SBR "U" (Page 58)
-
No new posts
Moderators: alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2015-05-08 10:32 AM in reply to: brigby1 |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: SBR "U" Originally posted by brigby1 Originally posted by marcag Originally posted by axteraa thanks. I was happy with the effort. But I really wanted to do some aero testing so that was kind of a waste. You realize with these tests that you can actually hold a power higher than you think, but the suffer threshold is brutal. I know I could have gone another 6 minutes, probably more, but man oh man it hurts. Originally posted by marcag I rode a 15km TT tonight Best 20min power ever, actually best 24min. 304w for best 20min, 303 w for best 24min Finished, heard rubbiinhg rear brake rubbing on wheel. 37.9km/h on 303 watts. F!!! That's not 24mph. Good news is my Quarq and Vectors were within 4 watts of each other. 305 out, 300 back and a bit lost at the turnaround. I was riding that fast in Texas on 210w :-) Oh well, at least my FTP is up and I get an early start time next race. Awesome news on the power Marc! Not so awesome on the brakepad. I've got a 19k TT tomorrow morning, gonna be cold! Just waiting for the Race Report before commenting. Hey ! I did my Galveston report I will do a report next TT. One saying 300w, 37km/h seems so silly I did not have speed on my Garmin so I had no idea until after the race. I was only watching HR and 10s average |
|
2015-05-08 2:09 PM in reply to: marcag |
Subject: RE: SBR "U" Originally posted by marcag Originally posted by axteraa thanks. I was happy with the effort. But I really wanted to do some aero testing so that was kind of a waste. You realize with these tests that you can actually hold a power higher than you think, but the suffer threshold is brutal. I know I could have gone another 6 minutes, probably more, but man oh man it hurts. Originally posted by marcag I rode a 15km TT tonight Best 20min power ever, actually best 24min. 304w for best 20min, 303 w for best 24min Finished, heard rubbiinhg rear brake rubbing on wheel. 37.9km/h on 303 watts. F!!! That's not 24mph. Good news is my Quarq and Vectors were within 4 watts of each other. 305 out, 300 back and a bit lost at the turnaround. I was riding that fast in Texas on 210w :-) Oh well, at least my FTP is up and I get an early start time next race. Awesome news on the power Marc! Not so awesome on the brakepad. I've got a 19k TT tomorrow morning, gonna be cold! Nice wattage!!! Did anyone pass you during the TT? I imagine someone ripping by 2-3 mph faster while you're pushing 300+ watts must really suck...LOL. I agree that the suffer threshold is a big part of sustaining your true potential power. I have a 40k TT this weekend and I know the last 20 minutes are really going to suck. When I was doing my 2x20' intervals the past few weeks I was really focusing on breathing control and good mental thoughts. Sometimes when things start to hurt I get into this state where all I think is "this sucks...this sucks...when is it over...ahhhhhh." It's okay to think that the last 3-5 minutes...not so much the last 15-25 minutes. I found that just trying to stay calm, focus on smooth strokes, and slowing down the mental conversation I'm having in my head tends to mask the pain a little better. |
2015-05-08 4:01 PM in reply to: marcag |
Veteran 1677 Houston, Texas | Subject: RE: SBR "U" Originally posted by marcag Did you ever have the problem only with TR or only with the 910, or do they always run in parralel ? Hmmm, that's a good question....I have only ridden with the 910 + TR or the 810 + TR, but never TR alone or Garmin alone (on the trainer). I'll give that a shot this weekend or next week....supposed to be doing 5' and 20' power tests, so not sure I want to goof around with it too much before then. Nice work on the TT! Bummer to not realize it was rubbing till the end (though, really, what would you do if you'd noticed it early? Stop?? I imagine your time would have been even slower with a stop in there!). |
2015-05-08 4:16 PM in reply to: Jason N |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: SBR "U" Originally posted by Jason N Nice wattage!!! Did anyone pass you during the TT? I imagine someone ripping by 2-3 mph faster while you're pushing 300+ watts must really suck...LOL. I agree that the suffer threshold is a big part of sustaining your true potential power. I have a 40k TT this weekend and I know the last 20 minutes are really going to suck. When I was doing my 2x20' intervals the past few weeks I was really focusing on breathing control and good mental thoughts. Sometimes when things start to hurt I get into this state where all I think is "this sucks...this sucks...when is it over...ahhhhhh." It's okay to think that the last 3-5 minutes...not so much the last 15-25 minutes. I found that just trying to stay calm, focus on smooth strokes, and slowing down the mental conversation I'm having in my head tends to