Power Mentor Group with Shane & Marc - Closed. (Page 60)
-
No new posts
Moderators: alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2014-03-06 4:15 PM in reply to: reecealan |
Champion 9407 Montague Gold Mines, Nova Scotia | Subject: RE: Run Program Originally posted by reecealan As an example SS for week 8 has 3x15' at 90% FTP. I was thinking I could start at 87-88% FTP, build to 92-93% FTP at 5' then repeat 2 times, someting like that. Sound reasonable? Yeah, the sweet spot/tempo efforts would usually be fine to break up that way. The only time I would get concerned is if you're breaking it up with chunks above FTP. Shane |
|
2014-03-06 4:56 PM in reply to: gsmacleod |
Master 3888 Overland Park, KS | Subject: RE: Run Program Originally posted by gsmacleod Originally posted by reecealan As an example SS for week 8 has 3x15' at 90% FTP. I was thinking I could start at 87-88% FTP, build to 92-93% FTP at 5' then repeat 2 times, someting like that. Sound reasonable? Yeah, the sweet spot/tempo efforts would usually be fine to break up that way. The only time I would get concerned is if you're breaking it up with chunks above FTP. Shane Well, no danger in that especially with a new FTP of 315W. For me specifically I was thinking : 3x15' @ 90% FTP "broken" by the following: 5' at 85% FTP or 268W 5' at 90% FTP or 284W 5' at 95% FTP or 299W I was really thinking of this idea for the long 30' intervals but I just want to make sure there's no loss in the goals/purpose of the traning session. |
2014-03-07 6:55 AM in reply to: croyston |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: Week 9 Originally posted by croyston Originally posted by trisuppo Also, negative value for aerobic decoupling. If I understand correctly, as I warm up my HR is actually settling into greater efficiency. Maybe last years run focus paid off with a much larger aerobic engine? I too am curious about negative values for aerobic decoupling. I've had negative numbers for my last three rides (1 - 3 hr outdoor ride and week 9 threshold 1 & 2). Chris Aerobic decoupling works better when the power level is close in the two halfs of the session. Basically they take the NP of the first half of the ride and divide by HR. They do the same for the second half and look at whether that ratio became higher or lower. If the first half is 300w and the 2nd half 150w, the number doesn't mean anything. I believe it is more intended for efforts at lowe levels but the concept can be used to see cardiac drift. Assume you maintain constant power and HR goes up. The second number (NP/HR) will be smaller Hence first number - second number will be positive. If HR goes down for the 2nd half, second number goes up. First number - second number will be negative. For a constant power level, if there is cardiac drift the decoupling number will be positive I would not treat this metric as very accurate or even all that meaningfull. It's just an indicator that your cardiac drift for that ride is low. |
2014-03-07 7:41 AM in reply to: 0 |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: Week 9 Wow, I was looking at a calendar and time is flyyyyyyying by. There were some topics we wanted to talk about so we better get cracking on them One was Scott's questions on the PMC chart, and prepping for two A Oly races, one early June and the other early August. I'll give you how I would tackle it, Shane can probably bring his wealth of experience with many athletes. First of all there is the 'theoritical' PMC chart. As we discussed the CTL line is your fitness. You want that as high as possible. The TSB is your 'Freshness", you want that as high as possible on raceday. But unfortunately you have to balance the two. To be honest, I would ignore the TSB metric. It's interesting, but unless you are balancing it across the 3 sports it's kind of useless. If your TSB for cycling is 0 but you are -30 in the hole for running, you won't perform well. I would simply focus on getting my CTL as high as possible. You want your CTL to peak X days before your race and then in those X days, it will slowly drop while your TSB rises. X depends on two things. The length of your race and just how high you get that CTL up and how much accumulated fatigue is in your body. I find that my CTL peaking at about 10-14days before a HIM works well and a week before an Olympic is fine. Starting a taper too early will just bring your CTL down too much. I like to minimize how low I bring it so I can get it higher for the next one. So I would plan for CTL to peak something like 1 week before your early June race and 1 week before your early August race. Now to get that CTL to it's peak, I would avoid "cramming", ie doing massive TSS in one week and none in the next. I would plan out to get to a target CTL and do it very gradually. Best way to do this is increase weekly TSS very gradually. How much bike would be a balance of how much time I have to train and how I feel I need to split that across the other two sports. I know to swim well I need to do at least 10k-12k per week. Therefore