Other Resources Challenge Me! » Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 Rss Feed  
Moderators: the bear, kaqphin, tinkerbeth, D001, k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 33
 
 
2011-11-07 5:35 PM
in reply to: #3744433

User image

Expert
906
500100100100100
Prattville, AL
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
New Jorge Checklist... WTF.... Water, Towels, Fans... LOL Cool


2011-11-07 7:17 PM
in reply to: #3889469

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
jgerbodegrant - 2011-11-07 4:22 PM
powerman - 2011-11-06 6:16 PM
jgerbodegrant - 2011-11-06 4:09 PM

powerman - 2011-11-06 5:48 PM Can someone please explain what a Garmin speed/cadence sensor would do for me? I have a 305. I have a regular Ploar HRM. I have a KK trainer... but I don't have a PM. I saw some place there was a way to sue speed/cadence to translate that to power. Can't find it now though. Tying to figure out best way to get my tracking down and where I should be in these work out. I know I can use just HR, but also know that has limitations.

Knowing what cadence produces the best results for you can be beneficial.  I find it better to maintain the same cadence instead of bouncing around all the time.  

How so? My cadence is pretty set around 90 +-10. As far as just spinning or knowing the number, I have had cadence computers before and my cadence is pretty consistent so I didn't really care anymore. And just for tracking trainer time I was just going to use time instead of some calculated mile number.

But this is different, and I will get one if it helps keep me at a place, or can be used for intensity levels. I realize it may not be as good as a power meter, but numbers do help consistency... at least for me.

Right so, I think your question sort of already got answered.  It really is okay to have a large range in cadence if that's what works for you.  You may find it beneficial to find that "sweet spot" for longer distance races and use your gearing to change the power output.  For example, when you approach a hill, you know you will require more power to go up, but you also know that your ideal cadence is 90, so you shift down to keep that optimal cadence and therefore power output consistent.

Hope that's not too confusing.

Ya, I got that. I pretty much stay where I stay. But I did get it answered and thank you for adding yours... ordering a Garmin speed sensor so that is done too. Will be starting the program late after my HM, but looking forward to jumping in.

2011-11-07 10:15 PM
in reply to: #3744433

User image

Pro
4360
200020001001001002525
Baton Rouge area
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
Day 1 of week 2 done.  Battery in PT CPU died, better now than later.
2011-11-07 10:31 PM
in reply to: #3889452

User image

Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
chasingkona - 2011-11-07 3:12 PM

Hey Jorge and everyone else! I am jumping into this plan a week later then everyone else so I will play behind by a week for the duration of the program. I will be training using HR as I do not have a PM to play with.

Jorge I wanted to ask your opinion on this as I am combining this program with the BarryP run program and working in some swim sessions as well. I am doing a run focus this winter, but still plan on working on my bike as well. So what I have planned is to do the cycling days on my easy/short run days, then take the higher more intense run days off from cycling so this week would like a little something like this:

M -Run 3 easy/cycle

T- Run 6 tempo/swim

W-Run 3 easy/cycle

R-Run 6 /swim

F-Run 3 easy/cycle

Sa-cycle

S-Run/swim

I don't think I will have time to fit in a 4th ride each week, or really need to. How will subtracting one workout each week effect my bike, are there certain workouts you would advise to skipping if one had to by skipped each week?

 

Not Jorge (obviously), but struggling with this myself.  I was doing something similar last season and the heavy intervals really loaded my calves for the next day's run, and I had a couple injuries as a result.  I am running more this winter but need to train for April HIM, so have to get back on thebike (haven't started ityet)

I couldn't figure out a way to do more than 3 days of the cycling program

2011-11-07 11:43 PM
in reply to: #3744433

Champion
9430
50002000200010010010010025
No excuses!
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
Day #1 of week #2 in the books, really liking the sweatfest I am having doing these workouts
2011-11-08 7:17 AM
in reply to: #3889452

Expert
691
500100252525
Cape Elizabeth, Maine
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
chasingkona - 2011-11-07 6:12 PM

Hey Jorge and everyone else! I am jumping into this plan a week later then everyone else so I will play behind by a week for the duration of the program. I will be training using HR as I do not have a PM to play with.