mask the pain a little better. Nobody passed me, but.... I seeded myself really slow. Slow people go first and if you seed yourself two minutes slower you start one hour earlier. Since I haven't done one in two years I got to pick the seed time. I was at the start line and the guy right ahead of me was, well I should not stereotype, but I thought I would catch him pretty quickly. I hadn't caught him by the turn around and was wondering why. Then on the way back, there were three guys (not racing). I caught them and they decided they would race me. I couldn't drop them. They were on road bikes, so I was wondering what was going on. I didn't have speed on and didn't have a clue what my time/speed was until saw the rubbing and later saw the power file. Good news is I get another bad seed time for next one. But I am not trying for a better power number. That hurt !! |
2015-05-08 7:52 PM in reply to: 0 |
Master 10208 Northern IL | Subject: RE: SBR "U" Originally posted by marcag Originally posted by brigby1 Hey ! I did my Galveston report I will do a report next TT. One saying 300w, 37km/h seems so silly I did not have speed on my Garmin so I had no idea until after the race. I was only watching HR and 10s average Originally posted by marcag Originally posted by axteraa thanks. I was happy with the effort. But I really wanted to do some aero testing so that was kind of a waste. You realize with these tests that you can actually hold a power higher than you think, but the suffer threshold is brutal. I know I could have gone another 6 minutes, probably more, but man oh man it hurts. Originally posted by marcag I rode a 15km TT tonight Best 20min power ever, actually best 24min. 304w for best 20min, 303 w for best 24min Finished, heard rubbiinhg rear brake rubbing on wheel. 37.9km/h on 303 watts. F!!! That's not 24mph. Good news is my Quarq and Vectors were within 4 watts of each other. 305 out, 300 back and a bit lost at the turnaround. I was riding that fast in Texas on 210w :-) Oh well, at least my FTP is up and I get an early start time next race. Awesome news on the power Marc! Not so awesome on the brakepad. I've got a 19k TT tomorrow morning, gonna be cold! Just waiting for the Race Report before commenting. I am kinda behind on reading anyone's though. Nice going on this one! Be interesting to see how well you do with the next. Various things can make it seem easier or harder to hold power. Some of the things you brought up may have gotten in my head. Edited by brigby1 2015-05-08 7:52 PM |
2015-05-10 12:21 PM in reply to: marcag |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: SBR "U" I have to find a better way to document this but I went to the Velodrome and did the testing with Alphamantis. Very cool stuff Improved cda between first and last run by .04 which is 40watts in that last TT I did. Followed up with beers with Andy and watch the Habs beat Tampa Bay. Day complete !! I will find a way to write up the results. |
|
2015-05-10 12:42 PM in reply to: marcag |
Elite 7783 PEI, Canada | Subject: RE: SBR "U" Originally posted by marcag I have to find a better way to document this but I went to the Velodrome and did the testing with Alphamantis. Very cool stuff Improved cda between first and last run by .04 which is 40watts in that last TT I did. Followed up with beers with Andy and watch the Habs beat Tampa Bay. Day complete !! I will find a way to write up the results. Did it involve making sure your brakes weren't rubbing? Seriously, that's pretty cool, I can't wait to read about it! My 19k TT yesterday kind of sucked, I couldn't get near the power I would have liked to do - legs were just not cooperating. It was also only 3 degrees. Time was 30:02 on 276w - almost identical to the same TT two years ago. I forgot to put a latex tube in my rear tire as well - I could have broken 30 mins had I done that! I'll do a bit of a RR soon. |
2015-05-10 2:33 PM in reply to: 0 |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: SBR "U" Originally posted by axteraa Originally posted by marcag I have to find a better way to document this but I went to the Velodrome and did the testing with Alphamantis. Very cool stuff Improved cda between first and last run by .04 which is 40watts in that last TT I did. Followed up with beers with Andy and watch the Habs beat Tampa Bay. Day complete !! I will find a way to write up the results. Did it involve making sure your brakes weren't rubbing? Seriously, that's pretty cool, I can't wait to read about it! My 19k TT yesterday kind of sucked, I couldn't get near the power I would have liked to do - legs were just not cooperating. It was also only 3 degrees. Time was 30:02 on 276w - almost identical to the same TT two years ago. I forgot to put a latex tube in my rear tire as well - I could have broken 30 mins had I done that! I'll do a bit of a RR soon. They actually have a guy who double and triple checks before each run What was cool was all the changes that made improvements were predictable for me because they are things i saw in my own testing. For example, I told them I wanted to go 1cm wider on the pads and they said "no way, that won't help". Sure enough it was an improvement that I had seen in field testing. They were surprised but the one thing they know is what works for one person does not necessarily for another. The problem with field testing is the numbers are not as consistent as at the Velodrome. You get improvements 3 out of 4 runs but the magnitude of improvements varies. The velodrome is very predictable, black and white. Andy is VERY good. Very methodical. Edited by marcag 2015-05-10 3:05 PM |