if my swim is deficient, I would schedule that first. I suspect you need to put some emphasis on your swim. If my run is in decent shape, me personally on an Oly, would simply do many very frequent/short workouts (30min) and 1 or two faster workouts per week. I would then take the remainder, see how much is left and decide how to use them For Oly on a limited time schedule I would be doing more the threshold/vo2 mix that Shane has been making us do. I would have more of a tendency to make my workouts align with my surroundings. For example when in Montreal, I have the mountain in my back yard. There is a nice 2km 9% grade. Great for 6min VO2 intervals. Or I would go to the F1 track where there is no cars and I would do 30s hard/30 sec easy intervals. I would do maybe 1 oer week. Of course lots of threshold work, 4x10, 3x12....I would do no tempo style work if training for Oly. So, to start the conversation, figure out where you need most work and plan that first. Then look at your strength and see how you can keep that at a minimum without losing it. Then fit the third leg in. I would put it down on paper, week by week, hours for each and adjust. You should now be able to figure how much time to spend on each and if you have X hours for biking you can roughly figure out how much weekly TSS that represents. Try to slowly increase it week over week, even if in small amounts. This all assuming you are time constrained and for Oly distance. HIM would be another story. I hope this is enough to start a discussion. Edited by marcag 2014-03-07 7:45 AM |
2014-03-07 8:00 AM in reply to: marcag |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: Week 9 OK, here's a teaser on the topic of aerodynamic testing In GC there is a tool called Aerolab. In this case it was Jason's TT where he put out 294watts for 23-24minutes To over simplify a very complex thing, the green line is the elevation profile of his course The blue line is the a mathemetical computation of what the terrain was based on his speed, his power, his aerodynamic drag, rolling resistance, weight and environmental conditions such as temperature and atmospheric pressure. His speed, power come from his Garmin His weight is known The temperature and atmospheric pressure are known So the unknowns are rolling resistance and aerodyanmic drag. My playing with the sliders I adjust these two parameters to get the actual elevation to line up with the mathematical computation. Now, using this tool requires some understanding of how it works and we can discuss that a little more but I did want to throw it out there as a teaser. There are other ways of testing aerodynamic drag, this is a really easy one. The beauty of this is that it doesn't care about terrain or the speed you are going at. It does care about wind but we can also talk about that. In this case it looks like there was no wind. RChung who dropped in at one point is the father of this tool. (Screenshot 2014-03-07 08.47.06.png) Attachments ---------------- Screenshot 2014-03-07 08.47.06.png (58KB - 2 downloads) |
2014-03-07 1:07 PM in reply to: 0 |
Subject: RE: Week 9 Thanks for doing this Marc. Shows I've got quite a bit of room for improvement on my position (for aggressive TTing)...which I already knew. I have a really hard time getting my head down while still being able to see up the road. I was using a skinsuit, shoe covers, 404 (non firecrest) front, and covered 404 rear, on my P2 (ETA...basically what my avatar shows). So i've got most of the aero goodies taken care of...yet a cda of .261 isn't that great. Probably closer to someone who has a really good position, but missing one of the aero goodies like race wheels or an aero helmet. 0.23-0.24 would be a better number to achieve for me. Edited by Jason N 2014-03-07 1:10 PM |
|
2014-03-07 1:33 PM in reply to: Jason N |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: Week 9 Originally posted by Jason N Thanks for doing this Marc. Shows I've got quite a bit of room for improvement on my position (for aggressive TTing)...which I already knew. I have a really hard time getting my head down while still being able to see up the road. I was using a skinsuit, shoe covers, 404 (non firecrest) front, and covered 404 rear, on my P2 (ETA...basically what my avatar shows). So i've got most of the aero goodies taken care of...yet a cda of .261 isn't that great. Probably closer to someone who has a really good position, but missing one of the aero goodies like race wheels or an aero helmet. 0.23-0.24 would be a better number to achieve for me. If you notice, I put .97 as the ETA. This number is to account for drivetrain losses. This brings up the point that while your PM says 294w, maybe it's 284, maybe it's 304, it all depends on the calibration of the PM. If your PM reads a little high, your cda number of course will be bad. This is the beauty of the quarq. Get the wahoo dongle, use weights, you can see the exact calibration of the Quarq to see if this number is accurate or not So the cda number is fine, you can use it to improve your cda but it's not 100% absolute. My Quarq last year was consistently 10-12watts or so higher than my PT I will pull out some of the data on dropping my head but it was very siginificant. |