Jorge I wanted to ask your opinion on this as I am combining this program with the BarryP run program and working in some swim sessions as well. I am doing a run focus this winter, but still plan on working on my bike as well. So what I have planned is to do the cycling days on my easy/short run days, then take the higher more intense run days off from cycling so this week would like a little something like this:

M -Run 3 easy/cycle

T- Run 6 tempo/swim

W-Run 3 easy/cycle

R-Run 6 /swim

F-Run 3 easy/cycle

Sa-cycle

S-Run/swim

I don't think I will have time to fit in a 4th ride each week, or really need to. How will subtracting one workout each week effect my bike, are there certain workouts you would advise to skipping if one had to by skipped each week?

 

Just a thought, BarryP's program is meant to be a run focus...I just went thru about 16 weeks of it.   I bet you could do 2-3 rides a week, just to the shorter interval workouts and skip the long ride.   I would just keep your running easy, not tempo work, no track work, just running every day at recover, easy and long paces.  Set the right expectations.   It seems to me to be hard to build major bike power and massive run endurance at the same time.



2011-11-08 7:22 AM
in reply to: #3893745

User image

Extreme Veteran
532
50025
Northampton, UK
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
Blueraider_Mike - 2011-11-08 1:17 PM

Just a thought, BarryP's program is meant to be a run focus...I just went thru about 16 weeks of it.   I bet you could do 2-3 rides a week, just to the shorter interval workouts and skip the long ride.   I would just keep your running easy, not tempo work, no track work, just running every day at recover, easy and long paces.  Set the right expectations.   It seems to me to be hard to build major bike power and massive run endurance at the same time.

This is pretty much exactly what I'm doing: 6 runs, the 3 interval rides from this plan and 2-3 swims a week
2011-11-08 9:05 AM
in reply to: #3886899

Member
49
25
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012

Day 1 of week 2 in the books... Another quick cadence question... I just picked up a computrainer a few weeks ago and I have noticed that my cadence is much lower on it versus when I'm out on the road. I am generally around 90 on the road and I've been consistently about 79 on the CT. My assumption is that the courses I'm riding on the CT are hillier and possibly that is the reason (it's pretty flat near my house)? Just curious if this is normal or if anyone has had a similar experience..??Also, Jorge thanks for the cycling program...

I've found the opposite on my CT (although I live in a pretty hilly area).  I consistently stay at 90-95 cadence and am generally 10 lower outside.  I'm still new to cycling though so haven't figured out my sweet spot yet.

For Jorge's workout, are you using the coaching software in erg mode?  I've entered the first two weeks' of workouts as .erg files based on my current FTP (the power numbers will be tweaked as we go through the training and more testing sessions).  Use this site to create the files if you don't want to manually enter them in notepad -- http://63.134.234.143/tri/erg.asp

Using the CT in .erg mode makes it a breeze to hit the exact power numbers called for in the cycling plan.  For testing you'll want to switch to course files with a constant elevation (I will probably set mine to 2% constant grade for 5/20 min called for by the testing).



Edited by crimsont 2011-11-08 9:07 AM
2011-11-08 10:11 AM
in reply to: #3893915

User image

Expert
1192
1000100252525
Oak Creek, WI
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
crimsont - 2011-11-08 9:05 AM

Day 1 of week 2 in the books... Another quick cadence question... I just picked up a computrainer a few weeks ago and I have noticed that my cadence is much lower on it versus when I'm out on the road. I am generally around 90 on the road and I've been consistently about 79 on the CT. My assumption is that the courses I'm riding on the CT are hillier and possibly that is the reason (it's pretty flat near my house)? Just curious if this is normal or if anyone has had a similar experience..??Also, Jorge thanks for the cycling program...

I've found the opposite on my CT (although I live in a pretty hilly area).  I consistently stay at 90-95 cadence and am generally 10 lower outside.  I'm still new to cycling though so haven't figured out my sweet spot yet.

