a 60 second count down.

Sorry but I feel no mercy for someone who knowingly and obviously kills someone.

If you can't place nice with the rest of us you don't need to be here.

I do think that we need to prove without a resonable doubt the person killed someone first though.



2010-04-24 5:13 AM
in reply to: #2813382

User image

Extreme Veteran
354
1001001002525
Townsville
Subject: RE: Execution by firing squad?
Very nicly put JMK.

I am very much against the DP as a means of punishment.

But since this country .... I assume it is the US .....  has the DP I see no reason to disallow the right to choose a method of execution. In fact I think a person should be allowed to choose the manner of his/her death as they see fit ...... as long as it is not long and drawn out.

I think if I had a choice I would anethatise my arm and slowly bleed to death. That would be nice and gentle I think.
2010-04-24 6:02 AM
in reply to: #2813382

New user
900
500100100100100
,
Subject: RE: Execution by firing squad?
Several years ago a friend's parents were brutally murdered in their bedroom.  What they went through was beyond belief.  The two murderers were convicted and put to death.  I don't care if it is or isn't a deterrent, those two did not deserve to live in our society.  Its about punishment, not deterrence.
2010-04-24 6:37 AM
in reply to: #2813550

User image

Master
2701
2000500100100
Salisbury, North Carolina
Subject: RE: Execution by firing squad?
NXS - 2010-04-24 7:02 AM

I don't care if it is or isn't a deterrent, those two did not deserve to live in our society.  Its about punishment, not deterrence.


AGREED.

Also, did the victims have a chance to decide how they wanted to be killed ?

Execution by firing squad is actually much less barbaric than the way many victims are killed.
2010-04-24 7:07 AM
in reply to: #2813382

User image

Expert
1288
1000100100252525
Hatboro, PA
Subject: RE: Execution by firing squad?
I m confused as to why people think lethal injection is so "humane".  There have been instances of it not working right.  In fact, the most humane way to kill someone is by guillotine.  It's quick and painless for the person.  If the person is lined up right (and it's hard to line the person up wrong), there is very low likelihood for mistakes.

I say "Chop off their heads!!!".

I used to be for capital punishment, until I saw what it costs me as a taxpayer.  Because of trials/appeals (prosecutors and possibly government-paid defense lawyers), the cost to kill somebody by CP is much higher than having the person spend the rest of their life in jail.  And when I thought about it more, I think the worse punishment would be living a long, long life in jail without the chance for parole.
2010-04-24 7:16 AM
in reply to: #2813550

User image

Elite
4547
2000200050025
Subject: RE: Execution by firing squad?
NXS - 2010-04-24 7:02 AM Several years ago a friend's parents were brutally murdered in their bedroom.  What they went through was beyond belief.  The two murderers were convicted and put to death.  I don't care if it is or isn't a deterrent, those two did not deserve to live in our society.  Its about punishment, not deterrence.


I don't think anyone advocated allowing murderers to "live in our society."  Ideally, I'd like to see them live long, miserable lives in isolation and harsh conditions.  Never seeing or hearing another human's voice.  No books, tv, pen, paper, etc.  Nothing.  They deserve misery...not to be put out of their misery...in my opinion.



2010-04-24 7:17 AM
in reply to: #2813382

User image

Master
2477
2000100100100100252525
Oceanside, California
Subject: RE: Execution by firing squad?
I agree.
I am anti-death penalty, solely because I am against making lawyers rich on the taxpayer dime.

If CA still had a death penalty, I would probably support the guillotine.

However, I see nothing wrong with the firing squad.

It is more humane than death by stoning, or stoning with nerf balls... that would take forever!
2010-04-24 7:19 AM
in reply to: #2813550


120
100
Subject: RE: Execution by firing squad?
nxs,  i agree with you.
2010-04-24 9:05 AM
in reply to: #2813593

Iron Donkey
38643
50005000500050005000500050002000100050010025
, Wisconsin
Subject: RE: Execution by firing squad?
ChineseDemocracy - 2010-04-24 7:16 AM
NXS - 2010-04-24 7:02 AM Several years ago a friend's parents were brutally murdered in their bedroom.  What they went through was beyond belief.  The two murderers were convicted and put to death.  I don't care if it is or isn't a deterrent, those two did not deserve to live in our society.  Its about punishment, not deterrence.