2014-03-07 10:40 PM in reply to: marcag |
92 | Subject: RE: Week 9 Did week 9 threshold 2 this evening and even though the intervals are hard, I much prefer the 5 min vs. 15 min. I held power through all of the intervals and built slightly across the sets. Week 9 Threshold 2 - TSS-88, NP-204 Have a good night. Ron Attachments ---------------- Ron-2014-03-07-bt-power-week-9-thr-2-810462.tcx (1992KB - 2 downloads) |
2014-03-08 7:06 AM in reply to: WaterRat |
Veteran 441 Maine | Subject: RE: Week 9 Got week9 SWE-1 done last night and that went much better than expected. The extra workout I added to the end and this morning's workout were a different story though, I could really feel the fatigue in my legs & cut those a little shorter than planned. Start the IMLP plan on Monday so I'll be merging the workouts from here into the plan workouts where applicable. Attachments ---------------- cdkayak-2014-03-07-bt-power-week-9-swe-1-810343.tcx (2962KB - 1 downloads) |
2014-03-08 11:57 AM in reply to: cdkayak |
Master 2151 Johns Creek, Georgia | Subject: RE: Week 9 WK 9 Threshold 1 done! 3 X 15 were tough mentally. I felt pretty good physically, but mentally I struggled. I definitely prefer to ride lower cadence heavy gear vs higher cadence easier gear. TSS 98 NP 188 Hope everyone has a great weekend. It's another beautiful day in Atlanta! Attachments ---------------- WK9TH-1.tcx (2716KB - 1 downloads) |
2014-03-08 1:38 PM in reply to: marcag |
Oakville | Subject: RE: Week 9 Originally posted by marcag Wow, I was looking at a calendar and time is flyyyyyyying by. There were some topics we wanted to talk about so we better get cracking on them One was Scott's questions on the PMC chart, and prepping for two A Oly races, one early June and the other early August. I'll give you how I would tackle it, Shane can probably bring his wealth of experience with many athletes. First of all there is the 'theoritical' PMC chart. As we discussed the CTL line is your fitness. You want that as high as possible. The TSB is your 'Freshness", you want that as high as possible on raceday. But unfortunately you have to balance the two. To be honest, I would ignore the TSB metric. It's interesting, but unless you are balancing it across the 3 sports it's kind of useless. If your TSB for cycling is 0 but you are -30 in the hole for running, you won't perform well. I would simply focus on getting my CTL as high as possible. You want your CTL to peak X days before your race and then in those X days, it will slowly drop while your TSB rises. X depends on two things. The length of your race and just how high you get that CTL up and how much accumulated fatigue is in your body. I find that my CTL peaking at about 10-14days before a HIM works well and a week before an Olympic is fine. Starting a taper too early will just bring your CTL down too much. I like to minimize how low I bring it so I can get it higher for the next one. So I would plan for CTL to peak something like 1 week before your early June race and 1 week before your early August race. Now to get that CTL to it's peak, I would avoid "cramming", ie doing massive TSS in one week and none in the next. I would plan out to get to a target CTL and do it very gradually. Best way to do this is increase weekly TSS very gradually. How much bike would be a balance of how much time I have to train and how I feel I need to split that across the other two sports. I know to swim well I need to do at least 10k-12k per week. Therefore if my swim is deficient, I would schedule that first. I suspect you need to put some emphasis on your swim. If my run is in decent shape, me personally on an Oly, would simply do many very frequent/short workouts (30min) and 1 or two faster workouts per week. I would then take the remainder, see how much is left and decide how to use them For Oly on a limited time schedule I would be doing more the threshold/vo2 mix that Shane has been making us do. I would have more of a tendency to make my workouts align with my surroundings. For example when in Montreal, I have the mountain in my back yard. There is a nice 2km 9% grade. Great for 6min VO2 intervals. Or I would go to the F1 track where there is no cars and I would do 30s hard/30 sec easy intervals. I would do maybe 1 oer week. Of course lots of threshold work, 4x10, 3x12....I would do no tempo style work if training for Oly. So, to start the conversation, figure out where you need most work and plan that first. Then look at your strength and see how you can keep that at a minimum without losing it. Then fit the third leg in. I would put it down on paper, week by week, hours for each and adjust. You should now be able to figure how much time to spend on each and if you have X hours for biking you can roughly figure out how much weekly TSS that represents. Try to slowly increase it week over week, even if in small amounts. This