2015-05-10 10:50 PM in reply to: marcag |
Subject: RE: SBR "U" I seriously need some position help. 40k went well power and execution wise. 281 watts for 57:47 in brutal winds and some rain that made for an extremely slow turnaround. 25 seconds slower on 13 more watts than last year...which was a fast day. For the life of me, I can't get my head out of the wind. it wasn't a stacked field, but the winner only beat me by 25 seconds on 234 watts. He does have an extremely good position and has left no stone unturned with regards to equipment choices. He beat me by a minute last year, so at least I'm getting closer. |
2015-05-11 5:52 AM in reply to: Jason N |
Master 8249 Eugene, Oregon | Subject: RE: SBR "U" IM Vietnam 70.3 report up....sorta. I don't have all the splits as I didn't have anything to photograph or write them down with; will finish later. The short version-- 1. Deathly ill with nasty cold/flu virus since Thursday. Definitely not 100% on race day. 2. Decent swim, given lots of "traffic" in the water. 3. For me, awesome bike leg. I did 2:58, which is a 29-minute drop for me. No doubt some of it due to new bike but my training seems to have really come together for that. I did not feel like I was pushing it too hard and it seemed a pretty controlled effort. 4. Worst. Run. Ever. 95 at start, who knows what at end. No shade, no breeze. Don't think it was a matter of overcooking the bike, but overcooking my body. Major issues with the heat, just didn't seem to have my usual tolerance for it. Not sure if due to really extreme conditions, illness, or both. It was, pretty literally, all I could do to finish the race. Anyway, I did, in 5:57. Absolute death march. Bet it's not very often that someone beats their best bike split by almost 30 minutes and then exceeds their best run split by 30 minutes....in the same race. Anyway, thanks for all who gave advice on bike-related matters. Now if I could just put my bike and run together, I'd be happy! |
2015-05-11 7:09 AM in reply to: Jason N |
Elite 7783 PEI, Canada | Subject: RE: SBR "U" Originally posted by Jason N I seriously need some position help. 40k went well power and execution wise. 281 watts for 57:47 in brutal winds and some rain that made for an extremely slow turnaround. 25 seconds slower on 13 more watts than last year...which was a fast day. For the life of me, I can't get my head out of the wind. it wasn't a stacked field, but the winner only beat me by 25 seconds on 234 watts. He does have an extremely good position and has left no stone unturned with regards to equipment choices. He beat me by a minute last year, so at least I'm getting closer. Still pretty fast Jason! Based on the pictures I saw on Facebook, I'd say that you are right about your head position likely hurting your aeroness. |
|
2015-05-11 7:14 AM in reply to: Hot Runner |
Elite 7783 PEI, Canada | Subject: RE: SBR "U" Originally posted by Hot Runner IM Vietnam 70.3 report up....sorta. I don't have all the splits as I didn't have anything to photograph or write them down with; will finish later. The short version-- 1. Deathly ill with nasty cold/flu virus since Thursday. Definitely not 100% on race day. 2. Decent swim, given lots of "traffic" in the water. 3. For me, awesome bike leg. I did 2:58, which is a 29-minute drop for me. No doubt some of it due to new bike but my training seems to have really come together for that. I did not feel like I was pushing it too hard and it seemed a pretty controlled effort. 4. Worst. Run. Ever. 95 at start, who knows what at end. No shade, no breeze. Don't think it was a matter of overcooking the bike, but overcooking my body. Major issues with the heat, just didn't seem to have my usual tolerance for it. Not sure if due to really extreme conditions, illness, or both. It was, pretty literally, all I could do to finish the race. Anyway, I did, in 5:57. Absolute death march. Bet it's not very often that someone beats their best bike split by almost 30 minutes and then exceeds their best run split by 30 minutes....in the same race. Anyway, thanks for all who gave advice on bike-related matters. Now if I could just put my bike and run together, I'd be happy! Congrats on the race and knocking so much time off your bike split! Too bad about the heat, it's such a killer! |
2015-05-11 7:35 AM in reply to: axteraa |
