Originally posted by Hot Runner
Yep--I have kid-sized wrists--even the "women's" watches are on the big size with some brands.
I upgraded to the 920 from the 310. awhile back.
It took me 13.5 hours to finish mine. I had more than enough battery life. I left the hotel with it fully charged and powered down. Didn't turn it on until I was a few minutes from getting in the water...and still plenty of time to get a GPS signal. Sometimes at my house
(trees/hills/house
) it takes up to a minute or two. Most places, like 5 seconds. And I didn't have it autoscrolling through a bunch of screens or anything. I'm happy with the standard display.
I had turned off Bluetooth, wifi, and everything else I didn't need. Made sure the Russian GPS signaling was turned off
(forget what's it's called
). The backlight timer was still set to the default of like 5 seconds. I left the audible alerts on, but not the vibration. There's websites that will go through power saving recommendations. Wore a heart monitor on the ride. I don't use a lot of the bells and whistles, beyond a beep or two.
I'm guessing I still had about 4-6 hours of juice left in it. Mine wasn't a refurb. Bought it when the LBS was able to have a 40% off sale to match online prices. Man, Garmin screws their brick and mortars.
Size-wise.....yeah...it's biggish. But NOTHING like the 310. And I had the quick release on the 310. I did not want to add it to the 920. The 920 is wearable as a "watch" for me. "Slightly" larger than the average watch. Smaller/less bulky than a blingy Rolex type. The 310 is not small. It's a boat anchor. Is it a bit of a pain to twist my arm a tad to look at it on the bike? No...not really. But, to be fair, I sometimes
(and did so on the day
) drop my 310 into the mount on my aerobar bottle cage on the bike so I could stare at it if I wanted. I mean, I had it...and I had the mount. Why not?
Edited by jhaack39 2018-05-23 11:13 AM