all assuming you are time constrained and for Oly distance. HIM would be another story. I hope this is enough to start a discussion. Marc - this is excellent. I actually stumbled upon a blog by Joe Friel that briefly discussed an in-season training program for someone doing mainly shorter distance races. One approach that Joe suggested was to stay in the "Build" phase and not move to a "Peak" phase. Now this was for a race season without any particular "A" race and so wouldn't necessarily translate for me, but something to consider when planning a Sprint heavy race season. On the training side, unfortunately I picked up a bug from one of my kids and haven't been on the trainer since early in the week for Threshold 1. Feeling a bit better today so may try Threshold 2 tonight - I don't think I could hit the >105% intervals in the VO2 session. Scott |
|
2014-03-08 2:03 PM in reply to: Scott71 |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: Week 9 Originally posted by Scott71 Originally posted by marcag Wow, I was looking at a calendar and time is flyyyyyyying by. There were some topics we wanted to talk about so we better get cracking on them One was Scott's questions on the PMC chart, and prepping for two A Oly races, one early June and the other early August. I'll give you how I would tackle it, Shane can probably bring his wealth of experience with many athletes. First of all there is the 'theoritical' PMC chart. As we discussed the CTL line is your fitness. You want that as high as possible. The TSB is your 'Freshness", you want that as high as possible on raceday. But unfortunately you have to balance the two. To be honest, I would ignore the TSB metric. It's interesting, but unless you are balancing it across the 3 sports it's kind of useless. If your TSB for cycling is 0 but you are -30 in the hole for running, you won't perform well. I would simply focus on getting my CTL as high as possible. You want your CTL to peak X days before your race and then in those X days, it will slowly drop while your TSB rises. X depends on two things. The length of your race and just how high you get that CTL up and how much accumulated fatigue is in your body. I find that my CTL peaking at about 10-14days before a HIM works well and a week before an Olympic is fine. Starting a taper too early will just bring your CTL down too much. I like to minimize how low I bring it so I can get it higher for the next one. So I would plan for CTL to peak something like 1 week before your early June race and 1 week before your early August race. Now to get that CTL to it's peak, I would avoid "cramming", ie doing massive TSS in one week and none in the next. I would plan out to get to a target CTL and do it very gradually. Best way to do this is increase weekly TSS very gradually. How much bike would be a balance of how much time I have to train and how I feel I need to split that across the other two sports. I know to swim well I need to do at least 10k-12k per week. Therefore if my swim is deficient, I would schedule that first. I suspect you need to put some emphasis on your swim. If my run is in decent shape, me personally on an Oly, would simply do many very frequent/short workouts (30min) and 1 or two faster workouts per week. I would then take the remainder, see how much is left and decide how to use them For Oly on a limited time schedule I would be doing more the threshold/vo2 mix that Shane has been making us do. I would have more of a tendency to make my workouts align with my surroundings. For example when in Montreal, I have the mountain in my back yard. There is a nice 2km 9% grade. Great for 6min VO2 intervals. Or I would go to the F1 track where there is no cars and I would do 30s hard/30 sec easy intervals. I would do maybe 1 oer week. Of course lots of threshold work, 4x10, 3x12....I would do no tempo style work if training for Oly. So, to start the conversation, figure out where you need most work and plan that first. Then look at your strength and see how you can keep that at a minimum without losing it. Then fit the third leg in. I would put it down on paper, week by week, hours for each and adjust. You should now be able to figure how much time to spend on each and if you have X hours for biking you can roughly figure out how much weekly TSS that represents. Try to slowly increase it week over week, even if in small amounts. This all assuming you are time constrained and for Oly distance. HIM would be another story. I hope this is enough to start a discussion. Marc - this is excellent. I actually stumbled upon a blog by Joe Friel that briefly discussed an in-season training program for someone doing mainly shorter distance races. One approach that Joe suggested was to stay in the "Build" phase and not move to a "Peak" phase. Now this was for a race season without any particular "A" race and so wouldn't necessarily translate for me, but something to consider when planning a Sprint heavy race season. On the training side, unfortunately I picked up a bug from one of my kids and haven't been on the trainer since early in the week for Threshold 1. Feeling a bit better today so may try Threshold 2 tonight - I don't think I could hit the >105% intervals in the VO2 session. Scott It's interesting you bring this up. Shane sent me the workouts for week 10, which I still have to translate to mrc files. In his write up he talks about this "base", "build", "peak" stuff and offers his view, which I think is the right view. It is a view shared by a few coaches I know and trust....stay tuned :-) |
