Teacher Pay (Page 2)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() tyrant - 2005-12-16 2:42 PM huengsolo - 2005-12-16 11:47 AM teachers hold the most sway and have the greatest impact on who your child is going to become, what opportunities they will have and their relative ability to succeed Nope thats genetics. most important thing that determines what kids will grow up to be.Gotta second what Jim said ... and respectfully disagree with the comment above. If genetics were truly the determining factor, then all if not most intelligent people would have intelligent children and vice versa. Goodness knows I have seen plenty of disparity in relative intelligence between children and their parents over the years. As such, I have a difficult time buying into the "pre-destination", "genetic pre-disposition" stuff. For the most part, the overwhelming majority of people have the capacity to do/get what they want out of life. Therefore, life is what you make out of it and education is the raw materials from which you make it from. ... and that is why teachers - coupled with parental involvement in their education - have such an impact on who their children are going to be when grown. If we were to pay teachers with this thought in mind, then I suspect that we would have the political will to pay teachers for what they are worth. (Btw, fwiw, I specifically moved to north Fulton County - a high property tax district - when I relocated to Atlanta b/c of the school system ... so I am annually putting my money where my |
|
![]() ![]() |
Giver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Good strategy, cause, ya know, I *am* always right. <I had good teachers.>
huengsolo - 2005-12-16 3:14 PM Gotta second what Jim said ... |
![]() ![]() |
Got Wahoo? ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Teachers are not the sacrificing martyrs they are constantly made out to be. Is it a tough job? Sure, but so is trash pick-up. I'm not saying that some teachers should not be paid more. What I can say is I work in a job where I have to produce, by black and white measurement. I produce more than my colleagues and I get paid more than they do. Whenever I hear of measurements like this being implemented for teachers, the howls of protest I hear from teachers unions is even louder than the more money mantra. Yes, your teaching our children - the question is, how well are you teaching them? Are you adding value, or simply reading regurgitated lesson plans geared to the lowest common denominator? From where I sit, I can see the amount of resentment teachers have for simple minimum standards for matriculation, and I wonder if most teachers are ready for a truly accountable system that pays based on merit instead of tenure/level of education, neither of which has any real bearing on quality.
I'm aware that what I'm saying probably sounds ignorant to teachers or folks more informed than I, but this is the general perception I have. I also know that there doesn't seem to be any real qualifications needed for the job of teacher other than a degree, which I suppose has some correlation as a degreed person has shown that they can at least learn the lesson plans, but ultimately seems to me to be a "net" for a lot of people who don't know what else to do or don't have any other marketable skills. Edited by tmwelshy 2005-12-16 2:23 PM |
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() tmwelshy - 2005-12-16 2:19 PM I also know that there doesn't seem to be any real qualifications needed for the job of teacher other than a degree, which I suppose has some correlation as a degreed person has shown that they can at least learn the lesson plans, but ultimately seems to me to be a "net" for a lot of people who don't know what else to do or don't have any other marketable skills. True and untrue depending on where you are. There are significant and substantial requirements in addition to a degree required for teaching in Minnesota. There are even different certifications based on grade level generally grouped as elementary, junior high, and secondary. Perhaps that's a major reason for the extremely high quality of public education in Minnesota. I think we could probably prove both correlation and causation there. Tom PS - My degree: secondary music education. My profession: insurance underwriting. I decided that I didn't love it enough to make it my career and I know for certain that I work less, deal with far fewer hassles, and get paid twice as much as most of my teacher friends. The only real difference is that I could be fired at any moment but the bar is set so low in corporate America that I doubt my risk is much higher than a tenured teacher "protected" by a union. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Matchman - 2005-12-16 3:41 PM True and untrue depending on where you are. There are significant and substantial requirements in addition to a degree required for teaching in Minnesota. There are even different certifications based on grade level generally grouped as elementary, junior high, and secondary. Perhaps that's a major reason for the extremely high quality of public education in Minnesota. I think we could probably prove both correlation and causation there. Tom PS - My degree: secondary music education. My profession: insurance underwriting. I decided that I didn't love it enough to make it my career and I know for certain that I work less, deal with far fewer hassles, and get paid twice as much as most of my teacher friends. The only real difference is that I could be fired at any moment but the bar is set so low in corporate America that I doubt my risk is much higher than a tenured teacher "protected" by a union. Tom I think that is pretty accurate. There are great variances from state to state. Where I live now in the metro-DC area, there are some districts that offer signing bonuses. In Pennsylvania, where I am from, you are hard pressed to find a job there in most districts. High standards and quality education. Edited by 3558 2005-12-16 2:46 PM |
![]() ![]() |
Elite![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() If I recall, their pay is quite good. LAUSD starts around 42k per year and can go as high as 66k with just a bachelors degree. I could be wrong on this, but I think that they are also not charged for state income tax - which is worth a few k more. I think the greatest benefit teachers get is their benefits package- which very few of could match in the corporate world. So while the initial 42k may be hard to swallow (which seems quite fair to me) , it's the benefits package (pension/health ins./life ins.) that is truly the brass ring. http://www.teachinla.com/whyteach/salary.html I think their pay is on par with police and fire fighters? If that's the case, I don't see a problem. Open can - insert worms. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I think it would be naive to think that while there is genetic pre-disposition to certain diseases, that there couldn't possibly be one for a pre-disposition for an innate ability to suceed. I also have to disagree that the majority of people in this world have the capacity to attain what they want in life. People can try as hard as they want but due to certain limitations, they cannot achieve their goals. huengsolo - 2005-12-16 12:14 PM tyrant - 2005-12-16 2:42 PM huengsolo - 2005-12-16 11:47 AM teachers hold the most sway and have the greatest impact on who your child is going to become, what opportunities they will have and their relative ability to succeed Nope thats genetics. most important thing that determines what kids will grow up to be.Gotta second what Jim said ... and respectfully disagree with the comment above. If genetics were truly the determining factor, then all if not most intelligent people would have intelligent children and vice versa. Goodness knows I have seen plenty of disparity in relative intelligence between children and their parents over the years. As such, I have a difficult time buying into the "pre-destination", "genetic pre-disposition" stuff. For the most part, the overwhelming majority of people have the capacity to do/get what they want out of life. Therefore, life is what you make out of it and education is the raw materials from which you make it from. ... and that is why teachers - coupled with parental involvement in their education - have such an impact on who their children are going to be when grown. If we were to pay teachers with this thought in mind, then I suspect that we would have the political will to pay teachers for what they are worth. (Btw, fwiw, I specifically moved to north Fulton County - a high property tax district - when I relocated to Atlanta b/c of the school system ... so I am annually putting my money where my Edited by auto208562 2005-12-16 2:51 PM |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() My wife is a teacher and I guarantee she works harder than I do and makes about half as much (actually about less than half as much). She is at school every day at 7 am and doesn't get home until after 5 most days. Factor in the planning and other things that go along with teaching elementary art and she is always doing something school related. Educators as a whole in my opinion are underpaid and under appreciated given the impact they make in our children's lives. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Everyone on this thread who disagrees with me is wrong. And that's all I have to say about that. In fact, everyone who disagrees with me anywhere on BT except my boyfriend Mike Ricci, is wrong. (but I am not a stalker, just right. I mean left.) |
![]() ![]() |
Elite![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() possum - 2005-12-16 1:48 PM Everyone on this thread who disagrees with me is wrong. And that's all I have to say about that. In fact, everyone who disagrees with me anywhere on BT except my boyfriend Mike Ricci, is wrong. (but I am not a stalker, just right. I mean left.) baaaaaaahaahahahahah! you forgot to slip in there "GFY" |
![]() ![]() |
