General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Camelbacks and hydration. Why not? Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 2
 
 
2013-04-11 10:41 AM

User image

Veteran
2842
200050010010010025
Austin, Texas
Subject: Camelbacks and hydration. Why not?

My wife and I were talking this morning after our run about hydration.  We both carried our drink (hand held and a bottle tucked into my waistband - also occassionally use a fuel/Nathan belt for long runs) and some combination thereof works for running for us.

Then we started talking about tri-bikes (not sure who brought up the subject - I'm sure it had nothing to do with my obsessing over what bike I might buy, as I'm ALMOST in the market for one) and drag, and wondered why you pretty much never see a back-bladder of drink outside of MTB - or at least we haven't.

Aside from it being as uncool as any other often-used-but-not-part-of-the-triathlon-tribe thing (mid-calf socks on the bike, shirts with sleeves of any length, etc.), is there a reason it seems no one slings a bladder onto their back in T1 and avoids all the windage of bottles hanging out on the bike?

Are they actually not aero?  Seems they would be, and that you wouldn't even need to break aero form to drink, with the straw just sitting right by your mouth.  You could just happily drink and pee your way through the course without a hitch, no?  Do they not allow cooling?

Anyway, thanks for indulging a noob question (so no flaming!).  Wink  Actually, flame away - more fun that way.

Matt



2013-04-11 10:45 AM
in reply to: #4696226

User image

Expert
1263
10001001002525
Wendell, NC
Subject: RE: Camelbacks and hydration. Why not?
Technically there's supposed to be an aero difference between camelpak and water bottle on frame.  I'm not sure it's significant enough to make a difference for those of us who aren't cutting edge world class triathletes.  I think it's mostly "not-part-of-the-triathlon-tribe thing".  But what do I know.
2013-04-11 10:50 AM
in reply to: #4696226

User image

Veteran
159
1002525
Subject: RE: Camelbacks and hydration. Why not?

I see Camelbak's at every race I do and I never get it (non mtn bike races)....unless the race is un-supported and long.  First off, they are hot.  Second, why would you carry around an extra 3 or 4 lbs of fluid?  I did Ironman with 2 bottles.  One fluid, one water and had no issues.  The only time I ever carry 3 bottles is during long training rides.  I just don't get turning yourself and your bike into a rolling convenience store. 

 

2013-04-11 10:53 AM
in reply to: #4696226

User image

Extreme Veteran
3025
2000100025
Maryland
Subject: RE: Camelbacks and hydration. Why not?
They are decidedly un-aero, if you care. The other issue I have run into on long training rides is that some can slide around/ride up your back when in aero, especially if they aren't full. Other than that they are fantatstic. Not trying to break land-speed records on a training ride anyways.
2013-04-11 11:01 AM
in reply to: #4696226

User image

Veteran
335
10010010025
Subject: RE: Camelbacks and hydration. Why not?

I use one on the century rides so I do not have to stop as often. In the summer I freeze it and let it keep me cool then drink it.

In the Tri world for normal peps I think it would be ok...

It would (if developed correctly) streamline the riders back but the gain compared to the time to put it on may be a wash.

You would also have to refill it (neither aerodynamic nor easy) or carry it empty which would not be cool...

2013-04-11 11:06 AM
in reply to: #4696226

User image

Champion
10471
500050001001001001002525
Dallas, TX
Subject: RE: Camelbacks and hydration. Why not?
I ride a road bike and I will take a Camelbak on the Ironman/140.6 distance. At IMKY in 2008 being able to stuff it with ice and having cold water on a long, hot, ride was a life saver.

I tried it on a HIM distance race and it proved to probably be more hassle than it was worth. Trying to fill up a Camelbak at a aid station is a PITA.

With that said, when I have used a Camelbak on my tri bike, it was really annoying once it was half way emptied out. Basically it was slipping around on my back. If I rode a tri bike in a race, I wouldn't use it for that reason.



2013-04-11 11:33 AM
in reply to: #4696226

User image

Pro
5011
5000
Twin Cities
Subject: RE: Camelbacks and hydration. Why not?

Off the top of my head:

Time to put it on/take it off

Uncomfortable

Hot

Not aerodynamic

Heavy

2013-04-11 11:36 AM
in reply to: #4696226

User image

Member
228
10010025
Lenexa, KS
Subject: RE: Camelbacks and hydration. Why not?

Yeah totally not cool man, why would you want to be excluded from the tribe? Tongue out

But seriously I have seen a few people riding around with them during races. As mentioned before I think it depends on your position as far as your age group racing goes and your personal goals. A good in between for a lot of people is having one of those aero bottles that sits in between your aero bars and has the straw the comes up towards your face. Not sure what the exact time savings would be of camelbak vs aero bottle, but it offers a similar convenience of not having to reach down and pull your bottle out of the cage then replace it.

 

Just my two bits, in the end just do what you're comfortable with and keeps you hydrated effectively.

2013-04-11 11:38 AM
in reply to: #4696226

User image

Master
1584
1000500252525
Fulton, MD
Subject: RE: Camelbacks and hydration. Why not?