2014-03-08 2:31 PM in reply to: marcag |
Regular 389 | Subject: RE: Week 9 Snuck in only thr 1 & 2 due to work schedule this week in addition to a sprint tri this morning. First time swimming in 55degree lake (1/3 mile), whew. Get on the bike and somehow my power meter is registering. Not sure what the deal was, tried to do some enable/disable reset on the fly, but figured better let it go (14 mile bike/37'). It was frigid (air in 40's and wearing a sleeveless jersey) The other kicker was my 310xt strap broke when I pulled off my wetsuit, wtf. Ran a solid 5k (20:22) and won first in my age, despite not being able to feel my feet or toes until about an hour after. Sucks I won't have power data to ananlyze, Back to regular training Monday. Tom |
2014-03-08 3:35 PM in reply to: tallytom |
1053 | Subject: RE: Week 9 Just checking in. I was sick for about a week, feeling about 80% today, but still cant get rid of the cough. I did ride for about an hour though, nothing very structured, just tested the waters. Felt ok, but still lacking energy. I really want to get back on track tomorrow, will be a week behind, and I really don't want to fall behind more than that. Aero info looks interesting, still rode on the trainer today, but it was just about nice enough to get outside. Need just a bit more snow to melt since the roads are still a bit narrow here and there from the plowing. |
2014-03-08 6:57 PM in reply to: ImSore |
Regular 135 Spokane | Subject: RE: Week 9 Got my first outdoor ride of the year today. I learned a lot about pacing since it was also the first time I got to use my powertap outdoors. It's no wonder I've blown up at a lot of my past races. It was only about 1:45 minute ride but the lessons learned were drastic: 1. It was very easy to go over my target watts when going uphill. I could have easily exceeded my CP by over 200 watts when climbing. I'm amazed at how "soft" I have to pedal. 2. Pedaling downhill requires effort. I have to switch gears must faster and increase my cadence to hit my targets. I used to always coast. 3. It's very hard to hard to do a precise workout outdoors unlike the trainer. I don't know if I'll be on the trainer again as the weather improves, but I totally see the value of it now. 4. I had my Joule set to 5s averaging. It was jumping all over the place. I reset it to 10s averaging and it was better but it still wasn't like the trainer where it's a lot easier to hold a number. 4. Riding is much more enjoyable for me now. I'm now officially a numbers guy - didn't think I could ever really have fun training with a powermeter but it's more than worth it!! Jim |
2014-03-09 6:20 AM in reply to: tallytom |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: Week 9 Originally posted by tallytom won first in my age Congratulations !!! Have you ever done this race before ? Can you compare time to previous years ? |
|
2014-03-09 7:06 AM in reply to: littlewj |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: Week 9 Originally posted by littlewj Got my first outdoor ride of the year today. I learned a lot about pacing since it was also the first time I got to use my powertap outdoors. It's no wonder I've blown up at a lot of my past races. It was only about 1:45 minute ride but the lessons learned were drastic: 1. It was very easy to go over my target watts when going uphill. I could have easily exceeded my CP by over 200 watts when climbing. I'm amazed at how "soft" I have to pedal. 2. Pedaling downhill requires effort. I have to switch gears must faster and increase my cadence to hit my targets. I used to always coast. 3. It's very hard to hard to do a precise workout outdoors unlike the trainer. I don't know if I'll be on the trainer again as the weather improves, but I totally see the value of it now. 4. I had my Joule set to 5s averaging. It was jumping all over the place. I reset it to 10s averaging and it was better but it still wasn't like the trainer where it's a lot easier to hold a number. 4. Riding is much more enjoyable for me now. I'm now officially a numbers guy - didn't think I could ever really have fun training with a powermeter but it's more than worth it!! Jim Gearing is very important. On very hilly rides I love my 11-28 cassette. 11 to go down, 28 to go up spinning. I may switch my chainrings from 50-34 to 52-36 this year. We have a tendency to put the trainer away when the roads become clear but as difficult as it is to ride the trainer in the summer, it's great for doing VO2 workouts when it's raining. Schedules are hard and to be able to get in a 1hr VO2 workout when it's raining helps a lot. |
