IMKY by the numbers

Forum guidelines BT super discount
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » IMKY by the numbers Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 2
 
 
2008-09-02 6:22 PM

User image

Champion
10154
500050001002525
Alabama
Subject: IMKY by the numbers

IMKY 2008 Numbers

2,644 registered 

1,975 starters

669 DNS (25.3%)

1,793 finishers

182 DNF (9.2%)

DNS + DNF = 851 (32.2%)

Net % finishers:    67.8%

 

So how does this compare to 2007?  I thought you'd never ask. 

IMKY 2007 Participants:  2,131*
IMKY Finishers:  1564  
% Finishers:  73%
143 DNFs  (8% of starters)
424 DNS (20% of those signed up)
*I'm not certain of this number.  They (Mdot) take down the number of people registered after event.
If you signed up for 2009, I'm not trying to freak you out but sometimes a little fear is a powerful motivational tool. 

2008-09-02 6:28 PM
in reply to: #1644690

User image

Champion
10471
500050001001001001002525
Dallas, TX
Subject: RE: IMKY by the numbers
I was wondering about those numbers! Thanks Mike!
2008-09-02 6:39 PM
in reply to: #1644690

User image

Champion
5615
5000500100
Subject: RE: IMKY by the numbers
I thought you were DONE tapering, Mike.
2008-09-02 6:45 PM
in reply to: #1644690

User image

Expert
1226
100010010025
Chicago
Subject: RE: IMKY by the numbers
Awesome.

Does the number of finishers listed include those who finished in 17+ hours?
2008-09-02 7:01 PM
in reply to: #1644750

User image

Champion
10154
500050001002525
Alabama
Subject: RE: IMKY by the numbers

RunningJayhawk - 2008-09-02 6:45 PM Awesome. Does the number of finishers listed include those who finished in 17+ hours?

 

I dunno.  I got that number off of what Aaron posted on the IMKY watching thread.

 

Cube, I'm tapering from 140.6 miles a week to 0 miles a week.

2008-09-02 10:51 PM
in reply to: #1644690

User image

Pro
3730
2000100050010010025
NorCal
Subject: RE: IMKY by the numbers
Mike, you are the numbers god!!!

2008-09-02 11:43 PM
in reply to: #1645312

Champion
9430
50002000200010010010010025
No excuses!
Subject: RE: IMKY by the numbers

AbbieR - 2008-09-02 11:51 PM Mike, you are the numbers god!!!

Plan on seeing a lot more of that now that he has all this time on his hands Wink

2008-09-03 8:06 AM
in reply to: #1645347

User image

Champion
10154
500050001002525
Alabama
Subject: RE: IMKY by the numbers
Shermbelle - 2008-09-02 11:43 PM

AbbieR - 2008-09-02 11:51 PM Mike, you are the numbers god!!!

Plan on seeing a lot more of that now that he has all this time on his hands Wink

 

Whatcho talkin' 'bout Willis?!  I've got to train for IMKY 2009.....be here before we know it!

2008-09-03 10:06 AM
in reply to: #1644690

User image

Pro
4672
200020005001002525
Nutmeg State
Subject: RE: IMKY by the numbers

"Net % finishers:    67.8%"

So IMKY was tougher than any bar exam.  Pretty impressive stuff.

2008-09-03 10:17 AM
in reply to: #1644690

User image

Extreme Veteran
725
50010010025
Subject: RE: IMKY by the numbers

How is this one for you Mike?  What % of finishers were BTers?  :-)  Are your ready for another number challenge?

2008-09-03 10:24 AM
in reply to: #1645952

User image

Pro
3730
2000100050010010025
NorCal
Subject: RE: IMKY by the numbers
amymengel - 2008-09-03 8:17 AM

How is this one for you Mike?  What % of finishers were BTers?  :-)  Are your ready for another number challenge?

Well done Amy!  Mike will come through for us



2008-09-03 10:29 AM
in reply to: #1645979

User image

Master
1376
1000100100100252525
Chicago
Subject: RE: IMKY by the numbers
AbbieR - 2008-09-03 10:24 AM
amymengel - 2008-09-03 8:17 AM

How is this one for you Mike?  What % of finishers were BTers?  :-)  Are your ready for another number challenge?

Well done Amy!  Mike will come through for us

Be sure to include me.  I actually finished this dang race, even though my timing chip was showing somebody else and the BT tracking spreadsheet had me as a DNS. 