Master 10208 Northern IL | Subject: RE: SBR "U" Originally posted by axteraa Originally posted by Jason N I seriously need some position help. 40k went well power and execution wise. 281 watts for 57:47 in brutal winds and some rain that made for an extremely slow turnaround. 25 seconds slower on 13 more watts than last year...which was a fast day. For the life of me, I can't get my head out of the wind. it wasn't a stacked field, but the winner only beat me by 25 seconds on 234 watts. He does have an extremely good position and has left no stone unturned with regards to equipment choices. He beat me by a minute last year, so at least I'm getting closer. Still pretty fast Jason! Based on the pictures I saw on Facebook, I'd say that you are right about your head position likely hurting your aeroness. Yeah, always like seeing going under an hour! I saw the same thing with the head position. I have a problem with that too. So far I've tended to duck and glance up ahead every now and then, hoping something doesn't run into the road in the meantime. Then it's down at least part of the time. I just can't hold my head in a position where it's both low and I can see very far for much time at all. |
2015-05-11 10:45 AM in reply to: brigby1 |
Subject: RE: SBR "U" |
2015-05-11 11:06 AM in reply to: Hot Runner |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: SBR "U" Originally posted by Hot Runner IM Vietnam 70.3 report up....sorta. I don't have all the splits as I didn't have anything to photograph or write them down with; will finish later. The short version-- 1. Deathly ill with nasty cold/flu virus since Thursday. Definitely not 100% on race day. 2. Decent swim, given lots of "traffic" in the water. 3. For me, awesome bike leg. I did 2:58, which is a 29-minute drop for me. No doubt some of it due to new bike but my training seems to have really come together for that. I did not feel like I was pushing it too hard and it seemed a pretty controlled effort. 4. Worst. Run. Ever. 95 at start, who knows what at end. No shade, no breeze. Don't think it was a matter of overcooking the bike, but overcooking my body. Major issues with the heat, just didn't seem to have my usual tolerance for it. Not sure if due to really extreme conditions, illness, or both. It was, pretty literally, all I could do to finish the race. Anyway, I did, in 5:57. Absolute death march. Bet it's not very often that someone beats their best bike split by almost 30 minutes and then exceeds their best run split by 30 minutes....in the same race. Anyway, thanks for all who gave advice on bike-related matters. Now if I could just put my bike and run together, I'd be happy! Balancing bike/run is an art. Doing in heat is half art, half crap shoot. I did it once successfully, I failed many times. Hopefully I will learn more this week about heat. Congratulations on the finish !!! One thing I find VERY misleading is the pro finish times. They "seem" less unaffected by the heat but I think it's more a case of they are finished by 11 AM and are two hours less in the hottest part of the day. |
2015-05-11 11:26 AM in reply to: Jason N |
Master 5557 , California | Subject: RE: SBR "U" Jason - from the photo, and also from your profile photo, it looks like you move your head slightly to the right when you're working hard. I'd have a friend line you up straight, then find a plastic strip or something and tape it to the side of your helmet, so that it hits your shoulder when you start getting off center. Do some reps on the trainer like that and see if you notice it. Probably hard to repeat when you're thinking about it though... That said, it's a really good time / performance. What I said above is just a nitpick. A lot of the winner's low power comes from a super skinny body type. He probably benefits from that a lot on a windy day. |
|
2015-05-11 11:33 AM in reply to: Hot Runner |
Master 5557 , California | Subject: RE: SBR "U" Originally posted by Hot Runner IM Vietnam 70.3 report up....sorta. I don't have all the splits as I didn't have anything to photograph or write them down with; will finish later. The short version-- 1. Deathly ill with nasty cold/flu virus since Thursday. Definitely not 100% on race day. 2. Decent swim, given lots of "traffic" in the water. 3. For me, awesome bike leg. I did 2:58, which is a 29-minute drop for me. No doubt some of it due to new bike but my training seems to have really come together for that. I did not feel like I was pushing it too hard and it seemed a pretty controlled effort. 4. Worst. Run. Ever. 95 at start, who knows what at end. No shade, no breeze. Don't think it was a matter of overcooking the bike, but overcooking my body. Major issues with the heat, just didn't seem to have my usual tolerance for it. Not sure if due to really extreme conditions, illness, or both. It was, pretty literally, all I could do to finish the race. Anyway, I did, in 5:57. Absolute death march. Bet it's not very often that someone beats their best bike split by almost 30 minutes and then exceeds their best run split by 30 minutes....in the same race. Anyway, thanks for all who gave advice on bike-related matters. Now if I could just put my bike and run together, I'd be happy! If you honestly felt comfortable with the bike pace, and your legs weren't dead at the start of the run, I'd say don't change things for the next race. Your run was probably affected more by the combination of heat and your recovery from illness. Being sick like that can leave you dehydrated so you started the day at a big disadvantage. |