I don't think anyone advocated allowing murderers to "live in our society."  Ideally, I'd like to see them live long, miserable lives in isolation and harsh conditions.  Never seeing or hearing another human's voice.  No books, tv, pen, paper, etc.  Nothing.  They deserve misery...not to be put out of their misery...in my opinion.



But we still have to feed this person, provide toilet paper, make sure the person doesn't kill themselves, etc.  Still a waste of tax-payers' money, to me anyways.
2010-04-24 12:25 PM
in reply to: #2813593

New user
900
500100100100100
,
Subject: RE: Execution by firing squad?
ChineseDemocracy - 2010-04-24 7:16 AM
NXS - 2010-04-24 7:02 AM Several years ago a friend's parents were brutally murdered in their bedroom.  What they went through was beyond belief.  The two murderers were convicted and put to death.  I don't care if it is or isn't a deterrent, those two did not deserve to live in our society.  Its about punishment, not deterrence.


I don't think anyone advocated allowing murderers to "live in our society."  Ideally, I'd like to see them live long, miserable lives in isolation and harsh conditions.  Never seeing or hearing another human's voice.  No books, tv, pen, paper, etc.  Nothing.  They deserve misery...not to be put out of their misery...in my opinion.



Sorry, I should have typed "did not deserve to live".

2010-04-24 2:05 PM
in reply to: #2813382

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.


2010-04-24 2:10 PM
in reply to: #2813382

Veteran
129
10025
Subject: RE: Execution by firing squad?
I'm against the death penalty on a couple of points:

1) No human being has the right to take the life of another

2) It doesn't achieve anything beyond saving a bit of tax payers money.

2010-04-24 2:10 PM
in reply to: #2814022

Elite
4547
2000200050025
Subject: RE: Execution by firing squad?
AcesFull - 2010-04-24 3:05 PM

I'm not against capital punishment on moral grounds.  I really could care less if we decide to off some murderer.  The problems with capital punishment are many.  Firstly, there is a growing body of evidence that we have put to death many innocent people.  The innocence project has gone back and used DNA evidence to exonerate many "murderers," and until we can be more certain, it seems a very bad idea to put folks to death who might not have done the crime. 

Issue #2: In cases where we are sure (and remember, all those wrongly sentenced were convicted "beyond reasonable doubt"), the death penalty is applied unequally across race lines.  If black folk deserve to die for certain crimes, so do white folk. 

Issue #3: It doesn't work.  The death penalty does nothing to deter people.  In theory it should, but the kind of person who commits a murder with special circumstances is not sitting around thinking, "well, I'd better not do this, I might get the chair, instead of life in prison."  Your typical murderer is not a wise planner, and the death penalty has failed as a deterrant.

Issue #4: Its too damn expensive. Each death penalty carried out costs millions (some estimates range as low as $2 million, and as high as $37 million per sentance carried out).  Life imprisonment costs a fraction of this, and in cases where the person is eventually exonerated, a life sentence is partially reversable.  A death sentence is not.

If for no other reason, number 4 should be the convincer.  It costs 6 to 12 times more to try a death penalty case, and millions to put someone to death.  In troubled economic times, I'd rather not blow my money that way. 



Aces, do you ever get bored with getting everything right?   
Nice post.

btw, after the initial shock of hearing the term "firing squad," everybody here is right.  There really is no difference as the death is brought about quickly.
But, like Aces said, the fiscally sound solution is to lock 'em up and throw away the key.
2010-04-24 2:25 PM
in reply to: #2813382

Expert
1036
100025
Subject: RE: Execution by firing squad?
Will probably get some negative responses but I don't really care.. I found guilty, make it as painful and awful as possible and televise it.  Next guy may think twice before his act.  Compassion is for civilized people, someone who commits brutal murder is not civilized.
2010-04-24 2:33 PM
in reply to: #2814053

Veteran
129
10025
Subject: RE: Execution by firing squad?
elcaminobill - 2010-04-24 7:25 PM Will probably get some negative responses but I don't really care.. I found guilty, make it as painful and awful as possible and televise it.  Next guy may think twice before his act.  Compassion is for civilized people, someone who commits brutal murder is not civilized.


I think that's part of the problem - it doesn't make people think before they act.  I no cases has the death penalty proved to be a deterrent.

Some people are scum, some people have mental health issues - as a society we have to be more imaginative in our methods of dealing with it.  Killing them doesn't work.  It just makes a few of us feel a bit better and gives us a sense of justice.  It don't bring anyone back.
New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Execution by firing squad? Rss Feed  
 
 
of 4