2008-09-03 10:34 AM
in reply to: #1644690

User image

Champion
10154
500050001002525
Alabama
Subject: RE: IMKY by the numbers

I've got one of my analysts working on a bell-curve graph of finish times.  I occured to me last night from looking at the finish times that the there are only a handful of sub-12s, a few more sub-13s, a whole bunch of 14 and 15 hrs finishes and less 16 and 17 hr finishes.  I tried to verify this Gaussian distrobution graphically but hit my Excel knowledge ceiling so hard I've still got a bump on my lil' haid.

Stay tuned....there are still more numbers to crunch!  :-)

 

~Mike

2008-09-03 11:06 AM
in reply to: #1646004

User image

Champion
5615
5000500100
Subject: RE: IMKY by the numbers
Don't forget to adjust for RMS.
2008-09-03 11:37 AM
in reply to: #1644690

User image

Champion
6993
50001000500100100100100252525
Chicago, Illinois
Subject: RE: IMKY by the numbers
Well I did not get to race IMKY but atleast I am still a number and I was not alone with 25% of the field not starting like me.

2008-09-03 4:58 PM
in reply to: #1644690

User image

Master
1920
1000500100100100100
Ann Arbor, MI
Subject: RE: IMKY by the numbers
Just curious, since you like numbers- what's the typical DNS rate at Ironman? Could I get that with some error bars and standard deviations?


2008-09-04 6:50 AM
in reply to: #1644690

User image

Master
2014
2000
Ohio
Subject: RE: IMKY by the numbers
Unless it's in a pie graph I'm not lookin' at it.
2008-09-04 8:26 AM
in reply to: #1644690

User image

Champion
10154
500050001002525
Alabama
Subject: RE: IMKY by the numbers
The finish times were converted to fractional days and put all the times is .05 day (1.2 hr) buckets.  The data is roughly bell shaped and the average was :
13:41:36

This confirms my theory....not just about IM finish times but life in general.  There are only marginal differences in MOST of us....there will always people people out on the extremes but we're not that much different.

~Mike

 



Edited by Rogillio 2008-09-04 8:48 AM




(IMKY Graph.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
IMKY Graph.jpg (26KB - 8 downloads)
2008-09-04 8:34 AM
in reply to: #1644690

User image

Veteran
172
1002525
Mansfield, TX
Subject: RE: IMKY by the numbers
Presented like a true engineer


Thanks Mike

(Hey it was great talking with you in line before the race. Awesome job!!!)
2008-09-04 9:13 AM
in reply to: #1644690

User image

Champion
10471
500050001001001001002525
Dallas, TX
Subject: RE: IMKY by the numbers
I'm also curious how those numbers are split between males and females.

2008-09-04 10:14 AM
in reply to: #1648430

User image

Champion
8540
50002000100050025
the colony texas
Subject: RE: IMKY by the numbers

David tri's - 2008-09-04 6:50 AM Unless it's in a pie graph I'm not lookin' at it.

hmm pie... I like pie

2008-09-04 11:48 AM
in reply to: #1644690

User image

Pro
4827
2000200050010010010025
McKinney, TX
Subject: RE: IMKY by the numbers
What about the median time (instead of the average)?
2008-09-04 1:46 PM
in reply to: #1644690

User image

Pro
4827
2000200050010010010025
McKinney, TX
Subject: RE: IMKY by the numbers

Okay.  I did some playing around with the numbers.  Median finish time 13:46:22.

 

 





(Male AG dist.JPG)



(Female AG dist.JPG)



Attachments
----------------
Male AG dist.JPG (34KB - 4 downloads)
Female AG dist.JPG (35KB - 7 downloads)
2008-09-04 1:50 PM
in reply to: #1644690

User image

Champion
10154
500050001002525
Alabama
Subject: RE: IMKY by the numbers
Nice work!
2008-09-04 1:53 PM
in reply to: #1644690

User image

Pro
4827
2000200050010010010025
McKinney, TX
Subject: RE: IMKY by the numbers

The Excel file is too large.  I copied the .txt file from the website and manipulated it to conform to Excel.  If anyone wants it, PM your email address.

 I can't find the spreadsheet that had the BTer's bib number.  Does anyone still have it?

 

New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » IMKY by the numbers Rss Feed  
 
 
of 2