For Jorge's workout, are you using the coaching software in erg mode?  I've entered the first two weeks' of workouts as .erg files based on my current FTP (the power numbers will be tweaked as we go through the training and more testing sessions).  Use this site to create the files if you don't want to manually enter them in notepad -- http://63.134.234.143/tri/erg.asp

Using the CT in .erg mode makes it a breeze to hit the exact power numbers called for in the cycling plan.  For testing you'll want to switch to course files with a constant elevation (I will probably set mine to 2% constant grade for 5/20 min called for by the testing).

 

Thanks for the info...  That is really helpful...  I will look into it...  I am new to the CT so was unaware that you could do that...  I have just been riding the courses and trying to keep my watts in the certain ranges - which is not that easy with the changes in elevation...  Also, I have just been guessing as to FTP - I must admit that I am not really looking forward to the upcoming 20 min max effort ride...

2011-11-08 11:19 AM
in reply to: #3893745

User image

Expert
2355
20001001001002525
Madison, Wisconsin
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
Blueraider_Mike - 2011-11-08 7:17 AM
chasingkona - 2011-11-07 6:12 PM

Hey Jorge and everyone else! I am jumping into this plan a week later then everyone else so I will play behind by a week for the duration of the program. I will be training using HR as I do not have a PM to play with.

Jorge I wanted to ask your opinion on this as I am combining this program with the BarryP run program and working in some swim sessions as well. I am doing a run focus this winter, but still plan on working on my bike as well. So what I have planned is to do the cycling days on my easy/short run days, then take the higher more intense run days off from cycling so this week would like a little something like this:

M -Run 3 easy/cycle

T- Run 6 tempo/swim

W-Run 3 easy/cycle

R-Run 6 /swim

F-Run 3 easy/cycle

Sa-cycle

S-Run/swim

I don't think I will have time to fit in a 4th ride each week, or really need to. How will subtracting one workout each week effect my bike, are there certain workouts you would advise to skipping if one had to by skipped each week?

 

Just a thought, BarryP's program is meant to be a run focus...I just went thru about 16 weeks of it.   I bet you could do 2-3 rides a week, just to the shorter interval workouts and skip the long ride.   I would just keep your running easy, not tempo work, no track work, just running every day at recover, easy and long paces.  Set the right expectations.   It seems to me to be hard to build major bike power and massive run endurance at the same time.

Yep that is kind of what I had in mind. As for the run, I plan on doing one of the mid-distance runs every other week to have some tempo, but other then that mostly running at an easy pace. With cycling I think 2-3 rides a week to "keep my legs going" should work. I just dont want to be starting the spring rebuilding my cycling.

How did the run program work out for you?

2011-11-08 1:59 PM
in reply to: #3889452


37
25
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
chasingkona - 2011-11-07 5:12 PM

Hey Jorge and everyone else! I am jumping into this plan a week later then everyone else so I will play behind by a week for the duration of the program. I will be training using HR as I do not have a PM to play with.

Jorge I wanted to ask your opinion on this as I am combining this program with the BarryP run program and working in some swim sessions as well. I am doing a run focus this winter, but still plan on working on my bike as well. So what I have planned is to do the cycling days on my easy/short run days, then take the higher more intense run days off from cycling so this week would like a little something like this:

M -Run 3 easy/cycle

T- Run 6 tempo/swim

W-Run 3 easy/cycle

R-Run 6 /swim

F-Run 3 easy/cycle

Sa-cycle

S-Run/swim

I don't think I will have time to fit in a 4th ride each week, or really need to. How will subtracting one workout each week effect my bike, are there certain workouts you would advise to skipping if one had to by skipped each week?

[/QUOTE

Last year, I did Barry P's running program for topping out at 40miles per week and incorporated Jorge's cycling in for 3 interval days a week as follows.  It looks to be very similiar to what you are going to be doing with a bit more running miles. It worked well for me.  This year I am going to drop a recovery run every week and add either the long bike or another swim.  I will likely rotate between the two.

