General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Running shoes... Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 2
 
 
2007-07-20 11:19 AM

User image

Arch-Bishop of BT
10278
50005000100100252525
Pittsburgh
Subject: Running shoes...

So my Saucony Hightails will be expiring before I run my first marathon in October, and of course the Hightails aren't made anymore.  I loved the Hightails because they were well cushioned.  I plan on going to a running store to get new ones, but I was curious if anyone had any comments about the shoes they used regarding cushioning and durability.

 Peace,
Brian



2007-07-20 11:43 AM
in reply to: #894353

User image

Champion
6993
50001000500100100100100252525
Chicago, Illinois
Subject: RE: Running shoes...
Well even at 325 I was using a light weight trainer so I do not think cushioning is always that needed.
2007-07-20 1:15 PM
in reply to: #894388

User image

Sensei
Sin City
Subject: RE: Running shoes...
I go to DSW and look for New Balance, Asics, or Saucany. I picked those brands because they historically have been making running shoes and they fit my foot. I just get the pair that looks nice and is in the price range I like (usually around $60).

For training, I tend to shop for durability which tends to be a slightly heavier running shoe. All shoes should have decent cushining, some just wear our sooner. With the more stout shoe, I usually think about getting new ones after 300 miles and probably wait to about 500 to get off my butt and get them. I use the old ones (because they tend to still look almost new) to do work around the house or screw around at the gym.

I have been lucky and I seem to have a natural foot strike and have never had any joint or knee problems or need for shims or special shoes, so this has always worked for me. I know serious runners should get their shoes fit for them almost like a bike because they could be pronating or have gait or arch issues.

I do have a pair of lightweight shoes for racing with speed laces. BUT, I make sure to wear them for my training runs for a couple weeks before the race to make sure I don't get blisters.

2007-07-20 1:21 PM
in reply to: #894353

User image

Master
3546
2000100050025
Millersville, MD
Subject: RE: Running shoes...

Just check out any of the shoe threads in the equipment forum or the main forum.... you'll see one common line of thought:

go get fit at a specialty running store - they can help you, and we really shouldn't because what is right for me (my form, my weight, my foot egonomics, my proclivity to injury, my footstrike, etc) might be totally wrong for you, even if we share the clyde classification.

That said I love my Saucony Hurricaine 7's

2007-07-20 1:26 PM
in reply to: #894566

User image

Champion
6993
50001000500100100100100252525
Chicago, Illinois
Subject: RE: Running shoes...
I second getting fitted for the right shoe. kinda like bike sure I might be a 64 cm but does not mean all 6'6" guys should ahve a 64 cm bike.

2007-07-20 1:37 PM
in reply to: #894353

User image

Member
27
25
Subject: RE: Running shoes...
Definitely recommend making a visit to a running store.

I did and they put me in Brooks' "The Beast", which I love. I've heard in other places that it is a great shoe for big/heavy people like us Clydes.

Thanks, Bob


2007-07-20 4:09 PM
in reply to: #894353

User image

Expert
626
50010025
Las Vegas, NV
Subject: RE: Running shoes...
What I did, is go to my local running store, and they spend about an hour checking my gait, and how I ran. Then we tried a few (i.e. 7 pairs) pairs of shoes, and finalized on one that fitted and worked the best. Somehow, the Mizuno shoes is the only one that works for me, and currently using the Waverunner 8's. They work great, and I love them. Great support, and very fun to run into.
2007-07-20 4:38 PM
in reply to: #894353

User image

Veteran
269
1001002525
Greensboro, NC
Subject: RE: Running shoes...
If you are in love with that type of shoe, sometimes you can hit the jackpot on Ebay :-)
2007-07-20 4:44 PM
in reply to: #894353

User image

COURT JESTER
12230
50005000200010010025
ROCKFORD, IL
Subject: RE: Running shoes...

Sauconey Omni, medium support for me.  After two pair, tried another brand.  No good.  Back to the store to trade back to the Omni.

2007-07-20 7:37 PM
in reply to: #894353

User image

Expert
844
50010010010025
Subject: RE: Running shoes...
I also run in the Beast from Brooks. There is an online company called Rod Runner Sports that offers the '04 model that I first bought as a "classic". That way you are assured of getting the same fit that might not happen with the subtle changes in a model from year to year.
2007-07-20 8:18 PM
in reply to: #895089

Expert
695
500100252525
Subject: RE: Running shoes...
I'll guess i'll third the beast....