Giver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I'm gonna create a macro that inserts that quote, and I'm going to use it everytime I offer an opinion on any thread. Awesome. But I thought I was your boyfriend... <sniff> Guess I'm gonna have to find another lesbian to stalk. possum - 2005-12-16 5:48 PM Everyone on this thread who disagrees with me is wrong. And that's all I have to say about that. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() don't say stalk. I think we all need to stop playing with that, I am thinking of Peter and the Wolf... but yes, you are my boyfriend, but you have a child, and well, I ain't into no homewreckin'. Plus, you're my brother. And that's just gross. Edited by possum 2005-12-16 5:05 PM |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() huengsolo - 2005-12-16 2:14 PM tyrant - 2005-12-16 2:42 PM huengsolo - 2005-12-16 11:47 AM teachers hold the most sway and have the greatest impact on who your child is going to become, what opportunities they will have and their relative ability to succeed Nope thats genetics. most important thing that determines what kids will grow up to be.Gotta second what Jim said ... and respectfully disagree with the comment above. If genetics were truly the determining factor, then all if not most intelligent people would have intelligent children and vice versa. Goodness knows I have seen plenty of disparity in relative intelligence between children and their parents over the years. I hate to be an *** here but it is proven that intelligence is genetic. Genetics are the most influental factor in any kids life. there are some infulence from teachers and stuff. It is clearly cover in the book called "freakonomics." Great read. people think that is they play motzart to their baby it will be smarter, if you have books for them at a young age. Statisticlly it makes no diffrence. Sad to swallow, but true. |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() ChuckyFinster - 2005-12-16 2:49 PM I think their pay is on par with police and fire fighters? If that's the case, I don't see a problem. Open can - insert worms. nope cops and firefighters top out at like 100kish. NO teacher in califonia makes that much. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() Tyrant, can you explain to me why, if intelligence is THE MOST IMPORTANT factor in shaping a child's future, why all people over a certain intelligence don't speak all languages? Stop. Before you answer, think again. The answer is in Jim's comment earlier. He's smarter than I look. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I thought I was done here, but the idea that intelligence=success is so funny! How are you defining intelligence? How are you defining success? serial killers usually have well above average "intellignce." there is so much research in the educational psychology field that refutes any such notion, beginning with the most fundamental, universally accepted FACT that most tests that try to assess this thing called "intelligence" have been built around the experiences and expectations of white males, aged 16-20.... I would hire a hardworking, honest, generous team player before an "intelligent" selfish socially clueless person.... Ok, I really need to stop. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() hangloose - 2005-12-16 5:35 PM Tyrant, can you explain to me why, if intelligence is THE MOST IMPORTANT factor in shaping a child's future, why all people over a certain intelligence don't speak all languages? Stop. Before you answer, think again. The answer is in Jim's comment earlier. He's smarter than I look. The language must be learned. the genetic determine if that is possible. you can give me the best teacher in languanges and i will be able to find a student who CANNOT learn the material. BC of genetic predisposition. our genetics predetermine more than just intelligence, mental disposition and almost any form of "equating the riches of life." |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() possum - 2005-12-16 5:45 PM I would hire a hardworking, honest, generous team player before an "intelligent" selfish socially clueless person.... Ok, I really need to stop. would you hire a person without a degree when the job requires one? would u hire a person with a degree over one that doesnt have one? would you hire someone if they suck at interviews? the process by which people hire is just as skewed as "inteligence" tests. Since 90% of interviewers decide to hire a person, and spend the interview finding their justification |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() Exactly. Intelligence only determines the ability to learn (thank you Jim), not the knowledge a child has. Knowledge must be provided by a teacher (generic use of the term, could be parent, relative, whatever). No one can speak a language they have not been taught. My point, and I realize it's a limited one in the scope of this conversation, is that you seem to be dismissing the importance of teachers compared to intelligence in the education of a child. If that is your point I would say that intelligence in a child is not of much use if the child has not the proper teachers to allow him/her to take advantage of that intelligence. Having said that I think that anyone who doesn't realize the value of a truly good teacher in a child's education has never seen the difference in their own child from their time spent with that kind of a teacher. My son has a fantastic kindergarten teacher and I'd vote for a tax increase just to increase her pay. She's unbelievable. I have no idea how you set up a system to address this issue, I just hope the good ones are rewarded somewhere because they deserve it. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() tyrant - 2005-12-16 6:00 PM possum - 2005-12-16 5:45 PM I would hire a hardworking, honest, generous team player before an "intelligent" selfish socially clueless person.... Ok, I really need to stop. would you hire a person without a degree when the job requires one? would u hire a person with a degree over one that doesnt have one? would you hire someone if they suck at interviews? the process by which people hire is just as skewed as "inteligence" tests. Since 90% of interviewers decide to hire a person, and spend the interview finding their justification I would a hire the person best suited for the job and I cannot think of a single job where some psuedo-scientific assessment of intelligence is the deciding factor. It is what you do with your genetics that will determine your "success" Additionally, I personally do not consider the job someone has to be a real measure of his/her "success" which, I think, was your original point. |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() hangloose - 2005-12-16 6:05 PM Exactly. Intelligence only determines the ability to learn (thank you Jim), not the knowledge a child has. Knowledge must be provided by a teacher (generic use of the term, could be parent, relative, whatever). let me refresh you to the start: huengsolo - 2005-12-16 11:47 AM teachers hold the most sway and have the greatest impact on who your child is going to become, what opportunities they will have and their relative ability to succeed tyrant- Nope thats genetics. most important thing that determines what kids will grow up to be. so teachers not the most important. genetic ARE, and teachers are second. they compliment the genetics. tyrant not wrong. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() possum - 2005-12-16 6:07 PM I would a hire the person best suited for the job and I cannot think of a single job where some psuedo-scientific assessment of intelligence is the deciding factor. It is what you do with your genetics that will determine your "success" Additionally, I personally do not consider the job someone has to be a real measure of his/her "success" which, I think, was your original point. my point was that genetics predtermine ANY thing that you look for in an employee (using this since U brought it up!). as i have stated, i NEVER said that everything other than genetics was unimportant. genetics predtermine the majority of our lives. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Ones genes define ones potentialities and the probabilities of those potentialities being fulfilled. They are not predestination or predetermination. There are probably hundreds if not thousands of people alive right now who were born with a genetic make up that gave them the potential to finish Kona ahead of Faris Al-Sultan this year. Conditions, events and contingencies after their genetic make-up was defined kept them from doing so. Good teachers are severely underpaid. The service they perform is enormously valuable, their work is a pillar of a stable, civilized society. Good teachers should get summers off and sabbaticals. Bad teachers deserve no job protection whatsoever. Their charge is too important, the damage they do too great*, the opportunities they squander too precious. Unfortunately, I'm not aware of any taxpayer funded service positions that have been successfully managed and compensated in the same manner as most private sector jobs. Teachers, and other municipal employees are evaluated and paid by cities and towns which is very different than being evaluated and paid by a corporation. There will always be a significant percentage of any community who see teachers as nothing other than a tax burden. In a corporation, the employees (mostly) contribute to the bottom line. In a school, everything and everybody is a cost center. The business model for evaluation and compensation falls apart. *Such as children growing up to believe things like "red bikes are fast". |
![]() ![]() |
Resident Curmudgeon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() marmadaddy - 2005-12-17 1:03 AM Bad teachers deserve no job protection whatsoever. Their charge is too important, the damage they do too great*, the opportunities they squander too precious. *Such as children growing up to believe things like "red bikes are fast". *Or that real men ride Edited by the bear 2005-12-17 7:08 AM |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I think we could settle the school uniform debate with this thread too. If everyone had a RED bike, we'd all get along (and be a lot faster!) the bear - 2005-12-17 8:08 AM marmadaddy - 2005-12-17 1:03 AM Bad teachers deserve no job protection whatsoever. Their charge is too important, the damage they do too great*, the opportunities they squander too precious. *Such as children growing up to believe things like "red bikes are fast". *Or that real men ride |
|