Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. (Page 30)
-
No new posts
Moderators: alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2014-01-19 8:31 AM in reply to: WaterRat |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by WaterRat Here is my TSS. Seems to match up to what Marc was saying. 221 fro the week with the breakdown being... Threshold 1: 67 Threshold 2: 59 Sweet Spot: 95 Have a great day, Ron I did Threshold 1 : 68 VO2 1 : 48 Sweet Spot : 93 |
|
2014-01-19 8:42 AM in reply to: marcag |
Veteran 441 Maine | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Here are my week 2 #s. THR1 - 74 VO21 - 55 SWE1 - 104 Hoping to get WK3-THR1 in this afternoon but I've got the 'Frozen Four miler' at noon today. It will all depend on whether i push that or not, considering it's snowing right now I may just treat this race as a fun run. |
2014-01-19 9:30 AM in reply to: 0 |
243 Lincoln, Nebraska | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by marcag Now that we have done a week of training, let’s talk TSS. TSS stands for training stress score. Look at your 3 workouts from last week The sum of the TSS you did is you weekly TSS. This week that will grow. Shane is very carefully growing our TSS score week over week. What was the TSS for the various workouts you did ? Post it here. Let’s see if there is anything that stands out. For example if someone did a TSS of 90 in threshold 1, that’s a sign….of doping….I mean your CP is too low. Sweat spot had a TSS of 95. Here are my three TSS numbers: Sweet Spot: 114 VO2-1: 59 THR-1: 77 ___________ Grand Total TSS: 250 I enjoyed Sweet Spot yesterday and thought the time went by rather quickly. Edited by crissy_jo 2014-01-19 1:37 PM |
2014-01-19 10:54 AM in reply to: gsmacleod |
190 | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by gsmacleod Wait,I thought you were a social scientist? More like anti-social. |
2014-01-19 10:58 AM in reply to: 0 |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by dtoce I would love to hear some conversation about selection of cadence. I know we should all 'find out optimal cadence'. Is it worthwhile to redo 5 or 20 minute tests with cadence 5 above and 5 below so see if you can help identify if one is more a 'masher' or a 'spinner'? Should we be trying to force cadence a bit to help with efficiency to try to spin at 90? Cadence on the bike isn't the same as running and with no landing shock, there is much less injury risk by a slower cadence, so I'm wondering if this is a case where less could actually be better or does it just depend on your own muscle makeup...Hmmmm. Very much a personal opinion here. The whole cadence thing, unless you are in cooky ranges is overblown. There is literature about how fast/slow twitch make a difference, how one depletes glycogen faster.....but my personal opinion is you should ride in what is comfortable and be ready to ride in all ranges. What I know from experience is that I tend to gravitate much higher on higher efforts. I was at 100 during testing. I use a computrainer which keeps me at a fixed wattage, so the cadence is very much a natural selection. Without a computrainer I would have to speed up/slow down cadence to hit a wattage if the wattage happened to be between two gears. But when I slow down my cadence it appears harder for me. However, I think it's important to be able to ride at different cadences because terrain and gearing will force us there. As Tom found out, riding at 110-120rpm is sometimes necessary. So is climbing at 60-70 Also, on perfect flats, perfect gearing, I need to change cadence just to switch things up. Pedaling at a constant wattage/condtant cadence for 2.5hrs on a HIM is grueling. I go up and down. I naturally tend to be very close to 90 on the run. 88 on slower runs, 92-93 if I step it up a bit. Edited by marcag 2014-01-19 10:59 AM |
2014-01-19 11:11 AM in reply to: marcag |
Regular 135 Spokane | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Here are my TSS scores: Threshold-1: 73 VO2-1: 59 Sweet Spot-1: 100 TSS for the week 232 |
|
2014-01-19 11:35 AM in reply to: marcag |
