BT Development Mentor Program Archives » Increase your Cycling Power over the winter = Faster times on 2009 Rss Feed  
Moderators: alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 31
 
 
2008-11-14 11:17 AM
in reply to: #1792702

User image

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: Increase your Cycling Power over the winter = Faster times on 2009

^^^ what he said. what I try to do is to keep my optimal cadence even.

What my optimal cadence is? well the one I feel most comfortable riding all the time, for me it is between around 90-95 rpm. For others it might be anywhere between 75 to 100 rpm, that is not all that important, what's important is that you keep your effort at that optimal cadence when possible.

With that in mind when doing intervals shooting for an specific power/HR/RPE I up my effort by changing gears (one at a time) until I am on the goal effort but my rpms remain around the same (again for me 90-95 rpm).



2008-11-14 12:37 PM
in reply to: #1792702

User image

Extreme Veteran
451
1001001001002525
Lake Effect Snow Country
Subject: RE: Increase your Cycling Power over the winter = Faster times on 2009
Thanks, that's exactly what I wanted to know. I'll change gears and try to stay at 90rpms...
2008-11-15 4:00 PM
in reply to: #1792702

User image

Extreme Veteran
333
10010010025
Subject: RE: Increase your Cycling Power over the winter = Faster times on 2009
Hi Jorge! Thank you for doing this. Please count me in for the HR/RPE group. This is what I need to keep motivated and improve my bike speed for next year's races.
2008-11-16 12:37 AM
in reply to: #1792702

User image

Master
3479
20001000100100100100252525
Utah
Subject: RE: Increase your Cycling Power over the winter = Faster times on 2009
Could you clarify what the different RPE's would correlate to, please? For example, is 6 the all-out can only sustain the effort for a few minutes level, or is that a 10? I know there are several different schools of thought on the numerical assignments, and I didn't see anywhere on your blog that it was spelled out. Of course, I have a nasty habit of asking for something that's right in front of me... 
2008-11-16 7:21 AM
in reply to: #1792702

User image

Elite
3595
20001000500252525
Quebec, Canada
Subject: RE: Increase your Cycling Power over the winter = Faster times on 2009

Hi Jorge,

I was preparing my planing for next week and realised that the 3rd workout of the week gives a total of 55min. Is it normal or am I unable to understand your formula. 

Here's how I read it

WU - 5' @ (68-73%

MS - 2 x 10' @ (86-91%) / 5' @ (78-83%) then 15' @ (78-83%)

CD - 5' @ (68-73%)

That would give a total of 55 minutes, is it correct? 

Thank you in advance

2008-11-16 8:44 AM
in reply to: #1810818

User image

Extreme Veteran
563
5002525
Pekin, IL
Subject: RE: Increase your Cycling Power over the winter = Faster times on 2009
rlejeune - 2008-11-16 7:21 AM

Hi Jorge,

I was preparing my planing for next week and realised that the 3rd workout of the week gives a total of 55min. Is it normal or am I unable to understand your formula. 

Here's how I read it

WU - 5' @ (68-73%

MS - 2 x 10' @ (86-91%) / 5' @ (78-83%) then 15' @ (78-83%)

CD - 5' @ (68-73%)

That would give a total of 55 minutes, is it correct? 

Thank you in advance

 

I did this one last week for an early start.  I did the 10' set then the 5' rest interval, then the 10' set, then went right into the 15' set as it's the same %'s as the 5' rest interval set.  I don't know if this was right, but it came out to 50' total.



2008-11-16 1:17 PM
in reply to: #1792702


2

Subject: RE: Increase your Cycling Power over the winter = Faster times on 2009
Jorge, Thanks for doing this...sounds great....but how will we get the day to day work outs?? will  you post them here or will they come to us an an email in out BT in box??  can you elaborate.....
2008-11-16 1:54 PM
in reply to: #1792702

User image

Elite
3595
20001000500252525
Quebec, Canada
Subject: RE: Increase your Cycling Power over the winter = Faster times on 2009
Just visit Jorge's logs, he has a link to his blog and the programs are there

Edited by rlejeune 2008-11-16 1:54 PM
2008-11-16 3:38 PM
in reply to: #1811108


2

Subject: RE: Increase your Cycling Power over the winter = Faster times on 2009
Thanks, Robert!! I went to the site and found the program.
2008-11-16 8:37 PM
in reply to: #1810765