2007-07-21 11:18 AM
in reply to: #894353

User image

Expert
773
5001001002525
Alexandria, NH
Subject: RE: Running shoes...
Nike Shox 2:45... however mine are about done and they don't make them anymore. I could hunt Ebay but there is another Nike calling my name. I replaced a full shox model with the rear shox 2:45 and absolutely love them. I agree with the go to a running store and get fitted by someone who knows advice because depending on your style certain shoes might not cut it. Nike has started including the shoe description on boxes (stiff, pronator, larger runner etc) but nothing beats being fit properly.
2007-07-21 2:08 PM
in reply to: #894353

User image

Expert
626
50010025
Las Vegas, NV
Subject: RE: Running shoes...

That is why, when I get a pair of shoes works supper great, I try to get right back to the dealer, and by one or two more pair so that when they croak, I have new one. If you are financially hardenned, then you just can't.

When I finally needed new pairs, I found a professional fitter tried all shoes, and again ended up with the Mizuno's. With the deformed feet I have, they are the only type that fit and work great on me. Chow for now.

2007-07-22 8:25 PM
in reply to: #894353

User image

Veteran
184
100252525
Stoughton, WI
Subject: RE: Running shoes...
x4 on the Brooks Beasts. I got hooked on their old model of Beast which they decided to upgrade into a newer model. The newer model doesn't fit my foot like the old model did, but I still feel great running in those shoes.
JB
2007-07-22 9:16 PM
in reply to: #894353

New user
214
100100
Subject: RE: Running shoes...
I wear a size 15EE. Getiing fitted is nearly impossible. I managed to get fitted to asics gel kayano a few years back and have been using them since. That said I have a marathon in October. I ran 14 miles in them on Tuesday and I have black tonails going now. I've run that distance in this same pair beofre with no issue but this time I got caught in a down pour and I could feel they were really heavy with the water. You guys think it's possible that it through of my gait enough to give me some black nail on my big toes?
2007-07-22 10:03 PM
in reply to: #896169

User image

Veteran
261
1001002525
Subject: RE: Running shoes...
jeffbach - 2007-07-22 8:25 PM

x4 on the Brooks Beasts. I got hooked on their old model of Beast which they decided to upgrade into a newer model. The newer model doesn't fit my foot like the old model did, but I still feel great running in those shoes.
JB


x10, I have only two pair of shoes for running..

Brooks Addiction
Brooks Beast

My knees love them.


2007-07-23 8:58 AM
in reply to: #894353

User image

Expert
626
50010025
Las Vegas, NV
Subject: RE: Running shoes...

Fromt he rain, it is not a surprise. When ever I run more than 10 miles, I have received quite a few black toe nails. Just a thing that we need to deal with.

If you talk to quite a few marathon runner, that is not an uncommon thing to have. (And some of them may weight around 130 lbs.)

2007-07-25 3:14 AM
in reply to: #894353

User image

Frugal Gear Geek
2199
2000100252525
having fun with the kids
Subject: RE: Running shoes...

big fan of Asics here, but I concure that a proper fit at a running store is important to keep you in it for the long hall. I finaly convinced my wife to get away from Payless when traing for the Avon Walk for Breast Cancer. She could not understand why her $15 specials would cause her discomfort since she only bought them 2 weeks earlier. I forced her to a running store to look for shoes and she now forks over the money for decent foot wear.

As for durability, I tend to rotate my trainin/racing shoes into daily shoes after only about 250 miles. The up side, my knees stay in better shape and it gives me a steady stream of s*** kickers to wear. The down side is I end up investing a lot of $ into about 3 pairs of shoes a year, but keeping away from injury is worth it to me.

2007-07-25 9:20 AM
in reply to: #894353

User image

Extreme Veteran
1234
100010010025
West Michigan
Subject: RE: Running shoes...
I've used Asics Gel Nimbus for five pairs in a row and just tried the Brooks Dyad. I'll either switch back to the Nimbus or I'll try the Brooks Beast for my next pair.

Also it's important to log your mileage on your shoes, even more important as a Clydesdale. I find that 400 miles is about all I can get before they break down. And by breaking down it's the cushioning. The shoes actually look almost new and my wife thinks I'm wasting money buying new ones so often...
2007-07-25 11:46 AM
in reply to: #900447

User image

Arch-Bishop of BT
10278
50005000100100252525
Pittsburgh
Subject: RE: Running shoes...

