Nice Cleavage vs. Big Honks

Forum guidelines BT super discount
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Nice Cleavage vs. Big Honks Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 2
 
 
2012-09-26 7:30 PM

User image

Veteran
928
50010010010010025
Columbus, Ohio
Subject: Nice Cleavage vs. Big Honks
After watching the Emmy's on Sunday (I think that was the awards show my wife had on the "main" TV) and now after seeing Britney Spears on the X Factor, here is my question. Gentlemen, what is more attractive to you? I am 100% with nice cleavage. Some of the outfits the other night and Britney tonight just are not attractive. Is it just me? Thoughts?

2012-09-26 7:45 PM
in reply to: #4429371

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: Nice Cleavage vs. Big Honks
Cleavage is good, but they have to be natural.  If they're silicon it's more like a train wreck for me.
2012-09-26 7:48 PM
in reply to: #4429381

User image

Master
2380
2000100100100252525
Beijing
Subject: RE: Nice Cleavage vs. Big Honks

tuwood - 2012-09-25 8:45 PM Cleavage is good, but they have to be natural.  If they're silicon it's more like a train wreck for me.

 

Agreed.  Silicon would make terrible hooters.   Silicone, on the other hand.... feels natural.

2012-09-26 7:48 PM
in reply to: #4429371

Iron Donkey
38643
50005000500050005000500050002000100050010025
, Wisconsin
Subject: RE: Nice Cleavage vs. Big Honks
It almost seems that "The Voice" should be called "The Cleavage" now, since Christina Aguilera's top of her shirt appears to be opening wider and lower more and more.
2012-09-26 7:59 PM
in reply to: #4429381

User image

Veteran
928
50010010010010025
Columbus, Ohio
Subject: RE: Nice Cleavage vs. Big Honks
tuwood - 2012-09-26 8:45 PM

Cleavage is good, but they have to be natural.  If they're silicon it's more like a train wreck for me.


x2
2012-09-26 8:01 PM
in reply to: #4429388

User image

Pro
4838
2000200050010010010025
Subject: RE: Nice Cleavage vs. Big Honks

1stTimeTri - 2012-09-26 7:48 PM It almost seems that "The Voice" should be called "The Cleavage" now, since Christina Aguilera's top of her shirt appears to be opening wider and lower more and more.

I have to start wacthing that show. Sounds perfect.

2012-09-26 8:03 PM
in reply to: #4429408

Iron Donkey
38643
50005000500050005000500050002000100050010025
, Wisconsin
Subject: RE: Nice Cleavage vs. Big Honks
Iowaman - 2012-09-26 8:01 PM

1stTimeTri - 2012-09-26 7:48 PM It almost seems that "The Voice" should be called "The Cleavage" now, since Christina Aguilera's top of her shirt appears to be opening wider and lower more and more.

I have to start wacthing that show. Sounds perfect.

You're a drrty, drrty man.

2012-09-26 8:42 PM
in reply to: #4429371

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: Nice Cleavage vs. Big Honks

Let's get one thing straight... In my opinion, of the many pairs I've seen... I would guess probably .5% could actually be considered "bad". I mean come on, even not so great bewbs are still pretty great anyway.We're talking boobs here.

But as far as what I prefer... always enjoyed smaller over larger, and certainly real over fake... and not all fake are bad.... but big beach ball porn star look...uhhh fail.

2012-09-26 9:02 PM
in reply to: #4429386

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: Nice Cleavage vs. Big Honks
moondawg14 - 2012-09-26 7:48 PM

tuwood - 2012-09-25 8:45 PM Cleavage is good, but they have to be natural.  If they're silicon it's more like a train wreck for me.

Agreed.  Silicon would make terrible hooters.   Silicone, on the other hand.... feels natural.

lol, i was wondering why they were so sticky

2012-09-26 9:34 PM
in reply to: #4429371

User image

Master
1439
100010010010010025
Calgary, AB
Silver member
Subject: RE: Nice Cleavage vs. Big Honks

Christina on Ellen - jump to :55 or so (sorry no HD)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VDZ0cKRlFA

2012-09-26 9:37 PM
in reply to: #4429505

User image

Pro
4838
2000200050010010010025
Subject: RE: Nice Cleavage vs. Big Honks
Khyron - 2012-09-26 9:34 PM

Christina on Ellen - jump to :55 or so (sorry no HD)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VDZ0cKRlFA

Thank you. Giggity. Holy cow.