User image

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: Increase your Cycling Power over the winter = Faster times on 2009

givemashot - 2008-11-16 12:37 AM Could you clarify what the different RPE's would correlate to, please? For example, is 6 the all-out can only sustain the effort for a few minutes level, or is that a 10? I know there are several different schools of thought on the numerical assignments, and I didn't see anywhere on your blog that it was spelled out. Of course, I have a nasty habit of asking for something that's right in front of me... 
the info is on my blog, here is the link: http://jorgepbmcoaching.blogspot.com/2008/11/winter-cycling-plan-training-zones-and.html 

2008-11-16 8:40 PM
in reply to: #1811081

User image

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: Increase your Cycling Power over the winter = Faster times on 2009
tri MD - 2008-11-16 1:17 PM Jorge, Thanks for doing this...sounds great....but how will we get the day to day work outs?? will  you post them here or will they come to us an an email in out BT in box??  can you elaborate.....
there aren't any daily sessions. There are three suggested sessions per week that you will do as you can. The sessions will posted on my blog (http://jorgepbmcoaching.blogspot.com/) all the specifics are in this thread and in the blog, please go to read it.


2008-11-16 8:40 PM
in reply to: #1810852

User image

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: Increase your Cycling Power over the winter = Faster times on 2009
CKinsey - 2008-11-16 8:44 AM
rlejeune - 2008-11-16 7:21 AM

Hi Jorge,

I was preparing my planing for next week and realised that the 3rd workout of the week gives a total of 55min. Is it normal or am I unable to understand your formula. 

Here's how I read it

WU - 5' @ (68-73%

MS - 2 x 10' @ (86-91%) / 5' @ (78-83%) then 15' @ (78-83%)

CD - 5' @ (68-73%)

That would give a total of 55 minutes, is it correct? 

Thank you in advance

 

I did this one last week for an early start.  I did the 10' set then the 5' rest interval, then the 10' set, then went right into the 15' set as it's the same %'s as the 5' rest interval set.  I don't know if this was right, but it came out to 50' total.

what he said!
2008-11-17 10:20 AM
in reply to: #1811619

User image

Lethbridge, Alberta
Bronze member
Subject: RE: Increase your Cycling Power over the winter = Faster times on 2009
JorgeM - 2008-11-16 7:40 PM

CKinsey - 2008-11-16 8:44 AM
rlejeune - 2008-11-16 7:21 AM

Hi Jorge,

I was preparing my planing for next week and realised that the 3rd workout of the week gives a total of 55min. Is it normal or am I unable to understand your formula. 

Here's how I read it

WU - 5' @ (68-73%

MS - 2 x 10' @ (86-91%) / 5' @ (78-83%) then 15' @ (78-83%)

CD - 5' @ (68-73%)

That would give a total of 55 minutes, is it correct? 

Thank you in advance

 

I did this one last week for an early start.  I did the 10' set then the 5' rest interval, then the 10' set, then went right into the 15' set as it's the same %'s as the 5' rest interval set.  I don't know if this was right, but it came out to 50' total.

what he said!


I tried this one last night as an erg workout on the ct. In the power meter version of Q3, the rests are at a lower wattage than the 15 minute bit but as described above I just skipped over the second rest. Erg is different because you can pedal at the same cadence in the same gear throughout the session and the ct varies the loads for each interval. One drawback is that the ct wants a 10 minute warm up before calibrating the rolling resistance. I did a 10 minute warm up again and calibrated before the main set, so I still got an extra 5 minutes in the workout.
2008-11-17 11:10 AM
in reply to: #1792702

Expert
936
50010010010010025
Salisbury
Subject: RE: Increase your Cycling Power over the winter = Faster times on 2009
I did the first w/o this morning. I'm pleasantly suprised to see I didn't lose that much considering I haven't been on a bike since September. Of course it's only the first stage so we'll see
2008-11-17 1:26 PM
in reply to: #1792702

User image

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: Increase your Cycling Power over the winter = Faster times on 2009

Ok people; get ready to start laying the foundation to increase your power over the winter!

Some will be starting today or some of us tomorrow. Remember to read the notes and details on this thread and on the blog. As I get more information I will continue to post on my blog and anytime anyone has any questions please post in here. You can always get links to the workouts and other info on my BT log or my blog.

If any of you haven’t really take any time off from training and you fitness is solid right now, then you can go ahead and add more time on the saddle while those of us who did catch up . You can add an interval; you can make WU or CD longer or just add some time at z2-z3. Just make sure you don't kill yourself and you will be ready to do the next session 48 hrs later.

If you are like me and took time away from the saddle and need to get back in shape, then do each session as you fitness allows you. IOW, if the session is too tough then make it a bit shorter; make rests a bit longer, etc. if it is a bit easy add an interval or make it a bit longer. Within a few weeks you should be able to have a solid idea of how fit you are and how much you can push. Just remember the key is consistency; it is better to do a bit less today so you can do more the next sessions rather than doing too much today and end up too tired to do anything the next session.