2015-05-11 11:36 AM in reply to: Jason N |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: SBR "U" Originally posted by Jason N 57:47 on 281w And 57:22 on 234w. the problem is your arms are bigger than his legs :-) just kidding. A picture of you a little more from the side would be nice. I personally think you have a lot of room for improvement, but first you have to find a way to test otherwise your just throwing darts blindfolded. There are a few things you notice about the guy that won. a) His powermeter is reading low :-) b) His head is much better positioned that yours c) Air has somewhere to go. On a). This weekend they actually set up two profiles while I was testing. One with my Vectors, one with Andy's PT. Other people I have seen that do these kind of tests allow you to use your own PM. Andy was telling me he sees big differences in PM values and I believe it. His PT is calibrated using 40+ lb weights. I have done the same with my Vectors. FYI, we were getting same cdas with my Vectors and his PT which was cool. But to go 57:22 on 234, he needs a pretty low cda. I heave heard people say "my cda is .21", well you should ask someone who has tested the pros like BMC and Trek what the likelihood of that is. b) There was a guy testing with me that is a pretty good cyclist. From what I can see, provincial level TTers, RAAM participant and multiple KOM holder on Strava. He started out with a better cda than me, but we ended up the same. The last test we both did was 4 laps in our best position/equipment and then 4 laps with the most shrug we could do. Both of us improved .01 from the shrug. That's about 10w at TT speed. But for me, it was certainly not sustainable. c) THis is something that I found in my field testing that I confirmed at the Velodrome. Reducing your frontal area is great, BUT, you also need to create room for the air to go. This is why, for me, opening up my elbows, without reducing my front area was beneficial. It created a place for the air to go. 1cm widening was almost 10w. Somewhere for air to go is really important. For example I tested the LG P09 and I was faster without the plug in the helmet. Someone else that has more room for air to flow may test faster with the plug. I tested faster without visor and better with sunglasses. Again it was how the air was being directed. Jason, I think that if you want to improve you first have to figure out how you are going to test. |
2015-05-11 12:14 PM in reply to: marcag |
Master 5557 , California | Subject: RE: SBR "U" I personally think you have a lot of room for improvement, but first you have to find a way to test otherwise your just throwing darts blindfolded. Yeah unfortunately I think the closest velodrome to Jason would be San Diego :/ Options are kind of limited on Oahu, even outside it's hard to get shelter from the wind. |
2015-05-11 12:50 PM in reply to: spudone |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: SBR "U" Originally posted by spudone I personally think you have a lot of room for improvement, but first you have to find a way to test otherwise your just throwing darts blindfolded. Yeah unfortunately I think the closest velodrome to Jason would be San Diego :/ Options are kind of limited on Oahu, even outside it's hard to get shelter from the wind. I find constant wind on a straight is very workable. Gusty winds with changes in direction, not so much |
2015-05-11 2:03 PM in reply to: marcag |
Subject: RE: SBR "U" How long of a straight do you think I need for workable testing? The only safe areas I can think of (with a decent area where I can park, pull over, and make changes) are only 1-2 miles long. The ones longer one is prone to some gusts, but the wind stays steady from the same direction. I'm not going to worry about it for now as we don't have any more TT's the rest of the year, but something I do want to play with in the off season. |
|
2015-05-11 2:23 PM in reply to: marcag |