2012-09-27 6:46 AM
in reply to: #4429505

User image

Champion
7347
5000200010010010025
SRQ, FL
Subject: RE: Nice Cleavage vs. Big Honks
Khyron - 2012-09-26 10:34 PM

Christina on Ellen - jump to :55 or so (sorry no HD)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VDZ0cKRlFA

"one question, are you nursing.."  ha!

2012-09-27 6:56 AM
in reply to: #4429371

User image

Pro
5755
50005001001002525
Subject: RE: Nice Cleavage vs. Big Honks
I prefer mine perky and proportional
2012-09-27 8:27 AM
in reply to: #4429371

Master
1946
100050010010010010025
Memphis, TN
Subject: RE: Nice Cleavage vs. Big Honks
I'm good either way real or fake. 
2012-09-27 8:36 AM
in reply to: #4429371

User image

Expert
2122
2000100
Next to a big lake
Subject: RE: Nice Cleavage vs. Big Honks
Ill vote for nice cleavage, real or fake (if not looking like a softball shoved under the skin) but there is a difference in presentation.  A confident woman with a lower or open cut top/dress is way sexier than a woman walking around showing nearly everything. 
2012-09-27 8:56 AM
in reply to: #4429456

User image

Champion
16151
50005000500010001002525
Checkin' out the podium girls
Subject: RE: Nice Cleavage vs. Big Honks
powerman - 2012-09-26 9:42 PM

Let's get one thing straight... In my opinion, of the many pairs I've seen... I would guess probably .5% could actually be considered "bad". I mean come on, even not so great bewbs are still pretty great anyway.We're talking boobs here.

But as far as what I prefer... always enjoyed smaller over larger, and certainly real over fake... and not all fake are bad.... but big beach ball porn star look...uhhh fail.



/thread. Giggity...

2012-09-27 9:04 AM
in reply to: #4429371

User image

Champion
10668
500050005001002525
Tacoma, Washington
Subject: RE: Nice Cleavage vs. Big Honks
2012-09-27 9:19 AM
in reply to: #4429371

User image

Pro
5761
50005001001002525
Bartlett, TN
Subject: RE: Nice Cleavage vs. Big Honks

with today's bra technology, you can never tell if everything is real or if there is some kind of flase advertising going on. 

 

So I prefer nice, real, proportionate vs BIG.

2012-09-27 9:23 AM
in reply to: #4429371

User image

Expert
1830
100050010010010025
Subject: RE: Nice Cleavage vs. Big Honks
I just prefer.  Big, small, covered, uncovered, real or fake.  
2012-09-27 9:27 AM
in reply to: #4429371

User image

Champion
11989
500050001000500100100100100252525
Philly 'burbs
Subject: RE: Nice Cleavage vs. Big Honks
Real. Every time. Period.
2012-09-27 10:33 AM
in reply to: #4429371

User image

Expert
1186
1000100252525
North Cackalacky
Subject: RE: Nice Cleavage vs. Big Honks
If you can touch them, they're real. Just sayin'.

2012-09-27 11:08 AM
in reply to: #4430098

Iron Donkey
38643
50005000500050005000500050002000100050010025
, Wisconsin
Subject: RE: Nice Cleavage vs. Big Honks

ScudRunner - 2012-09-27 10:33 AM If you can touch them, they're real. Just sayin'.

So sayeth the guy whilst holding a nudie magazine.

2012-09-27 11:11 AM
in reply to: #4430199

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2012-09-28 12:53 AM
in reply to: #4429371

Extreme Veteran
668
5001002525
Melbourne
Subject: RE: Nice Cleavage vs. Big Honks

Does anyone else get confused by what is good cleavage and what is big hoinks?

So we are on the same page, I propose that everyone should post a picture of what they feel (no, not literally) falls into each category so we know what they are comparing...

2012-09-28 8:38 AM
in reply to: #4429787

Elite
3221
20001000100100
the desert
Subject: RE: Nice Cleavage vs. Big Honks
Jtiger - 2012-09-27 6:27 AMI'm good either way real or fake. 
My policy has always been this - if you can touch them, they are real
New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Nice Cleavage vs. Big Honks Rss Feed  
 
 
of 2