2014-03-09 8:46 AM in reply to: marcag |
Champion 9407 Montague Gold Mines, Nova Scotia | Subject: Week 10 One of the things that Marc has posted about is how to progress as your race approaches. This is something that often leads to confusion, especially for those who have spent time studying The Triathlete’s Training Bible by Friel as the way periodization is explained there tends to highlight the idea of base (easy) to build (hard) to peak but periodization is really about the progression from general training to specific training. In the general phase, training should include a variety of training stimuli which is what we’ve been doing. We have easy (level 2) for warmup, between hard efforts, cooldown, tempo/sweet spot (level 3, into low level 4) intervals, threshold (level 4) intervals, VO2max (level 5) intervals and some very short all out efforts (level 6+). As race season approaches, then you want to look at what your race is going to entail and tailor your training to those efforts. Until the final few weeks before an IM or HIM, I would likely still keep a threshold effort in most weeks as FTP is the best predictor of performance across all triathlon distances, but I would limit anything that is above level 4. For IM, since your ride will be basically a level 2 effort, this is where you want to focus your long rides and if you have limited time, then I would look at some tempo or sweet spot work to compensate for reduced volume. Your key race sessions should be long steady rides at a level 2 effort and at no point should you exceed FTP and staying under 90% should be your goal. HIM is going to be a level 2 ride for some and level 3 ride for others – I would suggest that 3 hours will roughly be dividing line. If you plan to ride comfortably under 3 hours, then target steady level 3, if over, then high level 2. Your key race prep sessions should be steady at these levels and you can also mimic the course so if you have lots of hills in your race, practice riding hills at a steady effort where you never exceed FTP. Short course (both sprint and Olympic) will be very similar to each other as both are raced very close to FTP. Therefore level 3 should be limited and levels 4 and 5 should be your key workouts (with level 4 being the key race prep riding). Other riding should be level 2 so that you can hit your other rides, swims and runs well. TTers Workout 1 – VO2max 1 Workout 2 – Threshold 1 Workout 3 – VO2max 2 All Rounders Workout 1 – Threshold 1 Workout 2 – VO2max 1 Workout 3 – Threshold 2 or Sweet Spot Sprinters Workout 1 – Threshold 1 Workout 2 – Threshold 2 Workout 3 – Sweet Spot Long Course Race In The Near Future Workout 1 – Threshold 1 Workout 2 – Sweet Spot Workout 3 – Long Ride Workout 4 (optional) – Threshold 2 VO2max 1 – 1:05:00 10:00 spin build to 65% of FTP 5x15s all out, 45s spin 60% FTP 5:00 spin 60% FTP 5x2:30 >110% FTP (hard), 2:30 60% FTP 3:00 spin 60% FTP 2x5:00 at 98% FTP, 1:00 60% FTP 5:00 spin <60% FTP VO2max 2 – 1:10:00 10:00 spin build to 65% of FTP 5:00 at FTP 5:00 spin 60% FTP 6x3:00 at 106% (hard) FTP, 2:00 60% FTP 5:00 at <60% FTP 10:00 at 97% FTP 5:00 at <60% FTP Threshold 1 – 1:15:00 10:00 spin build to 65% of FTP 5x30s >105% FTP, 30s 60% FTP 5:00 60% FTP 2x20:00 at 96% FTP, 5:00 60% FTP 5:00 60% FTP Threshold 2 – 1:10:00 10:00 spin build to 65% of FTP 2x2:30 105% of FTP, 2:30 60% FTP 5:00 60% FTP 5x5:00 at 99% FTP, 1:00 60% FTP 5:00 60% FTP 5x30s >105% of FTP, 30s 60% FTP 5:00 60% FTP Sweet Spot – 1:45:00 10:00 spin build to 65% of FTP 5:00 at FTP 5:00 60% FTP 4x15:00 at 90% FTP, 2:30 at 60% FTP 10:00 at 97% FTP 5:00 <60% FTP Long Ride – 3:00:00 10:00 spin build to 65% of FTP 5x10s all out, 50s 60% FTP 5:00 65% FTP 2x{ 10:00 at 78% FTP 10:00 at 80% FTP 10:00 at 82% FTP 10:00 at 84% FTP 10:00 at 86% FTP 10:00 at 60% FTP} 5:00 at 60% FTP 30:00 steady at 82% FTP 5:00 60% FTP |
2014-03-09 9:06 AM in reply to: gsmacleod |
Extreme Veteran 5722 | Subject: RE: Week 10 Originally posted by gsmacleod One of the things that Marc has posted about is how to progress as your race approaches. This is something that often leads to confusion, especially for those who have spent time studying The Triathlete’s Training Bible by Friel as the way periodization is explained there tends to highlight the idea of base (easy) to build (hard) to peak but periodization is really about the progression from general training to specific training. In the general phase, training should include a variety of training stimuli which is what we’ve been doing. We have easy (level 2) for warmup, between hard efforts, cooldown, tempo/sweet spot (level 3, into low level 4) intervals, threshold (level 4) intervals, VO2max (level 5) intervals and some very short all out efforts (level 6+). As race season approaches, then you want to look at what your race is going to entail and tailor your training to those efforts. Until the final few weeks before an IM or HIM, I would likely still keep a threshold effort in most weeks as FTP is the best predictor of