Regular 135 Spokane | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by marcag Now that we have done a week of training, let’s talk TSS. TSS stands for training stress score. Although I also call it suffer score ? Using the intensity and duration of a workout a score is given. This score can give “an idea” of how hard a workout is and can also be accumulated over days/weeks/months to guage overall training load. Quick explanation of how it is calculated using your FTP. 1hour at 100% of FTP yields 100 TSS points. When riding lower or higher than 100% you take the square of the intensity relative to FTP. So if you are riding at 80% of FTP that’s’ .8 squared = .64 x 100 = 64TSS points per hour. 70% would give .7 squared x 100 = 49TSS points per hour So you can see that riding at 70% yields about half of the points of riding at 100%. Go above 100% and you accumulate lots of TSS points. 120% squared = 1.44 so you would get 144 TSS points per hour. You can’t ride at 120% for an hour, but doing say 120% efforts for 30 seconds gets you points at a rate of 100pts/60min or .833 pts/30sec Week 2 Threshold 1 theoretically gave 69TSS point Week 3 Threshold 1 should give 74 TSS points. You can see why, look at the intensity and duration increases of some of the intervals Look at your 3 workouts from last week The sum of the TSS you did is you weekly TSS. This week that will grow. Shane is very carefully growing our TSS score week over week. What was the TSS for the various workouts you did ? Post it here. Let’s see if there is anything that stands out. For example if someone did a TSS of 90 in threshold 1, that’s a sign….of doping….I mean your CP is too low. Sweat spot had a TSS of 95. This one is higher mostly because it’s a 90min workout vs 60. We’ll come back to “not all TSS is equal”. This is true, but I think it’s good for people to get a feel for what TSS is. TSS will be the basis for the performance charts we will eventually look at. TSS can be used to establish a budget for long distance racing. For example imagine a IM at 70% of FTP for 5h30hours. That .7^ * 100pts/hr * 5.5hr = 270TSS points. There was a table that showed that a good age grouper with good preparation had a "budget" of 270TSS points, to be spent based on the duration and intensity (% of FTP). We will discuss the other terms IF, NP, VI...bla bla bla....but for now, it's to get a feel for what TSS is and how different intensities rack up TSS points. Get a feel for what a 70TSS point workout feels like. See the difference between Week 2 threshold 1 and week 3 threshold 1. Very interesting chart. It really shows how small the margin is you have to work with. Is there a similar chart for HIM's by chance? Sorry if this has been asked before, but when I start my half training in April, what weekly TSS score should I be targeting? I realize that at this point we are basically at the build stage. Jim |
2014-01-19 12:06 PM in reply to: 0 |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by littlewj Very interesting chart. It really shows how small the margin is you have to work with. Is there a similar chart for HIM's by chance? Sorry if this has been asked before, but when I start my half training in April, what weekly TSS score should I be targeting? I realize that at this point we are basically at the build stage. I have never seen the same chart for HIM, however, it's pretty easy to calculate now that you know how TSS works. Let's say 80% of FTP for 2.5hours = .8^2 *2.5 * 100 = 160. Very rough. There are some very cool threads with Dr Phil and some pros on this. We'll come back to pacing for different races. As for the TSS per week that depends a lot on how you are divvying up load across the 3 sports, time you have available and intensity your coach/plan is requiring. I can tell you that for the first half of the year last year I was in the low 200s this time of year and in the 500s in May. While the TSS is important, how the TSS is made up is also. I can tell you that May was not 2.5x the time in zones of January. Also remember that I have a tendency to train on the high side for a guy my age. 500TSS on bike, 500 on the run and then swimming is a big load. I am not sure that is necessary.Some would blow up with that kind of load. Also I have slowly grown the load year over year. But you have to measure it to know how much to grow it. Edited by marcag 2014-01-19 12:09 PM |
2014-01-19 1:23 PM in reply to: marcag |
50 , Washington | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. My Week 1 #'s. Thresold 1 = 69 Threshold2 = 60 Sweet Spot = 96 Total= 225 TSS |
2014-01-19 1:40 PM in reply to: 0 |
Member 258 | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. My TSS for the week were Threshold 1 57 Sweet Spot 77 VO2 max 1 41 Am I getting different numbers because I'm not holding the right power during the intervals? I thought I was following the workouts pretty accurately but my numbers look a lot smaller than they are supposed to. If the workouts are set to my FTP I don't understand why my TSS would be different. Subjectively, I found the workouts hard, but manageable. My HR was 145-165. Help? Ah, I just remembered on the first workout I did my rest intervals at lower than the prescribed power. But I checked the others and they look pretty close, so I would think they would be more on track. Edited by RunningJoke 2014-01-19 1:52 PM |