I've seen them at longer races, but never fully understood the need considering water stops are usually plentiful. 

I use one on training all the time.  I realized there is an aero penalty, but it reduces the # of times you have to stop at a convenience store for resupply.

2013-04-11 11:41 AM
in reply to: #4696371

User image

Veteran
2842
200050010010010025
Austin, Texas
Subject: RE: Camelbacks and hydration. Why not?
funkj25 - 2013-04-11 12:36 PM

Yeah totally not cool man, why would you want to be excluded from the tribe? Tongue out

But seriously I have seen a few people riding around with them during races. As mentioned before I think it depends on your position as far as your age group racing goes and your personal goals. A good in between for a lot of people is having one of those aero bottles that sits in between your aero bars and has the straw the comes up towards your face. Not sure what the exact time savings would be of camelbak vs aero bottle, but it offers a similar convenience of not having to reach down and pull your bottle out of the cage then replace it.

 

Just my two bits, in the end just do what you're comfortable with and keeps you hydrated effectively.

For the record, I don't own a camelback. 

Now off to give my roadie socks and jerseys with sleeves to charity and then a quick manscaping sesh... 

Wink

2013-04-11 11:44 AM
in reply to: #4696226

Master
10208
50005000100100
Northern IL
Subject: RE: Camelbacks and hydration. Why not?

I use one all the time for training. It holds a lot of water well and I can use my aero position just fine with it.

I don't use it for racing for a number of reasons. I don't need that much water at once for a race. Aero helmet doesn't fit right. I don't think it's very aero, especially considering I have a very aggressive position. It's hotter since it doesn't allow air movement on my back. It also uses more energy since I'm carrying it on myself instead of the bike holding up the weight.



2013-04-11 11:52 AM
in reply to: #4696299

User image

Extreme Veteran
3025
2000100025
Maryland
Subject: RE: Camelbacks and hydration. Why not?
1_Mad_Madone - 2013-04-11 11:01 AM

I use one on the century rides so I do not have to stop as often. In the summer I freeze it and let it keep me cool then drink it.

In the Tri world for normal peps I think it would be ok...

It would (if developed correctly) streamline the riders back but the gain compared to the time to put it on may be a wash.

You would also have to refill it (neither aerodynamic nor easy) or carry it empty which would not be cool...

camelbacks as they are now are NOT aero. They are covered in straps and zippers and loops. They stick up off your back and then drop off suddenly which would create a big pocket of turbulence. I supposed theoretically you could design one that is aero, but it would be very impractical.

2013-04-11 12:35 PM
in reply to: #4696226

User image

Regular
309
100100100
Euless, Texas
Subject: RE: Camelbacks and hydration. Why not?
i have only ridden w/ my camelbak on one occasion.  it was like a 30 mile ride.  and the reasons i won't ever do it again are because the belt that is supposed to go around your waist rode up to my stomach and made me sick.  it also made me feel off balance.  it was hot.  there's a difference of the water weighing down on your back vs having it in bottles supported by the bike.  even if they're the same weight overall, with the bottle in the cage, you're not physically supporting it.
2013-04-11 12:48 PM
in reply to: #4696226

User image

New user
155
1002525
Michigan
Subject: RE: Camelbacks and hydration. Why not?

I sweat A LOT so I use one on any 60+ rides as I mostly do these out in the middle of nowhere and I'd rather be carrying too much water than run out.  

I definitely wouldn't want to mess around with it in a race though.  Most races worth doing have adequate nutrition on the course and can keep you hydrated and fueled without the need to hoard a gallon of water on your back. 

2013-04-11 1:55 PM
in reply to: #4696522

New user
58
2525
Subject: RE: Camelbacks and hydration. Why not?

Have you seen this:

http://shop.camelbak.com/mens-racebak/d/1016_c_112_cl_183

Good enough for Garmin-Cervelo Time Trials.

2013-04-11 2:02 PM
in reply to: #4696647


134
10025
Subject: RE: Camelbacks and hydration. Why not?
zivp - 2013-04-11 1:55 PM

Have you seen this:

http://shop.camelbak.com/mens-racebak/d/1016_c_112_cl_183

Good enough for Garmin-Cervelo Time Trials.

That is AWESOME!! Although, I can imagine your body heat would warm up the fluid, no?

I'm one of those who sweat gallons of water during any workout, so I have def thought about Camelbacks. I used to use one when I was into mountain biking. I DO remember that I would sweat even more on my back due to that trapping in more heat.



2013-04-11 2:26 PM
in reply to: #4696647

User image

Subject: RE: Camelbacks and hydration. Why not?
zivp - 2013-04-11 8:55 AM

Have you seen this:

http://shop.camelbak.com/mens-racebak/d/1016_c_112_cl_183

Good enough for Garmin-Cervelo Time Trials.

I know people that use them for TTs.  Good luck getting that thing on in T1 though.  And then getting it off in T2.

ETA: Just noticed it's full zip (I think), so it might not be that bad.  Still an extra step I wouldn't bother with...especially for $100.



Edited by tri808 2013-04-11 2:28 PM
2013-04-11 2:31 PM
in reply to: #4696226

User image

Veteran
348
10010010025
Houston, TX
Subject: RE: Camelbacks and hydration. Why not?