Mon: Swim am, 8mileTempo run pm

Tues: Bike interval then 4mile recovery run as a brick

Wed: Interval run 7miles

Thurs Bike interval,

Fri: swim am, 4 mile recovery run pm

Sat: 12mile long run

Sun: Interval Bike then 4 mile recovery run as a brick

 



2011-11-08 2:55 PM
in reply to: #3889452

Veteran
420
100100100100
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
chasingkona - 2011-11-07 4:12 PM

Hey Jorge and everyone else! I am jumping into this plan a week later then everyone else so I will play behind by a week for the duration of the program. I will be training using HR as I do not have a PM to play with.

Jorge I wanted to ask your opinion on this as I am combining this program with the BarryP run program and working in some swim sessions as well. I am doing a run focus this winter, but still plan on working on my bike as well. So what I have planned is to do the cycling days on my easy/short run days, then take the higher more intense run days off from cycling so this week would like a little something like this:

M -Run 3 easy/cycle

T- Run 6 tempo/swim

W-Run 3 easy/cycle

R-Run 6 /swim

F-Run 3 easy/cycle

Sa-cycle

S-Run/swim

I don't think I will have time to fit in a 4th ride each week, or really need to. How will subtracting one workout each week effect my bike, are there certain workouts you would advise to skipping if one had to by skipped each week?

I'm attempting the same thing and here's what my schedule looks like:

Saturday - 3 mile easy/day 1 of cycling plan

Sunday - 9 mile long run

Monday - 3 mile easy/day 2 of cycling plan

Tuesday - 6 mile easy/strength

Wednesday - 3 mile easy/day 3 of cycling plan

Thursday - 6 mile with 20' of tempo work/strength

Friday - day 4 of cycling plan (long ride)

I think this will work for me but going into week 2 I haven't hit every work out yet just due to schedule conflicts which I hope to minimize.  I take winters off from swimming to save money and time plus I'm satisfied with my swim times where they are at for now and I get back to them quickly when I start back up in the spring.  My limiters are cycling and running so that's where I focus in the off season.

2011-11-08 5:50 PM
in reply to: #3884877

Member
194
100252525
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
larson07 - 2011-11-07 2:00 PM

Without question, you should get the Garmin speed sensor and USB ANT+ stick. This combination allows you to do everything the KK power computer does and more.

And yes, TrainerRoad is excellent software for tracking your power on the KK trainer.  It is free during the beta - I'm not sure how much it will cost upon release.



It's going to be $10 a month. That includes 130+ workouts, all the training plans, VirtualPower, the desktop player and syncing/storing workout online.

We are just going to do month to month with an option to "suspend" your account. That allows you to stop the payments to us but still access your data. That way if you get sick/injured you can suspend your account and get better, then pick up right where you left off.

We're also doing a 30 day no questions asked refund period.

We plan on launching at the end of the month.



Edited by npearson99 2011-11-08 5:51 PM
2011-11-08 8:51 PM
in reply to: #3744433

User image

Regular
99
252525
Bartlett, IL
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
Back in the saddle (literally) for Week 2, Day 1 this morning.  Still recovering from my first HM on Sunday - really happy with my time (1:43) and had fun.  It was a smaller scale event, but that was fine for a first-timer.  Can't wait for my next one!  Quads especially are still sore, but it felt good to do some "active recovery" on the trainer this morning.
2011-11-08 9:50 PM
in reply to: #3875189

User image

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
powerman - 2011-11-07 2:42 PM

So I am trying to decide on which way to go. Garmin speed/usb and use trainer road, or KK power computer. Each has something different... now I'm trying to decide which will be better for program.

Jorge, I know you said you may be working with Trainerroad, and so might BT. What other options are available to download the program too and use it to do the workouts and track history? Intergating with tracking and programs might be better to go with a the garmin speed sensor.

For the purpose of this program, it is only available here on BT. If we I do something with trainer road I'll most likely follow a different format but nothing set on stone at all.

2011-11-08 9:54 PM
in reply to: #3889452

User image

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
chasingkona - 2011-11-07 5:12 PM

Hey Jorge and everyone else! I am jumping into this plan a week later then everyone else so I will play behind by a week for the duration of the program. I will be training using HR as I do not have a PM to play with.