TriMike - 2007-07-25 10:20 AM I've used Asics Gel Nimbus for five pairs in a row and just tried the Brooks Dyad. I'll either switch back to the Nimbus or I'll try the Brooks Beast for my next pair. Also it's important to log your mileage on your shoes, even more important as a Clydesdale. I find that 400 miles is about all I can get before they break down. And by breaking down it's the cushioning. The shoes actually look almost new and my wife thinks I'm wasting money buying new ones so often...

I totally agree.  Last Friday, without thinking, I threw on my shoes and went for what was supposed to be a 6 mile run.  At almost 2 miles into the run, I see that I am wearing my general sneakers... that have been kicking around the house for almost two years!  At 4.5 miles I quit.  Pain in the right big toe and tightness developing behind the knee cap... I walked straight home (not that far).  No cushioning and bad support... deadly for this clydesdale.  Don't be a dumb@$$ like me. 

 I have been keeping very close track of my mileage on my running shoes. 

Peace,
Brian

2007-10-11 3:52 PM
in reply to: #894353

User image

Veteran
145
10025
Blackwood, NJ
Subject: RE: Running shoes...
check out velocy.com... they are a running shoe that puts more emphasis on your muscular system while running as opposed to the skeletal system... they have about 4" of padding on the heel of your foot and right now they are really cheap $60.00. I started with them about a month ago and they are great... they put you more forward so it kinda makes you wanna run more. The customer service is awesome too... I emailed them about 5 times before I purchased... in addition, they are looking for wear testers for women... good luck


2007-10-11 5:43 PM
in reply to: #894353

User image

Expert
851
5001001001002525
Oceanside, CA
Subject: RE: Running shoes...
I'll second, third, fourth whatever the getting fitted comments. I just got fitted a couple of days ago and found out I was wearing the wrong type of shoe for my foot. I just ran in them the first time last night and it made a huge difference how my legs and feet felt afterwards! I was running in stability shoes, and was changed over to neutral with inserts for a high instep. I love my new shoes.
2007-10-12 3:45 AM
in reply to: #894353

User image

Expert
1013
1000
White House, TN
Subject: RE: Running shoes...

Got to go with the fitting as well.  It's really a fun time for a number of reasons:

The first fitting was great because I tried on a whole bunch of different manufacturers that I would never have thought of and went with someone I had never tried (Mizuno). Also, there was the shock and awe of  putting on a 14!  I usually wear 11.5/ 12's but I was told they were too tight.  Funny, when I ran in the larger shoe, my foot didn't go to sleep at mile 4 of a run any more.  Hmph.

The second fitting was great to see the shock and awe of my fitter when I chose the Nike Air Zoom Vomero.  She said, "I pulled this shoe out but heavier guys don't usually go for it because they overpronate so much."  It worked great because, even though I'm heavy, I have a really efficient footstrike.  She couldn't believe how well I ran in that shoe.  Fun.

The third fitting was fun because I came in and said, "These Nike Air Zoom Vomero's are the best running shoes I have ever owned.  I know they don't make them anymore, so let me try the 2+ version."  Tried them on and they were great, told her to give me to pair.  The whole experience took 15 minutes.  The fitter felt kinda gyped because I was so easy.

Like I said, go with the fitting because fittings are fun.

2007-10-12 11:54 AM
in reply to: #894353

Expert
821
500100100100
Golden, CO
Subject: RE: Running shoes...
I have owned the Asic Evolutions for the last two years and need a new pair - of course they changed the design and the new ones do not fit as nice...has anyone else changed from the evolutions to another shoe?  I need a starting point at what to look at now.
2007-10-12 5:19 PM
in reply to: #894353

User image

Master
1675
1000500100252525
Suwanee, Ga.
Subject: RE: Running shoes...
Have used Asic for years back when I was running exclusively. Got into Tri's after some back issues (unrelated to athletics) and went back to the Asic's GT2120 which is a later version of the GT 2000 that I used earlier...GREAT SHOE. I am a pronator that needs only moderate motion control and these fit the bill perfectly.

Echo those who have said to get to a GOOD running store and not the local BIG BOX retailer.
New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Running shoes... Rss Feed  
 
 
of 2