2014-01-19 1:42 PM in reply to: 0 |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by RunningJoke My TSS for the week were Threshold 1 57 Sweet Spot 77 VO2 max 1 41 Are we getting different numbers because some of us are not holding the right power during the intervals? I thought I was following the workouts pretty accurately but my numbers look a lot smaller! Jaime Where are you reading those numbers from ? it could be a bad setting in the tool calculating the TSS Edited by marcag 2014-01-19 1:43 PM |
|
2014-01-19 1:53 PM in reply to: 0 |
Member 258 | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. I got the numbers out of Golden Cheetah. OK, I just used Trainer Road (where I actually did the workouts) to calculate the TSS and I got slightly different numbers. But Threshold was the one where my rest intervals were low, so this still seems pretty screwy. Threshold 62 Sweet Spot 83 VO2 max 44 Edited by RunningJoke 2014-01-19 2:03 PM |
2014-01-19 1:56 PM in reply to: marcag |
Veteran 945 South Windsor, CT | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by marcag Originally posted by dtoce I would love to hear some conversation about selection of cadence. I know we should all 'find out optimal cadence'. Is it worthwhile to redo 5 or 20 minute tests with cadence 5 above and 5 below so see if you can help identify if one is more a 'masher' or a 'spinner'? Should we be trying to force cadence a bit to help with efficiency to try to spin at 90? Cadence on the bike isn't the same as running and with no landing shock, there is much less injury risk by a slower cadence, so I'm wondering if this is a case where less could actually be better or does it just depend on your own muscle makeup...Hmmmm. Very much a personal opinion here. The whole cadence thing, unless you are in cooky ranges is overblown. There is literature about how fast/slow twitch make a difference, how one depletes glycogen faster.....but my personal opinion is you should ride in what is comfortable and be ready to ride in all ranges. What I know from experience is that I tend to gravitate much higher on higher efforts. I was at 100 during testing. I use a computrainer which keeps me at a fixed wattage, so the cadence is very much a natural selection. Without a computrainer I would have to speed up/slow down cadence to hit a wattage if the wattage happened to be between two gears. But when I slow down my cadence it appears harder for me. However, I think it's important to be able to ride at different cadences because terrain and gearing will force us there. As Tom found out, riding at 110-120rpm is sometimes necessary. So is climbing at 60-70 Also, on perfect flats, perfect gearing, I need to change cadence just to switch things up. Pedaling at a constant wattage/condtant cadence for 2.5hrs on a HIM is grueling. I go up and down. I naturally tend to be very close to 90 on the run. 88 on slower runs, 92-93 if I step it up a bit. Thanks for the comments Marc. I do not have a computrainer and do have to shift and change cadence and cassette to generate increased force/power. I am playing with the various gears and will keep track so I do know which gears I'm training in and at what cadence. Have you seen this website that allows you to guesstimate your time on various courses? http://www.cyclingpowerlab.com/PopularEventModels.aspx |
2014-01-19 2:06 PM in reply to: 0 |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by RunningJoke I got the numbers out of Golden Cheetah. OK, I just used Trainer Road (where I actually did the workouts) to calculate the TSS and I got slightly different numbers. But Threshold was the one where my rest intervals were low, so this still seems pretty screwy. Threshold 62 Sweet Spot 83 VO2 max 44 Can you attach the workouts ? Export tcx files from Golden Cheetah Edited by marcag 2014-01-19 2:07 PM |
2014-01-19 2:18 PM in reply to: marcag |
Veteran 1677 Houston, Texas | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Week 2 TSS for me looked like: Threshold 1 - 75 VO2 1 - 58 Sweet Spot - 102
Then I did Sufferefest's Angels ride (at 90% on TR) and got another 77....and this ride felt really hard to me for some reason, though the TSS wasn't particularly huge And then this afternoon, I did Week 3's Threshold 1 for an additional 80....and this ride felt MUCH better than yesterday's Angels. Go figure....
|
2014-01-19 2:24 PM in reply to: ligersandtions |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by ligersandtions Week 2 TSS for me looked like: Threshold 1 - 75 VO2 1 - 58 Sweet Spot - 102
Then I did Sufferefest's Angels ride (at 90% on TR) and got another 77....and this ride felt really hard to me for some reason, though the TSS wasn't particularly huge And then this afternoon, I did Week 3's Threshold 1 for an additional 80....and this ride felt MUCH better than yesterday's Angels. Go figure....