Jorge I wanted to ask your opinion on this as I am combining this program with the BarryP run program and working in some swim sessions as well. I am doing a run focus this winter, but still plan on working on my bike as well. So what I have planned is to do the cycling days on my easy/short run days, then take the higher more intense run days off from cycling so this week would like a little something like this:

M -Run 3 easy/cycle

T- Run 6 tempo/swim

W-Run 3 easy/cycle

R-Run 6 /swim

F-Run 3 easy/cycle

Sa-cycle

S-Run/swim

I don't think I will have time to fit in a 4th ride each week, or really need to. How will subtracting one workout each week effect my bike, are there certain workouts you would advise to skipping if one had to by skipped each week?

That looks doable but you need to test it out and figure out how much is too much for your current fitness level. ideally if you can complete all and recover from session to sessions, you are on the right track. if you begin struggling you might want to tweak it a bit. The optional ride is usually the 4th long ride which is more low intensity oriented and one you can avoid until you begin doing specific training for you main race. i.e. if your main race is not until June 2012 then you can complete the cycling program skipping the 4th ride and by Feb you can start adding specific cycling training for your main event.



2011-11-08 10:08 PM
in reply to: #3893745

User image

Coach
10487
50005000100100100100252525
Boston, MA
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
Blueraider_Mike - 2011-11-08 7:17 AM
chasingkona - 2011-11-07 6:12 PM

Hey Jorge and everyone else! I am jumping into this plan a week later then everyone else so I will play behind by a week for the duration of the program. I will be training using HR as I do not have a PM to play with.

Jorge I wanted to ask your opinion on this as I am combining this program with the BarryP run program and working in some swim sessions as well. I am doing a run focus this winter, but still plan on working on my bike as well. So what I have planned is to do the cycling days on my easy/short run days, then take the higher more intense run days off from cycling so this week would like a little something like this:

M -Run 3 easy/cycle

T- Run 6 tempo/swim

W-Run 3 easy/cycle

R-Run 6 /swim

F-Run 3 easy/cycle

Sa-cycle

S-Run/swim

I don't think I will have time to fit in a 4th ride each week, or really need to. How will subtracting one workout each week effect my bike, are there certain workouts you would advise to skipping if one had to by skipped each week?

 

Just a thought, BarryP's program is meant to be a run focus...I just went thru about 16 weeks of it.   I bet you could do 2-3 rides a week, just to the shorter interval workouts and skip the long ride.   I would just keep your running easy, not tempo work, no track work, just running every day at recover, easy and long paces.  Set the right expectations.   It seems to me to be hard to build major bike power and massive run endurance at the same time.

Good advice. The main issue with managing load is that you have to consider volume (how much you do of it) and intensity (how hard you train). This cycling program focuses on intensity to get you fit on months you might not ride as much, hence the 3-5 hrs you might spend riding every week you might as well make it count.

I haven't check BarryP plan in a while but my guess is that it also has an element of intensity. if that is the case, you have to be VERY mindful at managing the intensity. You have to define your goals and what sport needs the most work. Depending on your needs and when your main event is; you can do:

1. follow the cycling plan sans the 4th long ride and do BarryP plan without much intensity. if you can complete your training day after day you are on the right track. if you are struggling somewhere tweak the plan until you are completing the sessions.

2. follow BarryP plan and just do sessions 1 and 2 or 1 and 3 of the cycling plan. Your cycling gains will be less, but if your weakness is running that is not a bad thing to focus on.

a few general rules of thumb:

  • I like leaving at least 24 hrs between intense (or very long) sessions. if your ride at 8am on Monday then I try to leave any intense training out until after Tuesday 8am.
  • when you are focusing on a weakness (i.e. cycling) I prefer to focus on that and maintain the other two sports
  • if you want to focus on two weaknesses (i.e. cycling and running) I prefer to have one focus with more intensity less volume (i.e. 2-3 short intense bike sessions) and the other less intensity more volume (i.e. 3-4 runs mostly easy/steady and varying the duration).
  • The are MANY ways to set up a program, but you have to be careful because what I might be able to handle, you might not. Always set up goals based on your OWN limitations.
  • It is better to do less than overdoing it a bit more; that extra effort above your limitations can quickly spiral into a major injury.

I wish I could you guys following BarryP concrete advice, but unfortunately I cant because each of you most likely have a different fitness level, goals, limitations, ability to adapt/recover, jobs, family, etc.