Subject: RE: SBR "U" Originally posted by marcag There are a few things you notice about the guy that won. a) His powermeter is reading low :-) b) His head is much better positioned that yours c) Air has somewhere to go. For a) He uses a powertap on all training and racing. He has one in a training rim, and one in a 303 that he'll road race with or cover for TTs. He's been using power for like 10 years and is very much a detail oriented power junkie. He's also a full time bike shop employee/mechanic with like 30 years of experience. So while it's possible his PM was reading low, all his PMs he has ever owned would have had to been reading low. b) No doubt. I don't know if it's the way my neck and shoulders are built, or just a crappy position, but I just can't find a way to get the top of my head anywhere close to the highest point on my back. Maybe I just have a really big head? c) I've thought about this for a while. My legs being the biggest issue. From my saddle to the top tube, if you looked at me from behind, you wouldn't see very much free space between my legs. Any air that comes between my arms and elbows hits a brick wall called my thighs. Funny because in the first short RR of the season that I won in a sprint, this guy who won the TT came in 3rd and joked at me saying "you finally put those tree trunks to good use." HAH |
2015-05-11 2:31 PM in reply to: Jason N |
Master 5557 , California | Subject: RE: SBR "U" Originally posted by Jason N How long of a straight do you think I need for workable testing? The only safe areas I can think of (with a decent area where I can park, pull over, and make changes) are only 1-2 miles long. The ones longer one is prone to some gusts, but the wind stays steady from the same direction. I'm not going to worry about it for now as we don't have any more TT's the rest of the year, but something I do want to play with in the off season. You need a military friend who can get you access to one of their big aircraft hangars |
2015-05-11 3:26 PM in reply to: mcmanusclan5 |
Seattle | Subject: RE: SBR "U" Originally posted by mcmanusclan5 Originally posted by Asalzwed Got the Oa woman's today in a 5 miler. I has a couple women hot on my tail all the way up the mountain. I put a little space between us on a demoralizING climb but I lost them, in - get this (you'll love it Rusty) - the downhill!Now I'm off to Maui for some down time! (like) Sweet! NOW do you feel like your downhill skillzzz are coming around? Did you try anything different, or just getting into the groove of it? Enjoy Maui (like anyone has to say THAT!). I'm off to Boston for a couple nights tomorrow (work conference). Will be the first time I've been home since moving to our new home. Actually kinda feels weird and I'm not sure why, but I'm looking forward to running the esplanade again! Matt No It's a work in progress. I think conceptually, I am able to wrap my head around what I need to do. My coach explained it as not so much being on your toes (and definitely not your heels) but more just touching your foot down as quickly as possible. So, high turnover and a fast touch. And then I was talking to the RD before the race and he gave me a good visual. He said to think about hiking in screen, when you take a step and it slides away from underneath you. If you pick up your feet quickly, you move on down the mountain before that happens...if that makes sense. I would say I did a better job putting this into action, but I have plenty of improvements to make. Particularly keeping my turnover rate super high. That is very unnatural for me.
And keep in mind, I am not talking about a road downhill. I am speaking of technical mountain running descents. |
2015-05-11 3:29 PM in reply to: Jason N |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: SBR "U" Originally posted by Jason N Originally posted by marcag There are a few things you notice about the guy that won. a) His powermeter is reading low :-) b) His head is much better positioned that yours c) Air has somewhere to go. For a) He uses a powertap on all training and racing. He has one in a training rim, and one in a 303 that he'll road race with or cover for TTs. He's been using power for like 10 years and is very much a detail oriented power junkie. He's also a full time bike shop employee/mechanic with like 30 years of experience. So while it's possible his PM was reading low, all his PMs he has ever owned would have had to been reading low. b) No doubt. I don't know if it's the way my neck and shoulders are built, or just a crappy position, but I just can't find a way to get the top of my head anywhere close to the highest point on my back. Maybe I just have a really big head? c) I've thought about this for a while. My legs being the biggest issue. From my saddle to the top tube, if you looked at me from behind, you wouldn't see very much free space between my legs. Any air that comes between my arms and elbows hits a brick wall called my thighs. Funny because in the first short RR of the season that I won in a sprint, this guy who won the TT came in 3rd and joked at me saying "you finally put those tree trunks to good use." HAH A side shot would be really good but I suspect you would benefit from your seat going up and your cranks being shortened. Maybe arms going forward 2 miles of straight road could be enough. One route I use is 4km How much does that guy weigh ? |
|
| |||
|