Post the rides if you can |
|
2014-01-19 2:55 PM in reply to: 0 |
Master 3022 | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Sweet Spot done: http://connect.garmin.com/activity/432735073 Entire workout (166 watts): Duration: 1:30:22 Work: 902 kJ TSS: 97.8 (intensity factor 0.808) Norm Power: 175 VI: 1.05 Pw:HR: 3.87% Pa:HR: 2.53% Distance: 25.409 mi Elevation Gain: 10 ft Elevation Loss: 30 ft Grade: -0.0 % (-23 ft) Min Max Avg Power: 0 272 166 watts Heart Rate: 88 174 159 bpm Cadence: 13 100 87 rpm Speed: 4.7 20.4 16.9 mph Pace 2:56 12:52 3:33 min/mi Altitude: 1220 1248 1230 ft Crank Torque: 0 705 162 lb-in Edited by trisuppo 2014-01-19 3:12 PM (1-19-14 Ride Graph.png) Attachments ---------------- 1-19-14 Ride Graph.png (40KB - 5 downloads) |
2014-01-19 3:00 PM in reply to: trisuppo |
Master 3022 | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. |
2014-01-19 6:04 PM in reply to: dtoce |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by dtoce Have you seen this website that allows you to guesstimate your time on various courses? http://www.cyclingpowerlab.com/PopularEventModels.aspx I tried a few two courses I have done and one was way off one wasn't too bad. I don't think they take into account quality of the roads which makes a big difference I entered my name and age group and my name came up....that was cool :-) 2013 results were not in there. 2012 was. |
2014-01-19 6:22 PM in reply to: 0 |
Veteran 1677 Houston, Texas | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by marcag Post the rides if you can Sure thing! Week 2, Threshold 1
Week 2, VO2 - 1
Week 2, Sweet Spot
Sufferfest Angels
Week 3, Threshold 1
Edited by ligersandtions 2014-01-19 6:23 PM |
2014-01-19 6:26 PM in reply to: ligersandtions |
Veteran 441 Maine | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by ligersandtions Week 2 TSS for me looked like: Threshold 1 - 75 VO2 1 - 58 Sweet Spot - 102
Then I did Sufferefest's Angels ride (at 90% on TR) and got another 77....and this ride felt really hard to me for some reason, though the TSS wasn't particularly huge And then this afternoon, I did Week 3's Threshold 1 for an additional 80....and this ride felt MUCH better than yesterday's Angels. Go figure....
Nice job on SF Angels. I had actually started that same ride yesterday as well; cut it short based on how it felt and what I knew I had lined up for today. I made it into a short brick workout instead. |
|
2014-01-19 6:27 PM in reply to: ligersandtions |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. sorry I meant just attach the tcx files not screen shots |
2014-01-19 6:33 PM in reply to: marcag |
Veteran 1677 Houston, Texas | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by marcag sorry I meant just attach the tcx files not screen shots Hah, I was actually wondering if the screen shots were going to be at all useful....let's see if I can figure out how to attach files... Attachments ---------------- 2014-01-19-120715.TCX (2152KB - 4 downloads) 2014-01-14-041911.TCX (2154KB - 4 downloads) 2014-01-16-042303.TCX (1660KB - 4 downloads) 2014-01-17-155421.TCX (2997KB - 3 downloads) 2014-01-18-105326.TCX (2158KB - 4 downloads) |
2014-01-19 6:35 PM in reply to: 0 |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Originally posted by ligersandtions Originally posted by marcag sorry I meant just attach the tcx files not screen shots Hah, I was actually wondering if the screen shots were going to be at all useful....let's see if I can figure out how to attach files... You do a reply, then there is a checkbox for "Attach a file after posting". You check that and the can add the files Also, what are you using as CP ? Edited by marcag 2014-01-19 6:36 PM |
2014-01-19 6:38 PM in reply to: marcag |
1053 | Subject: RE: Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. Threshold 1- 73 Threshold 2- 82 Sweet spot- 109 I go over the recommended %FTP here and there, but not by much. |
|
Shane's (gsmacleod) Coaching Mentor Group - Open Pages: 1 ... 2 3 4 5 | |||
Birkierunner's (Jim Kelley) General + Long Course Group (OPEN) Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 17 | |||
Slornow and Wannabefaster's Winter Group version 3-CLOSED Pages: 1 ... 72 73 74 75 | |||
| ||||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
|