2011-11-09 4:39 AM
in reply to: #3744433

User image

Expert
668
5001002525
Lancaster, PA
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
I started two days ago with the 20min test and when I finished, I almost had to use the hurl bucket. Now I have a base number to work with and plenty of time to get acquainted with the PowerAgent.
2011-11-09 4:56 AM
in reply to: #3744433

User image

Elite
7783
50002000500100100252525
PEI, Canada
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
Week two, day two done for me this morning.  I did 5x4' instead of 4x5' by mistake - apparently I don't read very well at 5:30am!
2011-11-09 10:20 AM
in reply to: #3895116

User image

Expert
913
500100100100100
Lost in the Evergreens
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
JorgeM - 2011-11-08 8:08 PM

a few general rules of thumb:

  • I like leaving at least 24 hrs between intense (or very long) sessions. if your ride at 8am on Monday then I try to leave any intense training out until after Tuesday 8am.
  • when you are focusing on a weakness (i.e. cycling) I prefer to focus on that and maintain the other two sports
  • if you want to focus on two weaknesses (i.e. cycling and running) I prefer to have one focus with more intensity less volume (i.e. 2-3 short intense bike sessions) and the other less intensity more volume (i.e. 3-4 runs mostly easy/steady and varying the duration).
  • The are MANY ways to set up a program, but you have to be careful because what I might be able to handle, you might not. Always set up goals based on your OWN limitations.
  • It is better to do less than overdoing it a bit more; that extra effort above your limitations can quickly spiral into a major injury.

Jorge,

Would you recommend ahtletes adjust training intensity or volume during test weeks?  Am I cheating the program if I increase the recovery period to 48 hours?  It is expected I will perform better on the test with a bit more rest.  But will I might realize better improvements if I approach the test workouts as if it is just another workout?  That is mentally hard for me to do.  I expect a test workout to be hard and I prepare accordingly. 

Best Regards.

2011-11-09 4:52 PM
in reply to: #3744433

User image

Master
2770
20005001001002525
Central Kansas
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012

Week One, Day One completed this morning. It's just a blur now.

I didn't know I could sweat that much. Cry



2011-11-09 5:47 PM
in reply to: #3744433

User image

Expert
906
500100100100100
Prattville, AL
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
Day 2 Week 1... 6x5' was just evil.... glad to be done! Tongue out
2011-11-09 11:04 PM
in reply to: #3744433

User image

Elite
5316
5000100100100
Alturas, California
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
Hrm day 1 30 sec at LT repeats... day 2 4x 5:00 at LT... ugly increase.  Got er done..  on to day 3 on Friday. This is going to hurt isn't it. 
2011-11-10 8:39 AM
in reply to: #3744433

User image

Pro
4360
200020001001001002525
Baton Rouge area
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012

Day 2 week 2 done.

Folks, need some help!  Background: wired PT (Comp SL) with a brand new CPU.  Worked several times then battery in CPU died (2 weeks old!).  New battery, hook up and everything works.  Do my workout and reads fine.  Put in CPU cradle, PowerAgent connects but shows no workouts.  It pairs fine but no workouts.  On the CPU I can cycle thru and see my avg and max Power, duration, etc.

Any ideas?

2011-11-10 9:12 AM
in reply to: #3896988

User image

Expert
906
500100100100100
Prattville, AL
Subject: RE: Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012
GaryRM - 2011-11-10 8:39 AM

Day 2 week 2 done.

Folks, need some help!  Background: wired PT (Comp SL) with a brand new CPU.  Worked several times then battery in CPU died (2 weeks old!).  New battery, hook up and everything works.  Do my workout and reads fine.  Put in CPU cradle, PowerAgent connects but shows no workouts.  It pairs fine but no workouts.  On the CPU I can cycle thru and see my avg and max Power, duration, etc.

Any ideas?

Have you tried to download using something other than PowerAgent? Like Golden Cheetah? Is it seated properly on cradle?

New Thread
Other Resources Challenge Me! » Cycling program v4.0 2011-2012 Rss Feed  
 
 
of 33