Sessions start at 40-50 min and will get to 1 hr considering this are geared to do on the trainer. If you are lucky enough to live in nice weather area then you can do this outside and ride longer.

The next two weeks are prep phase - let’s get use to the training routine, understand the plan, get the body used to training again, make sure our training area is organized and ready, etc

***Remember this is a general plan with general guidelines so each of you will have to do adjustments that fit your needs, but if you follow the core of it and are consistent getting all sessions every week you WILL grow fitter and stronger***

Enjoy, train smart, be consistent and let’s all push each other!   Don’t be afraid to post questions, post your progress and go and check on each other to see they are still on the wagon!

2008-11-17 1:27 PM
in reply to: #1812398

User image

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: Increase your Cycling Power over the winter = Faster times on 2009

Rencor - 2008-11-17 11:10 AM I did the first w/o this morning. I'm pleasantly suprised to see I didn't lose that much considering I haven't been on a bike since September. Of course it's only the first stage so we'll see

good job, I will start tomorrow! My schedule will follow a Tue, Thur, Sat frequency



2008-11-17 3:37 PM
in reply to: #1792702

User image

Master
1222
1000100100
Lafayette, IN
Subject: RE: Increase your Cycling Power over the winter = Faster times on 2009

Ok, so here goes!  I did the first workout today.  I promise I won't do this with upcoming workouts, but thought some of you analytical types might want to look at this and give me some feedback and it may answer questions that others have as they embark on this program.  I have never had any real direction as to how to train other than reading and have never really done much in the way of structured interval training.  Here are my stats from today:

Oh, ,my estimated LTHR based on self testing is 167bpm on the bike.  I am trying to get it professionally tested.

Time: 40:08 min

AveHR: 132-79%

MaxHR: 164-98%

WU: ave-115, max 142- 69-85%

Intervals:

aveHR: 154-92%

MaxHR: 164-98%

10 min after intervals: Ave-144, Max 161-86-96%

CD: Ave-130, max 138-78-83%

I would say my RPE during the intervals was at 5-6, and the CD was at 2.

I will be following a Monday, Thursday, Saturday schedule due to my business travel and it may change from time to time at that.

This is going to be very good for me!



Edited by Gregkl 2008-11-17 3:39 PM
2008-11-17 4:11 PM
in reply to: #1792702

User image

Elite
3447
2000100010010010010025
West Allis, WI
Subject: RE: Increase your Cycling Power over the winter = Faster times on 2009
Same here. I have never followed any plan directly. I have also been avoiding my bike! I started my plan today.I will be on a MWF plan. I didn't break my wo down as much but my av hr was 133  and max was 162. My seat needs to be moved up some as my knees were sore throughout the session. I think once my seat is right I will be just fine. Thanks again Jorge for doing this.
2008-11-17 5:25 PM
in reply to: #1812971

User image

Regular
68
2525
Waltham
Subject: RE: Increase your Cycling Power over the winter = Faster times on 2009

Gregkl or others...

Wondering what you use for HRM.  I am in the market to get a new one as I have a basic polar which does not allow a lap or pause function.  Therefore I can only get an avg & max HR for the entire workout.  I assume a lap function is how you got the avg/max for all the different portions of the training session.  Is this correct?  Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks.

 

2008-11-17 7:36 PM
in reply to: #1813212

User image

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: Increase your Cycling Power over the winter = Faster times on 2009
monkeytri - 2008-11-17 5:25 PM

Gregkl or others...

Wondering what you use for HRM.  I am in the market to get a new one as I have a basic polar which does not allow a lap or pause function.  Therefore I can only get an avg & max HR for the entire workout.  I assume a lap function is how you got the avg/max for all the different portions of the training session.  Is this correct?  Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks.

 

pretty much any of the Polar, Timex, Garmin, Saunto and other options will work. They have different  models with different features and prices. I would personally suggest one HR and GPS/pedometer because you can use the HR for the bike and the pace/distance for the run which IMO is the best way to become a better runner.
2008-11-17 8:04 PM
in reply to: #1813212

User image

Master
2202
2000100100
Canton, Michigan
Subject: RE: Increase your Cycling Power over the winter = Faster times on 2009
monkeytri - 2008-11-17 6:25 PM

Gregkl or others...

Wondering what you use for HRM.  I am in the market to get a new one as I have a basic polar which does not allow a lap or pause function.  Therefore I can only get an avg & max HR for the entire workout.  I assume a lap function is how you got the avg/max for all the different portions of the training session.  Is this correct?  Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks.