performance across all triathlon distances, but I would limit anything that is above level 4. For IM, since your ride will be basically a level 2 effort, this is where you want to focus your long rides and if you have limited time, then I would look at some tempo or sweet spot work to compensate for reduced volume. Your key race sessions should be long steady rides at a level 2 effort and at no point should you exceed FTP and staying under 90% should be your goal. HIM is going to be a level 2 ride for some and level 3 ride for others – I would suggest that 3 hours will roughly be dividing line. If you plan to ride comfortably under 3 hours, then target steady level 3, if over, then high level 2. Your key race prep sessions should be steady at these levels and you can also mimic the course so if you have lots of hills in your race, practice riding hills at a steady effort where you never exceed FTP. Short course (both sprint and Olympic) will be very similar to each other as both are raced very close to FTP. Therefore level 3 should be limited and levels 4 and 5 should be your key workouts (with level 4 being the key race prep riding). Other riding should be level 2 so that you can hit your other rides, swims and runs well. TTers Workout 1 – VO2max 1 Workout 2 – Threshold 1 Workout 3 – VO2max 2 All Rounders Workout 1 – Threshold 1 Workout 2 – VO2max 1 Workout 3 – Threshold 2 or Sweet Spot Sprinters Workout 1 – Threshold 1 Workout 2 – Threshold 2 Workout 3 – Sweet Spot Long Course Race In The Near Future Workout 1 – Threshold 1 Workout 2 – Sweet Spot Workout 3 – Long Ride Workout 4 (optional) – Threshold 2 VO2max 1 – 1:05:00 10:00 spin build to 65% of FTP 5x15s all out, 45s spin 60% FTP 5:00 spin 60% FTP 5x2:30 >110% FTP (hard), 2:30 60% FTP 3:00 spin 60% FTP 2x5:00 at 98% FTP, 1:00 60% FTP 5:00 spin <60% FTP VO2max 2 – 1:10:00 10:00 spin build to 65% of FTP 5:00 at FTP 5:00 spin 60% FTP 6x3:00 at 106% (hard) FTP, 2:00 60% FTP 5:00 at <60% FTP 10:00 at 97% FTP 5:00 at <60% FTP Threshold 1 – 1:15:00 10:00 spin build to 65% of FTP 5x30s >105% FTP, 30s 60% FTP 5:00 60% FTP 2x20:00 at 96% FTP, 5:00 60% FTP 5:00 60% FTP Threshold 2 – 1:10:00 10:00 spin build to 65% of FTP 2x2:30 105% of FTP, 2:30 60% FTP 5:00 60% FTP 5x5:00 at 99% FTP, 1:00 60% FTP 5:00 60% FTP 5x30s >105% of FTP, 30s 60% FTP 5:00 60% FTP Sweet Spot – 1:45:00 10:00 spin build to 65% of FTP 5:00 at FTP 5:00 60% FTP 4x15:00 at 90% FTP, 2:30 at 60% FTP 10:00 at 97% FTP 5:00 <60% FTP Long Ride – 3:00:00 10:00 spin build to 65% of FTP 5x10s all out, 50s 60% FTP 5:00 65% FTP 2x{ 10:00 at 78% FTP 10:00 at 80% FTP 10:00 at 82% FTP 10:00 at 84% FTP 10:00 at 86% FTP 10:00 at 60% FTP} 5:00 at 60% FTP 30:00 steady at 82% FTP 5:00 60% FTP Attachments ---------------- BTWK10-VO2-1.mrc (0KB - 18 downloads) BTWK10-VO2-2.mrc (0KB - 12 downloads) BTWK10-THR-1.mrc (0KB - 15 downloads) BTWK10-THR-2.mrc (0KB - 14 downloads) BTWK10-SWE-1.mrc (0KB - 12 downloads) |
2014-03-09 12:32 PM in reply to: marcag |
Master 3022 | Subject: RE: Week 9 I finished Wk9 sweet spot this morning. I planned in doing yesterday but life got I the way. Regardless, I went out a bit too strong on the 1st 30 minutes (96%) which made the 2nd a bit tougher in the final minutes. I managed to keep that one at 94%. The last 10 minute interval I averaged 99%. Legs are tired now but happy with the power I was able to hold on the long intervals. (3-9-14 Ride Details 2.PNG) (3-9-14 Ride Details 1.PNG) Attachments ---------------- 3-9-14 Ride Details 2.PNG (23KB - 3 downloads) _2014-03-09-080000.fit (113KB - 1 downloads) 3-9-14 Ride Details 1.PNG (41KB - 4 downloads) |
2014-03-09 4:41 PM in reply to: gsmacleod |
Champion 9407 Montague Gold Mines, Nova Scotia | Subject: RE: Run Program Run program is starting (well the prep work anyway): http://www.beginnertriathlete.com/discussion/forums/thread-view.asp... Shane |
|
2014-03-09 4:53 PM in reply to: marcag |
Subject: RE: Week 10 Just finished my first road race of the season. Short one, with a 4.7 mile climb at 4% thrown in the middle. I think some of you may find it interesting in that it was short, similar to a 20' test, but there are variations in power while responding to attacks, surges, or sitting in the draft...but not that much because it was uphill. A flatter road race would have much bigger spikes and a lot more coasting or soft pedaling. The lower dotted yellow line represents my AP of 279w, and the upper dotted yellow line represents my NP of 304w. You can see how much time I spent above and below the line and where it occurred. The race was neutral the first mile, and as soon as we hit the base of the climb, it was game on. You can see the big effort the first 5-10 minutes to establish position as breaks formed. I was in the second group of 3. Then the last 4 spikes was me trying to make an effort to latch back on as a gap formed, making an attack myself, then trying to latch back on when my attack failed. You can also see the low power at the end shows I got dropped at the end...LOL. Still managed 3rd in my division and 6th OA.