For one, they are against the rules!

Rule #32: Humps are for camels; no hydration packs

Hydration packs are never to be seen on a road racer's body. No argument will be entered into this. For MTB, they are cool.

2013-04-11 2:46 PM
in reply to: #4696717

User image

Extreme Veteran
1018
1000
Subject: RE: Camelbacks and hydration. Why not?
chris00nj - 2013-04-11 2:31 PM

For one, they are against the rules!

Rule #32: Humps are for camels; no hydration packs

Hydration packs are never to be seen on a road racer's body. No argument will be entered into this. For MTB, they are cool.

 

Those are cyclist rules.  Are you a cyclist or triathlete?

2013-04-11 2:48 PM
in reply to: #4696226

User image

Extreme Veteran
1136
100010025
Subject: RE: Camelbacks and hydration. Why not?

I use one during the summer for all training rides > around 50 miles.  It's the only way I can carry enough fluids without having to stop.

x2 to what the others said about not needing it in a race.  I used one in my first HIM because I didn't understand the bottle hand-up process and didn't want to be caught unprepared.  It's really not necessary to have that much water with you when you can get a new bottle every 15-20 miles.

2013-04-11 3:06 PM
in reply to: #4696748

User image

Veteran
348
10010010025
Houston, TX
Subject: RE: Camelbacks and hydration. Why not?
GAUG3 - 2013-04-11 2:46 PM
chris00nj - 2013-04-11 2:31 PM

For one, they are against the rules!

Rule #32: Humps are for camels; no hydration packs

Hydration packs are never to be seen on a road racer's body. No argument will be entered into this. For MTB, they are cool.

 

Those are cyclist rules.  Are you a cyclist or triathlete?

They are just funny and well written. I am in current violation of several.

 



2013-04-11 3:14 PM
in reply to: #4696226

User image

Veteran
512
500
Tempe, Arizona
Subject: RE: Camelbacks and hydration. Why not?

Seems that I break the "rules", as I use a Camelbak for my road rides and for the bike portion of tris here in AZ.  Okay, I don't have a tri bike or have aero-bars on my road bike, but I am mostly in the drops position and I have no problems.  It may make me slower due to drag, but I'm MOP anyway.  But I do have easy access to the water tube at all times and it's important to me to stay hydrated, especially on days when it's 100-120°F.  Hydration is STUPIDLY important here in the summer in AZ and it's pretty common to see people on road bikes with Camelbaks.  I half fill one, freeze it, fill up the rest with cold water, invert it to get the bubbles out (water sloshing around annoys me and makes me constantly want to pee!), and I'm ready to go.  I also carry two large water bottles on my frame as back up and to dowse my head and legs with water to get that wonderful evaporative cooling-effect-thing going.  I also use my Camelbak for running training as I hate carrying around water bottles.  I've got the Octane XCT model, which is body molded and has a high stomach strap to stop it moving around.  Good meshing on this model, so I don't notice it making me hotter than usual - well it's all relative when it's 100-120°F outside, so what do I know

2013-04-11 4:48 PM
in reply to: #4696489

New user
327
10010010025
Subject: RE: Camelbacks and hydration. Why not?
jjupiter100 - 2013-04-11 10:35 AM

i have only ridden w/ my camelbak on one occasion.  it was like a 30 mile ride.  and the reasons i won't ever do it again are because the belt that is supposed to go around your waist rode up to my stomach and made me sick.  it also made me feel off balance.  it was hot.  there's a difference of the water weighing down on your back vs having it in bottles supported by the bike.  even if they're the same weight overall, with the bottle in the cage, you're not physically supporting it.


It sounds like you were using something like the Blowfish

http://shop.camelbak.com/blowfish/d/1028_c_112_cl_267

And I would agree that that would be painful to ride with. The classic is much more bike friendly.

http://shop.camelbak.com/classic/d/1043_c_112_cl_375

I live in the desert and I use my Camelbak on almost every training ride, often in addition to 1 or 2 bottles. I do think it makes me a little hotter, but significantly less of an increase than my helmet. Plus I can freeze it and have ice cold water for the most of my ride.
2013-04-11 5:04 PM
in reply to: #4696647

User image

Expert
1263
10001001002525
Wendell, NC
Subject: RE: Camelbacks and hydration. Why not?
zivp - 2013-04-11 2:55 PM

Have you seen this:

http://shop.camelbak.com/mens-racebak/d/1016_c_112_cl_183

Good enough for Garmin-Cervelo Time Trials.

Yeah, but can you do flip-turns in it?

2013-04-11 5:28 PM
in reply to: #4696983

User image

Extreme Veteran
643
50010025
, Guam
Subject: RE: Camelbacks and hydration. Why not?

The problem I have with bladder type products (like Camelbak) here in Miami is that the inside of the bladder / tubing / bite thingy all require lots of cleaning after every use.  It is hard enough to get a good scrubbing inside my Profile Design Aero Lite.

New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Camelbacks and hydration. Why not? Rss Feed  
 
 
of 2