I like my Polar (models have changed since my purchase) as I can use it for the entire tri.  But if training is the main goal, I really like my wife's Garmin 305, though it doesn't like water, so swimming is out of the question unless you do some other steps that I wouldn't bother with.  

 Were still trying to figure out what it can do.  But I really like if for running and riding and borrow it whenever I can.  Another nice feature for those of us stuck on trainers is the cadence add on ($38 at Amazon), which will give you your cadence and mph (not sure how accurate but at least it's something)  There have been some threads regarding sales at Costco which is happening now and REI's may have them in a bundle package in the next week or two.  Might be worth checking into.

Just a little warning the altitude function can be a little out of wack.

 



2008-11-17 8:41 PM
in reply to: #1813212

User image

Master
1222
1000100100
Lafayette, IN
Subject: RE: Increase your Cycling Power over the winter = Faster times on 2009
monkeytri - 2008-11-17 5:25 PM

Gregkl or others...

Wondering what you use for HRM.  I am in the market to get a new one as I have a basic polar which does not allow a lap or pause function.  Therefore I can only get an avg & max HR for the entire workout.  I assume a lap function is how you got the avg/max for all the different portions of the training session.  Is this correct?  Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks.

 What the rest said!  I have an older Polar S410 which is on it's last leg.  Leaks water and one of the buttons doesn't work anymore.  I am looking at the new Polar's, but am considering training by RPE until I can afford a power meter.  I do like the features of the RS400SD though it is expensive! I have always trained with HR, so I am not sure if I should do away with it.  In sprints and other tri's that are not chip timed, I can take my own splits if I have a Polar unit that I can wear for all three disciplines.  Or I could get a timex for $40 and still get my splits without the HR data.

Jorge, weigh in on whether you think I should stay with HR vs. RPE only.

 

2008-11-17 9:06 PM
in reply to: #1813576

User image

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: Increase your Cycling Power over the winter = Faster times on 2009
Gregkl - 2008-11-17 8:41 PM

Jorge, weigh in on whether you think I should stay with HR vs. RPE only.

for the next few weeks I would go by RPE 1st and HR second until we do the test. That been said, given the limitations of HR training it would be wise for you to learn to develop your RPE. You will use the HR to complement your training sessions and make sure you are on the right park but RPE will always should get you closer to the actual intensity you should be training at. It just takes a bit of time to develop that skill!

2008-11-17 9:49 PM
in reply to: #1792702

User image

Master
1887
1000500100100100252525
Loveland, Ohio
Subject: RE: Increase your Cycling Power over the winter = Faster times on 2009

Thank you so much again for doing this, Jorge.  I, like so many others, really appreciate your valuable time.  I'm really, really new to all of this, and I just want to be absolutely clear that I'm proceeding correctly.  I'm really sorry if these questions are stupid, but could I trouble you to let me know if I've got this right?

I'm in the HRM/RPE group.  So, I go to your blog and scroll down to the "Cycling Plan Week 1 (HRM & RPE)" and find this chart.  I then see what I need to do for my first session or Q1.

The first thing I need to do for my first session is a warm up (WU), specifically WU #1.  So, I then find your WU chart for HRM/RPEs to see what the WU #1 looks like.

WU #1 will be 10' @68-73% HR + 5' as 30" @ 97-103%HR/30" 68-73HR.  So, I will spend my first 10 minutes getting and keeping my HR between 68-73%.  Then I spend the next 5 minutes and 30 seconds getting and keeping my HR between 97-103%.  Then I spend 30 seconds between 68-73%.

So, then I check out what the MS involves.  I spend my first 30 seconds getting and keeping my HR between 95-100%.  I take a rest for 30 seconds and repeat this 9 times.  I would then spend my next 10 minutes getting and keeping my HR between 78-83%.

I then do my cool down which consists of 5 minutes of getting and keeping my HR between 68-73%, with an RPE of 2-3.

So, I will have spent 16 minutes in WU, 20 minutes in MS and 5 minutes in CD with a total of 41 minutes.

Am I on the right track?  Thank you soooo very much!

- Lora

2008-11-17 10:26 PM
in reply to: #1792702

User image

Elite
3489
20001000100100100100252525
Lakewood, CO
Subject: RE: Increase your Cycling Power over the winter = Faster times on 2009
This sounds like fun and the duration works out great!  I should finish up, take a couple of weeks to "chill" and then start the 2009 training plans!!!!
New Thread
BT Development Mentor Program Archives » Increase your Cycling Power over the winter = Faster times on 2009 Rss Feed  
 
 
of 31