(2014 Pineapple Hill Sprint RR WKO.jpg) Attachments ---------------- 2014 Pineapple Hill Sprint RR WKO.jpg (189KB - 4 downloads) |
2014-03-10 12:04 AM in reply to: Jason N |
92 | Subject: RE: Week 10 Pretty cool stuff Jason. Based on the average heart rate it looks like you were pushing it pretty much the whole time, just like a FTP test. On the big drop off at the end, were you just cooked or did you know you could back off and hold the position. I know I would be looking over my shoulder asking myself if I can stop peddling yet. LOL. Nice work though, thanks for sharing. I did Week 9 Sweet Spot this evening and even though I was not looking forward to the 2 half hour intervals, it went much better than expected. I hit and went just a touch over on the power for the intervals and came off the bike feeling pretty good with more confidence about what I'm capable of. Besides the long intervals, my other hesitation was the 1:45 total time on the bike. I have struggled to get used to the road bike position after coming off the hybrid but I went through the instruction video for my Cobb saddle and made some minor tweaks to the seat angle plus dropped the seat about 1 or 2 mm. These changes seemed to help a lot. I did the measurement from the tip of the fingers to the elbow to find the right distance from the saddle to the handle bars. It looks like my bars are set 2 cm further than optimal. The video said if your more than 2 cm off to change the stem. My current stem is a 120 mm. Not sure if that's OK or if I should go ahead and go to a 100 mm. As I go through the rides, my hands seem to feel most natural just about 2 cm behind the hoods. So maybe that's my answer. Week 9: Threshold 1: TSS 101 Threshold 2: TSS 88 Sweet Spot: TSS 128 Total TSS: 317 Have a good Monday Ron Attachments ---------------- Ron-2014-03-09-bt-power-week-9-swe-1-816261.tcx (2972KB - 2 downloads) |
2014-03-10 12:50 AM in reply to: WaterRat |
Subject: RE: Week 10 I was cooked and nobody was within sight behind us. I knew I had 3rd in my division in the bag and I didn't have enough motivation to gut myself for 2nd. There was also a high speed right turn just before the finish which was wet and I didn't want to risk it. If I had a chance for first...sure...but not 2nd. |
2014-03-10 9:31 AM in reply to: WaterRat |
Oakville | Subject: RE: Week 10 Still recovering from a bug, but managed Week 9 Threshold 2 last night. Wasn't feeling 100% but still came close to the targets. The aerobic decoupling was above 10%, but not sure if that was because it wasn't a balanced workout? For the last few 5 minute intervals where I was 98% of CP, my HR never went above my LTHR. I believe that this is an indicator that my CP may be fairly accurate. Due to being sick, I was only able to finish Threshold 1 and Threshold 2 last week, and then will be heading on a 1 week vacation with the family this Friday. I'm going to try to get all 3 workouts in over the next 4 days, as I won't be on a bike for a week. Plenty of running and ocean swimming though, so that's a bit of bonus. Scott
Attachments ---------------- WK9THR2.tcx (3156KB - 2 downloads) |
|
Shane's (gsmacleod) Coaching Mentor Group - Open Pages: 1 ... 2 3 4 5 | |||
Birkierunner's (Jim Kelley) General + Long Course Group (OPEN) Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 17 | |||
Slornow and Wannabefaster's Winter Group version 3-CLOSED Pages: 1 ... 72 73 74 75 | |||
| ||||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
|